Not necessarily but the circumstances are there
The break (between Edward and Warwick) has numerous reasons and not all of the reported ones stand up to scrutiny.
Warwick and his brother were by far the greatest recipients of Royal largesse during the 1460s in terms of influence, land and offices - complaints that Edward was endowing his wife's family at the expense of Warwick just aren't true and beyond his father in law's state office they got very little.
The two men disagreed over foreign policy - Edward favored a traditional pro-Burgundian policy whilst Warwick saw a pro-French deal cutting off support for the Lancastrians as essential.
The King was reluctant to allow his brother's to marry the Neville daughter's - his brother's were diplomatic tools in the late 1460s for alliances etc and Edward may have been concerned that it gave Warwick even more influence - and until Edward had a son George was regarded as the heir to the throne. The problem for Warwick is there weren't many attractive matches around for his girls beyond the Royal brothers - and those that might have worked such as Buckingham had been snapped up by the Queen's family.
In reality Edward was King and wanted to exercise his authority as he saw fit - he was growing up if you like which meant Warwick was losing control - for me the best comparison is Wolsey and Henry VIII's relationship.
Given Warwick's influence over George of Clarence I still think it is likely to still happen as Thomas' survival doesn't really change the cause of the break - incidentally if you give Thomas the stuff assigned to Richard as i have done - by 69 Richard might not have gained much at all which kind of evens out what men and arms they can contribute to Edward's campaign.
The break (between Edward and Warwick) has numerous reasons and not all of the reported ones stand up to scrutiny.
Warwick and his brother were by far the greatest recipients of Royal largesse during the 1460s in terms of influence, land and offices - complaints that Edward was endowing his wife's family at the expense of Warwick just aren't true and beyond his father in law's state office they got very little.
The two men disagreed over foreign policy - Edward favored a traditional pro-Burgundian policy whilst Warwick saw a pro-French deal cutting off support for the Lancastrians as essential.
The King was reluctant to allow his brother's to marry the Neville daughter's - his brother's were diplomatic tools in the late 1460s for alliances etc and Edward may have been concerned that it gave Warwick even more influence - and until Edward had a son George was regarded as the heir to the throne. The problem for Warwick is there weren't many attractive matches around for his girls beyond the Royal brothers - and those that might have worked such as Buckingham had been snapped up by the Queen's family.
In reality Edward was King and wanted to exercise his authority as he saw fit - he was growing up if you like which meant Warwick was losing control - for me the best comparison is Wolsey and Henry VIII's relationship.
Given Warwick's influence over George of Clarence I still think it is likely to still happen as Thomas' survival doesn't really change the cause of the break - incidentally if you give Thomas the stuff assigned to Richard as i have done - by 69 Richard might not have gained much at all which kind of evens out what men and arms they can contribute to Edward's campaign.