Union and Liberty: An American TL

Part One Hundred Thirteen: The Waves of War Cross the Atlantic
Update's done. More footnotes will be added tonight.

Part One Hundred Thirteen: The Waves of War Cross the Atlantic

The British Blockade and the MacDonough Affair:
In both conflicts between the British and French in the 19th century, the British relied in large part on their naval superiority to blockade the French coastline. The British continued to use the blockade as part of the overall New Coalition strategy in the Great War. The British blockade of the western French coast was largely successful through the first half of the war. With the size of turn of the century warships, the British Atlantic fleet concentrated its forces on cutting off the ports at Brest, La Rochelle, and Bordeaux.

The blockade of France and Germany put a large strain on British-American relations and sparked a diplomatic incident that almost brought the United States into the Great War. On February 2nd, 1908, an American merchant convoy sailing from New York to Le Havre with the destroyer USS MacDonough[1] as escort was intercepted in the Channel by a British squadron. The British squadron escorted the American fleet to Portsmouth and the ships were searched. Despite the convoy carrying foodstuffs, the British seized the cargo as contraband. The United States received news of the seizure on the 5th. The media as well as Navy Secretary Talbott urged President Roosevelt to take the seizure of the convoy and the MacDonough as a hostile action and declare war. However, President Roosevelt stopped short of a war declaration and demanded that the convoy to be allowed to leave British waters.

After President Roosevelt's demand, ambassador to London John Hay spent the next weeks negotiating with British government officials. The British maintained that as part of the blockade the ships and their cargo were legally seized. Hay eventually arranged for the MacDonough and the ships to be relinquished, but the British officials stood firm on the convoy's cargo being seized with no compensation for the company involved in the convoy. While Roosevelt accepted the resolution, tensions between Britain and the United States remained high from then until the entrance of the United States into the Great War. The MacDonough Affair also led to further preparations for the war in the United States, including improved maintenance of forts along the Great Lakes and a greater naval presence shift to the Caribbean.


The Trading Dilemma:
The New Coalition's blockade of France and Germany was felt harshly in the United States as American exports shrank during the Great War. At the turn of the twentieth century, Great Britain, Germany, and France were the three largest trading partners of the United States[2]. Trade with those three countries made up over two fifths of total United States trade on the eve of the Great War. However, when the Great War began, United States exports dropped significantly as France and Germany were cut off from much American trade.

The Great War particularly affected the American agricultural trade. With young Russian men being sent off to fight in Poland and Hungary and Great Britain put on a war-time footing, global grain production fell overall. Russia's entry into the war led to Britain relying more on the United States, Argentina, Mokoguay, and Australia for its food imports. The war's effect in the United States was increased prices and profits for wheat and cattle production and an economic boom in the Great Plains and on the Upper Mississippi. During the beginning of the war, these states profited from American neutrality. However as the British stepped up the continental blockade, the agricultural boon began to subside. While the blockade swung many people in the Mid-Atlantic to support American entry into the war, the more rural states were divided. Heading into the 1908 election campaign, American neutrality was by far the foremost issue in the public discussion.


The End of the Fremont Republicans:
For decades, the Republican Party had presented itself as the party of freedom and of Fremont, and with this the party was dominant for much of the post-National War era. However, the rise of the Populist and later Progressive Party in the 1890s led to a crisis within the party. In the 1904 presidential election, the party had its worst showing since its inception and the first time since 1856 where the party received less than 100 votes in the electoral college. However, the Republican Party remained influential at the Congressional and state levels. Speaker Joseph Gurney Cannon maintained Republican control of the House through the McKinley administration and the early years of the Roosevelt administration. However, the issues for the Republican Party came to a head after the results of the 1906 midterm elections.

The 1906 Congressional elections struck a major blow to the Republican Party. While the Republican representation in the House had been declining since 1900, the party had maintained still maintained a majority that kept Cannon as speaker. With the 1906 elections and the admission of Shoshone, Pahsapa, and Washington, however, the Republican party lost a majority in the House. This generated a brief crisis at the beginning of the 60th Congress over how the Speaker would be elected, but it was soon resolved that the plurality party would still elect the Speaker if no party held a majority of seats. But while Cannon remained Speaker, the influence of the Republicans slipped further, with the Democrats and Progressives coming together to overcome the Republican plurality to pass bills. While the older Fremont era Republicans still played a large role in government, the loss of the House majority in 1906 and further defeat in 1908 led the Republican Party in a new direction in the next years.

That new direction began with opposition to American entry into the Great War, as it was already one of the major positions where the Republicans were at odds with both the other major parties. Former president William Jennings Bryan and New York Representative Oswald Garrison Villard spearheaded the expansion of the American Anti-Imperialist League in 1908 as promoting general American neutrality[3]. The Anti-Imperialist League gained traction later for opposition to the invasion and annexation of California. In the 1910s, Bryan and others such as Rhode Island senator Nelson Aldrich continued to influence the direction of the party as it became more conservative. The Republicans bounced would finally bounce back in the 1910s and 1920s amid a conservative backlash against perceived Irish and Ibero Catholic influence.

[1] Named after Thomas MacDonough, commander of US naval forces in the Battle of Plattsburgh in the War of 1812.
[2] In OTL the US's top three trade partners at the time were Britain with $837 million, Germany with $450 million, and Canada with $270 million. My estimates are that ITTL total US trade in 1905 is $3.5 billion, with Britain making up about $600 million, Germany making up $450 million, and France making up $400 million.
[3] The Anti-Imperialist League was started in 1903 after American involvement in the First Mexican War and the coup in Mesoamerica that returned Porfirio Diaz to the presidency.
 
Last edited:
Interesting update. Sounds as though the Republican Party is in for some rough goings in the near future.

Will the blockade be as damaging to France as it was to Germany IOTL? If so, I could well see the Franco-German alliance whose name eludes me for the moment start waging a submarine war against British commerce, same as the Germans did IOTL.
 
Cool update.

I do hope things turn around for the Republicans, my guess is that the immediate post war years will be a key moment for their rebranding. Also I'm starting to get the feeling that as awesome as Roosevelt is, especially in TTL where he won an olympic bronze while being president, that his presidency will come under much more strenuous judgement in TTL because he will be the "war President".

Will the blockade be as damaging to France as it was to Germany IOTL? If so, I could well see the Franco-German alliance whose name eludes me for the moment start waging a submarine war against British commerce, same as the Germans did IOTL.

It is sort off the main advantage the Brits have against the Allies, so I'll assume they are putting all their efforts into it. However, they have a lot more ground to cover, blockading France and Germany than just Germany. So it is likely not as extensive as OTL. And furthermore, France has the Mediterranean.
 
The Anti-Imperialist League gained traction later for opposition to the invasion and annexation of California.

I'm not sure I know how to read that, honestly. If it ends up annexed, who cares how big a sad they had, and how does one gain traction in defeat? Granted, I'd love for them to win and California remain independent, but too many hints have been dropped along the way for me to hold any hope for that.
 
It is sort off the main advantage the Brits have against the Allies, so I'll assume they are putting all their efforts into it. However, they have a lot more ground to cover, blockading France and Germany than just Germany. So it is likely not as extensive as OTL. And furthermore, France has the Mediterranean.

Notwithstanding that any ships trying to reach the French Mediterranean ports would not only have to brave the British in the Straits of Gibraltar as well as the hostile Spanish and Italians, a British blockade against an allied France and Germany can never hope to achieve what the British managed against the Germans OTL.

- The RN will never be big enough to close off the entire Atlantic and North Sea from Biarritz to Kiel.

- France can feed herself and cover the German alimentary deficit in most areas. Fats, with their wide industrial use, will be in short supply, but besides that only things which cannot be produced in northern Europe like coffee, teas, and tropical fruits will be hard to come by.

- Continuing the former theme, this war so far has involved far fewer land forces than the OTL conflict we all know so well. Both industry and farming are highly labour intensive activites still in the early 20th century, and the smaller mobilised size of the (especially) French and German armies leaves more men in the fields and factories to continue vital war production.

- France hasn't been invaded and hasn't seen its most important mining and steel-producing regions lost to the enemy.

In the end, France and Germany can provide almost all their own nutritional, mineral and metal-production needs. Petroleum hasn't yet become an important enough fuel for the small levels of domestic production to not meet their needs. Nitrates are a problem, but haven't the Germans solved that one (Haber-Bosch) a little earlier ITTL?
 
This suggests there will be a political realignment.

Guessing the Republicans will likely be the "Catholic" Party. Seeing how Wilcox has suggested they will be popular mostly in the South and Northeast. Being Fremont's Party they already have a base in the black community (rapidly becoming Catholic in TTL), and probably Ibero community in the South (seing how Cuba is the southern state that swings the most). So it seems to be that they'll likely take this route. Especially if the Dems remain conservative, and the Populist background of the Progressives makes them a tad protectionist.
 
Guessing the Republicans will likely be the "Catholic" Party. Seeing how Wilcox has suggested they will be popular mostly in the South and Northeast. Being Fremont's Party they already have a base in the black community (rapidly becoming Catholic in TTL), and probably Ibero community in the South (seing how Cuba is the southern state that swings the most). So it seems to be that they'll likely take this route. Especially if the Dems remain conservative, and the Populist background of the Progressives makes them a tad protectionist.

Getting the Republicans to be popular in the South would take quite a feat, IMO.....though, it's most prominent figurehead having been a S.C. native, maybe not so much.....;)
 
Finally got around to adding the footnotes to the last update. Next one should be done this weekend, and I'll respond to comments later today.
 
[2] In OTL the US's top three trade partners at the time were Britain with $837 million, Germany with $450 million, and Canada with $270 million. My estimates are that ITTL total US trade in 1905 is $3.5 billion, with Britain making up about $600 million, Germany making up $450 million, and France making up $400 million.

With the United States having a much stronger economic relationship with France ITTL, what kind of mark is France's cultural influence leaving on the United States?

Also, what's the current status of the French language in Louisiana?
 
There was a mention of the Anti-Imperialist League opposing Californian annexation. So, is California currently involved in the Great War, because I haven't found a single mention of them joining either side.
 
Great Britain forced California into the war in exchange for a forgiveness of debt. Sad. I was going to make a joke news update about California declaring war on both sides.

Update time!

Part One Hundred-Five: The First Winter of the Great War

In the Pacific, the British brought California into the war on the side of the New Coalition in the beginning of 1907. Soon after the San Francisco earthquake, the California government had gone bankrupt and agreed to enter an alliance with Great Britain and sell Clipperton Island and Isla Socorro to the British in exchange for annulling all its debts. Soon after California entered the war, the British moved the ships in Prince Rupert to Alameda to put them in a more useful position.
 
Great Britain forced California into the war in exchange for a forgiveness of debt. Sad. I was going to make a joke news update about California declaring war on both sides.

In the Pacific, the British brought California into the war on the side of the New Coalition in the beginning of 1907. Soon after the San Francisco earthquake, the California government had gone bankrupt and agreed to enter an alliance with Great Britain and sell Clipperton Island and Isla Socorro to the British in exchange for annulling all its debts. Soon after California entered the war, the British moved the ships in Prince Rupert to Alameda to put them in a more useful position.

Wouldn't the British have a bigger interest in Cali's Hawaiian possessions than these islands? Quite a bit more valuable no?
 
Interesting update. Sounds as though the Republican Party is in for some rough goings in the near future.

Will the blockade be as damaging to France as it was to Germany IOTL? If so, I could well see the Franco-German alliance whose name eludes me for the moment start waging a submarine war against British commerce, same as the Germans did IOTL.
With the blockade area more spread out and the French keeping access to the Mediterranean, it won't be as damaging as the OTL blockade, but curtailing the trans-Atlantic trade is definitely going to hurt. And the Franco-German alliance is the Alliance Carolingien. :)

Cool update.

I do hope things turn around for the Republicans, my guess is that the immediate post war years will be a key moment for their rebranding. Also I'm starting to get the feeling that as awesome as Roosevelt is, especially in TTL where he won an olympic bronze while being president, that his presidency will come under much more strenuous judgement in TTL because he will be the "war President".

It is sort off the main advantage the Brits have against the Allies, so I'll assume they are putting all their efforts into it. However, they have a lot more ground to cover, blockading France and Germany than just Germany. So it is likely not as extensive as OTL. And furthermore, France has the Mediterranean.
Yeah, Teddy will probably have more of a mixed legacy, with the view of his administration being affect by your opinion on US involvement in the war.

I'm not sure I know how to read that, honestly. If it ends up annexed, who cares how big a sad they had, and how does one gain traction in defeat? Granted, I'd love for them to win and California remain independent, but too many hints have been dropped along the way for me to hold any hope for that.
You'll see. ;)

In the end, France and Germany can provide almost all their own nutritional, mineral and metal-production needs. Petroleum hasn't yet become an important enough fuel for the small levels of domestic production to not meet their needs. Nitrates are a problem, but haven't the Germans solved that one (Haber-Bosch) a little earlier ITTL?
Actually the Haber process still hasn't been discovered. But the Frank-Caro process has probably been discovered by now and put to use.

With the United States having a much stronger economic relationship with France ITTL, what kind of mark is France's cultural influence leaving on the United States?

Also, what's the current status of the French language in Louisiana?
I haven't figured out exactly how a bigger French influence is going to show itself in US culture, but it will be bigger. For one, the Eiffel Tower being in Saint Louis. And Cajun French is pretty much still equal to English in much of Louisiana and will remain so ITTL.

Great Britain forced California into the war in exchange for a forgiveness of debt. Sad. I was going to make a joke news update about California declaring war on both sides.

Wouldn't the British have a bigger interest in Cali's Hawaiian possessions than these islands? Quite a bit more valuable no?
California would much rather hold on to a large archipelago of profitable sugar and coffee islands than a few smaller islands in the Pacific. Britain, on the other hand, primarily wanted a coaling station in the region. Clipperton Island is also one of the major guano islands. And Isla Socorro is about as big as Lana'i in area, so would serve as a coaling station alongside Clipperton.
 
All caught up. The Great War's alliances are neat. I can just see a propaganda poster with caricatures of France and Germany standing back to back surrounded by their enemies :p . Like the more global nature of this war and how naval resources vs. the ground war in Europe is playing a much more obvious and important role compared to the conflict of OTL.

The thing that's troubling me is picturing the tactics and tech. With exceptions this is not the static trench warfare we're use to seeing. It resembles more the Spanish-American War or the Mexican Revolution in terms of troop movements and use of cavalry and so forth, just based off the more mobile nature of it all.

Picturing the coming battles between California and the US, I see Cali using its terrain to its advantage over the industrial and demographic advantage of the US. It would be hella sick to see the Navajo and Apache acting as scouts and insurgents as the battles rage across the desert and mountains there.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if this is the right technology yet but what about the Californians making tunnels in the mountains,also if the us annexs California would its culture be similar to How current Texas culture is only a bit more bitter
 
I haven't figured out exactly how a bigger French influence is going to show itself in US culture, but it will be bigger. For one, the Eiffel Tower being in Saint Louis. And Cajun French is pretty much still equal to English in much of Louisiana and will remain so ITTL.

There's a simple way to accomplish that: OTL the Constitutions of 1915 and 1921 put draconian limits on French language education, the latter finally banning it all together as a language of instruction. That, plus the forced assimilation practiced in Louisiana schools, was what killed the French language here. The punishments were so bad that Cajun parents ceased speaking French to their children so that they wouldn't even be able to speak it on the schoolground, a crime which merited corporal punishment in many areas.

Take that away, and even despite the larger societal pressures (increased mass communication, influx of anglophones due to the oil industry, etc.), and you have a vibrant culture still going strong, with 30-40% still speaking French at home as opposed to 3-4% today. At the point this timeline has reached, French was still a potent enough cultural force that immigrants into Acadiana (Americans and Europeans) were at likely as not to end up as Cajun as their neighbors, or at least their children would be, with their fathers' last names getting frenchified in the baptismal records, giving us such Gallic Cajun names as Jeansonne or Istre (East) or Mire (Meyer).
 
I'm kinda bumping and following up with a question here to maybe further discussion, in hopes of encouraging Wilcox finishing an update.

I haven't figured out exactly how a bigger French influence is going to show itself in US culture, but it will be bigger. For one, the Eiffel Tower being in Saint Louis. And Cajun French is pretty much still equal to English in much of Louisiana and will remain so ITTL.

There's a simple way to accomplish that: OTL the Constitutions of 1915 and 1921 put draconian limits on French language education, the latter finally banning it all together as a language of instruction. That, plus the forced assimilation practiced in Louisiana schools, was what killed the French language here. The punishments were so bad that Cajun parents ceased speaking French to their children so that they wouldn't even be able to speak it on the schoolground, a crime which merited corporal punishment in many areas.

Take that away, and even despite the larger societal pressures (increased mass communication, influx of anglophones due to the oil industry, etc.), and you have a vibrant culture still going strong, with 30-40% still speaking French at home as opposed to 3-4% today. At the point this timeline has reached, French was still a potent enough cultural force that immigrants into Acadiana (Americans and Europeans) were at likely as not to end up as Cajun as their neighbors, or at least their children would be, with their fathers' last names getting frenchified in the baptismal records, giving us such Gallic Cajun names as Jeansonne or Istre (East) or Mire (Meyer).

What about German in the Midwest? Even in OTL German was pretty widely spoken in the northern midwest until it was seen as unpatriotic to do so. Here the US will be aligned to Germany in the Great War. Will German Americans retain their heritage? Itasca and Pembina are likely German majority states anyway.

Then there also be the issue of Spanish in Jackson, Florida, and Cuba. The Ibero culture of the US seems to be thriving in TTL. And what about the Dutch in Calhoun, which in the 1860 language map was very Dutch but that might have changed by now.

In an unrelated question what is the status of Native American in TTL? I know the removal was less severe. The Seminoles were allowed to stay in Florida, and the rest of the civilized tribes, I believe were allowed to settle in Arkansas and northwestern Mississippi. There was also no mention of the Indian Wars, so are the Great Plains tribes doing better? Is the Dakotah territory meant for them - it is shitty land, but something is something if they are allowed some autonomy there.
I also wonder how the more urban/densely populated US is affecting the natives?


Alright that is my bump.
 
Top