Just an idea of what GEATO is like.
Greater East Asia Treaty Organisation
Founded in the aftermath of the Second Great War, the Greater East Asia Treaty Organisation is a military and economic alliance consisting of the following nations: the Empire of Japan; the Empire of Korea; the Empire of Vietnam; the Kingdom of Laos; the Kingdom of Greater Thailand; the Federal Republic of Indonesia; the Democratic Republic of Burma; the Republic of Sri Lanka; and the Republic of India. Its legislative headquarters are found in the Greater East Asia Assembly Building in Tokyo, next to the Japanese Diet. GEATO exists both as a framework for a united military front, under which an attack on one member is considered an attack on all and – should all members agree – allows for united offensive action, and as a trading bloc by which Asian nations may trade with the rest of the world as a common group, granting them additional economic power, and may trade with one another without over-hindrance from tariffs.
Representatives meet regularly in Tokyo. Here, policy for the alliance as a whole is decided by vote: usually relating to trade outside Asia or to military action. Representatives are chosen directly by their governments, and voting is a smooth process. At least, as reported in the media - issues are not officially debated or voted on until after furious behind-the-scenes debating, usually coupled with arm-twisting, outright bribery, and occasional threats by Japan. Once it is known how the representatives and their governments will vote, then the official debate begins.
Of all the GEATO nations, the only ones that can make a real claim to being truly democratic are Indonesia and Korea, and maybe Sri Lanka. India continues to be dominated by the Jai Hind party, Burma is led by a military strongman who seems to have no intention of either relinquishing power or dying, and the other nations are very much like Japan: semi-deified rulers presiding over nominally democratic institutions are the window-dressing, while real power is held by cabals of wealthy industrialists and military officers. All of these nations are certainly autocratic, and will not suffer dissent, but neither are they overly repressive or harsh. The average citizen who stays out of politics (or, even better, is a vocal supporter of the status quo) has nothing to fear, and indeed may be grateful for his decent standard of living brought about by industrialisation and modernisation (largely brought about by the rapid expansion of Japanese zaibatsu across the new members of GEATO in the aftermath of the War). Having noted this, there are many among the younger generation (particularly in Vietnam, Laos and Thailand) who want to see real democracy come to their nations, and are starting to become more active. It is hard, though, for young people to gain traction or be taken seriously in nations where authority is generally seen as coming from age and where deference to age is considered a virtue.
Japan, by virtue of being the pre-eminent military power (biggest navy, most advanced air forces, superbomb arsenal), one of the leading economic powers, and the founder-member of the alliance, retains its position of leadership. This has been accepted by other members for a number of reasons: Japanese zaibatsu have invested heavily in developing the economies and industrial bases of most other GEATO members; most members depend on Japan for military equipment (with the notable exception of Korea); those members who share a land border with China need Japan to stave off Chinese domination (Vietnam in particular has a long memory for these things – Tran Hung Dao and the Trung sisters remain national heroes and objects of veneration, for instance); and many feel a measure of gratitude to Japan for evicting Western colonial powers from their nations (though older Vietnamese and Laotians can remember a time when, after throwing out the French, Japan held their nations as sem-protectorates and were more…direct in their dealings). However, a desire for change is beginning to form in the alliance – no country wants to withdraw from GEATO, but they do think that Japan has occupied the centre stage for too long, and that maybe things could be renegotiated along more equal lines.
Historically, Thailand has been considered the second nation in GEATO, largely as a result of being the only other Asian nation besides Japan to resist colonialism and modernise successfully, and also maintaining a strong military. However, without that prestige, Thailand isn’t a particularly rich nation – they’re not poor by any means, but they don’t have a vibrant economy.
If any change in GEATO leadership came about, the main contenders are Korea, India or Indonesia. Over the last five years, the Korean economy has grown rapidly, with great strides being made in electronics, avionics and computer technology. Many analysts believe that the Korean economy could outstrip Japan’s in another five years. Korea has also seen the growth of a strong business culture. However, Korea is somewhat handicapped by a comparative lack of natural resources, and is heavily dependent on imports from its alliance partners. India, by contrast, has abundant resources and a huge population, along with a land army that outstrips most other GEATO members. However, while many cities are heavily industrialised, the nation as a whole is underdeveloped and there are wide gulfs between rich and poor. Indonesia, meanwhile, combines the best of both worlds: a strong economy, thanks to oil sales and wise investment from outside; coupled with a wide range of natural resources and a growing population.
Of course, it could very well be that competition between these three could allow Japan to remain in its position of leadership, but only time will tell.
Economically, GEATO members are reasonably well-off (except for India – the sheer size of the nation means that meaningful development will take some considerable time). Slow but steady industrialisation and modernisation have marked all of the nations – no boom or bust cycles, just steady growth. While the industrial output of individual members lags (somewhat) behind many Western nations, the total output of GEATO is considerable. Likewise, while the average citizen is not as well off as his American or German counterpart, he enjoys a decent standard of living either in a modern city (though with traditional architecture) or in rural areas that now enjoy modern utilities. This means that, while there are those who desire political change, the majority of GEATO citizens follow a philosophy of ‘Things are good now, don’t rock the boat’.
Militarily, GEATO’s combined land and air forces are more than a numerical match for either of the two other Great Powers, while Japan’s navy is the second-largest in the world (just ahead of the High Seas Fleet, which underwent drawdowns in 1970). Technologically, they lag behind the United States, but Japanese (and Korean, these days) military equipment works reliably and will do what it needs to.
Culturally, the alliance was based on the idea of ‘Asia for Asians’. As such, senses of national exceptionalism and chauvinism have developed in member-states (and were always present in Japan). This has become apparent in increasing preference for traditional dress over Western dress (except in the military), the strengthening of traditional religions such as Shinto, Zen Buddhism, and Theravada Buddhism at the expense of Christianity (Islam was already strong in Indonesia), and a fall-off in interest for Western literature art, film and music. Though many older Japanese intellectuals still study French, pre-war British and even American literature, most young people who study the liberal arts across the alliance now focus on the arts of their own countries.
The one major change from traditional Asian ideals that has swept GEATO involves women’s rights. This came about largely because of the demands of the Second Great War on Japan and Korea – as men were drafted, women had to fulfil roles that they hadn’t traditionally. The defining moment of this was the employment of young women in Japanese shipyards, working on those most defining symbols of Japanese warrior pride: the IJN’s battleships Yamato and Shinano. As such, even after the war, women were given more avenues for employment, and as Japan came to set trends across GEATO, this set in elsewhere. Even Indonesia, the only Muslim-majority country in the alliance, has not proved immune to this. Naturally, with paid employment came voting rights, university opportunities, etc. Having noted this, it is still expected in Asian countries that women will end work outside the home when they marry.
Remaining with gender culture: the only GEATO nations where homosexuality is actually illegal are India, Sri Lanka and Indonesia. Outside these nations, it is not encouraged, but neither is any great fuss made about it – as long as men or women continue their family line through marriage and children, and as long as they don’t have children outside their marriages, no-one really cares. However, the promotion of any alternative to the traditional family model is heavily discouraged.
The main perceived threats to GEATO come from China and Australia. China is now loathed across East Asia since their use of fuel-air weapons against cities, their occupation of Northern Burma, and their support of Pakistan. For their part, China remembers the Sino-Japanese War and Japan’s support of the Manchu warlords during the 1930s, and is determined to never again be a victim to Japan. In addition, Chinese leaders still call for the return of Formosa and Hainan (though in private, they recognise that this is all but impossible now). Australia, meanwhile, is seen as a ‘natural enemy’ by Indonesia, thanks to their initial invasion in the Second Great War, the deployment of ANZAC troops during the Independence War, and the ongoing occupation of New Guinea. As long as these nations remain threats, and as long as Japan can provide the ultimate deterrent against them, GEATO leaders remain behind the Empire.
A more insidious threat comes from occupied peoples. Japan's colonies in Siberia and the Philippines are not a problem - the ethnic Russian population of Japanese Siberia has largely been evacuated, replaced with Japanese settlers, Jews and Mongolian refugees, while the Philippines have been largely Nipponicised (and the Moros are perfectly loyal as long as they're left alone on a day-to-day basis - in return for self-government and development assistance, they pay what amounts to tribute to Japan). However, the Japanese protectorate in Southern Malaya continues to be troublesome, while in Thai-occupied Northern Malaya and Cambodia, though full-scale organised revolt has ended, random and uncoordinated attacks on military personnel and Thai settlers are becoming more frequent. As are reprisals and relocations, unfortunately.