While I know that it would be extremely unlikely for the Germans to simply deport tens of millions of Eastern Europeans even if they had the ships or territory to put them at, I am interested in how it could best be executed. Having Russians and Jews working on roads or breaking rocks until only the strongest are left (which apparently meant that they were a threat instead of aryans incognito or something) is all very good and well when trying to waste as much labor as possible and ruin cities, but it seems that they could have gotten the same benefits from using forced labor from France done humanly. Probably sounding wierd now though.
Anyways, what areas would the Eastern Europeans (and intellectuals, Jews, Serbs, Slovens, Gypsies, etc.) do best in, where might their presence be best for the holder of the colonies, and which countries would want them? The Spanish wanted a large central African colony so that they would be able to tap labor. The Afrikaners would likely be happy to get large chunks of white meat to act as janisarries or to populate the less desirable areas. Would the Italians go for a trade in which they got rid of the Germans in their own European areas in exchange for stuffing Ethiopia with Catholic Poles?
Anyways, what areas would the Eastern Europeans (and intellectuals, Jews, Serbs, Slovens, Gypsies, etc.) do best in, where might their presence be best for the holder of the colonies, and which countries would want them? The Spanish wanted a large central African colony so that they would be able to tap labor. The Afrikaners would likely be happy to get large chunks of white meat to act as janisarries or to populate the less desirable areas. Would the Italians go for a trade in which they got rid of the Germans in their own European areas in exchange for stuffing Ethiopia with Catholic Poles?