TLIAM: Killing Home Rule with Kindness

33nOEdE.png


"[This government's strategy on Ireland is to] Kill Home Rule with Kindness."
-Arthur Balfour, Chief Secretary for Ireland, on the introduction of the 1898 Local Government Act


Our opposition to this Bill shall not be guided by the normal constitutional rules. There are stronger things than parliamentary majorities. If an attempt were made to deprive Ulster Unionists of their birth-right – as part of a corrupt parliamentary bargain – they would be justified in resisting such an attempt by all means in their power, including force. If such an attempt is made, I can imagine no length of resistance to which Ulster can go in which I should not be prepared to support them, and in which, in my belief, they would not be supported by the overwhelming majority of the British people.”
-Andrew Bonar Law, Leader of the Conservative Party, 27th July 1912

///---///
Jesus Gonzo, you're like a mouth ulcer...

Huh?

You just wont get the message and go away...

Oh...

So we're doing this rigmarole again...?

...

Pardon?

...Well if you don't want me to talk...

[Sighs Audibly] No... right so what is this going to be, your umpteenth TL that you wont finish?

Well depending on interest and,-

Gonzo...

Yes?

That's not generally the problem, you just don't write interesting content...

Such as...?

Oh I don't know, do something fun like have one of Nixon's daughters marry into the Royal Family or have Britain reclaim the Suez in the early 1970s...

But that's ASB...

Not with butterflies...

I see.

Right so are you going to get this started... soon?

Yes, I've got an update already done.

Wow, you're organised for once...

Haha! Good one!

It wasn't a joke...

Haha, good one again...
 
apIgONa.png


H. H. Asquith
1908-1915
Liberal

"Squiffy manning the Gate"

While the event that led to the 1915 general election occurred in 1914, the seeds were sown with the introduction of the third Home Rule Bill in 1912. The bill, which in retrospect was rather mild and in many ways a shortcoming after years of promises after Gladstone’s conversion to the Home Rule argument in the mid-1880’s; was met with fear, rage, distrust, and unease by those on the Tory benches. The reasons for opposing the bill were many and numerous, though differed depending on the group in question. The mainland Conservative Party, led by the Canadian-born and former Ulster resident Andrew Bonar Law, opposed the bill for fear it could lead to colonial holdings demanding similar settlements and in effect break up the Empire. Unionists in the provinces of Connacht, Leinster, and Munster opposed the bill due to their fear of becoming an even smaller minority within the country (they would comprise anywhere from fifteen to five percent of the population, give or take Ulster), as well as their fears of high taxation and being shut off from the rest of Britain via trade barriers. Ulster Unionists meanwhile opposed Home Rule due to a variety of reasons including those of the Conservatives and Southern Unionists, but also due to their fears of being a persecuted minority and the perceived power of the Catholic Church in a Dublin Home Rule parliament (fears were only increased after two Papal decrees, Ne Temere which was a perceived threat to Protestants in mixed marriages, and Motu proprio which seemed to put the Catholic church and its clergy above the law; events in Castledawson in 1912 when a group of Protestant Sunday school children bumped into an Ancient Order of Hibernians event, the AOH men apparently tried to attack the children, though it later emerged the children ran into the nearby woods, fearful of the AOH men that they had been told to fear.)

Opposition to the Home Rule bill came in all shades of opinion on the Conservative benches. Southern Unionists and more moderate members of the Conservative Party, such as Arthur Balfour, took a more passive approach, using parliamentary means to oppose Home Rule. While Unionists had a majority of the seats in Ulster, Southern Unionists generally could only count on certain Dublin seats for their survival (ironically they were better represented in Great Britain compared to Ireland, with several Tory MPs with Irish connections, such as Walter Long, calling themselves Southern Unionists despite holding mainland seats.) The Conservative leader in the Lords, Lord Lansdowne, the former Foreign Secretary, was a Southern Unionist, he was adamant that the bill should be killed outright, with no Home Rule anywhere on the island of Ireland. Noted lawyer and Southern Unionist Member of Parliament for the University of Dublin, Sir Edward Carson, shared Lansdowne’s view, but he reasoned that using Ulster Unionism as a way to present opposition to the bill, would suffice in killing the bill outright. Bonar Law, the son of a Scottish Presbyterian Minister who had at one stage settled his family in Ulster, had a strong connection to the province. The Tory leader became increasingly frustrated with Southern Unionists for their (in his view) failure to fight for their quarter and survival; Ulster was his priority to keep in the United Kingdom, the Southern Unionists could be thrown by the wayside for all he cared.

Through a variety of events ranging from a speech at the Ulster Hall in Belfast, to inspecting a march past by the paramilitary Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) at Balmoral in 1912, Bonar Law’s rhetoric and stance on the Irish question became increasingly hardline and radical. In 1913 he sent a memorandum to King George V, which the monarch had requested to sound out the views of the Conservative Party. Bonar Law’s length memorandum asserted that the British constitution was under threat and that civil war was on the horizon in Ireland. Dissolution or the dismissal of Asquith in favour of someone who would request of dissolution of parliament was the only way to avoid these two problems from getting progressively worse. The dismissal of a Prime Minister with a majority in the Commons by the monarch had last been attempted in 1834 when William IV had attempted to dismiss Robert Peel, this was quickly reversed after the condemnations from many in the political arena. The King, while legally allowed to dismiss Asquith, was warned by the Prime Minister in no uncertain terms that it would be very much unwise to attempt to dismiss him.

Such was the feeling of anger on the Conservative benches, that calls of ‘traitor’ when the issue came up in the House and the Prime Minister. Herbert Asquith was present, were not uncommon. In one instance after several members were ordered out of the chamber by the Speaker of the House of Commons, James Lowther, Winston Churchill and J. E. B. Seely, the Secretary of State for War, were walking out of the chamber when Ronald MacNeil, an Ulster Unionist MP happened upon them. He was so incensed by the Home Rule bill that he seized the Speaker’s copy of the Standing Orders which he then proceeded to hurl with alarming accuracy at Churchill’s head. The debates of the third Home Rule Bill were among some of the worst scenes of parliamentary disorder and ‘chaos’ seen in during the twentieth century.

Bonar Law’s opposition to the bill took an alarming turn in 1914 when he happened upon a strategy with Lansdowne in the Lords, to help make the enforcing of the Home Rule bill in effect impossible for the Liberal government. The Army (Annual) Act was a bill introduced annually upon which the running and discipline of the nation’s army depended upon. If the act were not passed, the position of a soldier would be in effect the same as that of a civilian. By refusing to pass the act, parliament could perhaps make the army useless as an instrument for the government to force its policy, domestic and foreign, through. Bonar Law, Lansdowne, and the Conservative benches idea was to amend the bill so as to ensure that military discipline and order would be nigh on impossible in Ulster until after a general election, something they had been demanding for well over a year. The bill presented a catch-22 for the government. If they passed it the opposition would have won a great victory, while if it was rejected the opposition would have succeeded in preventing military order and discipline from being put into force in Ulster. What makes this alarming is the fact that on the continent it would appear that the drums of war were beginning to beat ever louder until eventually, they would hit a crescendo sparking a supposedly inevitable European conflict. Britain would be in no way ready to fight said conflict without the passage of this bill. No government would be able to continue to run and function under these circumstances, making a general election in effect a certainty.

Bonar Law waited out for the first few months of 1914 while the date for renewal of the bill on the 30th April 1914, came ever closer. The Conservative leader’s resolve over the issue appeared to wane in March, with an apparent opposition to the move being made by the likes of Balfour and Curzon. The party backbenches were littered with many former military officers who were alarmed with what their party leader’s actions could lead to for the military. After a meeting with Carson’s second in command in Ulster, James Craig, and Lansdowne in late March, Bonar Law was resolved to maintain his strategy on the matter. The amendment was tabled by the Conservative and Unionist majority in the Lords, which was passed by that house soon after. It was struck down by the Liberal and Irish Parliamentary Party dominated Commons soon after. The two factions were at metaphoric loggerheads over the issue, neither side wanting to budge. Bonar Law felt betrayed by Asquith after a series of meetings in which Bonar Law had misunderstood Asquith’s assurance he would bring up an Ulster exemption in a cabinet meeting as an assurance he would push for Ulster exemption in the cabinet. As the time ticked out for the renewal of the bill, Asquith panicked and realised that without the army, Home Rule would be virtually impossible to implement. As a result along with Home Rule bill itself, a suspensory act was also added to the statute books along with the bill, in effect pushing the issue into the next parliamentary session.

The crescendo in Europe finally occurred with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on the 28th June 1914. This set into motion the intricate alliance system in Europe and would see the continent descend into war in little under a month. Britain, however, was to remain out of the conflict, with its military in effect in disorder, leaving its assurance to protect Belgian neutrality mere words on paper. The conflict, which would until conclude a little bit after Christmas of that year, saw a victory for the ‘Central Powers’ alliance of Germany and would usher in a period of German dominance on the continent.

By the next year, Asquith’s government could no longer continue on in its current form. On top of the overhanging threat of civil war in Ireland, which had yet to materialise, the issues of women’s suffrage and the various industrial strikes up and down the country, saw the country and the government brought to an effect standstill. Under these circumstances, Asquith was forced to call a general election for the 9th June 1915. The perceived weakness and inaction of the Liberal government on these issues, among others, seemed to spell defeat for the government.

Indeed the country on the 10th June 1915 woke up to the news that the ‘National Unionists’ (the new name of the newly formed party organisation between the Conservatives, Liberal Unionists, and linked to the Scottish and Ulster Unionists) under Bonar Law had won a strong majority over Asquith’s Liberal Party. Home Rule seemed to be dead in the water on account of the strong Unionist majorities in both Houses of parliament. While the threat of the UVF inciting a paramilitary campaign against the government receded, the threat of the Nationalist equivalent - the Irish Volunteer Force (IVF) increased very much, this is despite its reluctant leader, the IPP leader John Redmond, seeking to diffuse the situation and prevent civil war in Ireland.

---

[1]Some sections applied from a stencil on the Irish Home Rule crisis from the Tory/Unionist perspective.
 
Last edited:

Asami

Banned
*rushes to finish my UK update for Hakkou Ichiu so you can't use any of the ideas we talked about* ;)

Mmmm... good update tho.
 
Something something 3:10 to Yuma reference something

Huh? You kids and your weird terms. :p

I'm so in.

But will you do the Hokey Pokey and turn yourself around?

This looks very good

Thanks.

Very interesting indeed.

Thank you indeed very much. :)

Well, I see the Easter Rising is getting moved up a bit in timeframe and now in scale.

That'll be covered under Bonar Law, that I can assure you.

*rushes to finish my UK update for Hakkou Ichiu so you can't use any of the ideas we talked about* ;)

Mmmm... good update tho.

Bonar Law is copywrited by me, I'm afraid.

Thanks. :)

So no poor little Belgium this time...

What do you mean, Flanders-Wallonia is a lovely country. ;)

The bastard!

@Gonzo you've killed Poirot!

Oui? Moi?

 
JbzAcEK.png


Andrew Bonar Law
1915-1923
National Unionist

"The Reluctant Warrior King"
The 'warrior king' Andrew Bonar Law helped to unite the fractured Conservative Party and their Liberal Unionist allies after the trauma that was the 1906 general election and the two disappointments in 1910. Striking a different tone to his predecessor Arthur Balfour, who was known for his 'masterly witticisms' in parliament, rather Bonar Law introduced an abrasive 'new style' of speaking, with its harsh, accusatory rhetoric continuing to dominate British politics to the modern day. Bonar Law was personally reluctant and comfortable in using such rhetoric, indeed at the State Opening of Parliament in 1912 he personally apologised to Asquith for his coming speech, asking the Prime Minister that he "hoped you will understand]."

The new Conservative government was met immediately by a variety of problems, namely Ireland, industrial relations, and the repercussions of the conflict on the continent. The European War, as it was dubbed in some quarters of the press, had concluded a little bit after Christmas in 1914, as most people had expected when it had broken out earlier that year. The result was a victory for the German alliance 'The Central Powers', comprising of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. Victory had come quickly for the Germans who ensured that once the Belgian line had crumbled, so would the French line. The peace agreement, drawn up in early 1915 saw the German sphere of influence over Europe further extended with the dissolution of Belgium into in effect the puppet state of Flanders-Wallonia. The creation of a minor buffer zone along the Russian border, formed by a rump state of Poland and the Baltic States was yet another insult added to injury for the Franco-Russian alliance. This was greatly concerning to the Prime Minister and to Arthur Balfour, the Foreign Secretary, who, along with the Secretary of State for War, Lord Derby began to draw up a contingency plan if, and perhaps when, a war with Germany would break out in the coming years. As it would turn out the British army would meet a foe, but it would, in fact, be far closer to home.

Bonar Law and the National Unionists had been elected primarily on their strident opposition to Home Rule in Ireland, indeed this opposition was sincere on Bonar Law's part, owing to his past connections to the province of Ulster. Not long after taking office, it was announced that a repeal of the Home Rule Act would be introduced by the new government, indeed by the Prime Minister himself. To the calls of 'shame' and the glare of the embattled Liberal leader (who had just seen off a leadership challenge by Lloyd-George), Bonar Law introduced the bill into parliament. As opposed to the rather rough circuit that the 3rd Home Rule Bill had encountered after its introduction in 1912, the repeal bill went rather smoothly through the Commons, passing with the support of some anti-all Ireland Home Rule Liberals (such as Thomas Agar-Robartes, Clifford Cory and Hillaire Belloc.) The House of Lords predictably voted in favour of the repeal bill by a large margin. While this repeal led to anger among many in Ireland and contributed to the spike in the membership of the paramilitary Irish Volunteer Force (IVF); it was, however, unlikely that the IVF would take up arms after the repeal bill. The first reason was that Redmond was completely opposed to the application of violence (he was also opposed to the IVF as well, only becoming the leader so he could control and moderate it) and had the support of at least half of the members of the IVF. The more radical wing of the IVF, the National Volunteers were supportive of taking up arms but were pragmatic and realistic enough to see that they were hopelessly outgunned and outmanned by the British army and the Ulster Volunteers. Rather a group of radical Irish Republicans led by Patrick Pearse. These individuals supported maintaining the Republican tradition of blood sacrifice and risings against the British in order to eventually gain Irish independence (not simply Home Rule) as a fully fledged republic.

The group were members of or were aligned to the radical Irish Republican Brotherhood who had infiltrated a variety of groups ranging from the GAA to Douglas Hyde's Gaelic League. The rising commenced on Easter Monday in 1916 and lasted until the Friday. Many of the participants recognised that they were unlikely to survive the rising and that it was in effect a suicide mission (James Connolly would remark that "we are going out to be slaughtered.") Indeed the increased readiness of the military and the government's surveillance network were nearly caught off guard by the rising. Occupying a variety of key positions in Dublin, namely the GPO, the rebels held out while being faced by sniper and long range weapon fire. In the ensuing fighting, nearly 100 rebels were killed, including Connolly, while nearly 200 British soldiers and over 300 civilians were killed. When a mortally wounded Pearse agreed to an unconditional surrender on a Friday afternoon, the remaining rebels were subjected to a hail of rotten food, rubbish and sharp objects at the rebels, due to the damage, death, and destruction that they had caused in the nation's capital. Not wishing to further inflame feelings and taking a leaf from the response to the Young Irelander and Fenian uprisings of 1848 and 1867 respectful, the rebels were all given long prison sentences with hard labour. It wouldn't matter for Pearse who would die several days after he acquiesced to an unconditional surrender. The government would allege within internal memos that the rising was a 'Sinn Fein Rising.' This is incorrect due to the party's leader Arthur Griffith being decidedly anti-revolutionary nationalist and favoured an Austro-Hungarian dual monarchy settlement for Ireland (in order to appease Unionists fearful of an all out Irish Republic.) While this would initially harm Sinn Fein, the fact that it was seen as a truly radical alternative to the IPP was on the cards would be of a benefit to the party in the coming years.

It was under these circumstances that the country went to the polls in September 1919. The election, held at a time of Bonar Law's choosing was seen to be good timing for the National Unionists due to the perceived infighting within the Liberal Party and the generally good economic news. The election was also called due to Bonar Law's realisation that the noise made on the subject of tariff reform, which had reared its ugly head once again, had to potential to sink his government if the parliament was allowed to run its full term. He, therefore, called the election for early September. While the Liberal campaign was generally seen to be panicked and disorganised, the National Unionist campaign was comparatively low key, with posters appearing which urged people to 'Vote National: To Keep Britain on the Good Road' and suggestions that a vote again the National Unionists could let in a Liberal minority government propped up by socialists. The tactics worked as the National Unionists were returned with 385 seats (up two on 1915), the Liberals fell further down to 163 seats, Asquith himself lost his East Fife seat to the Unionist candidate Alexander Sprot. Labour was the main beneficiary of the Liberal collapse winning 77 seats. In Ireland, Sinn Fein had ridden the wave of public dissatisfaction over the IPP's failure to achieve Home Rule (once again), they took 16 seats, mainly at the expense of the IPP who (under new leader John Dillon) fell to 54 seats; the minor All-for-Ireland league halved in size as its non-sectarian nationalist message was drowned out. As a result of the Nationalist disorder, the Irish Unionist Association made some headway, gaining 9 seats from the IPP, including three south of Ulster. The election was also notable for the numbers of minor parties elected, two Independents (including Horatio Bottomley) were returned, an Independent Liberal was also elected, as were two Independent Irish Nationalists and an Independent (Southern) Unionist. Henry Hyndman finally won a seat for his National Socialist Party, while up in Dundee Edwin Scrymgeour defeated Winston Churchill to take a seat as one of Dundee's two MPs, for his Scottish Prohibition Party. In Smethwick Labour candidate John Emanuel Davison was defeated by less than 100 votes by Christabel Pankhurst, a leading suffragette running for the newly formed Women's Party.

The government, however, continued to experience a variety of problems that had been dogging it prior to the election. Since the government had come to power in 1915, industrial relations had been a pressing issue for several years. Arthur Balfour, during his Premiership, had joked "I don't even know what a trade union is." By 1919 it was no longer a laughing matter for the government as various industrial strikes, mainly in the north. These threatened to undermine the government and had the potential to push the country, or parts of it, to a standstill. Bonar Law and his Chancellor Austen Chamberlain were both reluctant to take the fight to the unions and resolved to solve the issue via pushing for negotiations between managers and the strikers' representatives. While it may appear weak, the move did avert a potentially crippling general strike up and down the country; there was, however, an ulterior motive for Bonar Law's drive to solve the issue as soon as possible. Daily Express owner Lord Beaverbrook and Mail owner Viscount Rothermere, putting aside their general animosity for each other, decided to turn their respective rags' fire on the issue of protectionism or Imperial Free Trade. The issue had threatened to split the Tory Party apart before during the Balfour government, and in many ways, it had done so in the form of Joseph 'Empire Joe' Chamberlain. Both Beaverbrook and Rothermere have committed protectionists in favour of Imperial Free Trade, Bonar Law, however, found himself in a predicament over the issue. If he were to side with the powerful press barons and probably where he personally stood on the issue, it would alienate the free-trade wing of the party (headed in part by the powerful 4th Marquess of Salisbury, James Gascoyne-Cecil.) If he were to appease the free-trade faction the threat of a split in the party and the potential for the formation of an 'Imperial Free Trade' party by Beaverbrook was a distinct threat. The fretting over the issue contributed to the general decline in the Prime Minister's health. Bonar Law during this period also pushed for an openness towards great self-government for India, along with Edwin Montagu's (who had proposed the policy to Bonar Law), this was widely detested and caused much dismay among rank-and-file Conservatives. Bonar Law was a deeply personal man, who had resolved to focus solely on politics after the death of his beloved wife Annie in 1909. This stressful work ethic combined with further coal and rail strikes in 1921 and a whiff of a moral and financial corruption scandal in 1921-22 helped to take its toll on Bonar Law's health.

Bonar Law was floored by his diagnosis with terminal cancer in early 1923, soon finding that he would no longer be able to physically speak in Parliament. After much fretting, he handed his resignation to King George on the 22nd May 1923. Law did not offer any advice on who his successor should be, but the ultimate decision of the King was expected by many inside and outside of Westminster. Bonar Law would retire to his residence in London, where he would die aged 65 at the end of October.

Bonar Law is generally rated as an above average to good Prime Minister in modern polls and academic evaluations. They point to his strong leadership concerning the issue of Ireland and in the realm of foreign affairs (avoiding embroiling in the nation further in European affairs), while critics point to his perceived lack of leadership over industrial relations and on the tariff issue, which would come to a head by the end of 1923, with disastrous consequences for the Tories and their new leader. His use of strong, if not abrasive rhetoric in the Commons, has led to some describing Bonar Law as the first truly modern British Prime Minister.
 
Last edited:
Top