Uit De Blauwe: A European South Africa; Salvage and continuation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anchobi

Banned
Decided to continue this dead-end TL https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/uit-de-blauwe-a-european-south-africa.399045/ , you'll have to read it to understand what the hecks going on.

Please be merciful this is my first attempt at a TL. :biggrin:

_______________________________________________________________
Part 6:

Catholic bishops in the south viewed the Protestant-majority north with suspicion, and had forbidden working for the new government.

The more numerous Northern provinces represented a majority in the United Kingdom of the Netherlands' elected Lower Assembly, and therefore the more populous Southerners felt significantly under-represented.

The traditional economy of trade and an incipient industrial revolution were also centered in the Dutch-region, particularly in the large port of Amsterdam. At the most basic level, the North was for free trade, while less developed local industries in the South called for the protection of tariffs. Free trade lowered the price of bread, made from wheat imported through the reviving port of Antwerp; at the same time, these imports from the Baltic depressed agriculture in Southern grain-growing regions.

King Willem I was from the North and largely ignored the demands for greater autonomy. His more progressive and amiable representative living in Brussels, which was the twin capital, was the Crown-Prince Willem, later King Willem II, who had some popularity among the upper class but none among peasants and workers.

A linguistic reform in 1823 was intended to make Dutch the official language in the Flemish provinces, since it was the language of most of the Flemish population. This reform met with strong opposition from the upper and middle classes who at the time were mostly French-speaking. On 4 June 1830, this reform was abolished.

The Belgian Revolution of 1830 crystallized this antagonism. Catholic partisans watched with excitement at the unfolding of the July Revolution in France, details of which were swiftly reported in the newspapers. On 25 August 1830 crowds had poured into the streets shouting patriotic slogans. The rioters swiftly took possession of government buildings.

Willem I sent his two sons, Crown-Prince Willem II and Prince Frederik to quell the riots. Willem II was asked by the Burghers of Brussels to come to the town alone, with no troops, for a meeting, this he did, despite the risks. The affable and moderate Crown Prince Willem II, who represented the monarchy in Brussels, was convinced by the Estates-General on 1 September that the administrative separation of north and south was the only viable solution to the crisis. His father rejected the terms of accommodation that he proposed. King Willem I attempted to restore the established order by force, but the 8,000 Dutch troops under Prince Frederik were unable to retake Brussels in bloody street fighting. A Declaration of Independence followed on 4 October 1830.

On 20 December 1830 the London Conference brought together five major European powers, Austria, Britain, France, Prussia and Russia. At first the European powers were divided over the Belgian cry for independence. The Napoleonic Wars were still fresh in the memories of Europeans, so when the French, under the recently installed July Monarchy, supported Belgian independence, the other powers unsurprisingly supported the continued union of the Provinces of the Netherlands. Russia, Prussia, Austria, and Great Britain all supported the somewhat authoritarian Dutch king, many fearing the French would annex an independent Belgium.

The Dutch did not receive support from the other Great Powers to reclaim Brussels and crush the revolt. Although at the moment they were supporting the Dutch King, if this instability carried on too long their fear of French intervention might make them support Belgian independence. Much of the Dutch's army had deserted due to a significant part of it having been Belgian. Willem I had other plans however. He had not forgotten how a well organized force such as the British had failed to subdue the Dutch settlers in that far-off colony in Africa during the Napoleonic Wars 30 years prior. Hermanus Steyn along with Adriaan van Jaarsveld were able to keep British forces at bay with small militias highly skilled in accurate shooting while firing from their horses. Such marksmanship was required in order to survive the South African frontier.

Due to the desperate situation regarding manpower, he had letters sent to the men who still commanded great respect from their peers in their old age for securing their new found economic freedom. In the letters he explained that revolutionary moods were about to tear the fatherland apart. He talked of (and without a doubt exaggerated) the plight of Calvinist Christians being oppressed and marginalized under Catholic Belgian revolutionary rule. He asked of them to gather willing marksmen to help retake Brussels and end the revolution. The men felt obligated to save their Brethren from the “Catholic Heretics”, but also felt they had not yet fully re-payed their King for his intervention in their affairs. The men rallied the populace with talk of a “Crusade” and managed to gather a combined force of around 12 000 men within a few months. This army gathered at Kaapstadt and boarded Dutch warships; each man bringing his own horse and rifle. The Dutch army offered proper uniforms which they struggled to convince the men to wear, because it made them “look like pish-posh city-folk”. They preferred their normal attire, which consisted of neutral or earth coloured farm-clothes, their only identifying trait being an arm-band of the Dutch tri-colours.

On the morning of 2 August 1831, just days after Leopold's coronation, the Dutch crossed the border near Poppel. Belgian scouts noticed the advance, and a number of roads were blocked with felled trees. The first skirmishes took place around Nieuwenkerk. The Dutch supreme commander, the Prince of Orange, arrived in the afternoon to support his troops and, at the same time, Zondereigen was taken by the Dutch, with some 400 Belgians repulsed. Near Ravels, the Belgian army was rapidly driven into the surrounding forests by the Dutch and subsequently into a swamp. The Belgians later retreated to Turnhout, allowing the Dutch to set up camp. The sound of the Dutch artillery alarmed the population of Turnhout, who fled en masse towards Antwerp. The next day a Dutch force of about 11,000 prepared to take Turnhout, while another Dutch corps made a diversion towards Antwerp (in reality they would attack Turnhout from another direction). In the following battle, the Dutch smashed the Belgian forces, whose morale broke down early in the battle when the Belgian banner was torn apart by Dutch artillery and a soldier lost a leg to a cannonball. The Belgians were unable to hold their ground and fled.


On 4 August, the Dutch took the city of Antwerp. The flag of Brabant was taken down and the Dutch flag was hoisted. The Prince of Orange demanded that the flag be taken down again, because it symbolized occupation rather than a restoration of Dutch power. At the same time the Dutch armies split up and moved further into Belgium, defeating numerous militias and two regular Belgian armies with ease. The division led by Prince Bernhard of Saxe-Weimar moved upon Geel and Diest, and the Third division moved into Limburg. On 8 August, the Dutch defeated the Belgian Army of the Meuse near Hasselt. On 11 August the advance guard of the Belgian Army of the Scheldt was defeated near Boutersem. The next day the Dutch army attacked and defeated the Belgians near Leuven.


For the Belgians all seemed lost. Fearing the total disintegration of the army, Leopold called for international support on 8 August. Sylvain Van de Weyer was sent to attempt to solicit support from Great Britain while François Lehon was sent to France. Although the British government was reluctant to send troops to support Belgium, the French immediately dispatched a force without informing the other Great Powers. The movement of French troops into Belgium particularly worried the British, who felt that it could represent a threat to Europe's balance of power. The French army under Marshal Étienne Gérard crossed the border the next day. The Dutch had taken a risk by invading Belgium without the support of its allies: Russia had wanted to assist but was having trouble suppressing the Polish revolution, and Prussia would not risk sending troops without Russia being able to secure its western borders; now they faced war with the French. The British diplomat Robert Adair urged King Willem I to halt the Dutch advance on Brussels. However the King brushed aside his pleads for peace and continued to press forward; famously quoting "De Fransen zullen ons nooit meer uit ons land drijven!" (“The French will never drive us from our land again!”).

The Dutch Army numbering some 40 000 men gathered South-East of Brussels and met the French on August 12 1831. The French bolstered by Belgian troops had about double the manpower of the Dutch, initially. The Prince of Orange Willem II issued a proclamation to the French and Belgians. He made it clear that he arrived as the heir to the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, and that the Belgians among the French were traitors to their Kingdom and should stand-down least they face execution. He advised the French to retreat from “non-French soil” if they valued their lives. King Leopold was among the armies on the opposing side and mocked the Dutch demands.

The French-Belgian armies, confident in their numerical superiority advanced on the Dutch forward positions to the East. The Prince detached a section of his army to march towards the outskirts of Brussels North of them. The rest swung towards the North East in a feigned retreat which encouraged the French-Belgian army to pursue. The re-positioning detached the 10 000 Belgian army, much less trained and more disorganized, towards Brussels to defend their capital from the Dutch detachment; exposing the weak left side of the allied force to reinforcements coming from the South West. These reinforcements were a 12 000-man cavalry force that had been recruited from the Cape Colony.


The French and Belgian cannon were moving much slower than the rest of the army, a few had decided that the Dutch retreat meant the battle was already won and hadn’t bothered to pursue. They were the first casualties when a barrage of bullets fell upon their positions. The Dutch colonial troops charged forward, briefly paused and fired highly accurate volleys into the rear positions of the Belgian force. After half an hour the Belgians had been decimated and were already in a disorganized retreat towards the city while being fired upon by the Dutch detachment from the North East and the cavalry from the South West. During this commotion the French army realized the encirclement attempt and stopped their pursuit of the main Dutch force. Marshal Étienne Gérard ordered the French to regroup and attempted to retreat South East, but not before the Dutch could inflict massive casualties. There was not enough Dutch forces to envelope the French so most of the army managed to escape through the South Eastern gap.

Casualties numbered 4 000 Dutch regulars wounded and killed while the colonial troops suffered about 700 casualties. The Belgians had suffered 7 000 casualties, mostly from the Dutch rear attack while the French suffered 15 000 casualties in the process of escaping the encirclement and further skirmishes during strategic retreat. In the battle King Leopold was wounded in the chest while trying to rally the fleeing Belgians. He was carried into the city center but later died of blood loss.

The French interventionist forces performed a strategic retreat, but they were constantly being peppered guerrilla-style by the Dutch cavalry until they were nearing the border between France and Belgium. Meanwhile the remaining Dutch forces occupied Brussels.

France was already planning a renewed invasion but upon hearing of the Dutch victory the other great powers felt confident enough to threaten France if they turned it into a general war. To reduce embarrassment and risk souring relations more, the French stood down.

Willem I had, with the help of his force of marksmen, decisively put an end to the Belgian revolution and defeated the French forces in what was later called the “De Grote Ruiters Wonder” (The Great Riders Miracle).

The Boers paraded alongside the Dutch army in Amsterdam and received military honors from Willem I before departing a few months later back to their homes on the African continent. Only a hand-full decided to stay due to the Boers general dislike of the landscape. "Waar de fok is die berge?!" (“Where are the f###ing mountains?!”) they asked.



Johan jumped off his horse and landed on the dusty ground beneath him. He made his way to the front porch of his farmhouse. His wife, Maria, was sitting there with their 4 year old daughter and holding their 2 year old son who he had not seen in more than a year. He kissed his wife and took his daughter up into his arms. “I have a present for you Pappa!” she told him and took out a small shiny stone from her left pocket while her father held her. Johan gazed at the stone with a shocked expression. Maria herself was not aware of this late birthday present. “What did you get Pappa?” she asked while leaning forward to look at what she was holding. “I found this by the river and brought it to Oom Tiaan, he said it’s a diamond. Pappa it’s for you!”

@Stuyvesant @Sevarics @General Ripper @Sceonn @Ameck16 @Jürgen @Dunois @assasin @Taloc13 @Janprimus @Vnix @MERRICA @Kurt_Steiner @joho6411 @traveller76 @fluttersky@Germania09 @dirtyjapaneseman @J. de Vos
 
Last edited:

Anchobi

Banned
So how much of an effect will the discovery of precious minerals in a Dutch Cape colony in the 1830s have? Demographically, economically and geopolitically?
 
Looking forward to more. The newfound Boer fame along with riches discovered in South Africa will create a tsunami of immigrants. Though the recent war would make it harder for Catholics to join in the frey.
 

Anchobi

Banned
Part 7

Secessionist moods in the Belgian region of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands remained after the occupation of Brussels. However, measures were taken to grant the French-speaking population more representation, though not as much as they would prefer. It would not matter for the next few decades as something else had grabbed the attention of the Kingdom’s national conscious: Gold and diamonds.

In the early 1830s diamonds were discovered in the Vaal River which separated the Dutch Transvaal and Oranje colonies. It was during the year 1833 that the 83½-ct “Ster van Suid-Afrika” (Star of South Africa) diamond was discovered close to the banks of the Vaal River. The news of the sale of the “Ster van Suid Afrika”, which fetched £30 000, and the discovery of more diamonds dispelled all doubts about the region’s potential mineral wealth.

It was called a Diamond “rush”, but the word was scarcely appropriate, for no prospector had ever had such a slow and arduous journey as those who first made their way to the bank of the Vaal river. From the Kaap docks to the diamond-fields is the better part of a 1 000 km journey and the landscape of the South African interior makes for hard travelling, especially on foot or by horse.

At the initial stage of the rush, a slow trickle of prospectors descended on the bank of the Vaal river and, by the end of 1835, several thousand people were encamped along the bank. The success of the first systematic diamond exploration on the north bank of the Vaal encouraged more adventurers to invest time and savings while the rush lasted. The Dutch farmers or “Boers” had already settled the region north of the Vaal River which was called the Transvaal colony. The capital lay at Pretoria, not far away from the Witwatersrand region where an even bigger discovery was waiting. It was there that a discovery of an outcrop of gold on the farm Langlaagte in February 1836 was made.

The United Kingdom of the Netherlands was in possession of perhaps one of the largest deposits of precious minerals the world had ever seen. Between the years 1835 and 1860 it was recorded that nearly 300 000 people immigrated to the Dutch colonies, equally Dutch and German, but also French, British, American and Russian. The effects of the rush were substantial. Though unfortunately whole indigenous tribes were often attacked and pushed off their lands by the gold-seekers. Agriculture and ranching expanded throughout the region to meet the needs of the settlers. The Witwatersrand grew from a small settlement of about 200 residents in 1836 to a boom-town named Johannesburg of about 180 000 by 1860; surpassing the population of Kaapstadt at the time. Roads, churches, schools and other towns were built throughout the interior.

One consequence of the gold rush was the construction of the first railway lines in this part of Africa. As a result of the rapid development of the goldfields on the Witwatersrand in the 1840s the Netherlands-South African Railway Company was founded and commissioned on 20 July 1853 to construct a railway line from Johannesburg to Kaapstadt. The line was opened on 17 March 1857.

The colony and thus the Kingdom of the Netherlands was by this point the largest producer of gold and diamonds in the world. With the extreme amount of wealth pouring into the treasury the Dutch were able to fund ambitious development and expansion of their possessions in South East Asia, exploring and colonizing much of the South Asian islands including all of Borneo and New Guinea.

This also entailed military expansion, namely the navy. The Dutch had long ceased to be a naval power on the scale of other countries such as France and Britain. The Anglo-Dutch wars seemed like a long forgotten tale. However, they still maintained a highly skilled naval tradition and with the appropriate funding and materials, as well as the incentive of guarding this new found wealth from curious neighbors, the need and ability for an enlargement of the navy was there. Skilled labour and machinery was sent to “De Goue Kaap” (The Golden Cape) as it was nicknamed. Kaapstadt, although surpassed in population by the mining regions of the interior, became an extremely busy port, exporting goods, precious minerals and mail between the colony and the rest of the world. Scholars of the time declared that a new “Golden Age” had dawned for the Dutch Nation, echoing the time during the 17th century.

A serious movement for union of the colonies arose in the 1850s, a time when there was increasing nationalism among the settlers, the great majority of whom were native-born. The idea of being an "Afrikaner" began to be celebrated in songs and poems. This was fostered by the vast distance between the colonies and the Netherlands which very few actually traveled to visit besides the educated elite. The South African colonies were also influenced by other federations which had emerged around the world, notably the United States.

The first champions of Afrikaner nationalism came from several members of the Dutch Reformed Church. The Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners ("Society of Real Afrikaners") was formed on 14 August 1855 in the town of Paarl by these members. These men funded the publishing of “Die Afrikaanse Patriot” newspaper. In these writings, they put forward the notion that Afrikaners were a distinct nationality and that the volk's destiny was to rule South Africa. They also stressed the need for the recognition of “the Cape Dutch dialect” as its own language as well as published a number of books, including grammars, dictionaries, religious material and histories.

Some Dutch academics had observed that most of the South Africans of Dutch descent could not speak the "pure" form of their original mother tongue anymore. In the course of its 200-year-old history, the language of the immigrants from the Netherlands had been thoroughly changed by the influence of other European immigrants, indigenous tribes such as the early Khoikhoi, low rates of literacy and the vast distances and thus isolation of many communities. In 1854 these views were expressed in the journal De Zuid-Afrikaan, under the title "Is die Afferkaans wesenlijk een taal?" The more influential members of the Dutch Reformed Church disliked talks of preaching in “kitchen Dutch” and outright condemned translating the Bible into the dialect. “We zullen niet toestaan dat het heilige woord van God door het slijk gehaald wordt door het boek te preken in onwaardig gebrabbel” (“We will not let the holy word of God be dragged through the mud by preaching his book in improper language")

As the wealth of Africa was revealed, other European powers, notably the British and Portuguese, began exploring the African interior from the mid-19th century on wards. This would bring them into conflict with the Dutch who had by this point in time begun to feel threatened by their former Allies. The Dutch soon had very few friends which they could trust among the world powers, except for Germany.
 
Last edited:

Anchobi

Banned
Now the questions are:

How will the Congo be divided with no Leopold II? (His father dying) And Africa in general?

How ambitious will a resurgent Netherlands get? New colonies? How big is the navy?

Will Afrikaner nationalism grow to threaten the integrity of the colony? If so, how will the Dutch react?

The Franco-Prussian war?

How will alliances shift as the early 20th century approaches?

What will the population size of South Africa be by 1900? Will the European population be vastly larger than the UKN?

Level of South African industrialization?

Are the Belgians fully put to rest?

Any other possible butterflies you predict?

Am I so far steering this timeline in the right direction or do you think I should touch more on x?
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, because the wet dreams of the apartheid state DEFINITELY needed a TL of their own.

Sorry, just not a fan of colonialism-wanks. Gives me a little bit of a headache just to think about. You're writing this well though, so good on you.
 

Anchobi

Banned
Oh yes, because the wet dreams of the apartheid state DEFINITELY needed a TL of their own.

Sorry, just not a fan of colonialism-wanks. Gives me a little bit of a headache just to think about. You're writing this well though, so good on you.

Well most TLs are wanks for one nationality to suddenly win over others that historically bested them. I imagine there's countless "What if the Nazis won?" threads in the archives that are light years worse than this for very obvious reasons. Imo, getting upset over a hypothetical exercises in historical speculation (and feeling you need to let the world know your dismay) makes as much sense as becoming depressed due to the ending of the latest Star Wars movie and posting your frustration online; pointless and unproductive.

Not trying to sound condescending but if you don't like the thread then don't read it. :kissingheart:
 
Last edited:
To be fair, no one "bested" the Afrikaners. They ended up creating a fairly brutal, ethnocentric state that lasted for decades and were then not really "bested", but forced to accept the fact that black people were humans too. And I have the same problem with Nazi-wanks that I have with yours; but at least Nazi-wanks tend to acknowledge the fact that there were, for instance, Jews and Roma in Europe when the Nazis were around, while I've seen little if any reference to the large indigenous population of South Africa in your 'reconstructed' timeline (except for the part where Clearthor decided to kill off half the Xhosa). That's not just the typical authoritarian/racist fetishism you see sometimes in those timelines; that's the erasure of a people, which I have far more problems with than just a wank. Hence my bringing up my issues.

And also, if letting you know that I'm not a huge fan of the unpleasantly white supremacist and colonialist connotations of your work is pointless and unproductive, then that, by default, makes much of these hypothetical exercises just as pointless and unproductive.

You know, I did try to compliment you; you didn't have to be a condescending ass about this.
 

Anchobi

Banned
To be fair, no one "bested" the Afrikaners. They ended up creating a fairly brutal, ethnocentric state that lasted for decades and were then not really "bested", but forced to accept the fact that black people were humans too. And I have the same problem with Nazi-wanks that I have with yours; but at least Nazi-wanks tend to acknowledge the fact that there were, for instance, Jews and Roma in Europe when the Nazis were around, while I've seen little if any reference to the large indigenous population of South Africa in your 'reconstructed' timeline (except for the part where Clearthor decided to kill off half the Xhosa). That's not just the typical authoritarian/racist fetishism you see sometimes in those timelines; that's the erasure of a people, which I have far more problems with than just a wank. Hence my bringing up my issues.

And also, if letting you know that I'm not a huge fan of the unpleasantly white supremacist and colonialist connotations of your work is pointless and unproductive, then that, by default, makes much of these hypothetical exercises just as pointless and unproductive.

You know, I did try to compliment you; you didn't have to be a condescending ass about this.
Well that escalated quickly. :neutral:
 

Anchobi

Banned
I think due to recent posts I should include a disclaimer here due to the content of the post and the TL in general.

I in no way nor will I ever nor have I ever endorsed outright genocide or other forms of genocide of any people or group.

I’m continuing this TL because I find the Dutch retaining the Cape a highly interesting scenario, and also the prospects of a more powerful modernized state in Africa much earlier rather than the odd-ball that was OTL backwater South Africa and the later minority-rule that resulted. If things occur in the TL that would normally be a breach of international laws/human rights/the Geneva Convention ect I do not endorse it, this is merely an exercise in alternate history. If you are still offended in some way by the content I would suggest you kindly leave the thread and not flood it with nonsensical complaints about what is meant to be a realistic and often cruel depiction of certain events that could have occurred. Thank you for reading.
______________________________________________________________________________________

Part 8

The UKN have had full control of the colonies ever since Willem I had placed it under direct administration after the bankruptcy of the VOC in the early 1800s. The Mfecane a few decades prior may have in a disastrous manner opened up the interior for European settlement, but several indigenous tribes still inhabited South Africa, namely the Zulus, Basothos and Xhosa tribes. These tribes, fearing further encroachment by other European powers, especially after the discovery of mineral wealth, petitioned Dutch colonial authorities to make them protectorates. These specific tribes lived in relative peace with the settlers for many years with hardly any skirmishes breaking out over land disputes. However, the Xhosa had not forgotten the great massacre during the early half of the 18th century ,more than 100 years prior, that had pushed them into the Transkei region. They knew any armed conflict would spell disaster and most rather preferred peaceful coexistence as it seemed like the only logical option at the time, but the yearning for revenge remained. These desperate desires would lead to Nongqawuse’s following.

In April or May 1856, the teenage Nongqawuse [this actually happened] and her friend Nombanda went to chase away birds from a crop field near the mouth of the Gxarha River. When she returned, Nongqawuse told her uncle and guardian Mhlakaza, a Xhosa spiritualist, that she had met the spirits of three of her ancestors.

She claimed that the spirits had told her that the Xhosa people should destroy their crops and kill their cattle, the source of their wealth as well as food. In return the spirits would sweep the Dutch settlers into the sea. The Xhosa would be able to replenish the granaries, and fill the kraals with more beautiful and healthier cattle. During this time many Xhosa herds were plagued with "lung sickness", possibly introduced by European cattle. By 1856, many cattle had died, and the Xhosa believed that the deaths were caused by umuthi - witchcraft.

Mhlakaza repeated the prophecy to Chief Sarhili. At first, the Xhosa were ordered to kill their fat cattle. Nongqawuse, standing in the river where the spirits had first appeared, heard unearthly noises, interpreted by her uncle as orders to kill more and more cattle. At length, the spirits commanded that not an animal of all their herds was to remain alive, and every grain of corn was to be destroyed. If that were done, on a given date, myriads of cattle more beautiful than those destroyed would issue from the earth, while great fields of corn, ripe and ready for harvest, would instantly appear. The dead would rise, trouble and sickness vanish, and youth and beauty come to all alike. Unbelievers and the white man would on that day perish. Sarhili ordered his followers to obey the prophecy, causing the cattle-killing movement to spread to an unstoppable point. The cattle-killing frenzy affected not only the Gcaleka, Sarhili's clan, but the whole of the Xhosa nation. Certainly some of the principal chiefs believed that they were acting simply in preparation for a last struggle with the Europeans, their plan being to throw the whole Xhosa nation fully armed and famished upon the colony. Belief in the prophecy was bolstered by the death of Lieutenant-General Cathcart in the Crimean War in 1854. His death was interpreted as being due to intervention by the ancestors. Historians estimate that the Gcaleka killed between 300,000 and 400,000 head of cattle.

There were those who neither believed the predictions nor looked for success in war, but destroyed their last particle of food in unquestioning obedience to their chief’s command. Either in faith that reached the sublime, or in obedience equally great, vast numbers of the people acted. Great kraals were also prepared for the promised cattle, and huge skin sacks to hold the milk that was soon to be more plentiful than water. At length the day dawned which, according to the prophecies, was to usher in the terrestrial paradise. The sun rose and sank, but the expected miracle did not come to pass. The chiefs who had planned to hurl the famished warriors upon the colony had committed an incredible blunder. They realized their error too late, and attempted to fix the situation by changing the resurrection to another day, but blank despair had taken the place of hope and faith.

In their extreme famine, many of the Xhosa turned to cannibalism, and one instance of parents eating their own child is authenticated. Among the survivors was the girl Nongqawuse; however, her uncle perished. This movement drew to an end by early 1858. By then, approximately 80 000 people had starved to death, reducing the population of the remaining Xhosa to a mere 27 000. As a result Nongqawuse was arrested by the Dutch authorities and imprisoned on Robben Island.

The Transkei, with its hilly but fertile soil and relatively high rainfall, now lay mostly depopulated by a desperate people’s hope for prosperity. The region was settled by European settlers in the 1860s and by the early 20th century the Xhosa would cease to exist as a nation due to emigration and mixing with hundreds of thousands of colonials over the decades.

Fortunately the Zulu and Basotho did not fall for superstitious prophecies and continued to live in harmony with the colonies.

The Dutch and the rest of the European great powers however did not plan to permanently leave Africa to do as it wanted and grow on its own.

In the middle of the 19th century, famous European explorers had mapped vast areas of Southern and Central Africa. Arduous expeditions in the 1850s and 1860s located the great central lakes and the source of the Nile. By the end of the 19th century Europeans had charted the Nile from its source, traced the courses of the Niger, Congo and Zambezi Rivers, and realized the vast resources of Africa.

Even as late as the 1870s, European states still controlled only 10% of the African continent, with all their territories located near the coast. The most important holdings were Angola and Mozambique, held by Portugal; the South African colonies, held by the United Kingdom of the Netherlands; and Algeria, held by France.

Technological advances facilitated European expansion overseas. Industrialization brought about rapid advancements in transportation and communication, especially in the forms of steam navigation, railways, and telegraphs. Medical advances also played an important role, especially medicines for tropical diseases. The development of quinine, an effective treatment for malaria, made vast expanses of the tropics more accessible for Europeans.

Expeditions were funded and encouraged by the Dutch government and settlement of the interior resulted as a domino effect. A sense very similar to the American manifest destiny swept over the colonies, the idea that, like the Jews in the Bible, God himself had set aside the land for the “Afrikaners” as the settlers had begun to openly call themselves. This was of much concern to the Dutch administration, who have already by this point gotten into disputes with local leaders over the use and exportation of the mineral wealth which seemed, to the colonials, to mostly flow back to the fatherland.

The Transvaal colony stretched from the Limpopo river down to the Vaal river and towards the beginnings of the Drakensberg Mountains and the Kalahari Desert. The colony of Natalia included much of the East coast including the harbour of "Alexandria-Suid" [Durban]. The colony of Oranje was nestled between the Vaal and Orange Rivers and the Cape Colony consisted of the Mediterranean southern coast and the Karoo interior. Settlers had by this point further trekked into Benchuanaland and Namaqualand, far into the Kalahari Desert, and a new colony was founded as a result. This colony was officially named the South-West colony but nicknamed "Dorsland". The Portuguese were alarmed at the ever enclosing border of the Dutch colonies along their East African trading ports and set the boundary of Moçambique some 80 kilometers across the Limpopo river. The Portuguese also, with the backing of Britain, laid claim to much of the interior between their East and West African possessions, effectively locking off further Dutch expansion into Africa.

Back in Europe in the aftermath of the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, Prussia had annexed numerous territories and formed the North German Confederation. This new nation destabilized the European balance of power established by the Congress of Vienna in 1815 after the Napoleonic Wars. Napoleon III, then the emperor of France, demanded compensations in Belgium from the Netherlands and on the left bank of the Rhine from Prussia to secure France's strategic position, which the Prussian chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, flatly refused while at the same time supporting the Dutch. Fearing a replay of the Belgium revolution and a war with France, Willem III, then monarch of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, aligned himself with the Prussians.

In Prussia, some officials considered a war against France both inevitable and necessary to arouse German nationalism in those states that would allow the unification of a great German empire. This aim was epitomized by Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck's later statement: "I did not doubt that a Franco-German war must take place before the construction of a United Germany could be realized." Bismarck also knew that France should be the aggressor in the conflict to bring the southern German states to side with Prussia, hence giving Germans numerical superiority. Many Germans as well as the Dutch also viewed the French as the traditional destabilizer of Europe, and sought to weaken France to prevent further breaches of the peace.
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing that the difference between the South African and the American "Manifest Destiny" is that Afrikaners are assimilating the natives instead of just mass killings and forced removal as played in the US westward expansion. This mean that the farther North you go in South Africa, the more colorful the people become.
 

Anchobi

Banned
I'm guessing that the difference between the South African and the American "Manifest Destiny" is that Afrikaners are assimilating the natives instead of just mass killings and forced removal as played in the US westward expansion. This mean that the farther North you go in South Africa, the more colorful the people become.
That's more what it entails. There are no planned removals like in the US (if one doesn't count some collateral from early mining and the Xhosa wars, which wasn't official policy by the Dutch government but rather prospectors and farmers going their own way) but overall the amount of immigration assimilates the much smaller numbers of indigenous people following the Mfecane and the cattle killings. Due to the time in which these people live however there is still obviously the view that blacks are "inferior" but the colony takes a paternalistic attitude to the remaining Basothos and Zulus while the rest end up completely assimilated by immigration.
 
Would be interesting to see if the UKN and Suid Afrika eventually enter some kind of Commonwealth construction or a (con)federation.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top