As I understand it the Constitution makes the VP President of the Senate. In OTL the only significance of this seems to be where there is a tie, which in most normal circumstances gives a victory to the administration.
Is it possible that a VP could have had real influence in the Senate. This could either be the ways the office has been interpreted or particular individuals. For instance had JFK taken LBJ more seriously might Johnson have been de facto majority leader in the Senate from Jan 1962 to November 1963.
Obviously traditions might have developed in the 1790s. That is why it is in this forum, however imaginably it could relate to post 1900 or even future history.
Is it possible that a VP could have had real influence in the Senate. This could either be the ways the office has been interpreted or particular individuals. For instance had JFK taken LBJ more seriously might Johnson have been de facto majority leader in the Senate from Jan 1962 to November 1963.
Obviously traditions might have developed in the 1790s. That is why it is in this forum, however imaginably it could relate to post 1900 or even future history.