One thing that always made me angry about the American Civil War is that, as far I can tell, the United States of America's Ordinance officer, a man named Ripley, wanted to equip the first 75,000 man Militia muster, with mostly smoothbore muskets and Springfield Armory Rifle-Muskets.
There see to have been sufficient revolvers from Colt and Remington, as well as European Arms Maufacturers, to equip both Union and Confederate, but equipping rifle muskets when you have Henry and Spencer, as well as Sharp's rifles that could kill a buffalo, let alone a horse, and Gatling patenting his mechanical gun the next year, the vibe I get from Ripley is he thought armies would fight in Napoleonic fashion, even though most of North America is totally unsuited for such blundering. Shiloh is not the North German Plain, where European armies had clashed for centuries.
Any thoughts?
There see to have been sufficient revolvers from Colt and Remington, as well as European Arms Maufacturers, to equip both Union and Confederate, but equipping rifle muskets when you have Henry and Spencer, as well as Sharp's rifles that could kill a buffalo, let alone a horse, and Gatling patenting his mechanical gun the next year, the vibe I get from Ripley is he thought armies would fight in Napoleonic fashion, even though most of North America is totally unsuited for such blundering. Shiloh is not the North German Plain, where European armies had clashed for centuries.
Any thoughts?