What was odd about it?
Nothing's final yet, so I can always go back and change things.....
What's wrong with my UN?.....
Nothing's final yet, so I can always go back and change things.....
What's wrong with my UN?.....
David bar Elias said:Is it turning too much like Stirling's Alliance for Democracy?
Well, the upper eschelon of your U.N. has an even number of states. There should be an odd number in my view.David bar Elias said:What was odd about it?
Nothing's final yet, so I can always go back and change things.....
What's wrong with my UN?.....
Indeed. It is implausible for many of those island groups to be their own states.King Gorilla said:I think thats the dirrection the later timeline is taking but otherwise its really good. My only critisms is Japan not having a higher ranking in the UN and the US turning every small cluster of islands under its control into a state.
I'd see it as feasible for the country to stay together under Beria into the 70's in the same way Castro has kept Cuba under his fist (except without US aid in his case)...Wendell said:With the Soviets forced from much of Europe (how much, exactly) I'd expect them to dissolve, or adopt a change ion structure including an embrace of capitalism.
Beria may be able to hold it ogether, but he may not. The rump USSR won't be without ethnic strife.luakel said:I'd see it as feasible for the country to stay together under Beria into the 70's in the same way Castro has kept Cuba under his fist (except without US aid in his case)...
Also Canada would want Newfoundland and Labrador.
*bump*
This thread/TL is just too good to die.