The Winkel-Tripel BAM project

How far should I go with subdivisions?

  • All subdivisions possible

    Votes: 15 60.0%
  • G20 countries

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Federal countries

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • US, Canada and Australia only

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .
version i.d. 0.6.3
version i.d. 0.6.3
Changelog:
  • Added regions: Continental United States and Bermuda
winkel tripel bam.png
 
One thing: You shouldn't use both the red "disputed" border as well as the outline for claims; I'd recommend using only the outline.
 
version i.d. 0.7.2
version i.d. 0.7.2
Changelog:
  • Added regions: Brazil
  • As suggested by erictom333, the red "disputed" border is now only used for unrecognised independent states and disputes too small to be shown without looking like occupations.
winkel tripel bam.png
 
FINALLY! - Version 1.0
Huff... hah... It's finally here. Just over a week behind schedule, but here it is. It's here and available for you all to use. Version 1.0 of the Winkel-Tripel BAM!
Changelog:
  • Added regions: Rio de la Plata
winkel tripel bam.png
 
Huff... hah... It's finally here. Just over a week behind schedule, but here it is. It's here and available for you all to use. Version 1.0 of the Winkel-Tripel BAM!
Changelog:
  • Added regions: Rio de la Plata
This is awesome! I hope this inspires others to use this projection for historical maps. Thank you so much effort for the work you put into this.
 
Actually, now that I think about it, I've decided to put the subdivision question up to a poll. Cast your vote now!
Can I vote for historical patches prior to subdivisions? BTW how do you do this? I wanted to make something like this with an Antarctica and arctic view
 
Top