If the Union is able to supply and defend Pensacola or some of the other coastal towns in Jackson, there will definitely be a lot of fighting there.
well Cuba still supports the union they could get supplies from there
If the Union is able to supply and defend Pensacola or some of the other coastal towns in Jackson, there will definitely be a lot of fighting there.
As for who shot President Houston, I haven't mentioned it yet partially because I'm not exactly sure.I'm leaning toward your run-of-the-mill crazy chap though, and of course there will be conspiracy theories.
The details will probably be revealed in the Great Men section on Houston.
Second presidential assassin.Remember, prior to Lincoln's assassination it was thought that the president is sacrosanct. It'd better be a lone nut otherwise the very first presidential assassin's cause will be completely discredited by his atrocity.
Do we get a map of the sucession.
You'll get a map in the next few days, and hopefully a new update. Was meaning to get a map up but forgot.We should get one. And a new update.
Well, in OTL, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas only joined after the attack on Fort Sumter so some states might still join afterward. I meant to have the seizing of Alexandria be the sort of equivalent to the attack on Fort Sumter, the firing of the shot was just for symbolic effect.Also Wilcoxchar just wanted to ask:
The section on the CSA forming makes it sound impromptu a much less organized than in OTL. Just on how it was created, by having delegates storm out of a meeting. And the Alexandria shot, which seems much less justified than the Fort Sumpter firing in OTL. Furthermore the fact that Jackson, Houston, and Tejas (which were all part of it in OTL) are not in it, yet, makes it feel less serious. The other non-OTL slave states Missouri, Kearney, Cuba haven't really shown their support for it either.
So is this CSA much more impromptu than OTL's?
Not sure about Cali's role in the war, but they will definitely get some immigration from people who are trying to escape the war.Also about California's role in the Civil War, my guess is that it will suffer form quite a bit of immigration from the US as people escape the war. Will this affect it's politics? Such as no American's west of the Sierra Nevada?
Look at the date.I thought Jackson didn't secede.
Different economic conditions and immigration patterns made Maryland less pro-slavery and more unionist than OTL.no news from maryland? (OTLs first shed blood in the pratt st riot)??
if other states, especially Va, get spooked into seceding because of fear of a president seward, wouldnt maryland?
Ooh. I've been thinking of possibilities for that. Good candidates would probably be western Virginia (of course), southern Missouri, and western Tennessee and Kentucky (the area of the Jackson Purchase). Maybe a few more surprises as well in other places.Something tells me that this is going to be a much quicker war than OTL. The West is probably going to be even more disorganized for the CSA than OTL (particularly due to the lack of Tejas, Houston, and Tennesee backing them up).
However thanks to Veracruz (nice touch btw) and Cuba this CSA will actually have a navy. So we might see an ocean theater / Gulf front in TTL.
Definitively looking forward to what's coming up next.
One thing that would be really cool, is if more than one state pulls a West Virginia ITTL. Always thought that the southern chunk of Missouri (the Ozarks Platue) could have done it the other way around with only half of it seceding. Kentucky and Tennessee are also candidates for a reverse W.V. here. Avoiding the cliche and keeping W.V. in Virginia would also be cool.
1. Jackson's assassin was another typical crazy guy. Richard Lawrence killed Jackson for the same reason he did in OTL, he thought that he was Richard III of England. He also thought that Jackson was his clerk, somehow keeping him from taking his rightful place as king. Very crazy man. I originally thought of titling my timeline "Richard III's Clerk is Dead"A few questions:
1. What was the motive of Jackon's assassin? Besides to make Calhoun president?
2. Why isn't there as much Manifest Destiny in this timeline? I mean, Fremont campaigned in California during the rebellion just as in OTL, the Americans could've chosen to be expansionists and annexed California and Rio Bravo after the war with Mexico, alongside Texas. Though I'm hoping both will remain independent in this timeline, it would be interesting to see how Latino republics fare in North America compared to their brethren in Central/South America. But then I suppose the U.S. will get around to conquering them once they've gotten the Civil War sorted out.
3. How are race relations, since there are more Mexican immigrants?
I can't recall any hostility toward Hispanics in OTL before the Civil War, but that might just be because they were so sparse. But the only really big Hispanic communities in the United States right now are Cuba, areas in Tejas, and Jackson around Pensacola. So there is a tolerance of them, since they mostly stick to their own areas. Although Cuba will soon gain prominence in politics with its large population, so that could change things.I don't want to pester you with too many questions, but is there any particular reason for the lack of racism so far? Is it because they're mostly isolated to the frontier regions such as Tejas? I guess the Anglos would still think of them as swarthy Papists but perhaps there is no active animosity against them as long as they stick to their own communities along the margins and don't try to run for president.
I suppose I need to do a bit of research on that as well.