A CP win sees an eventual five power world of two tiers: US, (AH), UK, Ger, (and Japan) vs France, Brazil, Italy, Russia, and either Argentina or South Africa.
How would it do this?
I have generally assumed a Central Powers win would fatally weaken the UK – perhaps at least partially transferring its global power to resource-super-rich Australia – and weakining France if it lost its colonies in Africa, Indochina and the Middle East. I have just now thought that in fact Germany – had it won the war and the US kept out – would have ran at least the Indochinese colonies in a more centralised manner than did France, and would have not made the slightest long-term plans for any independence of these colonies. Nor, of course, would the other Central Powers have done so in the Middle East, which might have been beneficial in terms of lessened racial conflict and the absence of a radical fascist movement in those regions of Europe populated by large numbers of Jews.
On the other hand, if the Central Powers win racially based social movements might have been stronger than they were in Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. Quite obviously, a
de facto authoritarian United States as I noted in my previous post would have quite probably been in effect ruled by the second Ku Klux Klan. If there had been no
Pierce v Society of Sisters, the religious freedom that made the US such a place of refuge could easily have declined and/or disappeared. Still, Dietrich Rüschemeyer in
Capitalist Development and Democracy does show that even with these prevailing attitudes, Britain and especially Canada and New Zealand would not have been likely to develop right-wing totalitarian politics
à la Nazi Germany.