I've noticed I'd started thinking of this TL as WWI's equivalent of Blunted Sickle.
Which, given Blunted Sickle's quality, is quite the compliment.
Which, given Blunted Sickle's quality, is quite the compliment.
Indeed, i share the same sentiment.I've noticed I'd started thinking of this TL as WWI's equivalent of Blunted Sickle.
Which, given Blunted Sickle's quality, is quite the compliment.
I've noticed I'd started thinking of this TL as WWI's equivalent of Blunted Sickle.
Which, given Blunted Sickle's quality, is quite the compliment.
Since I took inspiration from Zheng He and PDF27's TLs and since I consider them as the most detailed, accurate and plausible TLs about WW2 on this forum (with Galveston Bay's work being a close second), I'm really touched by this compliment. Will do my best to continue that way.Indeed, i share the same sentiment.
And the Belgian are less screwed here and we still have Albert I as leader.I've noticed I'd started thinking of this TL as WWI's equivalent of Blunted Sickle.
Which, given Blunted Sickle's quality, is quite the compliment.
Between the dutch border and Louvain, the terrain is the very definition of flatness with a decent number of canals/rivers. Along the Dyle river, between Aarschot-Louvain/Wavre, the terrain is less flat with small rivers and low ridges. Between Wavre and Namur, the terrain is again quite flat. Southeast of Namur, the terrain becomes more hilly. So I would say that between the Dutch border and Louvain, the terrain is roughly like Western flanders while Between Louvain and Longwy, it's more like in Eastern France OTL.Sorta curious how the front will work; I dunno if a 200-some mile trench line is necessarily going to come about. OTOH, how similar to Flanders/Northern France is East Belgium?
I just feel ITTL the Entente so far has had much control of the tempo of the war, so I don't see them allowing the Germans to dig in to the extent that they did IOTL.
Women began to be employed in factories in june 1915 OTL. So so far ITTL, the Entente governments don't feel the need to do so.Are women already starting to replace men in factories or are things not as bad yet?
Wait, weren't women always employed at factories, pretty much since the start of industrial revolution? Or what you mean here is that governments made no effort to organise recruitment drives specifically targeted towards women?Women began to be employed in factories in june 1915 OTL. So so far ITTL, the Entente governments don't feel the need to do so.
I wonder how the entente will enjoy being the one to have inadequate railway connections, with the Germans enjoying the home advantage of connections?
Why a status quo? Time to retake Alsace-Lorraine and stop the Hun.
My bad, I meant women employed in factories producing weapons/munitions etc. Of course there are women working in factories per se.Wait, weren't women always employed at factories, pretty much since the start of industrial revolution? Or what you mean here is that governments made no effort to organise recruitment drives specifically targeted towards women?
Western Belgium has an EXCELLENT railway system. Don't worry for the Entente: for the moment their armies are mostly advancing on foot and the BEF has trouble in bringing supplies but when the railway system is repaired/fully manned after the chaos of August/September, the logistical issues will disappear.I wonder how the entente will enjoy being the one to have inadequate railway connections, with the Germans enjoying the home advantage of connections?
Pyrrhic victory would be however better then tesults they got OTL.nothing at the moment however it will only be a very pyrrhic victory possible for the russians.