Vice Presidents Of The US Under Two Different Presidents

In OTL, only George Clinton and John Calhoun were vice-presidents of the US under two different presidents. Can anyone think of other possibilities, either before or after 1900?

I can think of a few, all post-1900:

(1) Most obviously, Charles Fairbanks, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Fairbanks if Hughes had just done a little better in California in 1916.

(2) Eisenhower-Truman in 1948?! https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/eisenhower-truman-democratic-ticket-in-1948.299036/

(3) McGovern-Humphrey in 1972? At Miami Beach, McGovern made a pro forma offer of the vice-presidential nomination to Humphrey, who, as expected, refused. But after the Eagleton fiasco, there was apparently a serious attempt to get Humphrey on the ticket, which Warren Beatty tried to broker... https://books.google.com/books?id=buw21mxhGp8C&pg=PT225 Of course, even if the attempt had succeeded, the odds against McGovern-Humphrey winning were pretty formidable.

(4) Nelson Rockefeller under both Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan (assuming the Reagan-Rockefeller ticket won in 1976). To quote an old post of mine:

***

But [John] Sears' real first choice is shocking--Nelson Rockefeller! When asked what the reaction of Helms and other conservatives would be, Sears replied "They would have come off the ceiling in a day or two." Sears added, "I thought very strongly that he [Rockefeller] would have liked the irony of it, and he had firm control of his delegates. And, Mrs. Reagan liked him a lot. But you couldn't trust that others wouldn't talk him out of it, and you couldn't take that chance."

"Although Rockefeller controlled Dick Rosenbaum and Rosenbaum controlled the vast majority of the New York delegation, it is unknown whether delegates would have gone along with them and supported Reagan had Rockefeller joined the ticket. Still, it was no secret that Rockefeller and Rosenbaum were angry and dismayed over the treatment afforded Rockefeller by Ford and the President Ford Committee. The question is whether Reagan could hold his conservative delegates in the face of such a selection..." https://books.google.com/books?id=fPWPDH-0TZYC&pg=PA273

(If the problem was not knowing whether Rocky would accept, one would think that the Reagan camp could have sent a trusted go-between to at least sound Rocky out about it. And after all, given that Ford was not going to keep him on the ticket, this is probably Rocky's only chance not to have his political career ended. How likely is it that he would be talked out of that?)

Also, on foreign policy, Rocky might not be that distant from Reagan. "[Stu] Spencer, in a 2000 interview with the author, also described Rockefeller as 'the toughest anti-Communist I ever saw. Much more than Reagan, much more than Barry. I said to him, 'Why?' He said, 'If you were a Rockefeller, wouldn't you be?'" https://books.google.com/books?id=yjuOAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT649

That being said, while Rockefeller was not as hated by conservatives in 1976 as he was in 1964, Sears' thinking that Helms, etc. "would have come off the ceiling in a day or two" may have been too optimistic.

https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/reagan-wins-nomination-in-1976-who’s-his-vp-and-can-he-win-the-election.448937/#post-17396476

(5) Reagan-Ford in 1980 (the deadly term "co-presidency" never comes up, and Ford is satisfied with the routine reassurances "of course you'll have a substantive role" and "of course you'll be consulted").

(6) Obama-Gore in 2008? "Buzz swirled around a possible Obama-Gore ticket last month after the former vice president - who remains a very popular figure in the Democratic Party - gave an enthusiastic endorsement of the Illinois senator after months on sidelines during the prolonged Democratic primary." http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/18/no-obama-gore-ticket/ but Gore made it clear that eight years as VP were enough for him...

Any other ideas?
 
"Although Dawes was frequently mentioned for the presidency, he announced that he was not a candidate and instead favored his longtime friend, Illinois Governor Frank Lowden. The nomination went instead to Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover, whose supporters considered putting Dawes on their ticket as vice president. But President Coolidge let it be known that he would consider Dawes' nomination as a personal affront. Instead, the nod went to Senate Majority Leader Charles Curtis of Kansas..." https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/VP_Charles_Dawes.htm Maybe Hoover decides that despite Dawes' unpopularity with some GOP senators (for his attack on the Senate rules) and especially with President Coolidge, he would still benefit the ticket by bringing in Lowden supporters and farmers who bacled McNary-Haugen.
 
In 1952, Adlai Stevenson considered retaining then-Vice President Alben W. Barkley. Retaining Barkley would probably be added baggage to Stevenson, because it would tie him closer to the unpopular Truman Administration. If a Stevenson-Barkley Ticket managed to win in 1952, Barkley would die in 1956, leading Stevenson to shop for his replacement (most likely OTL's Estes Kefauver.)
 
Last edited:
I don’t know if this counts, but what about John Tyler? He was Vice President for about a month before succeeding William Henry Harrison as President. Toward the end of his life, he stood by Virginia’s secession from the Union and was even elected to the Confederate Congress, but died of a stroke before he could take office.

Now, imagine that the stroke does not happen and Tyler lives even a little bit longer. Alexander Stephens was only the provisional Vice President of the Confederacy until February of 1862, when he was officially installed in the office. What if the Confederate government, thinking it would be a propaganda coup to give that office to a former President of the United States, decides to offer it to John Tyler shortly into his congressional term instead? It would also have the effect of giving an important office to a Virginian, which would provide some geographical balance against the Deep Southern Jefferson Davis. Sure, Tyler was a frail old man, but at least in hindsight, it would not put the Davis Administration in any worse a position than they were with Stephens as Vice President, given how quick he was to publicly criticize the government.
 
How about George Bush, Sr.? He was nearly picked as Gerald Ford's vice president in 1974. Let's say he gets picked, Ford still loses reelection, and Bush runs for president in 1980. (He'd be a more credible candidate too, as a former vice president.) It's conceivable that if Reagan still defeats him, Bush winds up on the ticket and serves as vice president again for eight more years.
 
How about George Bush, Sr.? He was nearly picked as Gerald Ford's vice president in 1974. Let's say he gets picked, Ford still loses reelection, and Bush runs for president in 1980. (He'd be a more credible candidate too, as a former vice president.) It's conceivable that if Reagan still defeats him, Bush winds up on the ticket and serves as vice president again for eight more years.

Or Nixon chooses Bush to replace Agnew as VP. Bush becomes president in 1974, loses to Carter in 1976, seeks a comeback in 1980 but loses to Reagan in the primaries--and is chosen by Reagan as his running mate in 1980.
 
This one is a bit of a reach BUT let’s say Henry Wallace doesn’t break so strongly from Truman over foreign policy, and isn’t fired in 1946. The next couple years go pretty much as OTL, except Wallace stays inside the tent as Commerce Sec., and isn’t viewed as so pro-Soviet and when ‘48 rolls around, the liberals are pushing to draft Wallace to primary the unpopular Truman. Wallace declines to challenge him, but Truman picks Wallace as his running mate to ameliorate the left.
 
Or Nixon chooses Bush to replace Agnew as VP. Bush becomes president in 1974, loses to Carter in 1976, seeks a comeback in 1980 but loses to Reagan in the primaries--and is chosen by Reagan as his running mate in 1980.


Vice President -> President -> Vice President.

That really cannot possibly be a good boost for any mans ego.
 
As mentioned, Ford considered being Reagan's VP. George HW Bush could end up being Ford's VP instead of Rockefeller. Then the 1980 election have him competing with Reagan and settling for second banana, and he would be determined as ever to win the 1988 election. Even if he doesn't, if Reagan is a two-term president it means he has the dubious honor of being VP the longest, at least 11 years.
 
Some other possibilities (this time pre-1900);

(1) I once had a post about how CC Pinckney could be elected president in 1800 with Jeferson in second place and therefore VP again as he was under Adams... https://www.alternatehistory.com/.../charles-coatesworth.../ But would Jefferson even accept the vice-presidency again, especially under those circumstances?

(2) Could George Dallas be nominated for VP again after leaving the office in 1849? It's not likely, because the Democrats' usual practice was to nominate a northern "doughface" (Cass, Pierce, Buchanan) for president, which meant that the vice-presidential nominee had to be from the South. Bur I'd like to see a Houston-Dallas ticket in 1852! :p
 
Last edited:
Top