Three Front War?Japan and Britain are allies like OTL.
Three Front War?Japan and Britain are allies like OTL.
Willy the 2nd actually doing something smart involving diplomacy? Now the TL has fully jumped into ASB territory.Oh wow! Yeah that's a great design. In the next chapter I plan on going over it but let's just say a country in europe plans on giving the Americans a gift.
Actual lol. 🤷♂️ we shall see next chapter.Willy the 2nd actually doing something smart involving diplomacy? Now the TL has fully jumped into ASB territory.
Realistically it’s a useless land. No one really wants it minus the British.I'm not convinced that the U.S. will fight Britain again, but I could see the U.S. here being unwilling to bail Britain out of a war in Europe, or two as the case may be.
As for Alaska, wasn't the Prince of Liechtenstein looking to get it? Or Leopold over in Belgium?
I mean give about a decade or so for the shock to wear off and the US going to want revenge given the stuff the RN pulled. When WW1 kicks off TTL and Britain starts blockading Germany I guarantee the US electorate will draw comparisons to the blockade of the US. Plus I seriously doubt the US would be as willing to actually be willing to follow the British contraband list which while technically was legal was most certainly pushing the letter of the law as close as they could. After thinking it over this is how I imagine the US gets drawn into the war. TR is president when it kicks off with him being very anti-British TTL. Britain blockades Germany like OTL, however unlike OTL the US isn't willing to play ball with the super strict list of contraband the British lay out. Eventually one of two things will happen that draws the US into the war. Either a US freighter refuses to comply and up getting fired upon and sunk or TR organizes a convoy escorted by at least on Dreadnought as a stare down with the British as part of his "Big Stick"beliefs with neither side blinking and like Liberia we never find out who fired first but all that matters is they did fire.I'm not convinced that the U.S. will fight Britain again, but I could see the U.S. here being unwilling to bail Britain out of a war in Europe, or two as the case may be.
Anglo-French relations are currently mentioned to be poor so I doubt the alliance system is going to be the exact same.I mean give about a decade or so for the shock to wear off and the US going to want revenge given the stuff the RN pulled. When WW1 kicks off TTL and Britain starts blockading Germany I guarantee the US electorate will draw comparisons to the blockade of the US. Plus I seriously doubt the US would be as willing to actually be willing to follow the British contraband list which while technically was legal was most certainly pushing the letter of the law as close as they could. After thinking it over this is how I imagine the US gets drawn into the war. TR is president when it kicks off with him being very anti-British TTL. Britain blockades Germany like OTL, however unlike OTL the US isn't willing to play ball with the super strict list of contraband the British lay out. Eventually one of two things will happen that draws the US into the war. Either a US freighter refuses to comply and up getting fired upon and sunk or TR organizes a convoy escorted by at least on Dreadnought as a stare down with the British as part of his "Big Stick"beliefs with neither side blinking and like Liberia we never find out who fired first but all that matters is they did fire.
US-France-Russia vs Germany-Britain *WW1 when? Then again, this was the same period as Fashoda IOTL.Anglo-French relations are currently mentioned to be poor so I doubt the alliance system is going to be the exact same.
Correction Germany will be on the side of the Allie’s hereUS-France-Russia vs Germany-Britain *WW1 when? Then again, this was the same period as Fashoda IOTL.
Eh I don't see Germany and Britain on the same side unless you drastically alter Willhelm's desire for an empire to rival them. At the bare minimum he won't be willing to accept a navy that isn't as grand as the RN and that alone is going to drive a wedge in any potential alliance.* Also France wouldn't want to risk it given how the RN behaved during the war against the US and the French coast is a lot closer to them then the US coast was. Plus if the USN can't defeat the RN fast enough Germany is almost certain to take out France before US troops arrive in enough force to stop it. I'm betting the alliance's once everyone is fully in the war will be France-Britain-Russia-Ottomans VS US-Germany-AH-Italy.US-France-Russia vs Germany-Britain *WW1 when? Then again, this was the same period as Fashoda IOTL.
OTOH, Britain's defeat of the US could lead to a more assertive stance by them at Fashoda due to the arrogance victory often brings about.Eh I don't see Germany and Britain on the same side unless you drastically alter Willhelm's desire for an empire to rival them. At the bare minimum he won't be willing to accept a navy that isn't as grand as the RN and that alone is going to drive a wedge in any potential alliance.* Also France wouldn't want to risk it given how the RN behaved during the war against the US and the French coast is a lot closer to them then the US coast was. Plus if the USN can't defeat the RN fast enough Germany is almost certain to take out France before US troops arrive in enough force to stop it. I'm betting the alliance's once everyone is fully in the war will be France-Britain-Russia-Ottomans VS US-Germany-AH-Italy.
*Still two-power standard era which the British don't give up until the Washington Naval Treaty OTL.
I mean the British couldn't really get more aggressive then they did OTL unless the orders they give Kitchener tell him to just straight up attack the French the moment they meet.OTOH, Britain's defeat of the US could lead to a more assertive stance by them at Fashoda due to the arrogance victory often brings about.
Damn, it looks like the American coast cities got the Copenhagen treatment by the Brits… Hopefully (sans Lady Liberty) nothing of too great value was lost"Royal Panic: A term for the mass hysteria and panic caused in the United States during the Anglo-American War (1893–1894). That is Webster's definition of 'Royal Panic'. Though today the term simply can refer to any large-scale fear or panic on a small scale (i.e., she had a royal panic at her surprise party!), the term originates from the fear of the Royal Navy during the Anglo-American War. The strategy came from London after the Battle of Montreal, as British admirals hoped that they could shatter American morale by destroying their most incredible cities. This plan worked beyond their wildest dreams.
Starting by bombarding Santo Domingo and almost killing the Governor of Dominica, the Royal Navy's bombardments got worse as the war continued. Bombing cities like New Orleans, New York, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland, Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Charleston, Baltimore, Providence, and Miami. All across the coast and Great Lakes, 'Royal Sightings' were recorded even if no ships were actually in the area. The fear quickly led to protests and even draft riots in many major cities and is widely attributed to ending the war, as many politicians, fearing their jobs, began to place more pressure on Congress and President Sherman to end the war."
-from THE ANGLO-AMERICAN WAR: For Kiddos!
by the Hill Education Company, published 2008
And America loses its most iconic monument… Hopefully they can fish her up and maybe rebuild?BREAKING! BREAKING!
HUGE BOMBARDMENT OF NEW YORK AND BOSTON! STATUE OF LIBERTY FALLS INTO THE SEA!
The Royal Navy showed no mercy to the yanks yesterday as a day long bombardment began in both Boston and New York. The Statue of Liberty is now nothing but it's shoes as the once Great American Statue lies at the bottom of the Hudson. No real American resistance was mounted.
-The Times, November 12th 1893
I say 'negotiations' but the truth is, the British could really say whatever they wanted. The American surrender might as well have been unconditional. Some in the commons pushed for the annexation of Maine, Washington, and even the State of Dominica, but Spencer and Roseberry saw no interest in that. Yes, they wanted to humiliate America, but not cause a raging inferno. They asked for all American overseas territories that weren't already states (like Dominica), then forced America to relinquish any claim on any land in Africa, basically leaving territorial changes at that. The only one that really stung the US was the loss of the Nicaraguan canal zone, though they were compensated with free shipping rights.
What happens with Haiti here? Has it been merged with Dominica here, or have the Yankees lost that part too? Also, Cuba, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines are still part of Spain right? Perhaps they’ll come into focus soonArticle VII. In conformity with the provisions of Articles I, and II of this treaty, The United States relinquishes in The Sandwich Isles, San Juan Islands, American Samoa, Liberia, Any and all African claims and the Nicaraguan Canal Zone, all the buildings, wharves, barracks, forts, structures, public highways and other immovable property which, in conformity with law, belong to the public domain, and as such belong to the United States.
Hopefully Canada gets Alaska. It just looks prettier damnit!Yeah the lack of Seward ITL meant no one was really pushing to buy the Russian ice so no one did. Also there hasn’t been any gold discovery yet because ITL Alaska is even less populated at this time then OTL Alaska so it’s kinda in limbo.
I mean if Canada gets Alaska that ultimately just means it still ends up in American Hands.Damn, it looks like the American coast cities got the Copenhagen treatment by the Brits… Hopefully (sans Lady Liberty) nothing of too great value was lost
And America loses its most iconic monument… Hopefully they can fish her up and maybe rebuild?
What happens with Haiti here? Has it been merged with Dominica here, or have the Yankees lost that part too? Also, Cuba, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines are still part of Spain right? Perhaps they’ll come into focus soon
Hopefully Canada gets Alaska. It just looks prettier damnit!
As long as the borders are prettyI mean if Canada gets Alaska that ultimately just means it still ends up in American Hands.