NOTE: This an scenario is offshoot from my APC thread and thanks to@Derwit & @Cryhavoc101 who further expanded upon it.
The mid 1940 the British army trials a dozen vanguard troop carriers and bishop self propelled guns in Malay, Singapore and east Indies. The trials prove without a doubt that tanks can work in the jungle without hindrance, the British further enhance the defence of Malaya and Singapore by forming two oversized armored battalions using a mixture of A10 cruiser tanks half of which is the close support version and vickers MK VIB/C light tanks with vanguard troop carriers and a bishops.
The RAF is further enhanced with the use of re-engined hurricane MK I that supplement the Brewster buffalo.
How does the defence of Malaya and Singapore go now that British have armour?
Could the British prevent the fall of Malaya and Singapore or delay it?
Who would a better commander instead of Arthur Percival?
The mid 1940 the British army trials a dozen vanguard troop carriers and bishop self propelled guns in Malay, Singapore and east Indies. The trials prove without a doubt that tanks can work in the jungle without hindrance, the British further enhance the defence of Malaya and Singapore by forming two oversized armored battalions using a mixture of A10 cruiser tanks half of which is the close support version and vickers MK VIB/C light tanks with vanguard troop carriers and a bishops.
The RAF is further enhanced with the use of re-engined hurricane MK I that supplement the Brewster buffalo.
How does the defence of Malaya and Singapore go now that British have armour?
Could the British prevent the fall of Malaya and Singapore or delay it?
Who would a better commander instead of Arthur Percival?
Last edited: