TLIAM: The Withered Oak

Royal Oak.png
If Colonel Careless had known how wet it was going to get that day, he wouldn’t have suggested it. That was what he told himself later. But fundamentally, the plan was sound. There were Roundheads scouting everywhere, for goodness’ sake, of course they were going to have a gander at the priest holes at Boscobel House, and that Penderel chap was a fool to suggest otherwise. Colonel Careless knew how to hide: he was a Catholic.

The fact that the roving Parliamentarians did not, in the end, search Boscobel House at all was a tragic irony, as it turned out.

Colonel Careless cradled the sleeping King in his arms, all six foot two of him. This wouldn’t have been a worry, except that they happened to be in the upper reaches of an oak tree at the time. Far below, a couple of Cromwell’s fiends wandered through the parkland without so much as a by-your-leave, tossing apples between one another in their mirth. If the last decade of war had gone otherwise, Colonel Careless would have leapt down to reprimand them on the slovenliness of their bandoliers, but as it was, Careless was got up in some foolish peasant costume that he’d borrowed from Penderel.

To be fair to him, William Penderel had done his bit the previous night, trying and failing to find a way across the Severn for them all – or Charles, at least. His Majesty. It didn’t look too hopeful at that point, what with the rabble of Scots and recusants getting demolished by the New Model Army, a force nearly twice the size of their own – Colonel Careless had been the last man off the field of battle, bar the dead ones. Perhaps, indeed, it was God’s will that the King should never more reign in England. Anyway, that was three days ago, and matters hadn’t exactly improved. For one thing, Careless was coming to the numb realisation that he’d caught cold, perched on that sodden branch with his hands occupied with the sleeping bulk of the rightful King.

He really needed to wipe his nose.

He waited until the pair of vulgar Roundheads had passed beyond earshot, and carefully extricated his left hand from His Majesty’s right flank: “Your Majesty!” he hissed. No response was forthcoming: to be fair, Charles II had had a devilishly long night, what with all the running and hiding on the banks of the Severn. His soft feet were had been rubbed raw by the leather, and were still bleeding through the slits that had been cut to account for the sheer size of His Majesty’s feet. He didn’t deserve to be woken up like this, but let’s face it, Colonel Careless was temporarily in much greater need. “Your Majesty! You’re going to have to cling on yourself for a minute.”

Still the King lay there like ballast. Colonel Careless came to a conclusion that he wouldn’t have dared make if he hadn’t been a foot away from the King’s forehead for the last six hours. He slipped his left hand up the baggy sleeve of the King’s soaking costume, all the while redistributing minutely the weight of the pair on the branch. He pinched King Charles II on the arm.

Now, one of the major differences between royalty and everyone else is that royalty tends not to be too keen on other people causing them physical pain – or, in some cases, touching them at all. Thus, it comes as a bit of a surprise to your average King when he’s rudely awaken from a peaceful dream about lemon drizzle cake or suchlike by the strong pinch of a hardened soldier who’s mind is focused by the dollop of phlegm dripping inexorably towards his upper lip. And in this case, King Charles II spasmed, his eyes still closed, and caught Colonel Careless on the jaw with a weak slap.

This was enough, on that slippery branch, to disrupt the equilibrium that Careless had carefully maintained for the last six hours. Confusion reigned for a nanosecond, but essentially Careless’ reptilian brain looked out for Numero Uno, and it turned out that Careless’ reptilian brain had a substantially different idea of who ‘Numero Uno’ was than the rest of Careless’ brain did. The upshot of all this was that Charles II, still presumably unconscious, plummeted out of the pollarded oak tree and splatted into a root which protruded from the mud below – head first. The mess was spread over quite a large area by the time Colonel Careless felt able to unclench any muscle at all, let alone his precarious grip on the branch.

“Oh, for fuck’s sake” said Colonel Careless. Then he sneezed.​

Royal Oak.png
 
THEN WHO WAS KING

A delightful POD, and a great idea. Who would the throne pass to if Restoration still occurred, I wonder? I suspect that's half the fun of the TL. Maintaining the Commonwealth 'because, well, we haven't really got any Kings left' sounds excellent.
 
Oh dear.

That's going to cause a bit of a to do. It probably puts a bit more weight behind ideas to groom Henry of Gloucester as an ideal Protestant prince. Whether there'll be enough support behind either him or James to guarantee a restoration is another thing entirely.
 
THEN WHO WAS KING

A delightful POD, and a great idea. Who would the throne pass to if Restoration still occurred, I wonder? I suspect that's half the fun of the TL. Maintaining the Commonwealth 'because, well, we haven't really got any Kings left' sounds excellent.

There's James who's like Charles if he lacked charisma and the ability to lie through his teeth about repressing anti-monarchists, and then there's Henry who comes off as an OC in a fanfiction about this cool other brother who isn't like Charles or James. This one is Protestant, good at war, supports the idea of a (relatively) limited monarchy, and would totally be BFFs with me in Parliament!

There is the matter of him promising his father that he wouldn't claim the crown so long as hid older brothers lived, in their final meeting before Charles I was executed as well, so how much that applies to him is a fair question. If he wants it, it'll be his. The only problem is that he's like many Princes Across The Water in that he might just let his issues keep him from the crown.
 
What about Elizabeth the OTL Winter Queen? If Richard Cromwell is as unsuited as in OTL she would be more acceptable than her surviving brothers.
 
I am intrigued, sir. Definitely intrigued. Will there be many long named puritans appearing? Let us hope, sir. Let us hope.
 
A very interesting POD. You've just made me about 30 pounds a year poorer as I am a recipient of the Penderel Pension.

Cheers,
Nigel.
 
58629_183380.jpg

Extract from The Stuart Court in Exile: 1649 – 1660 by Bulstrode Mainwaring

In the Parisian court of the Prince of Wales, three distinct factions had arisen. Around Queen Henriette Marie was gathered the so-called ‘Louvre Group’ which advocated the formation of international alliances and the offering of concessions to various Parliamentary factions. It was led by Lord Jermyn until his fall from grace after the abortive Worcester Campaign. Their main opposition was led by Sir Edward Hyde, which constituted the ‘Old Royalists’ who felt it wiser to rely on English and Scots loyalists to rise up when the time was right and public opinion had swung back towards the King, rather than bargaining away His Majesty’s hereditary rights for short-term gain. Under the Duke of York (called “James II” by his followers) this faction was usually in the ascendant. Yet a third faction, called the ‘Swordsmen’ gravitated around Prince Rupert and constantly proposed hare-brained schemes to invade England again and again.

One of the more entertaining plots that the Swordsmen formulated – and just about the only one which was put into practice - was the so-called Wagstaff Rising of 1655. Sir Joseph Wagstaff was originally a follower of Lord Rochester, but later became attached not only to Prince Rupert but also to the Queen, with whom they had made common cause. A plan was hatched to send Wagstaff and a dozen French soldiers across the Channel under cover of night, thence to Surrey, where they would effect the rescue of Henry of Oatlands, who was the youngest son of Charles I and Henriette Marie.

Now, Henry of Oatlands had languished in a rather loose Parliamentarian captivity for nearly a decade by this point, having been captured following the defeat of his father in the First English Civil War. One must assume that his family was desperate for his return, but apart from an abortive negotiation in 1651-2 (in which Cromwell decided that the new heir to the throne probably oughtn’t to be set free so soon after his late eldest brother had led an Army halfway to London) they made no practical steps to secure his release.

Thus it was that this Wagstaff, a stout man with a companionable nature that later led him to the evils of drink, ended up scurrying around the South Downs in search of James II’s heir. One of the Frenchmen in his company wrote this unforgivably lurid account of the business of their escapade:

“Monsieur de Waguestaffe effected his entrance to the premises by leaping from the bushes towards the ornamental gate, latching on to the rampart with his fingers and thereby raising himself up….

“Having slaughtered the remaining guards and set the majority of our cohort (selected, as I later discovered, for our good Gallic looks) to distracting the maids of the house, he motioned to me for silence as he entered the private chambers of the Prince Henri. The young Prince was terrified, hiding behind the curtains of his bed, but Monsieur de Waguestaffe bellowed out “Ho there, sweet prince! I have come here to rescue you from the clutches of these foul traitors, tyrants and Protestants, and take you back to your beloved mother!” This proclamation did not receive the gratitude that Monsieur thought it would, so he repeated it in a slow, clear tone. Evidently he thought the boy was deaf after so long being talked at by Puritan dullards. However, the Prince was nothing of the sort, and immediately set out a well-reasoned defence of Protestantism and appended an apologia on the subject of the traitor Cromuelle, who, said the Prince, was simply making the best of a bad situation…

“After several hours of impassioned debate between the Prince Henri and Monsieur de Waguestaffe, during which I was unsure of whether to remain, silently and awkwardly, in the room of the Prince, or to go downstairs for some less philosophical pleasures, there came a shout from below stairs as one of my drunken compatriots screamed for help mid-coitus. The shout was taken up by the others and the serving girls, and then shots rang out. It seemed that some servant had gone to the nearby village to raise a mob against us. I do not have a clear memory of whether these people were ordinary peasants, or Cromwellian reinforcements, but it mattered little: I never saw any of my companions again.

“At any rate, after hearing these sounds, Monsieur de Waguestaffe became rather pale for the first time (as I have mentioned, he always had a rosy hue to his face, despite the harsh climate of his upbringing) and simply tipped his hat to the Prince Henri, saying: “I suppose we shall have to agree to disagree, my Prince, although I shall be happy to continue this conversation at a later date.” At which point he beckoned me and leapt out of the window.”

It is unclear whether the details of this account are true, since the report that Wagstaff sent to his superiors no longer survives. In any case, it would be unlikely to contain the embarrassing account that the rescue only failed because Wagstaff was distracted by a highbrow discussion on the veracity of transubstantiation. However, this discussion brings us on to a larger point regarding the spread of Catholicism within the House of Stuart and their retainers...​
 
The Failed Frond, or, The Antepenultimate Tragedy of the House of Stuart, Act 1, Scene 3
By Philip Vanbrugh

Episode_of_the_Fronde_at_the_Faubourg_Saint-Antoine_by_the_Walls_of_the_Bastille.png


[At the camp of Marshal Turenne, outside Paris, the Duke of YORK and the PALSGRAVE Edward regard the progress of the Battle of Faubourg Saint-Antoine]

PALSGRAVE
My God, look ye! Through yonder spyglass, look!
The rebels, dashed like flotsam ‘gainst the walls
Are set about by Turenne’s armoured horde.
Listen, my cousin, to the wails of fright
As our master’s foes lose their will to fight!

YORK
‘Tis a pity that they have not equal ground
For His Majesty’s soldiers pin them to
The steadfast stones of the citadel
And the burghers of Paris regard their deaths
As Rome’s denizens would a Christian’s doom.
The battle is most dishonourable.
But soft! What object hold ye, good Palsgrave?
A necklace intended for your woman?

PALSGRAVE
Nay, forsooth! ‘Tis a rosary withal
Which all good Catholics must use to pray
To th’virgin Mary, Mother of God.
‘Tis my most precious earthly possession
For when I was disowned by my earthly
Kin, it was given to me by a priest
Whereat it gave my soul great comfort
I had fallen in love with my wife, with whom
I proposed to elope, for no Papist
Was brooked by my mother, who is your aunt
As you well know. Anna bad me convert
And the rest is a divine comedy.

YORK
For what do you pray?

PALSGRAVE
I pray for vict’ry.

YORK
For much of my life, I have depended
On the charity of those who follow
The Roman Rite. My Mother and le Roi
Being but two; but I must remain pure
Must I not? In order to regain my throne
‘Cross the brine of Britannia’s wat’ry sleeve.
But my people reject me at ev’ry turn
And it must be that they reject the Lord
For who else could appoint their earth-bound Kings
But one who bought th’eternal crown with blood?
And here I am in Paris with no hope
Of winning back my Father’s honoured throne
Or seeing once more my dishonoured home.

PALSGRAVE
‘Tis true. You must dissemble new methods
And fight for God and your rightful country.
I trust the Lord will tell you to have faith
And assemble Army after Army
To detach the Lord Protector from his
Stolen, tyrannical authority.
I, like you, am a younger brother. But,
If Charles the Elector follows his wife
To the grave, and martial Rupert likewise,
And his follower Maurice, then I’ll serve
As Elector – ‘twould be my blessed curse
To serve out my duty; reinvite
Myself from this Parisian exile
The Lord expects the same from you, good James.

YORK
Very well, but first I must seek a sign.
Hand me your rosary, I must entreat
For the lives of these, the basest rebels
That assail his Holy order – pity
Moves me for the moment in sympathy
With those cast upon the rocks by dread Fate.

PALSGRAVE
Look, the Bastille cannons fire on our men!
They retreat from the fray. The damage done,
The rebel Army will not seek glory
But they live to plough their fields anew – though
The Marshal may be displeased, the Lord
Has signified that yours is the right to
Claim the throne, crown and sceptre of a King!

YORK
I shall keep these beads, if you would allow?

PALSGRAVE
You may, so long as you use them in prayer.​


---

Extract from The Stagnation of English Drama: 1640 - 1756 by You-Will-Know-My-Name-Is-The-Lord-When-I-Lay-My-Vengeance-Upon-Thee Winnfield

You will see from this extract of 'The Failed Frond' that the format of English dramaturgy had not developed far beyond what was available to Kyd, Marlowe and Jonson - still the Gold Standards to which all playwrights must be judged. Indeed, Vanbrugh junior shows singular ineptness with dialogue and pacing that could only have been the result of a late 17th century education, for although the rulers of the time did not impose Puritan ideals on the general populace (the misconception that Oliver Cromwell banned Christmas is exactly that, and although it must be said that in the immediate aftermath of the Wagstaff Plot it was proposed that Britain be ruled directly by a system of censorious Major-Generals, the good feeling brought by the success of the Western Design made this proposal superfluous) education and culture were weighed down by the seriousness and pompousness of Puritan modes of being.

It is hardly worth noting that Vanbrugh, writing a good sixty years after the event, makes several historical errors. For one thing, the Palsgrave Edward's eldest brother could not "follow his wife to the grave" as she only died, in childbirth, three months after the Battle of Faubourg Saint Antoine in 1652, which the characters are watching offstage. For another, his mother, Elizabeth Stuart, had only briefly disowned him when he married Anna Gonzaga and converted to Catholicism and they were in full amity with one another by the time of the late Fronde. And last but not least, there is no evidence that it was James' cousin who converted him to Catholicsm, least of all by proving G-d's existence by turning the tide of battle. In fact, it was the treason of a certain voluptuous noblewoman who bribed the cohort at the Bastille to turn on their brethren out of pity for the Frondeurs. However, even Marlowe's historical plays have their inaccuracies compared to modern scripts, but even so, not much progress had been made in the intervening sesquicentury.​
 
Extract from The Stagnation of English Drama: 1640 - 1756 by You-Will-Know-My-Name-Is-The-Lord-When-I-Lay-My-Vengeance-Upon-Thee Winnfield
Puritans, ho!

Good stuff. Interesting cultural commentary on a history that never happened. Top notch. I both admire and pity you for devising that Iambic Pentameter. Rather you than me.
 
Top