John Fredrick Parker
Donor
So @NikoZnate did this amazing TL sometime back about Atenism not only thriving in Egypt, but managing to gain a slight following among the other Bronze Age Civilizations (sponsored by the Pharohs). While Niko does a great job exploring the plausibility and short to medium term prospects for such an endeavor, I got to thinking about it in a different light. See, AIUI the present historical consensus is that the Bronze Age Collapse is essentially inevitable, due to being the effect of geological activities and climate change, that in turn leads to runoff effects our PoD is unable to stop (ie famines, mass migrations, etc); I realize that some here might want to take issue with this analysis, but let's all say, just for the sake of staying on topic, that it is the case.
What I'm interested in here is, if, as of 1177 BC, the Faith of Aten is dominant in Egypt and of noticeable presence in urban centers all across the civilized (western) world, how does this change the civilizations that emerge and thrive in the subsequent Iron Age (circa 1200 to 600 BC)? For me, the most intriguing potential aspect of this is, does Atenist influence lead to affected civilizations taking on more "Egyptian" characteristics as they rebuild?
To take one obvious example -- would monotheism (though not necessarily worship of Aten) be closer to the norm in this alternate western world earlier? Would the "dark ages" be shorter, as there were movements and institutions laying the groundwork for (a more) non-violent state building?
And another particular detail that comes to mind -- I had read that marriage in Ancient Egypt, at least as early as the New Kingdom, was both monogamous and by consent of both parties (ie parents did not "give away" their children to new homes, as was custom among the Greeks and Romans). If there's a religion with some popularity in places like Mycenea and Anatolia that preach of a single "true" way of doing things, and happen to see Egyptian culture as most approximating this "truth", does that lead to this kind of conception of marriage possibly being absorbed into successor *Greek* civilization?
So what do you guys think?
What I'm interested in here is, if, as of 1177 BC, the Faith of Aten is dominant in Egypt and of noticeable presence in urban centers all across the civilized (western) world, how does this change the civilizations that emerge and thrive in the subsequent Iron Age (circa 1200 to 600 BC)? For me, the most intriguing potential aspect of this is, does Atenist influence lead to affected civilizations taking on more "Egyptian" characteristics as they rebuild?
To take one obvious example -- would monotheism (though not necessarily worship of Aten) be closer to the norm in this alternate western world earlier? Would the "dark ages" be shorter, as there were movements and institutions laying the groundwork for (a more) non-violent state building?
And another particular detail that comes to mind -- I had read that marriage in Ancient Egypt, at least as early as the New Kingdom, was both monogamous and by consent of both parties (ie parents did not "give away" their children to new homes, as was custom among the Greeks and Romans). If there's a religion with some popularity in places like Mycenea and Anatolia that preach of a single "true" way of doing things, and happen to see Egyptian culture as most approximating this "truth", does that lead to this kind of conception of marriage possibly being absorbed into successor *Greek* civilization?
So what do you guys think?