Part 81: Reign of Terror (1929-1934)
Lukas Šinkevičius, the Grand Hetman of Lithuania and the dictator of the nation for the last three years, died from the French Flu on January of 1929, throwing his country into chaos. Much of the dictator's reign was centered around reorganizing the state and rooting out political opposition, he didn't even have the time to designate a potential successor to his regime, which meant that once his coffin was laid to the ground, the government entered a free for all between the many factions he relied on in his rule. Many of the militarists and army leaders in the government formed the
Hetmanist faction, seeking to retain the current authoritarian structure of the state and entrench the Hetmanate. They were led by General
Stasys Dirmantas, one of Šinkevičius's former aides and an important authority among the Lithuanian military. The
Restorationists were supported by the civilian members of the dictatorial government - they sought to restore the monarchy, arguing that the Emperor would become an anchor of stability in this tough era. There was a minor
Republican faction, mostly limited to the moderate United Christian deputies, who believed that since order has been restored, the military no longer has a place in the government and should step aside to return the nation to democracy.
And one more. Perhaps the most awful option Lithuania could possibly take in this crossroad -
Revivalism, the ideology of the growing Revival Front and it's leader, Augustinas Stankevičius. It is hard, perhaps even impossible, to place Revivalism into the standard red-blue political spectrum, where red is Protectionism and blue is Unitarianism. Stankevičius presented his party as the "third way", separate from both the "rotting corpse of democracy" and the "degenerate idiocy of Unitarianism" - instead, it's primary feature was extreme nationalism, to the point where even the most reactionary monarchists of the Imperial period would step back and say "that's crazy". Lithuania should be for Lithuanians, and yet at the same time, it must expand to regain it's rightful territory across Eastern Europe. All semblances of democracy and "mob rule" needed to be vanquished and instead, all rule must be concentrated in the Party and it's leader - the
Vadas ("leader"). And that was only the
moderate wing of the Revival Front - this doesn't even take into account the
Sarmatist wing of the party, successors of the fringe 19th century National Lindemanist movement, which declared the Lithuanians to be the "Sarmatians", an ancient nation which supposedly ruled over the Slavs - as such, it is the Lithuanian nation's birthright to rule over and colonize Eastern Europe.
And yet, despite their extremism, the Revivalists were a genuine power in post-Šinkevičius Lithuania, thanks to two of their features. The first one of them was the Green Berets - the official paramilitary of the Revival Front, composed of young and loyal members of the party and tasked with entrenching it within Lithuanian society. It gave the Revivalists a form of "power projection" within the population, giving them a tool which allowed them to eliminate, fight and attack dangerous political opponents. The only other movement within Lithuania which had something like that was the Unitarians - and they had been banned since 1917. The second was the reason why the Revival Front was even invited to the government in the first place - their ties with the Jewish minority. Believe it or not, but while claiming that all minorities within Lithuania must become second class citizens and bend their knee to the Sarmatian master race, the Revival Front was sure to exclude the Jews from the negative rhetoric. A lot of it came due to personal preference - Augustinas Stankevičius had a Jewish grandmother and had lived among the Litvaks for a considerable amount of time in his early life. In addition, although it may seem unbelievable, portions of the Lithuanian Jewish population were genuinely in favor of the Revival Front - this support stemmed from traditional Jewish loyalty to the Lithuanian state, as well as Russia's and Krajina's treatment of their Jewish minorities. The Russians remembered well that the Jews formed militias to stand against them during their War of Independence, and as a result, Jewish rights were severely curbed in their Democracy.
Soon after Šinkevičius's death, a provisional interim government was formed in the Council of Hetmans - but it was merely a smokescreen for the vast political battles, alliances and intrigue happening behind the scenes.
Perhaps, if history had gone differently, this period of "interregnum" would have ended as soon as it began. From the start, the Restorationist faction had a headstart above the others, and they could have potentially secured a majority, had they drawn a powerful figurehead to their disunited movement.
Artūras Vitalgas proposed
Silvestras Žukauskas, the famous hero of the Great European War, one of the most talented and competent leaders in that entire conflict - and he certain wasn't reactionary enough to fall to the Hetmanists or Reformists. However, Žukauskas could tell which way the wind was blowing, - perhaps even towards a civil war - and thus, instead of meddling in the politics he disliked so much, he ditched his wagons and moved West, to France. This gave enough time for the Revivalists to outmaneuver the disunited monarchist faction, and soon, the stage was set for the
Stankevičius-Dirmantas Concordat in late 1929 - the Revivalists and Hetmanists forged an unofficial political alliance (one which a number of Hetmanists opposed, in fact, but Dirmantas himself ended up persuaded that perhaps he would be able to keep the Revivalist extremism in check), and, in the beginning of 1930, when the Green Berets executed the
Purge of the Prezidiumas and either killed or kicked out over 80 of the 150 members of the symbolic parliament, the opposition to the inevitable was over.
Augustinas Stankevičius had become the undisputed ruler of post-Šinkevičius Lithuania, the head of the Council of Hetmans (half Revivalist and half Hetmanist), and, unofficially, the Vadas.
Augustinas Stankevičius (right) and Stasys Dirmantas, the leader and second-in-command of Revivalist Lithuania, respectively
From the very beginning of their rule, the Revivalists initiated a vast transformation of the nation. The Prezidiumas and any other democratic institutions were abolished, and those that remained - namely the courts, the ministries and local administration - were turned into puppets of the Revival Front and the Council of Hetmans, only responding to them and the Vadas. With an executive order in April of 1930, Stankevičius ordered the restoration of the
Saugumas - the former Imperial secret police, whose services were needed now more than ever. A reign of terror had begun - current and former members of any other political movements were repressed, any opposition to the new regime was being rooted out and the rule of the Party was being entrenched.
The Revivalist and Hetmanist response to the economic crisis was quite unique when compared to their neighbors. Stankevičius personally placed one of his longtime friends, the economist and businessman
Vladas Požela, as the chief of economic affairs, and his solution to the brewing recession was to dramatically increase government spending to compensate for the loss of trade and private consumption. This aligned closely with the interests of the Party, which sought to transform and remilitarize the nation as quickly as possible. Large scale public works were organized throughout the country - most notable of them was the
Amelioration Campaign, a vast array of land improvement campaigns to drain the hundreds of miles of swamps across the country and turn them either into farmland or into useful peat plantations. Within a few years, hundreds of kilometers of swamps practically disappeared from the map, endangering dozens of rare marsh species of animals and plants, to the point where an association of biologists in Vienna even sent a letter of protest to the Vadas (it was ignored). Military construction and factory conversion also took place, although here, the Lithuanians were faced with a problem - lack of resources. Lithuania lacked reserves of such vital resources as iron or coal, both important for militarization - that was something Lithuania had to keep in mind...
To fund all this massive spending, especially for purchasing needed resources, Lithuania had to think creatively. One of the ways the Revivalists helped fund their programs was by establishing a
National Lottery, running every month. All of the profit from the lottery went into government spending - and to maximize it, the Party was sure to establish purchasing tickets as a "patriotic endeavor" for the good of the country. The totalitarian state also found a couple of cordial trade partners - most important of them being, interestingly enough, India and Turkey. They both supplied the Lithuanians with cheap coal, iron and oil, sometimes only for credit - after all, how could you miss the opportunity to prop up a potential enemy to Visegrad and Germania on their border?
Jonas Pakalka, one of the figureheads of the Sarmatist movement within the Revival Front, was placed as the chief of internal and education affairs, and he soon began to apply his views into the system. He was one of the men responsible for running the Saugumas and it's terror across the country, and for that, he earned the nickname "Pakarka" ("The Hanger"). Under his and the Vadas's command, the
National Commission on the Lithuanian Language (
Valstybinė lietuvių kalbos komisija) was founded - and it was an institution whose purpose was to "clean the Lithuanian language of any Slavic or Germanic impurities", in a similar manner as the English language and it's Purification of the Mother Tongue. A number of new letters were introduced and thousands of words were replaced with "Lithuanized" synonyms, all government and major private commissions were provided with updated dictionaries and use of the new Lithuanian language was made mandatory. Pakalka is also famously quoted as having said
"History is a set of lies which people agree on", and this view was put in place in his reforms to the education system - the humanitarian sciences from pre-school to university had to unilaterally tow the party line. Old textbooks and "unpatriotic" literature was being thrown out and burned, to be replaced with government organized and assigned "historically accurate literature". Here is an example from a 7th grade history textbook in 1932:
It is known through dozens of historical works and modern research that the Lithuanian, "Ruthenian" and "Russian" people are all descendants of the same tribe - the Sarmato-Lithuanians. [...] The name "Russia" comes from a modern distortion of the real historical name (Sa)"Rumatia", and it's inhabitants - (Sa)"Rumatians". The successor of the ancient Sarmatia was the state of Lithuania-Rus, which, while founded on Sarmatian principles, witnessed a nation which was already in the process of artificial separation, due to the abandonment of the Sarmatian faith and adoption of Christianity. [...] The Russian and Lithuanian nations were about to reunite back into the Sarmatians, but the particularism and separatism of the Russian peoples, instigated by foreign pressure and evil attempts to dissolve the Sarmatian state, stopped this natural process. Despite that, the Ruthenians, Lithuanians and Russians are all descendants of the same tribe - it is just that the Lithuanians have retained most of the Sarmatian heritage, while the Sarmatian heritage within the "Slavs" became diluted due to their abandonment of their history.
FOR HOMEWORK:
[...]
3. Describe the negative effects of the adoption of Christianity in Sarmatia. Why, despite of the inferiority of Christianity compared to the Sarmatian faith, did the Sarmatian kings abandon their religion?
4. Why are the terms "Ruthenian" and "Russian" historical inaccuracies?
[...]
7. Refer to your knowledge of current history and the knowledge you have gained from this lesson and write a paragraph on why Russia and Krajina should not be independent nations.
Perhaps the culmination of the transformations which happened to the Lithuanian state took place in 1932, when, under the orders of the Vadas, the Republican flag and coat of arms of the Lithuanian state were replaced with the banner of the Revival Front.
Flag of Revivalist Lithuania (1932-???)
Troubling...