Valdemar said:
That wouldn't be Prussia it would be Sweden on speed. The Soldier King wasn't King of Prussia, he was King in Prussia, but with gaining the title of King of Sweden, there would be no interest in raising Prussia to a Kingdom, and Brandenburg would stay the title of the German possesion rather than being replace with Prussia (which stay the name of East and West Prussia).
Prussia already was a kingdom, so youre wrong there. And that "in" instead of "of" was a meaningless formality, really. However, before the exploits (and the ASB-level luck) of Frederick II, Prussia was no great power yet, so Frederick might indeed choose to reside in Sweden, making it a Swedo-wank. It depends of course, the Swedish King did not have as much power by far, which can be an argument against residing in Sweden (simply using the extra title for prestige and elsewise letting the nobility continue to run the country) or for residing in Sweden (Prussia obeys anyways, so trying to throw around political weight by being in Sweden).
As has been named here several times we can have several
Hohenzollern-wanks, but thats not the same. In most unions with Sweden, Sweden would be the centre, and in ANY union with the England/GB/UK, England/GB/UK would be the centre. So dynastics are not the way to go.
The best chance to wank Prussia is probably the Napoleonic time. The Third Partition of Poland, plus rule over Hannover and practically all of North Germany... if that can be kept or even expanded, that would be quite a difference in power to OTL!
Oh, and Germany, even the Kaiserreich, is not the friggen same as Prussia
