Part 12: Alas, Poor Leader (1467-1475)
The forces of Matthias Corvinus - the Black Army - sieged down Brest (Brasta) on August of 1467, capturing over 3 000 prisoners, looting the city and moving north. Teodoras I hastily reorganized his forces in Kaunas, far from Poland or the first, but even with this moment of grace to recover, even he was aware that defeating Corvinus was practically impossible. Sure, one might go for the classic Lithuanian strategy and try to lure the Black Army into a forest or something, but was it really worth risking the burning of half the nation just to get this opportunity? While these questions were being pondered over in Lietuva Land, the Bohemo-Hungarian forces continued north, reaching Vawkavysk in the beginning of October, caputuring it's old fortress too in two weeks.
Panic slowly began to ensue, especially when Corvinus moved north, towards Grodno (Gardinas), the gateway to Lietuva Land and one of the biggest cities and fortresses in western Lithuania. Teodoras hastily began preparing his troops for a possible, though likely suicidal, confrontation with the Black Army in the Dainava Forest, but it never came to be.
In the first day of November in 1467, Corvinus suddenly retreated, leaving the outskirts of Grodno and moving back to Poland. To Lithuanians at the time, it looked like God's will descended from the skies to save the heart of the entire nation from certain doom, but the actual reasons for this retreat were far more earthly. The Polish Succession War had been going on for four years, and the Ottoman Turks used this as an opportunity for more and frequent incursions into Bohemia-Hungary, the last Christian nation standing between the Balkans and the center of Christendom. War seemed imminent, and knowing that an extended campaign into Lithuania would consume time, resources, men - especiall during a winter - and leave the nation itself vulnerable to a Muslim invasion, Charles I called Corvinus back, but this lack of information about the events in Southern Europe left Lithuania confused.
Nowadays, the sudden abrupt end of the 1467 Lithuania campaign has since become a source of big what-if discussion - what if Bohemia-Hungary pushed forward? What if the Ottomans did not use the opportunity to raid Hungary and thus distract Charles I? What would have happened? These debates seem to have no end, and numerous sources of obscure information - the recently unearthed sources about Mykolas Žygimantaitis's cooperation with the Bohemo-Hungarians, the "Eastern Bull of 1466", where Pope Pius III granted "all territories east of Vistula" to Charles I, and other documents - is what makes this discussion so interesting. But the consensus is that no one knows exactly.
Despite the retreat, Teodoras I did not have the capabilities to resume the offensive, both in a manpower and morale situation, and this situation prompted Charles I to propose an offer of peace in January of 1468. The offer, which later went down in history as the
Peace of Plock, was quite punitive - Lithuania renounces all claims to the Polish throne and accepts Charles I as the rightful ruler of the Kingdom of Poland, as well as pays a sizable sum for war reparations - indeed, punitive enough that Teodoras I wanted to simply decline it and press forward until he got something better, but this time the nobility of the nation stepped in. The higher council of Lithuania - the Council of Lords - said no to resumption of hostilities, and despite his burning desire to continue, he was forced to peace out, with a single demand of his own - that Mykolas, the pretender, is extradited to Lithuania.
Bohemia-Hungary said no, instead secretly releasing Mykolas in occupied Brest to prepare his forces for war. Despite the declination, Lithuania agreed to the peace terms, and it was signed in Plock in March of 1468, ending the Polish Succession War.
The war was a defining moment in the history of Eastern-Central Europe, and in the history of Lithuania. For the first time in it's history, it's expansion was stopped, it's wings were clipped, and it's army was humiliated in battle. The war led to dozens of thousands of Lithuanian deaths, and eroded the prestige of Teodoras I Jogailaitis. It was the introduction to modern tactics and technology in the region. Bohemia-Hungary-Poland left the war as a winner, but a costly one. The newly acquired Poland lost over 30 percent of it's population, over 50% in Podolia, and the remnants weren't particularly fond of this new government. The nation's treasury was spent on this draining war, and was by now almost empty, filled up mostly by Lithuanian war reparations. However, one positive thing came out of this conflict for the Triple Crown - it provided an injected a sense of unity into this multicultural state. The prestige of the formerly controversial House of Luxembourg rose to new heights, and it slowly started to stylize itself as a Bohemo-Hungarian, not a Brandenburgian or Luxembourgian dynasty.
What followed the Polish Succession War? As is known today, Mykolas Žygimantaitis, secretly supported by Bohemia-Hungary, raised a revolt, but it's details are still unclear. It is known that in 1469 and 1470, there were numerous small-scale battles across Western Lithuania, particularly around the Brest and Lutsk area, ended only by the pretender's death from old age in 1471. The Chronicle of Lithuania, highly supervised by the Grand Duke, purposefully left out all details of this revolt to keep the authority of the monarch stable. The Lithuanian leadership saw no problems with tampering with history for their own goals.
The last few years of Teodoras I's rule were uneventful. For the most part, the already slowly dying Grand Duke of Lithuania focused his efforts on keeping what was left under him in check. A few punitive raids against Novgorod and Pskov, some treaties with Tver to ensure their loyalty, some efforts to relieve the war exhaustion still rampant in the nation, and finally, in April 1475, he stepped out of the mortal world with the Reaper at his side.
Teodoras Jogailaitis, the son of one of the most revered figures in Lithuanian history, is a controversial figure in Lithuanian historiography. Most people agree that Lithuania's tremendous failure in the Polish Succession War was at least partially his fault, and his unyielding focus on turning his realm into a militarized state heavily hurt the arts and culture of the recovering nation, but even then many still don't completely write him off as a failure. His success against the Livonian Order, even if it was not accomplished by him, is till upheld, and his independent, though somewhat self-centered attitude regarding the mending of the East-West Schism make some see him as a patriot, even if such a claim is very, very bold. Perhaps it's nostalgia of his father, who was indeed a great man, that saves Teodoras I from being shunned from history completely.
Upon the death of the old Grand Duke, Prince Algirdas succeeded him as
Algirdas II. Already over 30 years old at the time of succession, the new Grand Duke did not have the same problem of inheriting at a very young age.
What does the future hold for Lithuania with this new leader?
Teodoras I, Grand Duke of Lithuania, 1409-1475
Algirdas II, Grand Duke of Lithuania, 1438-