TLIAD: Shuffling The Deck


macmillian_by_lordroem-d7liy12.jpg

1964-1968 Harold Macmillan (Conservative)
The 3 of Hearts

The Austerity Statesman Who Hid From The Public Eye

Harold Macmillan, nicknamed ‘Shittymac’ by his more puerile detractors, was the Conservative Party’s last attempt to steady a drifting ship via an elder statesman. In the aftermath of Douglas-Home’s resignation, Iain Macleod and Rab Butler had begun to lobby the magic circle for a chance at the top job. Macleod was dismissed almost out of hand by the same men who remembered too well what happened when Douglas-Home, the pliable young radical, had convinced them to put him in office. Butler, too, tainted his chances when his desperation for the leadership translated into a rather public campaign of lobbying MPs at conference. This vulgarity was not to be tolerated.

And so, two months after Douglas-Home announced he would resign the leadership in the aftermath of the 1961 election, the magic circle turned to the Last Hero Standing. Harold Macmillan, a veteran of the Great War and one of Churchill and Eden’s allies during Appeasement, found himself called upon to lead the party to which he had given his whole life. A charming figure with a sense of noblesse oblige, he provided an obvious contrast with the Callaghan government. A health scare in 1962 saw him warned by doctors of possible cancer, but this had disappeared within the year. Forever a slightly more cautious man, he nevertheless campaigned with renewed vigour, and a leak of his health fears to the press backfired and attracted public sympathy across 1963. When Callaghan appeared out of place at the funeral of President Nixon, the public longed for a Douglas-Home-like figure to represent them on the world stage - or, indeed, a Macmillan.

When the election of 1964 placed him in Downing Street, Macmillan was still surprised at the result. Callaghan’s timing had been misjudged, but a narrow Labour victory had been expected. The people were prepared to give the Tories a chance, it seemed. Initially confident that the Conservatives could govern as Douglas-Home had done, Macmillan’s hopes were dashed in the crash of 1965, where Callaghan and Wilson’s ‘overheated economy’ came crashing down around their successors. Attempts to blame the previous government fell on deaf ears, and Macleod’s radical and forthright budget, with its talk of ‘unavoidable reductions in public expenditure’ dominated the headlines. Macmillan tried to remain above economics, pointing out instead the ‘quality of life success story’ of post-war Britain. Callaghan lambasted him in the House for this. “Mr Speaker,” began a memorable quip, “is the Prime Minister living in the same country as the rest of us? Is he really not aware that most of our people have never had it so bad?”

At the end of 1965, with agitation in Botswana increasing, Macmillan gave his famous ‘winds of opinion’ speech. “I will not allow the British state to be buffeted about,” he told television viewers, “by the winds of fickle international opinion.” This would define his foreign and colonial policy. As President Reagan stepped up American involvement in Korea, Macmillan gained rare plaudits from friends and foes alike when he held firm to a commitment to keep British troops out of harm’s way. Korea was not Viet Nam - the public view of the conflict was influenced by television and photojournalism, bringing its stalemated horror to Western homes night after night.

On decolonisation, however, Macmillan proved to be a man on the wrong side of history. Recent scholarship has put his obstinance on the matter down to the chaos of the previous government’s attitude to the process, which had seen some nations in Africa granted independence without the slightest consideration for post-Imperial infrastructure or meaningfully democratic power structures. When Ian Smith made his ‘unilateral declaration of independence’ in Rhodesia in late 1965, Macmillan pressed the British government to find a way to legitimise the Smith government over time, and eventually accept Rhodesia’s status. Simplistic commentary accuses Macmillan of racism over this - the anti-fascist was nothing of the sort. A patrician, however, he most certainly was. Seeing African not as black or white but in terms of ‘readiness’, he demonstrated his views by, in 1966, launching a programme of ‘educational aid’ for Rhodesia and a number of colonies in Africa. Decolonisation would be slow and steady if Macmillan got his way.

Which, of course, he would not. By 1967, the economy was not so much on its feet as shakily standing on one leg and just about managing to remain upright. Macmillan’s government, and his own appearance, had begun to reek of staleness and a lack of dynamism. He famously never reshuffled his Cabinet once during his four year premiership (aside from replacing Joseph Godber with John Profumo when the former resigned over budget leaks) and many compared his government to one more suited to the booming years of the 1920s. As Labour rallied and made headway in the polls, Macmillan grew personally apathetic toward running the country, spending long hours at his club and even, it was rumoured, taking to drink. He refused, however, to resign as Conservative leader, and attempts to purge him failed when the Magic Circle closed ranks around their vanguard leader. This set in motion the Tory Civil War of the late 1960s, which culminated in the formal process for electing a leader from among the Parliamentary Conservative Party. That, however, would first take place after Macmillan’s time in office.

As 1968 dawned, the world was an uncertain place. Reagan was doubling down in Korea, and growing frightened of the anti-war Republican faction headed by Nelson Rockefeller. That year’s election would see Reagan lose power, but it would also see the Seollal Offensive irrevocably turn the American people against Korea. In Britain, trade union strife was on the rise, and marches demanding ‘freedom for Africa’ occurred almost every weekend, with largescale riots breaking out on the May bank holiday. The atmosphere of the year was captured by Michael Foot's infamous Hang The Rich speech (a title that comes from a misquotation of this fiery address to the Rhymney Socialist Society). Foot would be sacked from the Shadow Cabinet for his remarks, and remains to this day a controversial figure who epitomises the Angry Left.

Macmillan, meanwhile, was often nowhere to be found. He gained a reputation as an invisible Prime Minister, unwilling to actually do anything. The announcement of an election, only four years after the last one rather than the expected five, was a bolt from the blue, and the Conservatives grudgingly readied themselves for a pasting. The public were only too happy to provide one. Macmillan resigned as leader of the Conservative Party the following day, and died only three years later.

Historians today have little to say about Harold Macmillan. Public opinion ranks him low among post-war PMs, and he is considered the last of an out-of-touch generation that sought to govern Britain simply out of a sense of entitlement. Those who say he was a stodgy, unimaginative person are probably wide of the mark - in his youth, he was radical figure in the troublemaking right on the Conservative Party, and in personal terms he is believed to have been entertaining and innovative until the end.

But when it came to his leadership style, there is no polite way of describing him. He was a firm hand on the tiller that came to power when the boat needed to be turned around. When this became clear to him, he chose not to adapt, or to resign - he retreated from the public eye, leaving the country’s leadership in a vacuum, fought over by sharks circling in the race to succeed him. His selfishness cost Britons jobs, and many British subjects their lives. There is only one statue to him in all the United Kingdom, including Westminster - it stands on a side road in Brighton, his adopted home. It bears the headline the Brighton Argus ran when he took office: ‘Local man becomes Prime Minister’.​
 
Last edited:
If I had to make a guess, after Wilson (who is the only Labour one left until the 1990s), we get to see the Ice-Cream Lady see what hand she was dealt with.
 
Most uncontroversially loved Tory PM of recent years. It must be done :D

To be honest this could be difficult, even in Thaxted I really struggled with seeing Peggy win even though I had a lot of sympathy with 'The Programme'. That said, if there are any who could pull it off then it's our democratic socialist duo!
 
Really good TL, I really like all the details that it's added, it's quite difficult to believe that anyone could write so much so good in a day, but hey, you surely can :D

For some reason, it seems as if this Mcmillan is the TTL English equivalent of Rajoy, no reshuffles, austerity, hides form the cameras, dubitative...
 

Heavy

Banned
This is a pretty original idea; I don't think I've ever seen a "same guys, but out of order" premise before, but it's a lot of fun to read, and very interesting.

How about the American presidents? Obviously, they're not the focus, but from what I can see, so far it's been Truman (1945-1949), Eisenhower (1949-1957) and Reagan (1965-1973) so far. Nixon was mentioned, so I assume he won in either 1956 or 1960 (or both), but so was his funeral, of which Callaghan was an attendee. What are the circumstances of Richard Nixon's apparent demise? Was he shot dead in Dallas? Was Reagan his Vice-President?
 

Thande

Donor
Nice, I'd actually forgotten we hadn't had Macmillan already.

1964 seems a wee bit early for Reagan, unless it's one of those "he went into local politics in Hollywood and stayed a Democrat" things so it put him down the path earlier.
 
Poor Macmillan. And someone gets sacked from the Shadow Cabinet in 1968 for making a radical and potentially offensive speech whose title is a popular misquotation. Hmmmmm.... :rolleyes:

I suppose it has to be Wilson now, unless my pet theory of a Labour Heath comes to anything.
 

AndyC

Donor
Surely it'll be Callaghan returning, followed by Wilson as an "unelected PM" who loses against Thatcher.

Thatcher to be replaced by Heath?
 
Nice, I'd actually forgotten we hadn't had Macmillan already.

1964 seems a wee bit early for Reagan, unless it's one of those "he went into local politics in Hollywood and stayed a Democrat" things so it put him down the path earlier.

The Americans are even more of a 'bit of fun' than the TLIAD's main subject. Not a huge amount of thought is going into them, but we wanted to try to mix everyone up - or at least have them remembered completely differently to OTL (which some have correctly suggested is the main motivator for this TL). For Reagan, think of him as a Dan Quayle 'Housewives Love Him' choice for Nixon's second term, who ends up in power after a tragic day in Dealey Plaza (IT'S A FIXED POINT).

Next update shortly, thank you very much for your comments, everyone. They're fueling us.

Incidentally, we're over 24 hours in now but we do plan to get this done before midnight tonight.
 
For Reagan, think of him as a Dan Quayle 'Housewives Love Him' choice for Nixon's second term, who ends up in power after a tragic day in Dealey Plaza (IT'S A FIXED POINT).

So was it Craig Charles, Edward Blake, or Marge Simpson on the Grassy Knoll in TTL? :p

Lovely stuff - Macmillan seems to have the same kind of windbag reputation I always lumped on him, which somewhat makes up for poor Attlee's mauled reputation. I'm wondering just who might be in office during Douglas-Home's 1973 anecdote, but I'll keep my speculation to myself...
 
callaghan_2_copy_by_lordroem-d7lj5dc.jpg


1968-1972 James Callaghan (Labour)
The King of Diamonds


Sunny Jim Two: Consensus Boogaloo

Labour’s return to power was something of a foregone conclusion by about mid-1966. Callaghan had remained leader, facing down a challenge from George Brown in 1964. Embarking on a ‘listening campaign’ in which he travelled around the country (to a reception often more starstruck than that which met the Prime Minister when he was on the doorstep) Sunny Jim was back on the steps of Downing Street by May 1968 - “regardless of which party is in power,” the newly returned Prime Minister said to the reporters jostling for position - “we have always been taught that the Treasury has to be in charge. It is about time that the British people deserved to have the government that they want in power, rather than what the Whitehall Mandarin insists that they should have - government should not be a nursemaid.”

Callaghan’s words had an effect. The term “Nursemaid State” - a left-wing criticism of a pervasive, controlling establishment force throwing diktats upon the working-class - proved an effective counterpoint to the Conservative opposition, who were still reeling from their defeat the previous year.

Callaghan was also more of a statesman during his second term. President Johnson - himself an old hand brought back to save his party - had a good rapport with Sunny Jim. However, after a tragic heart attack in 1971, the elitist, Massachusetts millionaire who followed LBJ did little to give Callaghan - or the world - the impression that he was much more than an empty suit.

Despite comparative success abroad (including brokering a ceasefire in Korea when General Jeong’s corrupt, wildly unpopular regime in Busan finally collapsed in 1971, but not before Johnson entered history as the President who got the United States out of Korea), the Prime Minister’s domestic record did not enjoy the dizzying popularity of his first administration. Despite emerging from the mid-Sixties recession with a decent growth rate, the government struggled to regain the “Dutch Syndrome” ethos that had proven so electorally successful in the pre-Macmillan era. Despite being riven by in-fighting, by the end of the decade, the Conservative Party had regained a healthy lead in the polls and party dissatisfaction with the Labour leader threatened the Prime Minister’s own position. However, the events of Monday 26th January 1970 were to transform the political climate.

The Primrose Hill Declaration remains one of the most decisive events in post-war British political history. Dissatisfied with what they perceived to be a “devastating result” of the leadership reforms, which took responsibility for electing the leader of the Conservative Party by the consensus building “Magic Circle” in favour of a ballot of all serving MPs. Whilst an effective means of breaking the power of the aristocratic grandees, Enoch Powell’s election had driven home the right-wing course that the Conservative Party that - seemingly inexorably - set for herself. At a private lunch at the Carlton Club just after the New Year, a group of prominent members of the Tory left met to discuss their future.

The result was the so-called “Primrose Hill Declaration” - although the tabloid press preferred the term “The Sermon On The Mound” for the somewhat evangelical language that the defectors crouched themselves in. From the Shadow Cabinet, the former Foreign Secretary, Francis Pym was joined by his old colleagues, Reginald Maudling and Robert Carr - whilst the dissatisfied backbenchers were represented by Ian Gilmour, in his guise as Deputy Chairman of the 1922 Committee. Adding a sense of gravitas, but doing little to dampen speculation of the schism being led by people passed over for promotion, was the Earl of Saffron Walden - Rab Butler - who had been ruminating his next move in self-imposed exile among the Crossbenchers. The ‘Infamous Five’ - as they were soon dubbed by likes of the Daily Mail - set out their stall in a brief statement lasting under ten minutes. ”Britain has lost its way,” Pym stated bluntly, ”And there is little sign that the Conservative Party - seemingly content to dash itself upon the rocks in a destructive act of self-imposed, ideological vandalism - can help to redress the balance. We instead call for the establishment of a new party to represent the British ideal of private enterprise, economic moderation and social tolerance. In the past, this was a term that seem to epitomise the Conservative Party, but decisions by the leadership have corrupted that title beyond all recognition - the party of Peel, Disraeli and Eden is no more - instead, we announce the formation of an Organisation for Christian Democracy and invite politicians of all existing parties to join us in this historic endeavour.”

In a matter of minutes, the British political system seemed to have been turned on its head. Powell, while a brilliant intellectual and orator, always made things worse for himself when he tried to confront the accusations that he was mad-eyed and, frankly, a ‘nutter’. His decision to attend the wreathlaying at the Cenotaph wearing his wartime medals attracted derision and, due to the ignorance of certain press photographers, a damaging rumour that he had worn medals he had not earned. “Enoch Powell’s VC” is the answer to many pub quiz questions on urban legends to this day. As the Nutty Right continued to control the Conservatives, and the OCD formally registered as the Christian Democratic Party and took their seats (joined by a dozen other MPs, only one of whom resigned his seat to force a by-election), it seemed British politics was on the brink of a sea change. It appeared to be one that Callaghan did not wish to be around to see.

Rumours that Sunny Jim was on his way out began to circulate in the spring of 1971. He finally confirmed in January 1972 that he intended to resign the following month, and allow his successor to call an election once a new government had been formed.

When his replacement as Labour leader had been elected, Callaghan retired as Prime Minister. He was still a relatively young man in the field of politics, and took a job that would keep him on the world stage - he became the Managing Director of the IMF.

The second Callaghan government achieved a great deal during its four years in office. Homosexuality and abortion were legalised, and the death penalty was finally formally outlawed (having been ‘suspended’ since a Private Member’s Bill in 1966). This was in some ways making up for lost time - Callaghan strongly felt that his government failed to set the tone of the 1960s correctly. The Macmillan government (sometimes referred to today as an Interregnum) was regularly called ‘four wasted years’.

Callaghan’s time in office is seen favourably by most people today. His premierships were periods when inequality decreased, public spending increased, and nothing too disastrous was ever allowed to happen. His international achievements - bringing peace to Korea and liberation to East Africa - move him from a good Prime Minister to a great statesman. He regularly tops polls seeking to find Britain’s greatest post-war leader.
 
Last edited:
Oh god, Labour will never lose an election again, with Jim 'Safehands' Callaghan! :p;)

Но если есть в кармане пачка сигарет,
Значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день.


Shut up you!
 
Last edited:

AndyC

Donor
Awesome!

It's only just sunk in that world affairs have been shuffled: we had the Vietnam War in the Fifties and the Korea War in the late Sixties/Early Seventies.

And following Johnson's tragic death in office, it looks like Kennedy took over (and was remembered poorly)

The CDP - well, there's got to be an electoral alliance with the Liberals, and I'll bet that it turns out in retrospect that they split the Labour vote but are popularly assumed to split the Tory vote?

Got to be Wilson next, surely?
Then Thatcher, then Heath. Then maybe Brown, followed by Major?
 
Top