Because they weren't colonies by then - they were dominions.Colonies that turned out just fine.
Which is the point. They had been around long enough, for Canada in 1867, and New Zealand in 1907 to move from Colony to Dominion, as local development increased.Because they weren't colonies by then - they were dominions.
That's also the point of the OP: without said local development, colonies are dependent on their masters.Which is the point. They had been around long enough, for Canada in 1867, and New Zealand in 1907 to move from Colony to Dominion, as local development increased.
Only later did some Dominions go the next step into full, independent Republics, while the above Dominions, stayed Dominions.
I have doubt of colonial power extending that to non European population ? It would go against the mindset of the timeThat's also the point of the OP: without said local development, colonies are dependent on their masters.
Absolutely. No WWII means an intact Europe, and that means the White Man's Burden continues.I have doubt of colonial power extending that to non European population ? It would go against the mindset of the time
South Africa went to Dominion status in 1910. No war, I believe that trend would continue across the British Colonies in Africa, probably Egypt next, before 1920I have doubt of colonial power extending that to non European population ? It would go against the mindset of the time
Proto-apartheid South Africa went to Dominion status. Brown people don't get the same privilege, even in the Forties.South Africa went to Dominion status in 1910. No war, I believe that trend would continue across the British Colonies in Africa, probably Egypt next, before 1920
It's the difference between Hawaii and Puerto Rico.Because they weren't colonies by then - they were dominions.
And even Hawaii had problems - fears on the mainland of having a senator named "Moto" almost kept it away from statehood.It's the difference between Hawaii and Puerto Rico.
In Hawaii, White settlers from the USA physically replaced the original inhabitants, so granting the "territory" equality meant that the "right people" were in charge, and the "natives" were seen as quaint and folkloric. Typically refered to as "settler colonialism".
In Puerto Rico, there was no movement to bring Anglo settlers since the Island was overpopulated and had a developed culture. Instead, political and economic power was kept in the hands of USA expatriates, like a modern version of "plantation colonialism".
For Hawaii, read the Dominions, and for Puerto Rico read India
Each State that made up the Dominion at that time, were responsible for setting those privileges/rights, so it starts there.Proto-apartheid South Africa went to Dominion status. Brown people don't get the same privilege, even in the Forties.
Except PR had more than one opportunity for Statehood, and never voted in favor of it.For Hawaii, read the Dominions, and for Puerto Rico read India
That depends. While the leadership were...well, kind of insane, there was some recognition that they had to choose their moment. Hence why they waited until France went down and Britain was up to its elbows dealing with Hitler before deciding on 'Go South' as a policy.Anyways, how do you think does this war affect Japanese foreign policy going forward, changing subjects of discussion?
That depends. While the leadership were...well, kind of insane, there was some recognition that they had to choose their moment. Hence why they waited until France went down and Britain was up to its elbows dealing with Hitler before deciding on 'Go South' as a policy.
Here...there can't be any rhetoric about how Japan 'can't miss the bus' because the bus never even left, if you see what I meanUltimately it depends on what @Onkel Willie decides, but it's entirely likely IMO that Japan continues the fight in China for a while, try to get enough of a victory that they can ensure a face-saving peace, and then lick their wounds for a while.
Just because they wanted the entire nation to fight to the death and they tried to overthrow their godking because he said "let's stop" doesn't mean they're insaneWhile the leadership were...well, kind of insane
Japan still wants itself to be seen as a great power; a Sudeten war won't change that. The Go South was a gamble to make that happen. Though I would agree with both @Bookmark1995 and @theg*ddam*hoi2fan - Japan will still want an empire by force but will wait until the time is right or they feel they have no choice (oil embargo).Anyways, how do you think does this war affect Japanese foreign policy going forward, changing subjects of discussion?
Given that that a few of their leaders have essentially boiled down their options to "victory" or "non-existence on a concept of a people level..."Just because they wanted the entire nation to fight to the death and they tried to overthrow their godking because he said "let's stop" doesn't mean they're insane
Japan still wants itself to be seen as a great power; a Sudeten war won't change that. The Go South was a gamble to make that happen. Though I would agree with both @Bookmark1995 and @theg*ddam*hoi2fan - Japan will still want an empire by force but will wait until the time is right or they feel they have no choice (oil embargo).