What does the exact situation in India look like? Who controls the Punjab and Sindh? Who do the Rajput princes support? Do the British still hold Bengal, and how far down the Ganges are the rebels?
I've actually been working on a QBAM of this; that's why I asked about the fronts.
How about this map from Pearsonwright before he was banned?
Needs a few changes. I am working on it.
Cool. Need any help? Also, how's the 'Stan treating you?
I will look through the Qbam thread to see if there is one.
Edit: Here you go
https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/attachment.php?attachmentid=181017&stc=1&d=1342980073
Also, there are some good ones on the Wiki.
http://wiki.alternatehistory.com/doku.php/resources/qazaq_s_old_world
India by the end of 1954
How did Mysore suddenly gain a coastline? Since that area was within the Madras, and includes some of India's biggest ports (at least historically), I should think Madras would keep it. Also, Tibetan Aksai Chin? To my recollection they never even claimed that, let alone held it. It should probably belong either to Kashmir (the option I support, both because China is fractured and won't be able to make as strong a claim to it) or to Xinjiang/East Turkestan.
Is there going to be a Bengali state?
Yeah...over time, you will see trouble in those areas, because they are filled with people from Mysore, and south of there, the Malayalam people. In short, the Madras Presidency will see trouble as its large Telengana, Malayalam and Kannada populations might want to rejoin the neighbouring states.Valid points, although not mentioned it was my intent to give Mysore a coastline as a deal sweetener to remain close to the British, but if it as you say with important ports it could be kept as part of Madras. Good call on Aksai Chin I hadn't thought about that. Lets give it to Kashmir.
Anyone else want to weigh in on the map?
It is yet to be seen. What are y'all's thoughts?
I agree with this, given the precedent they would want thisI would think they'd want to be independent from the Hindu-majority areas.
I would think they'd want to be independent from the Hindu-majority areas.
Um, no. Most of the political establishment here will be either pro-British or anti-British. And most of the intellectuals will not be so focused on religion, as the TL implies Britain never does switch its support from the Princes to the Muslim League (Whether it even exists is another topic.) So British divide and rule policy is still essentially the Princely States vs the Presidencies.I agree with this, given the precedent they would want this