@Michel Van Some of your questions are answered below. Since the thread is restarted I decided to add this little snippet in.
----------------------------------------
Germany: Which Path Shall You Walk?
An essay in Newsweek magazine October 24, 2012
As the 50th anniversary of World War III is observed by various ceremonies throughout the world in the city-state of Berlin there is a special somber mood remembering this dark period.
Berlin was one of the few European capitals that was spared when the general nuclear exchange began. Neither the Soviets nor NATO would target the city for fear of killing their own troops. The Berlin garrisons Soviet and Allies were left to fight it out street to street – until it no longer mattered.
Within a month the fighting had ended. There was no agreement by the opposing forces to stop fighting. The fighting slowly died out as it became apparent there was nothing left to fight for. Both East and West German governments had collapsed. There was no communication with any Soviet commander higher than the East Berlin, garrison, the same for NATO. It quickly became apparent to both sides that the war for control of Berlin was over, the war for survival had begun in earnest.
For several months the Berliners struggled to survive both soldier and civilian on an island in the middle of a nuclear wasteland. Large sections of Germany had been hit by tactical and strategic nuclear strikes. Millions of their fellow countrymen were dead. Millions more were dying or seeking to find refuges away from their ruined cities and towns.
For the people of Berlin this was the time known as the “second hunger time”, reminiscent of the “first hunger time” following the second World War. Only this time there was no Marshall Plan, no Berlin airlift. Instead there were small groups sent out to scrounge the various stores and the countryside for food and other needed supplies. There was strict rationing in order to survive the fierce winter of ’62-’63. There were burial details to bury the growing number of dead from starvation and disease.
Spring brought hope as the U.S. military in conjunction with surviving units of British forces in Europe sent word to evacuate the remainder of U.S. and British forces in Berlin. Many of the Berlin survivors decided to leave with the Anglo/American units in the hope of finding better conditions elsewhere. The remnants of the Soviet garrison in Berlin left at roughly the same time in the hopes of finding their way back to their homes.
But Berlin has not been named “the city that would not die” for nothing. A hardy group of survivors chose to stay. Berlin had been their home and some of them had parents and grandparents that has suffered through the worst of both previous world wars. They were not about to allow yet another one to force them to leave their city.
Thus, the city-state of Berlin was born. Created by the survivors of both East and West Berlin it is now the most prosperous of the dozens of nation/states in what has become known in most of Europe as the German Dead-Zone or simply the Lawless Zone. Over the last 50 years by a combination of capitalism and socialism the city/state of New Berlin has slowly but surely emerged as one of the more prosperous city/states and a beacon of light in the middle of the ruins of the former German Republics.
New Berlin can boast a population that is able not only to feed itself but also to export some food to those around it. It also has rebuilt its infrastructure if not to pre-war levels at least to the point where transporting goods is not a major problem. It is at present the only part of former Germany stable enough to have diplomatic relations with many of the western nations and a representative in the new U.N. New Berlin is a shining example of one path a new Germany may take.
But New Berlin is the exception to the rule. After the collapse of the civilian government during the war widespread lawlessness was the norm simply for survival’s sake. The German population was effectively abandoned by the rest of the world. Eastward was a continuing lawless zone into Poland. Westward the bridges over the Rhine were destroyed either during the war or afterward by the French. And any refugees that attempted to cross the Rhine into France were shot by French soldiers.
There was no escape to the north as Denmark had closed its borders to refugees, although the Danes were not as draconic as the French were in keeping refugees out. To the Northwest the Benelux countries were for the most part flooded out of existence by the destruction of the dikes leading to precious little land left for survivors.
To the south Austria still had open borders but their supplies were limited and soon exhausted by the wave of refugees that headed there. And still further south the Swiss chose to create labor camps to imprison German refugees and in a grim repetition of what had happened a generation before worked many of the German refugees to death or at the end forced them out of the camps to slowly freeze to death.
The German survivors of the war found themselves prisoners in their former home.
With no civilian government left local strongmen rose to power in many areas. In others enclaves of survivors elected local councils in order to try to establish some order.
But for the first decade or so following the War these various groups would fight a war for survival among themselves. There were too few resources and too many survivors. Local city-states fought over a tank farm of gasoline, a few fields of wheat, a cache of medical supplies. Anything that could help them survive the coming winter and the constant hunger.
It will never be known how many thousands died during this period of warfare between Germans. What is known that out of this time of warfare emerged dozens of smaller nation-states like unto New Berlin. Each with a different government.
However, these nation states were not stable. Between coups, counter coups, revolutions, counterrevolutions, and annexations by neighbors the borders of the various nation-states in the Lawless Zone shift on an almost daily basis. Add to this the number of roving paramilitary marauder bands that are constantly seeking either to plunder various populations or to out and out take over a nation state and it becomes clear why no map can currently show a clear picture of the former German Republics.
In this environment there are troubling signs that an old terror may be raising its head.
In what is now known as the German People’s Republic of Munich a reborn version of the old National Socialist Party has recently seized power. Led by a charismatic young man by the name of Guenther Heidler [fictional name], this new brand of Nazism has over the last few years brought law and order to a lawless area – at the price of personal liberty and human rights. Those of non-German ethnicity or of “mixed blood” are being exiled from this new nation-state. While Munich can boast it is able to feed its population now there are growing reports of various human rights abuses, of torture and beatings of those who dissent against this New Order.
More worrying is the call by Heidler for the reunification of Germany. The New National Socialist Party preaches a reunification of the German state and a new nationalism that its forbears would be proud of. It even speaks of one day “punishing” those nations who destroyed Germany and then left its people to die,
To hungry and destitute people who are barely able to eke out a living on the land and have memories of what was done to their parents during the War this message has an attraction. In 1918 the myth of the “stab in the back” was an ideological notion that fueled the rise of Nazism. With the draconic policies of France and Switzerland still fresh in the minds of many Germans and the feeling that the rest of the world abandoned Germany the idea of a second such myth is not hard to craft by this new ultra-right movement.
Many in neighboring city-states have begun to flock to Heidler’s message. While the numbers as of now are small it needs to be pointed out that the Nazi party in the 20’s started as a small minority and rose to become one of the major parties in the German legislature. As one modern British Prime Minister Tony Blair commented, “We must never forget that Hitler was given power in a democratic Germany.
The hour is still early, but at this point New Berlin and the GPRM are the two extremes illustrating directions that the people of Germany may follow. Whether they will follow the beacon of hope that is New Berlin or the dark seduction of the GPRM is a story for future generations to write.