What would they have called themselves? Welsh seems too modern to me.
No way that we would have named ourselves after an English insult. Cymry makes sense. It means, roughly, Brotherhood.
Tywysog, or prince in English, was the most common title of Welsh rulers in the Middle Ages, but at the time you specified the most powerful ruler in Wales used the title "King of the Britons". Both the terms Cymry and Britons were used by the people of Wales to describe themselves.And what would their Monarchial title be?
Today it seems to be Lloegr, but did they use another name then?the name they called England
Yes, but since they use different names for the country and its inhabitants, one might assume that the name for England is older, while the name for English is younger, and that it stems from a deep desire to rectify the situation and reconquer the country, or at least some reluctance to accept defeat.
Ah, so that's it, then. I have not seen any Welsh etymologies, so I had no idea.Lost lands
If I'm not mistaken, Lloeger refers to England as the "lost lands", and Saesneg is like the Scots Sassenach - Saxon.
Nothing about older or younger necessarily.
The Etymology of the word "Lloeger" seems unknown. "Lost lands" has been but one proposal. Perhaps popularly so among some of the Cymry.
http://www.cumbraek.co.uk/celt_lloegr.html
Welsh is Old English/Saxon for foreigner (ie not one of us). They definately would NOT have called themselves that!
Which takes some big ceilliaus when you think about it. The Saxons occupy their country, expand into their territory, and then call them the foreigners.
They are the foreigners from a Saxon POV, whether the Saxons are invading or not, though. It makes more sense than calling all Western Europeans Franji.
It's the Ugly American trope, or in this case the Ugly Saxon.