Russian Word: 2021 gubernatorial elections page; 2021 Nikolayevsk-on-Amur gubernatorial election
Last edited:
Cyprus has representation in the UK House of Commons as a constituent territory akin to constituent countries like Scotland or Wales. British Honduras is a colony, so my guess is that they are too minor and underpopulated to warrant greater autonomy.According to the map, British Honduras (OTL Belize) and Cyprus continue to be ruled directly from Britain. What’s stopping them from gaining dominion-level autonomy? Britain won’t lose much; London can still override local laws and the British military can still have bases there.
Looks like you posted the wikipage twice instead of the wikipage and the Russian article.
According to the map, British Honduras (OTL Belize) and Cyprus continue to be ruled directly from Britain. What’s stopping them from gaining dominion-level autonomy? Britain won’t lose much; London can still override local laws and the British military can still have bases there.
Why is Turkestan dark grey? With Khiva and Bukhara I imagine it is because the gubernatorial position is hereditary but what about the rest?
What would happen hypothetically speaking if an Emir or Khan were to commit a treasonous crime against the Tzar? Like saying “The Tzar is a senile old buffoon”This is where the Russian Empire gets weird.
The Emirate of Bukhara still has an Emir, who has total control in his territory. Kokand and Khiva still have a Khan, under the same arrangement as Bukhara. Most crucially, they are not subjects of the Tsar. Though the Emire and the two Khans are subjects of the Tsar and swear fealty to him, but they maintain complete control in their territory, and the Russian Army maintains garrisons and bases there, which makes them this quasi-independent entity which is pretty common globally. They are not arranged under a Russian system of government, and maintain their traditional government and social structure, pretty much left alone to develop as they'd wish to (being part of Russia did help them develop, just from access to market goods).
Now, Ashgabat, Syr Darya, and Samarkand are all directly managed and owned by the Tsar himself (imagine it sorta like Congo under Leopold. Not exactly, but its close). The Duma is allowed to legislate for it, but Russians are discouraged from settling there lets say. The area is exceptionally poor, much poorer than Bukhara, Kokand, and Khiva are. Instead, they are pretty much left to fend for themselves under the nominal control of the Tsar, who appoints local leaders to provide administration of essential resources, supplies garrisons and military forts in the region (as well as a couple airbases, missile silos, and radar stations). There is no court system, and instead disputes are taken to the Tsar himself (this is often delegated), who issues a ruling which cannot be challenged. The Duma has split them off into various administrative divisions, which the Tsar appoints people to administer. They are technically like uyzeds in any other governorate, but they can't elect anyone to the Duma and it's the Tsar's personal territory.
In short, its complicated.
Is there an English language version of the first graphic?
What would happen hypothetically speaking if an Emir or Khan were to commit a treasonous crime against the Tzar? Like saying “The Tzar is a senile old buffoon”
How many people live in these territories? If all three regions are 1) exceptionally poor, 2) unrepresented in the Duma, and 3) deprived of something as basic as a court system, then their long-term economic prospects must be pretty damned bleak - I'd expect labour migration and permanent emigration to further hollow out the population base. Wouldn't Russia be risking political discontent by upholding the status quo? Are there any local movements advocating for either governorate status (i.e. full annexation) or independence?Now, Ashgabat, Syr Darya, and Samarkand are all directly managed and owned by the Tsar himself (imagine it sorta like Congo under Leopold. Not exactly, but its close). The Duma is allowed to legislate for it, but Russians are discouraged from settling there lets say. The area is exceptionally poor, much poorer than Bukhara, Kokand, and Khiva are. Instead, they are pretty much left to fend for themselves under the nominal control of the Tsar, who appoints local leaders to provide administration of essential resources, supplies garrisons and military forts in the region (as well as a couple airbases, missile silos, and radar stations). There is no court system, and instead disputes are taken to the Tsar himself (this is often delegated), who issues a ruling which cannot be challenged. The Duma has split them off into various administrative divisions, which the Tsar appoints people to administer. They are technically like uyzeds in any other governorate, but they can't elect anyone to the Duma and it's the Tsar's personal territory.
How many people live in these territories? If all three regions are 1) exceptionally poor, 2) unrepresented in the Duma, and 3) deprived of something as basic as a court system, then their long-term economic prospects must be pretty damned bleak - I'd expect labour migration and permanent emigration to further hollow out the population base. Wouldn't Russia be risking political discontent by upholding the status quo? Are there any local movements advocating for either governatorate status (i.e. full annexation) or independence?
It's been about 9 months since the armistice between the British and Americans, so, how are the negotiations going? What are the main issues?
Is this one of those "Wait, wtf are these countries supporting different sides of the Nigerian Civil War" moments?
Is this one of those "Wait, wtf are these countries supporting different sides of the Nigerian Civil War" moments?
Australia is on the side contrary to the UK and Canada so it would appear that the British Empire is losing controlLet’s hope it hasn’t strained relations too much between the great powers