TLIA(F)D - Rattling the Dags: Shuffling the New Zealand Deck

Exiled to the political wilderness, Muldoon would continue to launch fearsome attacks at Labour, whose Third Government now sat under their own version of Handsome Jack, a master debater with big plans for New Zealand.

If this means a Kirk Government in 1967, then can I suggest the young Roger Douglas as something like Broadcasting Minister where he can make some handy reforms/deregulation without administering shock treatment to the whole economy.. preferably with his ministerial career going nowhere near the finance portfolio in later years.

[Edit] I see Roger actually was Broadcasting minister in the 3rd Labour Govt in OTL. If he is a bit more free-market obsessed at that stage, it could make for interesting results in that sector (assuming he gets the same position in this TL)

The prospect of a longer Kirk Government without Muldoon following to reverse it's work is exciting - especially if their superannuation savings scheme survives.
 
Last edited:
If this means a Kirk Government in 1967, then can I suggest the young Roger Douglas as something like Broadcasting Minister where he can make some handy reforms/deregulation without administering shock treatment to the whole economy.. preferably with his ministerial career going nowhere near the finance portfolio in later years.

The prospect of a longer Kirk Government without Muldoon following to reverse it's work is exciting - especially if their superannuation savings scheme survives.

Oh, I have my own designs for Mr Douglas... :D Third Labour Government update'll be coming in ten minutes or so, and to whatever controversy may come I say only this: Wikipedia said he was, so I'm calling him a valid Prime Minister.
 
I anticipate backlash for this, which should tell you everything you need to know about this update :rolleyes:

Hugh_Watt.jpg


Hugh Watt – The Red Joker
Labour (1967-71†)

New Zealand’s Favourite Australian

Hugh Watt should probably never have been Prime Minister, but for a stroke of luck which saw him elected to Parliament in the otherwise disastrous 1960 election. Watt soon formed a cabal with Kirk, Rowling, and others to overthrow Nordmeyer and give Labour a chance to put the Curdled ’55 behind it. With the support of Nash before his 1963 resignation, Watt was able to co-opt support from the Federation of Labour (which sought to strengthen ties with Labour to cement itself as more legitimate than the TUC, which by now was restricted to mainly transport workers) and establish a solid leadership. Although the 1965 snap election was a surprise to all, the Australian managed a respectable 38 seats, an increase of two from 1963. By 1967 he had cut his teeth properly on the gears of government, and victory in the Eden by-election in January led him to announce to caucus in a meeting after Social Credit won Hobson that “…after a decade playing at walkabout…it’s time we chuck out the Tories.” In this adversarial atmosphere the news of the snap election was welcomed by Labour, which immediately began campaigning under the slogan “Our New Zealand.” As the results came in on election night in August, it became apparent New Zealand was indeed theirs.

Watt was a unionist at heart and had held the Works and Electricity Ministries in Nash’s Government, where he proved adept at managing to balance the demands of the unions in the heady post-Holland days with what the Government felt it appropriate to grant them. As such, when he became Prime Minister he eagerly took the Labour and Works & Development portfolios, where he said he could “get my hands properly dirty to bring home the bacon for the workers.” As the Minister for these portfolios he often visited factories and worksites around the country to make sure everything was going smoothly at the lowest levels of the economy, the management of which was largely left to his deputy and Finance Minister Norman Kirk, with whom he had developed a close friendship and working partnership during the Marshall years.

If he was not a micromanager of economic affairs, the same could not be said for his stances on social and diplomatic matters. New Zealand troops were withdrawn from combat in Vietnam within his first hundred days in office, and tabled legislation to improve child welfare services which had remained stagnant since the 1940s. Although Australian by birth, he declared himself to be “a citizen of New Zealand and the South Pacific,” and on this basis claimed to be stringently opposed to nuclear testing by France in its Pacific possessions. Kirk handled the economy admirably as well, with a raft of economic regulations introduced, as Watt said, “not to give everyone a free ride, but to give everyone a good foundation upon which to build themselves the life they deserve as New Zealanders.”

Alas, it was not all to be smooth sailing: in his first term as Prime Minister Watt would face two international crises which would determine New Zealand’s place in the international system for decades to come. The Caribbean Crisis of 1969 boiled down to Costa Rica’s refusal of American ‘offers’ of security towards the small state (which had no military) to establish naval bases on the Caribbean coast, an issue leading to a question within FLIP of whether the small states would continue to allow themselves to be entirely subject to superpower bullying, or if, as in Korea, UNO could provide an avenue for resolution of the dispute on a world stage. Using the goodwill amassed through the support provided to the Americans in Korea, New Zealand’s delegation was able to promote the Costa Rican agenda whilst reassuring the Americans that “we do not seek to undermine the Great Powers, particularly those with whom we share close ties forged in peace and war. Rather, we seek their acknowledgement of our existence as friends and partners within this Organisation and the International Community.” As more pressure came to bear from the Latin American states who were largely FLIP participants (and Brezhnev’s death left the Soviets unable to respond coherently from amidst a Kremlin power struggle), the US begrudgingly retracted its demand for basing rights, on the understanding that Costa Rica declare its neutrality to better keep with the Monroe Doctrine. With this agreed, the argument was neatly resolved, displaying the capacity of minor states to act collectively.

Second, the Ten-Day War of 1970, occurring scarcely two months before the election, presented strain for New Zealand in the international arena – on the one hand, Israel had seized most of the Palestine in 1949, some 68% of the total land area, with Palestinian authority confined to the West Bank and North Jerusalem and mistreatment of Arab Israelis leading to increasing tension throughout the 1960s. On the other, Egypt’s reactionary government had committed severe abuses towards its own Coptic population, leading to resentment in the Christian West against them, and Abdullah of Iraq (then half of the Arab Confederacy) had tacitly supported the exile of Kurdish civilians north into Turkey or west to Syria. Watt’s path was difficult, then, and at the FLIP summit convened (many Arab states having joined through the 1950s) in Lisbon the New Zealand delegation led by the Prime Minister headed the emergency council which held negotiations between the two sides after the ninth day of the war ended with the Israeli seizure of Port Suez and the Arab victory at Aqaba. The negotiations were mediated by New Zealand, and the Lisbon Agreement secured a peace which allowed both sides to retain face with as few territorial changes as possible.

Watt had proved victorious in peace and war, and Norman Kirk engaged in a frenetic barnstorming campaign to make sure people were aware of it. Against National, which had “brought back nothing but body bags from its wars,” Labour increased its share of the vote (albeit marginally, as disaffected pacifist and anti-Arab elements defected to Social Credit or National) and seats, from 48 of 84 to 53 of 85 seats. He therefore claimed a mandate to stay the course, and used the country’s recent significance on the world stage to affirm New Zealand’s independence – a trade access deal was signed with the EC and the New Zealand Day Act 1970 established Treaty Day as a national public holiday, while government subsidies for manufacturers rose and the smelter at Aramoana, near Dunedin, was completed.

Mention must be made of the split between Labour and Maori which began to develop at this time. Although Treaty Day was created as a concession to Maori protest, the gap between Pakeha and Maori remained. Although he had lived in New Zealand for most of his life, it was felt by Maori leaders like Whina Cooper (and crucially his own Minister for Maori Affairs, Matiu Rata) that he lacked sensitivity around the issues Maori faced in contemporary society, particularly as Australia had only just granted Aboriginal people citizenship that year. For his part, the Prime Minister largely ignored Maori grievances, as he believed the duty of a Labour Government was to protect the equal rights of all New Zealanders, without regard for ethnicity. While the wound was small in light of his other achievements, it would lie beneath the surface for some years to come.

Nevertheless, 1970 was a good year for Watt, as the country experienced a rebound in economic growth and trade figures remained favourable in spite of slowing exports to Britain, with the zealer remaining firmly within its 4.5% range of the set exchange rate with the US dollar. The Army contingent deployed to Vietnam was finally evacuated as Watt acquiesced to Kirk’s pressure within Cabinet for greater independence from the US, although President Humphrey’s troop drawdown had already taken effect. Towards Christmas, a disability allowance was introduced, major healthcare reform was undertaken with a particular focus on rural areas, and the death penalty was repealed in a vote which saw Jack Marshall shoot in the foot any chances of his returning to power when he made an ill-advised defense of what had become an indefensible position. However, when during the summer recess he decided to visit Scott Base in Antarctica, tragedy struck as the RNZAF Hercules carrying him, three aides, four other passengers and six crew was lost in a crash near Mount Erebus with all aboard killed.

The outpouring of grief for the Prime Minister was tremendous, especially from the working class Labour supporters who had been his core constituency since his first election to Parliament. Although he lacked much of the boisterousness which made his successor’s tenure so memorable, it has to be admitted that he presented a reasonable figure of authority for what turned out to be radical changes in New Zealand society, which would help determine Labour’s future path in much the same manner as that other Australian to hold the Premiership, Micky Savage. The question only remained of whether future leaders would take that path or be otherwise led astray.
 
Last edited:
Hey, if I can count Malenkov as a General Secretary, you can count Watt as a Prime Minister. :)

My biggest nitpick was actually about putting Holland after Fraser - but having read the rest, it seems you're gunning for a more "realistic" shuffle than an "ironic" shuffle.

Was Edmund Hillary on the plane in TTL Erebus?
 
Oh, I have my own designs for Mr Douglas... :D Third Labour Government update'll be coming in ten minutes or so, and to whatever controversy may come I say only this: Wikipedia said he was, so I'm calling him a valid Prime Minister.

Nicely done.. the 'caretaker' gets a longer term as PM.. will be interesting to see if Palmer & Moore have similar extensions to their tenure. Palmer especially strikes me as the sort of reasonable leader who could get some good policy in place.. particularly in 'big picture'/ constitutional issues.
 
Hey, if I can count Malenkov as a General Secretary, you can count Watt as a Prime Minister. :)

My biggest nitpick was actually about putting Holland after Fraser - but having read the rest, it seems you're gunning for a more "realistic" shuffle than an "ironic" shuffle.

Was Edmund Hillary on the plane in TTL Erebus?

True, but you had a hell of a lot more trouble with your one - Khrushchev was a good move, especially as it allowed us Forgotten Lenin, Awesome Malenkov (huh, look at that, we both went for 'pick obscure nonentity as althistorical badass :D), and Holy Stalin. At this stage I feel I'm drifting into an awkward dead zone between "realistic", "ironic", and "lazy". A Bermuda Triangle of alternate history writing, if you will.

As for Sir Ed, he's got other things coming to him (as IOTL he made it atop Everest with Tenzing, and as IOTL we'll never know who came first. Some parts of reality are too good to want to change :)).
 
Also - what happens to capital punishment in TTL? Jack Marshall was adamantly pro-capital punishment, so I can't see him not reviving it. Does Watt abolish it? Or does Muldoon (who was anti-capital punishment) do it earlier?
 
Also - what happens to capital punishment in TTL? Jack Marshall was adamantly pro-capital punishment, so I can't see him not reviving it. Does Watt abolish it? Or does Muldoon (who was anti-capital punishment) do it earlier?

Damn, knew I forgot something. Hold on...

EDIT: *dusts hands* Done!
 
norman-kirk.jpg


Norman Kirk – Two of Hearts
Labour (1971-73)

A Great Man at a Terrible Time

When news came through of Watt’s untimely death, his Minister of Finance found himself thrust into the limelight, first as the man who had to coordinate the search and rescue efforts in Antarctica and the Cabinet, and then as the interim Prime Minister while a suitable replacement was found.

It is a testament to Kirk’s moral character that he didn’t make political hay out of the Erebus Disaster, instead resolving on national television to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry and find out what had happened, while inside the Party he made an impassioned speech to “keep alive Hugh’s legacy, the legacy of a party which has been striving to help all in this country for the last sixty years.” Possibly as a result of this (or, as Johansson has pointed out, as a result of his being less abhorrent to the unions than Rowling), Kirk was handed the leadership within a week of Watt’s death. The mover and shaker behind many of the sweeping changes of the Third Labour Government’s first term in office, he was shaken at his friend’s death and seemed lost in the month after the state funeral held in Wellington (where he wept openly after giving his eulogy), although he had recovered significantly by March.

A general feeling of loss of direction stayed with Kirk through the rest of his term, with his laser-like focus scattered amongst relatively minor policies like abortion and homosexual law reforms, both issues which Kirk disagreed with despite widespread Labour support – although today he is often accused of holding back the cause of women’s rights and gay rights, it is perhaps more fair to say that he was an intensely moral man in a period when these matters were held to be inherently immoral. More popular at the time was his imposition of price freezes to stymie inflation, which had been fuelled by his continued borrowing as Minister of Finance, although this proved to be a Canute-like effort even sooner than his stance on homosexuality and abortion, with domestic manufacturers suffering even as tariffs were raised to the detriment of the zealer.

Two areas where Kirk had significantly more luck were foreign affairs: his decision to recognise the People’s Republic of China opened up what would in time become a massive export market, the voting age was lowered to 18, and Maori were for the first time given an option of whether to vote in general or Maori electorates. Controversially, he announced a moratorium on rugby tests against South African sides in an attempt to fit in with the international community, a move which drew ire from a country still in mourning. A year after Erebus, the government was therefore doing more than ever to try and provide for all within society, even as the good times within the New Zealand economy began to enter the years of darkness and hunger.

The strike of 1972 had few proximate causes which are easy to identify; rather it was the cumulative result of underlying tensions between Labour and organised labour which had been held down by a booming economy and the alliance against the monolithic Marshall government. With those both distant memories, the TUC and FOL were fighting for influence within the working population and thus the Labour Government, and their desire to keep the escalating promises to their members in the face of an increasingly bleak situation, in much the same manner as Kirk’s insistence on sticking to all of Labour’s election promises, came to a head. Stretching through the middle third of 1972, the strike made the stagnating situation worse by shattering investor confidence, with the knock-on effects hitting consumers almost immediately. Kirk’s high-handed attitude didn’t help matters, with his oft-quoted ‘cool off or piss off’ soundbite one of the great political gaffes in New Zealand history. Although the strike abated in September as union delegates were voted out across the country and the TUC was subsumed back into the FOL once and for all, the damage was done, with the death knell effectively sounded a year out from the election.

Kirk undoubtedly saw the writing on the wall, but it didn’t blunt his resolve to force through continued left-wing economic policy in a time that demanded austerity, exacerbating what neo-Marxists today claim could otherwise have been a manageable blip in a smoothly-running economy which was on the track towards an effective democratic socialist state. Whether they were right or wrong (and is generally agreed that the inefficiencies of the export-dependent 1970s New Zealand economy make these critics firmly wrong), Kirk’s intransigence cost Labour the election, with the night of September 15, 1973 going down in Labour history as a black one.

Shattered by the result, Kirk limped back into Parliament as Leader of an Opposition which sat 32 strong to National’s 55, a 20-seat loss which gutted the Labour backbenches and spelled the end of Kirk’s revolutionary programme of change and the unions’ piggybacking along with a rampant Labour Party. National was back in charge, and though their leader seemed a ghost from the past, he was determined to have things go his way this time.
 
The Zealer? That sounds awfully anti colonial ;)

It was actually a proposal IOTL for the name of the currency - given that Holyoake and Marshall both favoured weaning NZ off the Mother Country (but not her sweet sweet export dollars), I felt it a fun one to throw in.

For those curious, the other proposals included crown, doubloon (you've no idea how much I wanted to use that one), zeal, fern, tui, and royal. So yeah, two very visible undercurrents of pro- and anti-colonialism :D

Dollars and cents aside, any other comments from people so far? I should hopefully have the winner of the '73 election up by midnight NZDT, and going to extend TTL through to tomorrow. Because as long as it's December 9 somewhere I get my deposit back :p
 
IIRC, the reason they went with dollar was that it was easier to just use the $ abbreviation on typewriters. Having the zeal would mean having to invent a new typewriter key.
 
It was actually a proposal IOTL for the name of the currency - given that Holyoake and Marshall both favoured weaning NZ off the Mother Country (but not her sweet sweet export dollars), I felt it a fun one to throw in.

For those curious, the other proposals included crown, doubloon (you've no idea how much I wanted to use that one), zeal, fern, tui, and royal. So yeah, two very visible undercurrents of pro- and anti-colonialism :D

Dollars and cents aside, any other comments from people so far? I should hopefully have the winner of the '73 election up by midnight NZDT, and going to extend TTL through to tomorrow. Because as long as it's December 9 somewhere I get my deposit back :p

Well I quite like the bits on the side, like FLIP, but I find it slightly frustrating as the very point of such a TL is to quickly skip through in a plausible manner and not delve deeply into the non leadership detail, but I want to know more!
 
Last one for the night: if you think it's frustrating not getting to read more about the background, imagine what it's like not getting to write it! ;) This one may have gotten out of hand; let me know if any trimming is necessary.

H177_0_PAColl-6075-56holyoake2.jpg


Keith Holyoake – King of Clubs
National (1973-76)

How to Build a House of Cards, in Nineteen Simple Years

Losing the 1954 election and then the Party leadership, Holyoake was almost incensed enough to quit National altogether. But he was nothing if not determined, and when Brian Talboys delivered the news of Muldoon’s defeat legend has it he sat back in his chair, slowly lit a cigarette, and said “Well. Time to get to work then, Brian.” While this may be apocryphal, the manner in which he set about getting back into the saddle of leadership is a truth worthy of fiction.

Although he went to Muldoon offering his condolences and advice for handling the Labour landslide, Holyoake set to work undermining the man who had stolen the leadership from him and driven National out of power for six years (to paraphrase his autobiography: his disdain for Muldoon remained strong throughout the years). Realising early on that Watt was far too popular for him to hope to defeat even if he took back the leadership in time for the 1970 election, Holyoake gave Muldoon his support for the duration, all the while sounding out support for the bid he hoped to make after the defeat he had forecast for Muldoon. Banking on the arrogance he had seen in Muldoon, Holyoake offered to help Muldoon however possible in return for a portfolio in the shadow cabinet. Muldoon, himself seeking to gain all the backing he could to strengthen the bid he would make once the voters realised their folly in electing Watt, accepted Holyoake’s offer and advice as one of National’s elder statesmen in return for the deputy leadership.

The 1970 election going worse than even Holyoake had predicted, he was placed better than he had been at any other time since the waterfront strike to take the leadership and ride into another election. Likewise, the leadership election immediately following it came out in Holyoake’s favour, as Muldoon was exiled in disgrace or, in the words of Talboys, “sent further into the wilderness than Hillary in Antarctica.” With the Erebus Disaster coming as a surprise to all (and despite what a few conspiracy theorists have claimed since, there is no way on Earth Holyoake could have arranged for the navigational failure, tenuous connections to Air New Zealand or no), Holyoake was now one winnable election from the Premiership. His election drive was run more vigorously than his 1954 attempt, and represented National’s most vigorous campaign since Handsome Jack – who, incidentally, ran once more for his Mount Victoria seat, giving a number of speeches which hinted that the zealer would be doing better if Holyoake, agent of his most successful financial policies, were Prime Minister. The strike of ’72 having shattered Labour’ cohesion, Holyoake galloped to victory, giving an impassioned speech which called for “a return to common-sense” and “removing the power from disunited unions and returning it to the mum and dad consumer. As it was, and as it should be.”

The first year of Holyoake’s rule was thus spent adjusting economic policy to cope with the perceived overreach of the Third Labour Government. Benefits were slashed for the unemployed and the unions were crippled by the Employment Relations Act 1973, which removed the union representation quota on export regulation boards and did away with compulsory unionism. Although this move only strengthened Labour in the long run, in the immediate term it gave the National Government immense political capital with an electorate tired of being held to ransom by an increasingly hostile and incoherent TUC. With this stable base built, Holyoake had to try and get the economy back on its feet, and his assumption of the Finance portfolio himself reflected his desire to take the economy back to where it had been during the first half of the Marshall years.

As the months lengthened into a year, Holyoake’s steady if sometimes heavy hand on the tiller appeared to work, as his careful work constructing a shadow cabinet of Marshallite old guard and Muldoonian Young Turks returned handsome dividends in the form of a Cabinet which followed him loyally. Tariffs were raised and devaluation of the zealer saw export revenue increase to 1969 levels – not fantastic, but an improvement. Unfortunately for Holyoake and New Zealand, the stagflation which persisted in the West throughout the early 1970s reached its nadir in early 1974, as the Iranian Intervention failed to protect the Shah’s government from falling and resulted in a raise in oil prices amongst OPEC members to capitalise on the reduced supply. A sudden doubling of the oil price to $6 a barrel (Ƶ7.90) thus hit the country in the gut at a crucial stage in its fragile recovery and inflation took off again, forcing Holyoake to implement a wage freeze.

At the same time, two more events were lurking in the wings of New Zealand society, relatively minor but important at the time. First, the Commonwealth Games debacle, where it became known that Holyoake intended to continue sporting contacts with South Africa, raised hackles across black Africa and eyebrows across the white Commonwealth capitals. Although admittedly a minor point given the small amount of trade with Africa, it was a diplomatic blunder and signalled a dramatic reversal from Kirkist morality, while dividing the country on whether or not the government had any business intervening in sport of all things. Secondly, the death of Norman Kirk from heart failure represented a juncture for both Labour and National. Although Rob Muldoon came out of the woodwork, surfacing from the backbenches to give his sincere and emotional condolences for his fallen adversary, Holyoake’s cool, clipped speech which gave scarcely two minutes to cover two years of Kirk’s leadership (little of it entirely complimentary) came off as sour grapes from a man who’d been pipped at the post by Labour three times over. As Holyoake’s grip on power tightened with the cooling mood in the country, it would take a miracle to save his government.

When the Second Korean War erupted following Park Chung-hee’s assassination by North Korean commandos during the June 1975 Manila Pact meeting in Pyongyang, a bare twenty miles from the Ceasefire Line demarcating the two Koreas, Holyoake must have thought his Christmases had all come at once. Although small, North Korea had developed into an Orwellian nightmare under its founder Kim Il-Sung, and with his death in 1968 his son Kim Jong-Il had determined to consolidate his rule by striking while the Americans, under a dying President Kennedy, had little will to retaliate. But retaliate they did, with K Force reassembled, although conscription was not reintroduced (Holyoake recalling the lessons of Holland). Instead, he trusted that another protracted war, while unfortunate indeed for the Koreans, could mean millions if similar supply contracts could be reached.

But then, once more, defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory as the Soviets, seeking to broaden international ties under Kosygin, supported the UNO resolution condemning North Korea’s actions and renewing the points outlined in 1950's Resolution 83. An impossible coalition of Warsaw Pact and Manila Pact forces therefore launched a counteroffensive against North Korea on July 30th, with Wonsan and Chongjin falling to joint operations before September ended. As the Cold War entered a bizarre thaw in the wake of East-West cooperation to take down a Stalinist dictator, Holyoake’s Cold Warrior rhetoric began to ring hollow.

Heading into 1976 then, New Zealand faced a tough situation. Committing troops to the meatgrinder which was the road to Kanggye, even as the Filipino contingent unearthed concentration camps of a sort unseen for thirty years (well, a lean fifteen if one was from of a Soviet detachment), the trade situation was uncertain at best – with the possibility of trade with the Soviets tempting but entirely contingent on approval from the Americans who were playing their cards close to their chest, Holyoake’s own house of cards came tumbling down, with a collapse in wool prices causing an acute balance-of-payments issue.

Holyoake’s campaign leading up to the October election was therefore almost grimly resigned, his demeanour daring his Labour opponent, a bright young thing who drifted between Nash’s competence and Kirk’s bellicose nature, to test his patience. The Prime Minister was already 72 years old, and even if he wasn’t quite as old as Nash had been at his re-election he was even further from being as popular, even if the Second Korean War ended with victory where the First had seen bloody stalemate. For Labour, the comparison was particularly apt, with their candidate joking on election night to his new Cabinet – elected with a bare two seat majority of 45-43, not including the Social Credit’s with whom they could caucus if worst came to worst – that Korea had proven the graveyard “…of four totalitarian dictators: two Stalinists over there and two Hollanders over here!” From the results National quite agreed: a vindicated Muldoon famously predicted Holyoake would be gone by Christmas, and he was right with more than two weeks to spare.

Such was Holyoake’s legacy: a man of infinite patience who carefully laid his own road to the top (with a stable foundation of those he had knifed to get there), but upon claiming the victory he had sought for twenty years saw his joy turn to ash in his mouth. Though the appalling international situation was no fault of Holyoake’s, the desire to be vindicated in the history books only hampered his efforts to manage the many crises, and ultimately sent National stumbling dazedly back into the woods. As Johansson helpfully points out, though, they had a few men in particular who had navigated the dark path, and might yet lead them back into the broad sunlit uplands.
 
Prediction: there's a surviving Soviet Union in TTL: Brezhev is killed off, and I'm betting it's Kosygin in charge.
 
Top