Victoria 3
- Thread starter cloistered scholar
- Start date
Loose a war.
More seriously I don't think you can. Vic3 has very rudementary options for territory exchange. Apparently the only ways to give away regions currently available are to Release a subject, surrender territory in a diplomatic play or loose a war. No exchange of territory without diplomatic play (except if hardwired for certain conditions like Alaska), no freeing people for an existing country and for some reason liberation of a new country is a wargoal, but not available to start a diplomatic play.
If you had been playing Vic2 I would suggest savegame editing; however, the savegame files of V3 appear to be compressed (I just opened one on my own laptop) making that impossible.
There is a mod that gives you the option to trade territory. It is called the State Transfer Tool on the Steam Workshop.
I had a problem occur where the political power of one of the Influence Groups in my country got so large it over flowed and went negative and collapsed my legitimacy. Hopefully they will fix this cause a large portion of my population switching from loyalist to radical because too many of them are loyalist seems very dumb to me.
Last edited:
Hmm, that reminds me of CivI's (or was it II's) super aggressive Gandhi...
IIRC, super aggressive Gandhi due to stack overflow is more of an urban legend. A spearman defeating a tank, though...
So the first dlc is going to be the Voice of the People, and focusing on France. It looks cool.
So how's the latest DLC/patch? I saw enough complaining about bugs in the Paradox forums that I did what I did to EUIV after Leviathan came out-locked the game at the last good version (1.27 in this case) until Paradox releases a hotfix or two. Paradox is a good company that produces some amazing content...that you should generally wait until the first hotfix to buy.
For people who have played the patch or DLC-just how bad is the situation, and was the DLC worth your $14.99?
For people who have played the patch or DLC-just how bad is the situation, and was the DLC worth your $14.99?
Yeah, the DLC model they've adopted feels really exploitative and controlling. I miss the days when there was a giant expansion once every year or two for $25, with no "free update" (featuring incomplete-without-the-DLC content) that forced itself into your game files whether you liked it or not.
This meme seems really appropriate actually.
Yeah, the DLC model they've adopted feels really exploitative and controlling. I miss the days when there was a giant expansion once every year or two for $25, with no "free update" (featuring incomplete-without-the-DLC content) that forced itself into your game files whether you liked it or not.
This meme seems really appropriate actually.
The one thing they're doing well right now, is Stellaris - sure, there's DLCs, but they also improved on the game proper via a dedicated team of people. That said, the DLCs are so many that I can only get them by sailing the seven seas, otherwise I'd be even more broke than usual.