If we only took the good, and hope the bad was cancelled out?Just imagine the horrors that will result from THAT union!![]()
The horror is the amount of research we'll end up doing before anything happens...
If we only took the good, and hope the bad was cancelled out?Just imagine the horrors that will result from THAT union!![]()
I'd say a map can be used in a non-border divergent timeline, just to show geographical locations. I've wanted to try out a method for making war-maps lately...If I can throw tuppence into the ring, I would say that maps and flags etc. are usually an essential part of a good TL, unless it's a TL where the divergence from OTL is primarily sociological or short-term and maps and flags are not relevant. Certainly if it's necessary for the reader to keep track of what's happening, as Blochead implies, a map should be used.
Only drawback I can think of is that not everyone knows how to make maps and flags.
So far I've got potential contestants as:
Imajin
Diamond
Amerigo Vespucci
FENK
Blochead
Othniel
Keenir
Nek
Matt
Glen
And as potential teammembers:
BlackMage
Justin Pickard
First potential team:
Othniel & Justin Pickard
Thande said:Only drawback I can think of is that not everyone knows how to make maps and flags.
Are there any conditions on the sorts of timelines that can be entered? I know some people object to "butterfly heavy" timelines, other people object to timelines that include people from OTL born after the POD, many people dislike ASBish elements (e.g. someone discovers how to harness psi-powers) etc.
I don't like that. I mean the OTL person has just as much of chance of being born as any alternate sibling given the same parents. (Plus most Baby Bommers are just coming into power into the 90s, which is the late according to the rules.) People born in the 50s to late 60s should be kept and people shouldn't be penalised if they want to go even further than that...The big issue of course is how to hand people conceived (not born necessarily) after the POD. Given the short timespan of the timelines, (59 years), I think a middle ground would be reasonable. Most of the people active in at least the first 3/4 of the timeline will have been conceived before the POD, so try and mine OTL figures. For the last twenty years, probably more 'Alternate Siblings' and people completely new could be incorporated into the timeline.
I don't like that. I mean the OTL person has just as much of chance of being born as any alternate sibling given the same parents.
(Plus most Baby Bommers are just coming into power into the 90s, which is the late according to the rules.) People born in the 50s to late 60s should be kept and people shouldn't be penalised if they want to go even further than that...
I think we should just let people do whatever the heck they want. It can easily be sorted out by the polls, after all - in a poll for 'Most Realistic', a TL that features an alien invasion will probably not fare well.![]()
I don't like that. I mean the OTL person has just as much of chance of being born as any alternate sibling given the same parents. (Plus most Baby Bommers are just coming into power into the 90s, which is the late according to the rules.) People born in the 50s to late 60s should be kept and people shouldn't be penalised if they want to go even further than that...
Even if you're a Butterfly Nazi, surely a man is shaped by his experiences as well as his birth. The only thing I could see making a big difference necessarily is if he had a disease or was born female (or vice-versa for historical women).
But there are cases of identical siblings exsisting, their only difference being age and expirence but being the exact same genetically! This is extremely against the chances but the only way I'm going to change the genetics of the birth is by change in the parentage.Actually, let's look at that. If we assume that we rerun two people mating at exactly the same time, we can at least say that the ovum would be the same. So in this case only the variation in the sperm counts.
Let's make a huge simplification and say there is no recombination (and this is not the true case). That means the chance of a sperm cell with the same chromosomes as the OTL person reaching the ovum is the same as the chance of a coin toss coming up heads 23 times in a row. That's 1 in 8,388,608. Now, the OTL person has the same chance as any one other sibling being born, but as you can see, the chance of the same genes (absent twinning) being possessed by the same siblings is huge. IF the child were conceived in a different month, then you have to take into account the variation possible in the mother's combination of chromosomes. That would then be a chance of heads coming up every time 43 times in a row. I'm not only going to type that big number.
Think about it, Oth. This is the same reason why you don't see identical siblings being born into families (again absent twinning).
Even if you're a Butterfly Nazi, surely a man is shaped by his experiences as well as his birth.
The only thing I could see making a big difference necessarily is if he had a disease or was born female (or vice-versa for historical women).
But there are cases of identical siblings exsisting, their only difference being age and expirence but being the exact same genetically!
This is extremely against the chances but the only way I'm going to change the genetics of the birth is by change in the parentage.
There's probably about a greater than 50% chance that if they are born the same gender, they'll end up with the same name to the person who was born in OTL.
Does it matter if they are dizygotic twins who happen to be identical? It has the same occurance rate as identical siblings. (They are much easier to track you see.. and are better documented.)You have a reference on that?