TLIAPOT

So the two major parties are Mecham's Conservatives and the continuity-Buckleyite Constitution Party? :eek:

Honestly, I think that the Democrats and Socialists would merge together into a broad-tent left-ish party. Think labor unions, Catholic rights, Hispanic rights, that sort of thing. Hispanics in the 1970s or so were working-class and big on organized labor stuff, if I recall right. Given their time working together in Opposition and probably some radicalisation on the Dems' part, I can see a broad-ish "Social Democratic Party" or something emerging.

So basically my ideal Democratic Party pre-1972 versus Mechamite Conservatives?
 
You make me sicker than I could have ever imagined.

*George Meany intensifies*

George-Meany_halfWidth_Sidebars.jpg
 
At least you put my homeboy Pierre Salinger back in the Senate.

Salinger's a really interesting character - was in the Kennedy and Johnson White Houses, then became a Senator for California, then a political commentator in France and a columnist for a right-wing French newspaper. It's a shame not to use him and his wonderful eyebrows with those Jamaican cigars.
 
Salinger's a really interesting character - was in the Kennedy and Johnson White Houses, then became a Senator for California, then a political commentator in France and a columnist for a right-wing French newspaper. It's a shame not to use him and his wonderful eyebrows with those Jamaican cigars.

That's why I love him.

Also, I like Californians just kind of in general.
 
So is West Germany going to reunify soon? Seeing as most of their neighbours are now red.
Or are they going to become some kind of North Korea analogue vaguely allied to the Nordics?
 
After the downfall of Buckley, how will evolve the the French, Portuguese, and Spanish exile governments?

As for the negociations leading to the refom of the U.N., it seems at least four of the five permanent seats are now held by left-wing governments.

Article 18 covers education. This is guaranteed to all Americans, and moreover, only public schools are permitted within the Union of Independent States.

How this will work for the private colleges and university?

And I can infer this article was put in place after the States' Right Party-sponsored voucher system.

Article 21 covers public ownership of certain industries and forbids profit making in said industries.

So the BuckleyCorps will stay owned by the State?
As for the second clause, the military just lost any opportunity of becoming a business power in its own right, and the ban on profit-making could elad to inefficiencies.

Articles 23 spells out political rights, namely the franchise, the right to access to public institutions, and the right to form political parties as long as their activities are legal, non-profit, and they are democratic in nature.

"The Party" is forever banned, but is the anti-Buckleyite branch of the former GOP banned from reestablishing the Republican Party or is the Elephant forever tainted?

Articles 24 lists the franchise as an obligation of the citizenry, stating that anyone aged 16 or above shall not be denied the right to vote "for any reason whatsoever". Furthermore those aged 18 to 70 are compelled to exercise the franchise by law.

So the only reason to not be able to vote is if the person hasn't evidence he is a citizen.

Articles 26 gives everyone the right to submit ballots by mail.

Doesn't they fear fraud issues? Putting the voting days on public holidays, and opening the voting offices from 8 A.M to 10 P.M. would have been better, in order to prevent the kind of sheningans used by Buckley and his pals.

Articles 29 lays out the apportionment of Sovereign Assembly seats to the several states, the standard representative-to-population ratio being set at that of the smallest entitled unit, which is currently Wyoming. In the first Sovereign Assembly election Wyoming was apportioned a single seat while California, the largest polity, was apportioned sixty-six seats. Sovereign Assemblymen are elected from party lists set by the various seats, in practice only members of state legislatures are placed on said lists except in extenuating circumstances.

No Senate?

Articles 31 the several states are held to ensure a system of social security, as well as the wise use of land and natural resources so as to preserve the natural environment for future generations.

Will the U.I.S. fund States whose ressources prevent them from fulfulling this obligation?

As for the land and natural resources part, I may imagine more States than only OTL North Dakota establishing State banks to reinvest inside the State the benefits of the public wealth.

Who's gonna try Buckley for his crimes? While the UIS seems like the obvious choice, there are plenty of people in the rest of the world who would like to have a word with Buckley.

My bets are the U.I.S.

EDIT: Fixed URL
 
Last edited:
Top