Hey Guys,
In 1814 the Treaty of Kiel led to the transferral of Swedish Pomerania to Denmark, and Norway to Sweden. Pomerania was then transferred to Prussia the next year in the Congress of Vienna.
But Norway declared independence after the Treaty was signed, and thus Sweden had to invade it for the Norwegian government to yield to King Charles XIII.
Due to this could the Treaty of Kiel be deemed to be invalid? I'm unsure as to how these kind of treaties worked but to me it seems as if Denmark didn't help keep up their side of the bargain.
If the treaty could be said to be invalid then what would happen and what would the results be in a revised Treaty?
In 1814 the Treaty of Kiel led to the transferral of Swedish Pomerania to Denmark, and Norway to Sweden. Pomerania was then transferred to Prussia the next year in the Congress of Vienna.
But Norway declared independence after the Treaty was signed, and thus Sweden had to invade it for the Norwegian government to yield to King Charles XIII.
Due to this could the Treaty of Kiel be deemed to be invalid? I'm unsure as to how these kind of treaties worked but to me it seems as if Denmark didn't help keep up their side of the bargain.
If the treaty could be said to be invalid then what would happen and what would the results be in a revised Treaty?