Henry Ford might be more likely.I'm half expecting Strom Thurmond and Barry Goldwater to have been president at this rate.
Henry Ford might be more likely.I'm half expecting Strom Thurmond and Barry Goldwater to have been president at this rate.
True, but FF historically palls around with Christian Dems on the European level. They would deffo be in different parties, given that Irish politics is based around spite, century-old grudges, and flegs (if you're in Ulster).
Oh...
So I assume that Civil Rights did not happen ITTL for the US.
If they weren't involved in WW1 I expect they went through an isolationist phase right when fascism emerged...
I'm half expecting Strom Thurmond and Barry Goldwater to have been president at this rate.
Henry Ford might be more likely.
Different Versailles? Something involving Wilson and the LoN?Close to the truth but not quite, WWI went down as OTL, the PoD comes a little later. At least one person mentioned has been President and I will say that the US is not out and out Fascist, just very, very, very Paleo-conservative.
I bet in Norn Iron, the DUP would be the local Vigilant wing.
Different Versailles? Something involving Wilson and the LoN?
Paisley definitely wouldn't be long for the party leadership. The Catholics in Spain, Italy, and Poland (all the party heartlands, I'd think) would never tolerate such a thing.I was really torn about it, they might be on the Right Wing of the Confederals but then, of course, I thought that given the PoD, they don't exist OTL. Nevertheless, their equivalent certainly is because that's more interesting; in fact Paisley (Senior) was their leader for a few years in the 80s.
That is a good point I did not think of! Never too late for me to retconn thoughPaisley definitely wouldn't be long for the party leadership. The Catholics in Spain, Italy, and Poland (all the party heartlands, I'd think) would never tolerate such a thing.
Well, he could be the sort of leader who undercuts his own party in a bad way. A sort of a Foot figure. Or it could be he kept his views on the pope quiet to rise within the party, and the worst of it was only exposed when he took the reins.That is a good point I did not think of! Never too late for me to retconn though![]()
Oops they're not meant to be!Does anyone else think it's ironic that the most anti-communist political party is called Vanguard?
Well, he could be the sort of leader who undercuts his own party in a bad way. A sort of a Foot figure. Or it could be he kept his views on the pope quiet to rise within the party, and the worst of it was only exposed when he took the reins.
Seat count so far, please.
Go ahead m8.I like it actually, I'll be stealing all your ideas if you don't mind.
Can I make a critic? It's pretty unlikely that Matteo Renzi would be a Coop. The OTL Democratic Party was formed by not-extreme ex-Communists and vaguely leftish ex-Christian Democrats. Renzi wad part of the second section. The first party he was affiliated with is the Italian Popular Party, one of the immediate successors of the dying Christian Democracy. And even now, his ideas are clearly neoliberal and liberists, and have really few things in common with Coops (in fact the Democratic Party today OTL is a center party, not a center-left). I think that TTL he would be member of the CPP, maybe a Dem. But not a Coop.
Thanks, I'll either swap him to a Dem or replace him with an alternative leftie Italian. I'm afraid to say that despite having a very brief knowledge of Italian politics, the details do elude me.
Also what is the position of our current President (Macron ) ?