TotrueTufaar
Banned
Anyone think Germany would go through with the plans to make Canada a personal possession of the Kaiser?
TotrueTufaar said:Anyone think Germany would go through with the plans to make Canada a personal possession of the Kaiser?
Kaiser James I said:From what I've read, Luxemburg would become a German federal state within the Reich and will receive a strip of the present Belgian province of Luxemburg and perhaps the corner of Longwy.
Belgium would become an independent vassal rump state, subservant to Germany. It would be named the Tributary State of Flanders-Wallonia.
And Holland would be annexed to Germany, probably as a Duchy. Maybe they could have named it the Duchy of Batavia.![]()
![]()
Personally, I'm a Grand Duchy.Gustav Anderman said:Yepp but i would only be an earldom![]()
Gustav Anderman said:What do you meant with Holland the province Holland or the whole Netherlands.
And if you mean Netherlands why a Duchy and not a Kingdom like Bavaria, Prussia, Baden and Saxony?
Kaiser James I said:Or maybe this flag would be more appropriate?
Revenge, perhaps, for not aiding Germany in the war with France?Gustav Anderman said:And if you mean Netherlands why a Duchy and not a Kingdom like Bavaria, Prussia, Baden and Saxony?
You mean county or a barony. The concept of an "earl" and "earldom" doesn't exist in Germanic feudal theory. Counts (Graf) and Barons/Freelords (Freiherr) do. Or, perhaps due to Canada's location on the periphery of annexed territory, it would be "Markgraftum Kanada"- Margraviate of Canada.Gustav Anderman said:Yepp but i would only be an earldom![]()
Hapsburg said:Revenge, perhaps, for not aiding Germany in the war with France?
You mean county or a barony. The concept of an "earl" and "earldom" doesn't exist in Germanic feudal theory. Counts (Graf) and Barons/Freelords (Freiherr) do. Or, perhaps due to Canada's location on the periphery of annexed territory, it would be "Markgraftum Kanada"- Margraviate of Canada.
The status of Canada within the German Empire would be irrelevant, as the Americans would soon be invadingGustav Anderman said:Well the netherlands didn´t aid Germany in 1866 or in 1871 and didn´t annex the netherlands so why now?
And of course i should have wrote " Yepp but it would only be an earldom"
it was an ironic statement that if somebody devot the Kingdom of the Netherlands to a duchy, a much larger Canada should devoted to something even smaller![]()
hmm. sounds interesting, esp. the Persia part. perhaps a Persian civil war, with an Ottoman supported side, and a British supported side?Franz Josef II said:Since Russia will be quiet for the next twenty or thirty years, will there be another war or war scare in Europe? I could foresee a possible second (third) round with France, but Turkey could also be a contender. Possible reasons include most importantly Caucasus oil and the political destiny of Georgia, disagreement regarding political policy towards Persia, etc. Maybe Turkey gets too high and mighty once she realizes the power she has controling such a big chunk of the oil market and ceases to be the 'sick man of Europe.'
Scarecrow said:hmm. sounds interesting, esp. the Persia part. perhaps a Persian civil war, with an Ottoman supported side, and a British supported side?
Hapsburg said:You mean county or a barony. The concept of an "earl" and "earldom" doesn't exist in Germanic feudal theory. Counts (Graf) and Barons/Freelords (Freiherr) do. Or, perhaps due to Canada's location on the periphery of annexed territory, it would be "Markgraftum Kanada"- Margraviate of Canada.
PS- I don't know much dutch. I had to use wikipedia and google translation for the words. Might be some errors.
Caucasian oil was under Russian control and relatively important. If the area has managed to seced during a civil war any victor will immediately move in to retake it.Franz Josef II said:Since Russia will be quiet for the next twenty or thirty years, will there be another war or war scare in Europe? I could foresee a possible second (third) round with France, but Turkey could also be a contender. Possible reasons include most importantly Caucasus oil and the political destiny of Georgia, disagreement regarding political policy towards Persia, etc. Maybe Turkey gets too high and mighty once she realizes the power she has controling such a big chunk of the oil market and ceases to be the 'sick man of Europe.'
The Turks had no interests in Persia. It had not been a part of the Ottoman empire so any attempt to meddle in it would bring the wrath of the British Empire down on their heads. As it would not be in the interests of the Germans to back them up, Istanbul would be told in no uncertain terms to get out.Scarecrow said:hmm. sounds interesting, esp. the Persia part. perhaps a Persian civil war, with an Ottoman supported side, and a British supported side?
Max Sinister said:If they're stupid enough... Tirpitz IOTL had the plan to acquire an island in the Caribbean... "without angering the USA".