Why do we need Catholicism to be introduced? Much more interesting, and I think plausible, to have a Christian undercurrent within a pagan society, with violent religious conflict down the line - just like Japan.
Why do we need Catholicism to be introduced? Much more interesting, and I think plausible, to have a Christian undercurrent within a pagan society, with violent religious conflict down the line - just like Japan.
Well, converting to Christianity goes a long way to convince Europeans that the Inca state has a right to exist...
Converting to Christianity doesn't magically remove the ressources of South America. Also, what's the point about a Christian Inca Empire? It wouldn't be that different from OTL South America, except the lacking Spanish language and the population of Spanish origin.
Well, converting to Christianity goes a long way to convince Europeans that the Inca state has a right to exist...
Converting to Christianity also means the Sapa Inca can no longer proclaim descent from Inti, which means that the sons of Inti shall perish.
Converting to Christianity didn't stop the Teutonic Knights from trying to beat up the Poles and Lithuanians, why would it stop the Spanish from beating up the Tawantinsuyu?
Didn't go well for the Kongo or the Cherokee either.
Like in all things the key to legitimacy is strength.
Europeans had no trouble recognising that the heathen ming dynasty was a proper state.
Didn't go well for the Kongo or the Cherokee either.
Well, the Kongo, at least, were quite independent until the nineteenth century, even if Portuguese influence existed there for long before that.
I get the feeling that a war of succession will arise between those who support Queen Mary I and OTL Elizabeth I if King Edward VI dies like OTL. The former will win in such a scenario since she will have support from the Irish and English Catholics for restoring Roman Catholicism, and for being married to King Philip II who would gladly support his wifes succession to the English Throne if it means better relations in the future. That is depending if he isn't to busy with continental and colonial affair that is.
Pack your bags, folks: looks like we'll be taking a little trip to Europe.
Not Venezuela?
*homer*
Just finished reading through this timeline and I really enjoyed it. Great to see such a period covered in such detail and the effects it can have. Looking forward to seeing more.
An excellent line! I like careful attitude to detail, it gives a sense of believability. I have long been interested in the Inca civilization and consider it to be one of the greatest worldwide.
Two points
1. Quipu is an excellent system for the collection and rapid transfer of statistical information. This is especially important in epidemics. The Incas would probably quickly learn to identify the symptoms of the disease, the incubation period, detect the most dangerous areas and dynamically introduce quarantines, opening or closing the corresponding roads. Even chaskis (messengers), in order not to become infected, could transfer quipu each other without coming into direct contact, but, for example, tying to a stone and throwing it at a distance. I believe that such steps, thanks to the high degree of obedience and organization of the population, would be extremely effective.
2. There are vague indications that some patterns, called tokapu, might be ideographic writing, in themselves or in combination with a quipu. The chroniclers have references to the fact that chronicles were recorded in Incan temples with help of patterns embroidered on the fabric.
What I was getting at was, can the llama carry as much as a horse could for goods, or for people. I'm assuming the horses would be faster overall though, even though they may be ill-suited for mountaintop movement.
I've heard (from unreliable sources) that the Tawantinsuyu mountain roads were built for llamas and were thus staircases, while european horses preferred ramps and HATED the Tawatinsuyu road network. Is there any truth to that
The problem are that the Andean people had one of the best agricultural packet for their environment, I don't see much to improve.
Yes the Mapuche will get major benefits from European crops. The Andeans on the other hand will not, they're going to have massive food surpluses for 10 generations. A interesting aspect are with other Europeans interact with Incas, we may see a earlier spread of potatoes in Europe, but we also see a spread of the other Andean crops and livestocks. Quinoa being introduced to 16th century Europe could be pretty revolutionary, while Guinea pigs could outcompete rabbits as micro livestock in Northern Europe.
I'm almost more interested in the Mapuche subplot than the main one. The Mapuche were some of the fiercest fighters in the New World, resisting Inca and Spanish conquest for centuries. Now they are spreading into one of the best areas of farmland in the world.
Here's a thought: Mapuche as a destination for Jewish refugees. If the Mapuche establish peaceful relations with even some of the Europeans, and don't adopt a hardened xenophobia, Jews fleeing Spanish persecution might find refuge there rather than in New Amsterdam.
Can I somehow watch the thread and just get alerts when @King of the Uzbeks posts something?
In Himalaya/Tibet region, I hasn't found something really amazing, like potatoes or quinoa. Some interest is caused by a bare barley (Hordeum distichon, so we would have a good beer and whisk(e)y!), peas, buckwheat. Nothing special, I fill slightly disappointed.
How fictional was this link?
Welser could try to get the natives to help him in his conquest of Quito. Or, is more accurate terms: He could join the natives and maybe get a share of the plunder, what with how weakened the expedition is.
By the way, regarding Catholicism, in the 1550s OTL the infiltration of the Order of Jesus into South America begins. A century later, the Jesuits even founded many Jesuit reductions of Guaraní, according to the methods of state administration in some respects similar to (and probably inspired by) Tawantinsuyu.
Why do we need Catholicism to be introduced? Much more interesting, and I think plausible, to have a Christian undercurrent within a pagan society, with violent religious conflict down the line - just like Japan.
Well, converting to Christianity goes a long way to convince Europeans that the Inca state has a right to exist...
But conversion makes a crusade almost impossible. The conversion of Lithuania forced the Catholic Church to maintain neutrality in the Battle of Grunwald, in which the Teutonic Order suffered a decisive defeat.Converting to Christianity didn't stop the Teutonic Knights from trying to beat up the Poles and Lithuanians, why would it stop the Spanish from beating up the Tawantinsuyu?
Maybe. But by and large, in Pacific from the Coast to the line of the Zaragossa Treaty there is nothing particularly interesting for the Spaniards. The Philippines would probably have been explored more actively. Possible also would be an active expansion into Australia or even Japan. But compared with Tawantinsuyu it's tears.Since the Spanish won't conquer the Tawantinsuyu, will this encourage more Spanish expeditions into the Pacific to enlarge the Spanish East Indies?
This would be a crucial difference. Tawantinsuyu would be a cohesive, highly organized state that would have a work ethic close to Confucian, while unlike China and Japan of the XVI-XVIII centuries, open to new technologies, new contacts and new ideas. As I already wrote here, it would be like the Japan of the Meiji era, but started 300 years earlier and lasted 400 years longer. It's hard to imagine what the world would be like, in which there would be additional strong and intelligent player such as Tawantinsuyu.Converting to Christianity doesn't magically remove the ressources of South America. Also, what's the point about a Christian Inca Empire? It wouldn't be that different from OTL South America, except the lacking Spanish language and the population of Spanish origin.
Maybe. But by and large, in Pacific from the Coast to the line of the Zaragossa Treaty there is nothing particularly interesting for the Spaniards. The Philippines would probably have been explored more actively. Possible also would be an active expansion into Australia or even Japan. But compared with Tawantinsuyu it's tears.
Possibly. But in East Asia we have the Portuguese and the Zaragoza treaty. The Portuguese are not asleep.More involvement in East Asia politics will create some interesting side effects.
Maybe. First of all, Catholicism is heterogeneous. I think the Incas would rather find a common language not with Spanish or Portuguese episcopates but with an extraterritorial religious organization such as the Order of Jesus. I guess that this would be a very mutually beneficial union. It is possible that the Jesuits, powerful ideologically and rich economically (gold, silver and labour of Incas!) could hold their candidate for the Pope (which they achieved only in 2013 in the OTL). But concessions can not be one-sided, and the Jesuits would reconcile with the Inca duality, identifying the local gods with Christian saints (Wiraqucha = God-father, Inti = Christ, Pachakamaq = Holy Spirit, etc.). Yes, it looks some like Japan.Why do we need Catholicism to be introduced? Much more interesting, and I think plausible, to have a Christian undercurrent within a pagan society, with violent religious conflict down the line - just like Japan
Possibly. But in East Asia we have the Portuguese and the Zaragoza treaty. The Portuguese are not asleep.