Should Burma have the Andaman and Nicobar Islands?
I'd just leave them with the UK. They'd make useful places for naval bases to keep an eye on the region (on account they lost it).
Should Burma have the Andaman and Nicobar Islands?
I'd just leave them with the UK. They'd make useful places for naval bases to keep an eye on the region (on account they lost it).
Yeah that's what I think would happen.
(Save the Sentinelese!)
I wonder if the British would try to populate the Island with colonists, as without the WWII equivalent, they will be producing a much higher population.
Most likely.
The Lakshadweep Islands, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and the Maldives staying British Crown Colonies is a very interesting concept. Up until December 26, 2004, that is.![]()
I wonder if the Butterfly effect could take place, just because of a long time period...
Geological PODs are a lot harder to plausibly accomplish in most cases, compared to weather-related ones.
Well, they say that Fracking causes Geological effect's, so given the time span I could see something different happening.
That's actually much better. And in the case of a violent Indian revolution, I can see the British keeping the Andaman and Nicobar, as well as the Lakshwadeep Islands.I wonder if the British would try to populate the Island with colonists, as without the WWII equivalent, they will be producing a much higher population.
I'm not sure if there would be enough fracking in that particular area. A 9.0 is a very major event. I suppose it could get shifted maybe a month or two either way, but something is going to give.Well, they say that Fracking causes Geological effect's, so given the time span I could see something different happening.
I do say that an Earthquake will happen about the same time, but what actually sets one off isn't known, so it might just be a minor specific event that provides the final nudge. (A poorly placed dropping of a bowling ball perhaps?)
I wonder if the British would try to populate the Island with colonists, as without the WWII equivalent, they will be producing a much higher population.
Afghanistan wouldn't have the strength to get it. It would be independent...and yes, the majority of the Princely States would likely be very closely tied to Britain.The map is looking good. I think y'all will see a few changes when I do the final update on the Indian War of Independence. Also, I think most of the princely states will want to be closely tied with Britain to try and counterbalance India. Especially Baluchistan which will be wedged between Persia and India both of which might have designs on its territory. Indeed Afghanistan might want it as well to get access to the sea.
Is an Afghan corridor possible?
I'd say no. The Afghans don't really have an interest in sea access, I'd think.
Fair enough. I guess they wouldn't want/need Balochistan then.
Not all of it, no; however, there are some Pashtuns living in the north-east of the province, close to the Afghan border. They might either keep that by TTL's border settlement or sneak in while no-one's watching.