The Twists of Fate: A TL

So, new TL. I know, I know, but I promise to work extra-hard on this one, and to see it through to wherever it may take me. So, let it begin!

0. We're all Born Superstars

Though none knew it, the day 13th May 1717 would change history forever. For it was on this day that a male heir was born to the Hapsburg throne, Ludwig Karl. A healthy baby boy, Ludwig Karl would become a great monarch. But his birth would begin a chain of events that would, before the century ended, put an end to the reign of the Hapsburgs, and begin a new era of war.

As they say, the high and the mighty are often oblivious to the little things until they have grown too large to stop. And often, as they say, things are impossible until they happen, and then suddenly they were inevitable all along.
 
I. God Makes no Mistakes

The birth of Ludwig Karl of Austria was a celebrated event, the birth of a new heir to the Archduchy of Austria and the Holy Roman Empire. The labour was not difficult and the child was healthy. The baby was then christened Ludwig Karl in a ceremony five days later.

From an early age, Ludwig Karl showed an aptitude for warfare and military matters. He was obsessed with tales of the great Battle of Vienna that had occurred in the year 1683, and with various other stories of military campaigns and battles. As he grew up, this tendency turned into a thirst for glory and fame on the battlefield that would be inherited to his far less worthy son Rudolph VI Von Hapsburg. Also as he grew up, Ludwig Karl showed great levels of contempt for the more boring elements of statesmanship and diplomacy (during his reign, he left these matters to various ministers). When his father Karl VI died in 1738*, Ludwig Karl was 21, a young monarch, but potent both intellectually and physically.

He was crowned Holy Roman Emperor a few days later, in a lavish ceremony. Not that the office had meant that much since the Peace of Westphalia, and it was not to last this century, But Ludwig Karl would be remembered as the last of the good Emperors, a last look at the old glory of the Holy Roman Empire before the rise of the new ideologies and the great upheavals they would bring...

*A minor butterfly.
 
Last edited:
So is Ludwig Karl essentially a Habsburg version of the Hohenzollern Frederick the Great?

If you include the whole "country declines after leader's death" thing, then yes.

I think he wouldn't have really bad relations with his father though. And since Frederick was born pre-POD he'd be a contemporary of Ludwig Karl. :eek:
 
II. No, I don't Wanna be Friends

The Great Silesian War was largely a matter of chance and time. Ludwig Karl had devoted the first two years of his reign to massive reforms of the military, in particular reforms which would make the Austrian military a fully professional force. This he had good reason to do - he envied and feared the Prussian military, first under the Prussian King Friedrich Wilhelm I, then under Friedrich II. In many respects Friedrich and Ludwig Karl, and some say that this is exactly what made them such bitter enemies. Friedrich had almost no justification for war, but he wanted to challenge Hapsburg power, and to gain the rich territory of Silesia for the Prussian Crown.

In the former motive, he colluded with France, which also wished to check the power of the Hapsburg dynasty, and the latter he thought of as now-as-never due to Ludwig Karl's reforms. He also estimated Ludwig Karl as weak due to his combat inexperience. It is thus not too hard to see why Friedrich, on a hot June morning, invaded Silesia. This action of sudden attack, without seeming pretext, was to be repeated two centuries later (but by another nation), and begin the Second Great War. When the news hit Ludwig Karl, he reportedly leapt into action, the war he had been waiting for for years had finally arrived.

The initial skirmishes were minor and inconclusive as blue-coated Prussian regiments marched into Silesia and Ludwig Karl mustered his full might for a hammer-blow right at the Prussian armies. Meanwhile, the war of Jenkins' Ear (which had been raging for a year beforehand) was subsumed into the wider pattern of war. As the year continued, Ludwig Karl won a battle at Breslau, however it was not to decide the war.

In 1741, the fighting continued with new ferocity. Ludwig Karl began his campaign as soon as the snow cleared, and pressed on with a fervent power that caught Friedrich very much by surprise. Ludwig Karl had come to see himself as the Prussian King's personal nemesis, and sent the full might of his armies straight at him, beginning the Battle of Neisse. Ludwig Karl led multiple cavalry charges at Friedrich's lines during the battle, and seemingly miraculously survived. Friedrich himself almost died several times during the campaign of 1741. Neisse was inconclusive, but Ludwig Karl was fuelled by sheer determination to, in his words, 'teach the Prussian upstart a vital lesson'.

1742 was a year that went by with little incident. But in 1743, the nature of the war changed completely. Friedrich made for Breslau again, but was intercepted on the way by Ludwig Karl's troops. Thus, just outside the city, began the great Battle of Breslau. Ludwig Karl threw himself time and time again at the enemy, at the last breaking their lines with one mighty charge. Friedrich was cut off from retreat, and Ludwig Karl was in no mood for mercy. The King and his Guard fought with great courage, cut off and surrounded. But following a last desperate attempt to break through, they were slain to the last.

The death of Friedrich resulted in Prussia leaving the war, but Ludwig Karl was forced to head south as news of a French army near Vienna reached him. Ludwig Karl defeated the French as they neared Vienna, but the war was far from over.

The final battle of the war was in 1747, after which France agreed to a peace.

However the war, no matter how great it might have seemed, would be as nothing compared to the wars which would close this century.
 
I had a reposne typed out but the thing went goofy - maybe others' do too?

In short, my reponse was...

1. It's too nice out to be waiting for an update, I just happened to check for antoher one while checking e-mail.:p

2. Did you just kill Frederick I before he has an heir?

3. Will this lead to a War of Prussian Sucession?

4. Might France remaina llied with Prussia?

5. Is Ludwig Karl sen as a bad guy for killing a rival monarch, even though the fellow *did* fight to the death?
 
I had a reposne typed out but the thing went goofy - maybe others' do too?

In short, my reponse was...

1. It's too nice out to be waiting for an update, I just happened to check for antoher one while checking e-mail.:p

2. Did you just kill Frederick I before he has an heir?

3. Will this lead to a War of Prussian Sucession?

4. Might France remaina llied with Prussia?

5. Is Ludwig Karl sen as a bad guy for killing a rival monarch, even though the fellow *did* fight to the death?

1. Frederick II had no heir IOTL either.

2. See above.

4. Can't say, can't say.

5. Ludwig Karl's glory will be eclipsed by others...the names Adlerssohn, Germanotta, Kunz and Jones are important. And that's all I'm saying.
 
Top