The Silver Knight, a Lithuania Timeline

What's your opinion on The Silver Knight so far?


  • Total voters
    381
Chapter 15: Lituania, Dominor Orientalem
flag_of_the_grand_duchy_of_lithuania_by_lyniv-d786xjb.jpg


Part 15: Lituania, Dominor Orientalem (1495-1500)
The nearing end of King Algirdas II's reign saw the introduction of one last world-changing Westerner invention - the printing press. Developed by a German artisan, named Peter Schoeffer, in Mainz, the printing press was spreading wildly across Europe, changing the speed of spread of information as we know it. Printing books using a press was both much faster than scribbling them by hand like in the good old days, it was more reliable and with less likely errors, and it could be reused multiple times to make many copies of the same book every day. Lithuania, meanwhile, was still struggling with bringing Christianity fully to the countryside - many peasants, both in Ruthenia and Lithuania, still only nominally followed the ways of Christ. Sure, they declared themselves to be Christian, but, as numerous priests of the Lithuanian Orthodox Church have complained about, almost none of them know any prayers or knowledge about God and the Bible, and in their spare time commit to pagan rituals like sacrificing lambs or visiting holy Baltic pagan forests (alkas). All of this arose from lack of literature, which was still only written by hand and by priests. Algirdas II, still locked to his bed, declared the official establishment of a printing house in Vilnius in 1496, and some printing presses were brought from Germany as equipment.

A problem arose soon, though. The cast metal sorts brought from Germany used the Latin alphabet, while the Lithuanian and East Slavic languages used Cyrillic as it's script. After some discussions of whether to use the Latin letters or make new ones, the priesthood and printers of Lithuania decided to cast a brand new set, mostly based on Cyrillic letters, though with a few redesigns to make them fit more for printing, creating an official Cyrillic movable type. The first book printed in Lithuania was a small book of prayers and religious texts, only about 25 pages long, printed both in Lithuanian and in Old Church Slavonic, named "Simple Catechism and Prayers" (Prasta katekismusump und poteriump knigele), or simply "Lithuanian Cathechism" or just "Catechism". Only about 300 copies were made in the Vilnius Printing House in 1496 and 1497, but nowadays they are hailed as one of the biggest literary checkpoints of the Lithuanian language. While the Chronicle of Lithuania and numerous administrative texts were written in Lithuanian throughout the last century, the Catechism is the first printed Lithuanian book, and the first directed to and for the common people. It was the start of a printing industry in the Lithuanian nation, which was quick to grow with more printing houses established in Polotsk, Kiev and Smolensk, though most of them were small and for local needs.

It's also regarded as the first printed book in the East Slavic languages, and thus is also cenebrated by those nations as the beginning of their own printing industry. The production of books in the Kingdom of Lithuania, which is recorded to have produced only about 3 000 manuscripts in 1450, went on to become a major part of Eastern European typography, and the introduction of the movable type and the printing press halped for literacy and spread of information in the long term.

King Algirdas II didn't congratulate it much, though - he had far more pressing matters. Like his body's worsening condition. It is still not known what the King suffered from, but it appears to have been a very painful and slow disease that drained the life of the monarch. On his deathbed, in April of 1497, Algirdas declared - though, considering his situation, likely muttered out - that, since his successor Prince Valdislavas was still underage (about 11 years old at the time) and unable to rule the country, the reigns of regency are to be entrusted to the Grand Hetman, Mykolas Glinskis, should they be needed. Glinskis, a close friend and ally of the King, was already controlling the Kingdom's day-to-day matters while the sovereign was locked to bed, so the official declaration of a regency was to be expected. Algirdas still believed he could make a miracle recovery, though - he prayed to God day and night to forgive his sins and allow him to return to the helm of the country. Some courtiers began to spread rumors that it's how God was punishing him for striking deals with the Western schismatics and abandoning the ways of Christ that he was taught in...

Nine days after declaring Mykolas Glinskis as regent, Algirdas Teodoraitis, the second King of Lithuania, the bringer of the ways of the Renaissance, the westerniser of the nation, the flagman of the Brest Concordate, died in his bed, wretched in pain and agony, clutching at his heart. "Oh, God, Mary, Jesus and all saints, have mercy on us Lithuanians..." were his final words, and the King passed to the afterlife. Algirdas was, among many things, a bright man. He knew that Lithuania will not survive keeping to the ways of old, and he did what was necessary to change that. Chroniclers report that he was a calm, reserved and well read man, though not particularly talkative during his rule. However, despite his achievements, he is not remembered as fondly as his grandfather, mostly because of what the second greatest decision in his life led up to many years after his death. But he couldn't have predicted that, none of us could've in his situation, and it seems that in the modern days, the benefits of his rule are much more upheld that the consequences. Most importantly the creation of the second Kingdom of Lithuania, which is seen as a great moment in Lithuanian history.

Prince Valdislavas, an eleven year old boy, was soon coronated as King Valdislavas I, but he was only a ruler by name. Mykolas Glinskis retained his position as Grand Hetman and Grand Chancellor, now adding Royal Regent to that list, thus becoming the de facto ruler of the country. Immediately upon the ascension, Regent Mykolas met a great challenge in his tracks.

A great challenge in the name of Tver. The Principality of Tver.

During the rule of Teodoras I and Algirdas II, Tver overtook the position of becoming the chief unifier of the Russian state from the incorporated Muscovy, treading it's tracks of paying lip service to the Lithuanian overlords while slowly expanding and increasing it's influence in the Rus'. It annexed Yaroslavl and Suzdal-Nizhny Novgorod in that time, and the Princes of Tver tried their best to consolidate the state into something stronger, something more capable of fighting their suzerain. Lithuanians couldn't not notice this troubling development, and responded with harsher tribute demands and hiring brigands and mercenaries to loot the Tverian countryside. In response, Tver worked covertly to stir up discontent against Lithuanian rule in Muscovy and Ryazan. The Tverian state was not particularly consolidated at the time of the ascension of Valdislavas, it was suffering through dissent of it's own in recently incorporated Mordvin territory, but it gambled on Lithuania hopefully entering a succession crisis and maybe a civil war, to declare in 1497 that they will not accept Valdislovas I as their overlord. Border clashes between Lithuanian garrisons in Moscow and Ryazan and Tverian raiding parties began, and the Prince of Tver, Ivan Mikhailovich, hoped to create a revolt in the region that he could support.

250px-Michai%C5%82_Barysavi%C4%8D._%D0%9C%D1%96%D1%85%D0%B0%D1%96%D0%BB_%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%87.jpg

Ivan Mikhailovich, Prince of Tver during the Tverian-Lithuanian War
Something else was happening in Lithuania proper, though, something much more intriguing. The regency of Valdislavas I brought up an opportunity for the Lithuanian nobility, which has been more and more disenfranchised by the ongoing centralization process in the Lithuanian state. The ways of old, they were changing. The magnates, which used to rule over entire duchies, saw their influence weakening under Algirdas II in exchange for appointed voivodes. The service in the military, previously a game for the nobles to spend their free time in and loot other land, was now turned into a professional business. These things that used to be reserved only for the upper classes were now being taken away, and a petition of 15 Lithuanian nobles approached Mykolas Glinskis with an offer. They would allow the Grand Hetman to get rid of the child King, suffocating him under a pillow or throwing him off a balcony or something, and abolishing the title of King itself, to have the magnates, with, of course, Glinski in charge, run Lithuania as a state "by nobles, for nobles".

In response, Mykolas Glinskis famously stated back:

"Lithuania is one and indivisible under the Crown. What you propose is treason - treason not only to our King, but also to God himself."
The conspirators were arrested and Glinskis began preparing an army for war against Tver.

Could Lithuania have become the first European state to get rid of it's monarchs, almost a century before the first Westerner state did so (in quite a bloody rumble)? Could it have become a noble republic? That is a question for history buffs and fans of alternate history to ponder at. But one fact is certain - in our universe, Glinskis refused. He had his own priorities. He wasn't a man only centered on saving the Kingdom, he was still looking for his own wishes. It's just that they didn't coincide with the ones of the nobles.

A few magnates rose up to revolt against the Regent, and an army of 800 men attacked Polotsk, only to be staved off by the city's garrison. Jonas Varkalis, the Vaivada of Polotsk, soon marched in with a raised army, and the rebels scattered. Along with other Vaivadas, Varkalis joined up with the Lithuanian Regiment, now led by Mykolas Glinskis himself, in a march East. On January of 1498, the Kingdom of Lithuania officially declared war on the Principality of Tver, starting the Tverian-Lithuanian War. This time, Lithuania, led by Glinskis, was out for blood. The Regent set his goal as the complete destruction of the Tverian state and incorporation of it's territory into the Kingdom. Ivan Mikhailovich organized his own troops, but even he knew that a direct confrontation was too one-sided to even be tried. Offers of peace, even submitting back to Lithuanian fold, were denied. The Republic of Novgorod declared that it will remain loyal to Glinskis's Lithuania - it's military was even less prepared for war that that of Tver.

Meanwhile, Moscow rose to revolt. 20 000 Muscovite revolters, many of them normal peasants and the city's inhabitants, took up arms, gathering near the Kremlin - still a wooden one, rebuilt after the annexation of the Principality into it's southwest neighbour - and clashing with the Lithuanian garrison in the fortress. The battle in Moscow took four hours, and the revolters, led by a man the Chronicles refer to as "Roman Zakharyin", captured the guards and gored them across the streets. The chopped off head of the captain of the guard was placed on a pole and raised in front of the Kremlin, and the rebels declared the restoration of Moscow as a Principality. However, Tverian help and support was too late to arrive, mainly because their primary goal was to avoid a confrontation with Glinskis first and actually helping the fellow Russians second.

Thus, the 30 000 men strong Army of the Kingdom of Lithuania arrived to Moscow first, faced with about 18 000 peasants and citizens armed with straightened scythes, spears and knives. There were only a few horses among the Muscovites, and Zakharyin was riding one of them. He was taken out by a Lithuanian arquebus in the very beginning of the battle. The Second Battle of Moscow was a massacre of the highest order - the orderly, professional and well armed Lithuanian force stood against disorganized civilian revolters, it was pretty clear who was going to win from the start. Glinskis did not plan to let Moscow get away easily, too - this region has for a very long time been the thorn in Lithuania's side. It was hard to collect taxes from it, it tried to revolt after almost every succession, and it was in solidarity with Tver. From the Regent's eyes, the best way how to fix it was to erase Moscow from the map.

Put it through the sword. Let it rot and burn.

Lithuanian troops ravaged the city and it's surroundings for almost a week, and almost every source that writes about it carries a feeling of disgust. Entire blocks of the sity were burned down completely, and the civilians were kicked out and slaugtered. It was a massacre comparable to the ones going all around Poland in the Polish Succession War, but on Lithuanian soil. Glinskis did not actually succeed in wiping Moscow out of the map - it remained as a center of population, though a dark and grim shell of it's former past - but it signified his position among the Russians as one of the most resented Lithuanian rulers in their history. Glinskis later gave the same treatment to Vladimir, an another important Russian city. The Chronicle of Lithuania comments that "the fires of burning Russian cities could be seen from as far as Vitebsk".

Finally, Glinskis turned to Tver, which was starting to panic. Ivan Mikhailovich gathered his 8000 men strong army and marched to meet Glinskis, facing the Regent of Lithuania and his armies on the fields of Dobrovo. Ivan of Tver still hoped to achieve a peace, and thus ordered his troops to put down their weapons, jumped off his horse, took off all of his royal garments, jewelry and the crown, leaving him in normal, blank while clothes, reminiscent of that of a peasant, then ran up to Glinskis and fell on his knees, kissing his encrusted boots and pleading for an agreement.

Mykolas Glinskis listened to the Prince of Tver's plead, then took out his sword and stabbed him. This was followed by the Lithuanian Regiment opening fire at the shocked and infuriated Tverian units, opening up the battle when they were least expecting it. Many Russians fell before even taking their weapons off the ground, and those who charged forward in fury and rage found themselves to be facing against modern technology with Russian halberds and bows. By the end of the day, the Tverian forces were soundly defeated, and the remnants that survived found themselves fleeing towards a doomed city... The Battle of Dobrovo was a great example of Mykolas Glinskis's true character, one that he didn't get to show in the peaceful times of Algirdas II - his determination, determination strong enough to spit on things like chivalry and honor towards the opponent. A man truly fit for the job of saving the country, right?

It was Tver's turn to burn. The Lithuanian troops entered the city with almost no resistance in sight - the Prince was dead, his army was dead, the morale was crushed. The smartest inhabitants of the city had already fled, and those who were left suffered through all seven circles of Hell in a single night. The Chronicle of Novgorod states: "The Litvin forces committed all possible sins that night. You couldn't see a street without littered corpses and abused women, without burning churches and slaughtered children..." The pillage of Tver marked the end of the Tverian-Lithuanian War, and Mykolas Glinskis declared that the Principality of Tver is now officially incorporated into the Kingdom of Lithuania. Novgorod and Pskov, the last Russian states in Eastern Europe, while both nominally independent, had their rights constrained and tightened, much worse than before.

The Tverian-Lithuanian War was a success, the Kingdom survived and asserted it's complete dominance over all of Kievan Rus', but at what cost! Thousands of Russians dead, slaughtered, mutilated, abused? Despite what Glinskis believed, it did absolutely nothing to make the Russians obedient, in fact, it did the exact opposite of that. Tver, now a city under the Kingdom, was quick to recover from the looting, and arose as the center of Russian thought and politics. The heart of the Rus'. The boundaries between the Russians, Ruthenians and Lithuanians have been drawn, and while the magnates and kings of the Lithuanians may feast in their halls and declare themselves the Dominor Orientalem, but the Russian nation never sleeps...
 
Last edited:
Wow.... Guess Russia is going to be an ulcer on Lithuania's ass for quite some time....

By the way: When you're talking about Lithuanian literature, are you talking about the actual Baltic "Lithuanian language", or has the Ruthenian language come to be known as "Lithuanian" in TTL?
 
I have to state that the nobles who thought that they could get the regent to help them overthrow the king were fucking idiots. I state that because of a few factors they couldn't think through. One of them was the fact that as the grand hetman and regent the guy was essentially already the power behind the throne and losing the legitimacy of the crown as the bedrock of his defacto rule would weaken him fundamentally as the legitimacy of the crown allows him to essentially break the backs of his major rivals as he is the regent and the actor of the crown's will and he can then neatly use this as an example to the King for his loyalty after all the conspirators stupidly asked him to overthrow the crown and he was so "loyal" that he didn't consider it for a moment (at to be honest he probably didn't since it would fundamentally weaken him). It was also stupid of them in that he fundamentally has one dejure liege at present that he has to respect and so does every other noble and he would not have that liege with their plan true but fundamentally if he doesn't have that liege to serve as a way to balance against his rivals and he would have to deal with several equals in a way that he couldn't easily break without the central monarchy to do it for him legally if he joined in on this scheme. For him it was simple, gain dejure power but lose a way to break his rivals and lose his defacto power thanks to his high position in the Kingdom's administration or more logically keep his defacto power and use this as an opportunity to strengthen his hand further by breaking several of his rivals, especially as I doubt the noble families didn't lose their lands from this moronic wannabe power grab.

He would also be even more skeptical of the offer because he may very well think that after they backstabbed the crown they wouldn't ty to cut him down to size as the most powerful lord and the one who had served as an ally of the previous King. Which made them even dumber as they knew of his ties and position in the present system and still thought he'd break with it anyway.
 
You`ve done it, too, you`ve killed Moscow, too.
He actually did it, the absolute madman!

Wow.... Guess Russia is going to be an ulcer on Lithuania's ass for quite some time....

By the way: When you're talking about Lithuanian literature, are you talking about the actual Baltic "Lithuanian language", or has the Ruthenian language come to be known as "Lithuanian" in TTL?
Baltic Lithuanian language. It's currently taking it's first steps towards becoming an actual literary language (actually faster than OTL, where the first Lithuanian printed book was released in 1547), so I decided to write about developments there, too.

I have to state that the nobles who thought that they could get the regent to help them overthrow the king were fucking idiots. I state that because of a few factors they couldn't think through. One of them was the fact that as the grand hetman and regent the guy was essentially already the power behind the throne and losing the legitimacy of the crown as the bedrock of his defacto rule would weaken him fundamentally as the legitimacy of the crown allows him to essentially break the backs of his major rivals as he is the regent and the actor of the crown's will and he can then neatly use this as an example to the King for his loyalty after all the conspirators stupidly asked him to overthrow the crown and he was so "loyal" that he didn't consider it for a moment (at to be honest he probably didn't since it would fundamentally weaken him). It was also stupid of them in that he fundamentally has one dejure liege at present that he has to respect and so does every other noble and he would not have that liege with their plan true but fundamentally if he doesn't have that liege to serve as a way to balance against his rivals and he would have to deal with several equals in a way that he couldn't easily break without the central monarchy to do it for him legally if he joined in on this scheme. For him it was simple, gain dejure power but lose a way to break his rivals and lose his defacto power thanks to his high position in the Kingdom's administration or more logically keep his defacto power and use this as an opportunity to strengthen his hand further by breaking several of his rivals, especially as I doubt the noble families didn't lose their lands from this moronic wannabe power grab.

He would also be even more skeptical of the offer because he may very well think that after they backstabbed the crown they wouldn't ty to cut him down to size as the most powerful lord and the one who had served as an ally of the previous King. Which made them even dumber as they knew of his ties and position in the present system and still thought he'd break with it anyway.
Bravo!
 

PhilippeO

Banned
surprised that Rus still viable and dream of independent state. what about the Khanate ? Crimean and Kazan ? Nogai and others ? without Muscovy, and with Lithuania too far West (and spending time dealing with Poland), Rus should accept any Christian ruler as viable. Tver and Muscovy is not acting like border city, afraid of fleet going upriver from Kazan. did some disaster fall on to Turks/Tatar ? that they failed to raid defenceless realm in their border.
 
surprised that Rus still viable and dream of independent state. what about the Khanate ? Crimean and Kazan ? Nogai and others ? without Muscovy, and with Lithuania too far West (and spending time dealing with Poland), Rus should accept any Christian ruler as viable. Tver and Muscovy is not acting like border city, afraid of fleet going upriver from Kazan. did some disaster fall on to Turks/Tatar ? that they failed to raid defenceless realm in their border.
Well, the Rus is pretty stubborn, both in OTL and TTL :p

As for the Tatars, they are deep in their own problems. After the crushing battle of Vorskla, the Golden Horde began to rapidly disintegrate. Right now, it is a free for all between dozens of independent Khanates - the Golden Horde still remains in Sarai, but now there's Perm, Kazan, Astrakhan and others to deal with. The Ottomans have set their sights on some of the Tatar khanates, too, and while Lithuania was busy in the Polish Succession War, they vassalized the Crimeans and annexed the Genovese cities and the Circassian coast.

Lithuania is mostly uninterested in what's happening in the steppes, but they began to fortify their easternmost border in the case that things go sour there.
 
Chapter 16: Silva Rerum
flag_of_the_grand_duchy_of_lithuania_by_lyniv-d786xjb.jpg


Part 16: Silva Rerum (1500-1525)
The last years of the Glinskis regency were centered around the continuous centralization of the Lithuanian nation and the incorporation of the newly acquired terrtories. The title of the Prince of Tver was abolished and instead the territory of the annexed Principality was reorganized into the Voivodeships of Tver, Vladimir and Nizhny-Novgorod. Boundaries were drawn and Lithuanian garrisons in the cities were sent. The family of Ivan Mikhailovich was captured and imprisoned to make sure that none of the the Prince of Tver's successors try to raise a revolt in the near future. The children of Ivan died in the next few years in captivity in Chernigov. The Regency put a lot of effort to enforce the Brest Concordate on the newly conquered lands - Catholic churches were built in Tver, Vladimir and Suzdal, and the Orthodox priesthood was forced to accept the theological changed mandated by the Concordate. Mykolas Glinskis worked hard to root out corruption and any of his political opponents from the court and any higher positions of the Kingdom, and in exchange made the necessary changes and donations to support his own bloodline. The Glinski Regency saw the beginning of about a century of Glinski family dominance in Lithuanian politics and diplomacy, and Mykolas was the man to achieve that.

At the same time, though, the Regent promoted further introduction of Renaissance culture and literature to Lithuania proper. Listening to poems of Virgil, Homer and Horace, among others was starting to become a favorite pastime of well-read, educated Lithuanian nobles, especially in winters, when the weather was too cold and harsh for outdoor activities. It was around this time that the first examples of Lithuanian renaissance architecture came about in the nation - for example, the renovated Cathedral of the Theotokos in Vilnius. The Regent also provided funding for a project that was considered by the citizens of Vilnius for a while - surrounding the city with a wall to protect it from possible invaders or raiders. It was also at this time that numerous cities in Lithuania received city status via Magdeburg Rights - most notably Gardinas (Grodno), which was starting to become an important population center, with the inhabitants being a mix of Lithuanians and Ruthenians.

In 1504, Valdislovas reached maturity, and the Regency was no longer required. Mykolas Glinskis honored the will of his former sovereign and relished his title of Regent to grant full control of the Kingdom to the legitimate Monarch. The old noble, over 60 years old at the time, resigned from his position as Grand Hetman too mere three years later, retiring to his now massive estates scattered across the entire Kingdom, pretty suspiciously almost tripled in size during the Regency... Despite the self-service and brutality, Mykolas Glinskis is not an all-negative figure. A harsh and brutal man, he haunts the darkest nightmares of the Russian people, but it was a time when Lithuania needed a man as harsh as him the most. He still stands as an important figure in Westernizing the nation under Algirdas II and under his own devices - he brought the Lithuanian Army to better fighting capacity and modernized it to the newest weapons of the time. He may not be the gentlest ruler in Lithuanian history, but he surely was among the more capable ones.

220px-Cranach_the_Younger_Sigismund_II_Augustus.jpg

King Valdislavas I of Lithuania. Painted in Vilnius in about 1510
King Valdislavas entered his period of rule as a complete novice. Merely 18 years old, he only received childhood tutorage by his court in the absolute basics of the state. As such, in the first years of his rule, a lot of the new King's policies were influenced by the nobility, whom he relied upon. A sizable portion of the Lithuanian magnates, led by the Kęsgaila family, put their hopes on manipulating the young and inexperienced King into returning the noble rights of old. In fact, at the beginning of his reign they managed to push through a few pro-nobility privileges and laws, but something unexpected came to be. Valdislavas was a quick learner, and the more he discovered about the art of rulership, the more arrogant he grew to be. Even though he was still incredibly young, he saw himself as one of the greatest rulers of Lithuania to have risen to the throne, and soon he dismissed the closest of his advisors, even imprisoning some of them for betrayal. Now reigning alone, with only a small ring of loyalists around him to handle day-to-day matters, Valdislavas set out to shape Lithuania into a nation of his liking.

One big problem that the powerhungry King had from the start came from the south. The Ottoman Turks were stopped by united Bohemo-Polish-Hungarian forces in the Battle of the Sava River in 1506, in a crushing defeat that left the Sultan and many of his officers dead, and the new Kaiser-i-Rum, Mehmet III decided to turn the expansion of the Turkish empire into a different direction. It was around this time that the Ottoman Empire extinguished the Mamluk Sultanate and subjugated the vast lands of Egypt and the Levant, and at the same time, they decided to employ the Crimeans for a push north. The Crimean Khanate was one of the many successor states of the Golden Horde, and was the first to fall under Ottoman dominance as a vassal and tributary. The territory of the peninsula was cramped, too small to feed all of it's inhabitants, and the rich lands north, held by Lithuania, were so enticing to any Tatar raider... The Ottomans encouraged Crimean tatars to attack this Orthodox state through military pushes and "bounties", and the raid on the Khadjibey port by the Black Sea in 1511 marked the beginning of a long series of raids and wars between the Crimeans and the Lithuanians across the lands of the former Kievan Rus. Tatar raiding parties reached as far north as Minsk and Smolensk, every time chipping away a part of Lithuania's wealth with them. An enraged Valdislavas sent numerous counterattacks to the peninsula, but it didn't do much to stop the attacking forces.

In regards to domestic matters, though, some other developments were put in place. While not particularly well educated, Valdislavas was learning by the minute, and one of the smarter moves of his reign was reorganizing the law code and archive of the Kingdom. That is, the Metrica. The Lithuanian Metrica was the nation's archive of law documents, decrees, yarlyks and other government information that was being kept and overseen by the Treasurer since the 14th century. It contained pretty much all written laws and documents in the nation, and under the rule of Valdislavas, it was reorganized and divided into organized directories, ordered by date and by content. It was also moved out of the Trakai Castle, the previous capital of Lithuania, and into Vilnius, where it was put under the oversight of the Grand Chancellor.

220px-Metryka_litewska.jpg

A Ruthenian language copy of the Metrica from the 16th century
While that was an important development in Lithuanian law, it was way, way overshadowed by what came after it - the Statute of Lithuania. Ever since the establishment of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the concept of written laws was common among the nation, mostly inherited from annexed Ruthenian principalities, and some carried from the West, like the Magdeburg Laws. However, it should be noted that for most of it's history, Lithuania did not have a universal codified legal code - the codes were different in each duchy, the cities had their own rights, and the laws released by the King and the Council of Lords (Ponų taryba, Lithuania's own "representative" organ) were sporadic and often had loopholes. Valdislavas I ordered the Grand Chancellor of his court, a Jewish statesman from Vilnius, Elijah ben Moses Margalit, to create what is nowadays known as the Statute. Margalit wasn't particularly liked around the court due to him being a Jew, but he was nevertheless capable to push his proposal for a code of law to the King, who approved after a few edits and officially signed it in 1518. The Statute of Lithuania was one of the first pieces of codified law in Europe, and was very progressive in many ways. It had a tendency towards severe penalties for many crimes, especially capital punishment, and while the punishments were slightly higher for the lower classes, they were nevertheless close enough to fulfill the common Renaissance idea that "all humans lives are of equal worth". The powers of the King were greatly expanded, in expense for the Council of Lords, which was lowered to a more advisory role.

It was once again reiterated that all religions in the Kingdom of Lithuania can be expressed freely, as long as it's followers do not take action against the King and his government - an another example of great Lithuanian religious tolerance that was by then already a tradition. Lithuania was a haven for exiled Jews, fleeing Muslims and protesting Christians alike, it was where religious thought of the entirety of Europe could arrive and live in peace. For now, at least. While religions were all equal in the eyes of the King, the borders between the nations turned more clear. The Statute of Lithuania had some small, barely visible, but nowadays obvious instances of incoming pro-Lithuanian law codification. It was hard to notice for people of the time, but some of the laws in the section of land ownership and serfdom included bits and pieces that benefited the Lithuanian nobility in expense of the Ruthenian ones. Institutional anti-Slavic laws had a long way to go, but it was a menacing start in hindsight...

TS_virs.gif

Front page of a 17th century edit of the Statute of Lithuania
The rule of Valdislavas I saw progress in the northwest. The Teutonic and Livonian Orders lost Papal support after the Brest Concordate, and their lives were coming to an end. The Teutons, locked to Prussia and surrounded by two hostile Eastern European superpowers, were experiencing problems of their own in the name of Hanseatic cities within their territory, which demanded more autonomy and even wanted an end to the rule of the monastic order. Valdislavas stood in favor of the cities, and in the three-year long Teutonic-Lithuanian War between 1518 and 1521, more commonly known romantically as the The Teutonic Order's Last Raid, the Lithuanian armies clashed with the Teutons across East Prussia. The "last raid" in the name was actually the unsuccessful Teutonic attack on Klaipėda in 1520, the last Teutonic attack on Lithuanian land. A successful Prussian uprising in Sambia, led by Sarbis Mančius, helped in the conflict, and in the end, Valdislavas I banished the Teutonic Order from East Prussia, demanding that they never return, and incorporated the territory into Lithuania - of course, the cities of Elbing, Konigsberg and others, which were the ones who started the war, received significant autonomy from the Lithuanian King, so much that they were regarded as "a state within a state" by contemporary and modern researchers alike. The Triple Crown was busy with a border struggle with the Ottomans and so couldn't intervene, but their King Charles II still sent a complaint.

All in all, the beginning of Valdislavas I's rule was calm, indeed. The King was willing to centralize as much power around him as he could, and while this sparked numerous clashes with protesting magnates, the transition from an ancient feudal to an Early Modern monarchy went quite smooth for Lithuania. The Statute of Lithuania gave the people of the nation a sense of safety, knowing that the laws will punish all of them equally. But the King was treading a path that none had ever even imagined. Although... not for good reason.

There was a particular genre of literature growing popular across Lithuania. Home chronicles. Chronicles detailing the lives of multiple generations of noble members, recording pretty much everything that the authors wanted to record for future generations, from jokes and anecdotes to financial documents and moral advice. Silva rerum is what they were called.

Silva rerum. Silva rerum. Latin for "forest of things". In a way, that name was an accurate description of Lithuania at the time, too. The people of Western Europe saw those "barbaric lands to the north" as one massive, impenetrable forest, still supposedly inhabited by wild and uncivilized pagans. But Lithuania wasn't just a forest, no more - it was a forest of things. It had characters, it had drama, it had culture, it had power. Power. Power strong enough to stop Tatars and destroy Teutons. Power elaborate enough to create one of the first systems of codified law since the Antiquity. Power cultured enough to take up on the beliefs and philosophy of the Renaissance...

In the year 1525, when Lithuania was still in the middle of Valdoslavas I's rule, something far, far, far more influential happened in the West, though, no matter how many silvas we were to write. The Roman Catholic Church, the most powerful of all the Christian churches in Europe, had been in rapid decadent conflict for over a few centuries. No matter how many inquisitions and anti-heretic crusades they were to launch, the "heresies" - from Cathars to Hussites - just kept popping up, "like from the devil's ass itself". But this time, Europe was lit on fire, by a German. Philip Melanchthon, a German theologian from Baden, launched what at first seemed only a local debate on theology and the state of the Catholic Church - from the point of view of many reformist preachers, a hive of scum, villainy, indulgence and greed - in Heidelberg University eventually turned into a wide upheaval of theology students sending a petition to the Bishop of Worms, now famously known as the "118 Theses on the State of Corruption, Simony and Indulgences in the Church of Christ". Melanchthon began preaching his idea of "renovating" the Catholic Church according to the Bible, not to the Papacy.

Of course, the Catholics were quick to learn of this new development that was taking southern Germany by storm, and a long, but in hindsight expected, struggle in the name of religion began.
 
Last edited:
I am most happy of the safe haven for the Jewish people.

And Good King Valdislavas! The Catholics have show they true colors! They care not for God, or the follow man, but they own power! Now is the time to end the Catholic Church rule, and free Europe for all the Christians!
 
I am most happy of the safe haven for the Jewish people.

And Good King Valdislavas! The Catholics have show they true colors! They care not for God, or the follow man, but they own power! Now is the time to end the Catholic Church rule, and free Europe for all the Christians!
We need to find an exorcist, I think this man is possessed by Teodoras I's ghost
 
Great update.
Just one tiny nitpick: Is there really a Baden-Württemberg already around at this time in your timeline? How so?
IOTL, Heidelberg was in the Kurpfalz, and the bishop in question would be the Bishop of Worms.
 
Needs more Hyphens.
Bohemian-Silesian-Greater Polish-Lesser Polish-Ruthenian-Hungarian-Transylvanian-Croatian Kingdom

Great update.
Just one tiny nitpick: Is there really a Baden-Württemberg already around at this time in your timeline? How so?
IOTL, Heidelberg was in the Kurpfalz, and the bishop in question would be the Bishop of Worms.
Ah, that's my mistake. I didn't do enough research, I guess. Yeah, it should be Worms.
 
Speaking of heresy, how are the Hussites doing?
Also, how much Paganism left in Lithuania?

Is there anything left of the Golden Horde? They are nominal Lithuanian vassals, they might still be able to help out against the Crimeans.
 
Speaking of heresy, how are the Hussites doing?
Also, how much Paganism left in Lithuania?

Is there anything left of the Golden Horde? They are nominal Lithuanian vassals, they might still be able to help out against the Crimeans.
Hussites achieved a stalemate in the Hussite Wars, not as much of a crushing victory as in OTL due to no Lithuanian support ITTL, but they still survived and are under the Triple Crown.

Paganism is still going strong, detailed a bit more in the first paragraph of part 15.

The Golden Horde is still going, but it's lost a lot of territory to breakaway Khanates. They survived past their OTL expiration date because Lithuania is not really interested in pushing to the steppe, so far at least.
 
Hmm - anti-Slav laws? Not good. In the long run, there aren't enough ethnic Lithuanians - they are going to have to merge with the Slavs to some extent, or they won't be able to hold onto the whole already-vast region of European Russia/Ukraine, let along march to the Pacific. :)
 
Top