I thought about arguing against this, but looking back through your posts on this thread, you seem to be an anti-American/anti-capitalism nut. So I'm just going to ignore you instead.
Does it have to be that guy in charge? Anyone else who might do better?
hm, why should i be antiamerican? because i describe realistic possibilities? Sounds strange
about capitalism - i am a fan of capitalism, but this has nothing to do with the plot "how can the usa win in vietnam"
i describe standard us policy of nearly 100 years - like in columbia (for the channel), chile (in 1973), vietnam (in the late 50ties), honduras , cuba (twice)
why is one anticapitalism (oh - but i agree, THIS kind of capitalism is nothing i agree to - my capitalism is called Soziale Marktwirtschaft) if he describe why the us of a can´t win in vietnam without asb changes or a plot in 1865?
but i can live with it... you are welcome, but if you do not want to discuss things, we do not need to do so
but i still like to ask why you are on an alternate history forum, if you do not want to discuss things that could or could not be changed (and the us of a win vietnam war is like succsessfull sealion



)