So, all this talk around Saudi Arabia as of late has gotten me thinking. Ibn Saud, is famous for founding Saudi Arabia, and for having a shit tonne of children. His firstborn son Turki, was considered his heir for most of his initial conquest of Arabia, but died in 1918-1919, leaving behind an infant child, who was bypassed for the throne.
However, what would've changed had Turki not died when he did, and instead survived to see Saudi Arabia come into being, and to later help his father shape the new Kingdom. If Turki had then succeeded his father when the man died in 1953, what could've changed for the Kingdom and the HOuse of Saud?
However, what would've changed had Turki not died when he did, and instead survived to see Saudi Arabia come into being, and to later help his father shape the new Kingdom. If Turki had then succeeded his father when the man died in 1953, what could've changed for the Kingdom and the HOuse of Saud?