Would there be a war over Zoroastrian refugees fleeing to India, and refugee crisis?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe but it would just be Zoroastrian crusaders.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Giving the Jews one representative in the Majlis is totally irrelevant. Jews, and other non-Muslim minorities, have to conform to the rules for the majority - such as women being covered in ways well beyond the most modest Orthodox Jewish customs. There is a reason a huge number of Jews left Iran after Khomeini came to power. By definition to be a Dhimmi is to be a second class citizen, even if you are not forced in to a ghetto or subject to other more obvious daily discrimination. I do agree that an Iranian genocide as opposed to the sort of oppression that would "encourage" those folks to leave, or even forcing them to leave is truly ASB.
 
Jesus Christ, your tone is really aggressive. If you think it's wrong, you don't have to lash out so harshly dude. I thought it was a prospect I thought was interesting. If you don't think so, that's okay.

I like your ideas and value the creativity, but it’s clear from threads like this and the Jesse Owens one that you’re looking at things only on the most superficial level and you don’t take to heart criticism from anyone who understands the topic more. People aren’t trying to naysay, they’re telling you that you fundamentally don’t get the topic you’re trying to discuss, but you blithely ignore that, which is frustrating.

Counterfactual history has taught me different perspectives on a lot of things and made my understanding deeper and more complete. If you actually read what people post in this thread instead of trying to make an absurd scenario happen, you’ll have a deeper understanding of Iran and Shia Islam that you can use with your next creative idea.
 
I like your ideas and value the creativity, but it’s clear from threads like this and the Jesse Owens one that you’re looking at things only on the most superficial level and you don’t take to heart criticism from anyone who understands the topic more. People aren’t trying to naysay, they’re telling you that you fundamentally don’t get the topic you’re trying to discuss, but you blithely ignore that, which is frustrating.

Counterfactual history has taught me different perspectives on a lot of things and made my understanding deeper and more complete. If you actually read what people post in this thread instead of trying to make an absurd scenario happen, you’ll have a deeper understanding of Iran and Shia Islam that you can use with your next creative idea.

Your right man, I should take criticism more to heart. I'm only 13, but I've just been really interested in Alternate history, and I just don't like the same old same old alternate history, so I try to spice it up a bit. I always like constructive criticism, but my knowledge on some topics isn't as good as others, so I just like to put scenarios in the ballpark. I'm gonna try to do so, but thank you for enlightening me.
 
Top