exact let's say that James was perhaps very naive from the point of view of religion and also very convinced of the divine right of kings (normal thing for the time eh, after all Louis's "" absolutism "' was only the French equivalent of personal rule of Charles I of England, only much more successful, because we clearly state the concept of absolute monarchy is a false one, Louis could not do everything he wanted, because he had the Catholic church as possible opponents ( which as we know does not responds to the total control of the monarch, unlike the Protestant ones ) and above all the nobles ( so much so that you have to make them all come to court to remove them from their areas of power, be able to pit them against each other and finally control them ( so much for absolute power ) I argue that Frederick II of Prussia was much more absolutely in control of the state than the Sun King ( but everyone takes the latter as an example ) I am curious to see James use the Irish ( and non - Irish ) clergy to gain influence in Rome ( to match the Habsburgs and France, it would be an interesting development in my humble opinion eh )