Well, I don't forget about them. But they are the internal problems of the three 'big nations'.
That's the question to the topic starter -
which of the "big nations" has more suppressed 'ethnic' minorities to weaken them respectively?
Well, I don't forget about them. But they are the internal problems of the three 'big nations'.
Bohemia has Germans, Poland has Ruthenians and some Germans (and also a lot of Jews - the second largest community in Europe, in fact, after Lithuania), while Hungary has Slovaks, Romanians, Romani, some Ruthenians, Croats and, since 1834, Bosniaks and Serbs.Well, I don't forget about them. But they are the internal problems of the three 'big nations'.
That's the question to the topic starter -
which of the "big nations" has more suppressed 'ethnic' minorities to weaken them respectively.
Well, from the top off my head... Hungary is the weakest 'big nation' considering the number of the oppressed ethnic minorities. And most of Hungary's ethnic minorities are Slavic (correct me if I am wrong).Hungary has Slovaks, Romanians, Romani, some Ruthenians, Croats and, since 1834, Bosniaks and Serbs.
You judge which one could have the most problems.
Well, they have the positive of being a liberal constitutional monarchy, so that at least makes them more stable than the two of their eastern neighbours.So ye, Visegrad is resting on a gunpowder keg - it might blow up any minute.
Agreed.Well, they have the positive of being a liberal constitutional monarchy, so that at least makes them more stable than the two of their eastern neighbours.
As I understood the Hungarian language is the official language of the Visegradian Union, the language of the central government and the army.Hungary is the ruling nation, as was stated in updates before. That is where the Royal Family and the Convention of Three Nations reside. And yes, there is one federal Visegradian army...
As I understood the Hungarian language is the official language of the Visegradian Union, the language of the central government and the army.
But that is a very difficult to learn for a Slav, being unrelated, belonging to Finno-Ugrian linguistic group.
So we have a union where the majority of the population speak the Slavic languages:
Poland+Bohemia=32 million (56%)**
And the minority of the population speak Hungarian=25 million (44%)*
*actually it is even worse for Hungarian, as inside Hungary itself there are different Slavs (the Ruthenes (Ukrainians), the Slovaks, the Serbs, the Croats) - I guess about 3-5 million in all.
So overall in the Visegradian Union the Slavic languages are spoken by 36 million (63%) and Hungarian by 21 million (37%).
** here I understand that there are Non-Slavic minorities in Poland and Bohemia, but they already definitely use the Slavic language, so I included them as Slavic-speakers in this calculation.
We have to realize, that Slavic languages are mutually intelligible (more so if they are neighbors, which is a case here); a Slav doesn't have to learn anything to understand 30-80% of the the other Slavic language. (Me, being a Slav makes me an expert, before you ask).
So for a Slav learning Hungarian takes years; for a Visegradian Slav learning other Visegradian Slavic language takes months.
My point is that it's a matter of time when the Visegradian Slavs realize that the official language of the Union has to be some Slavic language, as the Slavic speakers are the majority - 63% of the total Visegradian population.
The Polish language is an obvious candidate for becoming the official Visegradian language of the central government, but as I said it might be any Visegradian Slavic language.
The German language is a candidate, I suppose.Hmm... are there any barely spoken/existent languages in Visegrad that could serve as a 'neutral' language that serves as an administrative language?
Well, there is historical precedent for this to be a possibility.It would also be interestig if they tried to create an artifical language Visegradian language that mixed all the major ones together. Something like that could probably be done today, but I'm not sure if such a thing would be possible in the 18th Century. It would depend upon how advanced linguistics are in this timeline, really.
Well, there is historical precedent for this to be a possibility.
As I understood the Hungarian language is the official language of the Visegradian Union, the language of the central government and the army.
But that is a very difficult to learn for a Slav, being unrelated, belonging to Finno-Ugrian linguistic group.
So we have a union where the majority of the population speak the Slavic languages:
Poland+Bohemia=32 million (56%)**
And the minority of the population speak Hungarian=25 million (44%)*
*actually it is even worse for Hungarian, as inside Hungary itself there are different Slavs (the Ruthenes (Ukrainians), the Slovaks, the Serbs, the Croats) - I guess about 3-5 million in all.
So overall in the Visegradian Union the Slavic languages are spoken by 36 million (63%) and Hungarian by 21 million (37%).
** here I understand that there are Non-Slavic minorities in Poland and Bohemia, but they already definitely use the Slavic language, so I included them as Slavic-speakers in this calculation.
We have to realize, that Slavic languages are mutually intelligible (more so if they are neighbors, which is a case here); a Slav doesn't have to learn anything to understand 30-80% of the the other Slavic language. (Me, being a Slav makes me an expert, before you ask).
So for a Slav learning Hungarian takes years; for a Visegradian Slav learning other Visegradian Slavic language takes months.
My point is that it's a matter of time when the Visegradian Slavs realize that the official language of the Union has to be some Slavic language, as the Slavic speakers are the majority - 63% of the total Visegradian population.
The Polish language is an obvious candidate for becoming the official Visegradian language of the central government, but as I said it might be any Visegradian Slavic language.
Silesia belongs to Bohemia and has been so since the 14th century.Can't remember Silesia, which nation does that belong to? might just be a autonomous region, though if part of Bohemia, they certainly would have more than 5 million people?
I think you overestimate pan slavism. Would a Croat really view Polish as less Alien than Hungarian, when they've lived in Hungarian lands for centuries?
Visegrad holds a so what liberal view on languages - the majority of all important documents and official texts are translated into all three languages (it would only make sense, of course), while the work in each of the nations' autonomous convention is done in their native language.It has nothing to do with pan slavism actually.
It's all about convenience only; as I said, if you're a Slav it takes you years to learn Hungarian (belonging to Finno-Ugrian linguistic group), but it takes you months to learn the other (Visegradian) Slavic language.
So it's not about 'Slavic brotherhood' stuff no no; it's about ease of use of the official language, usability.
If you're a Visegradian Slav and you want to take a job in the Central Visegradian government or the central army, you have to waste years of your life learning the Non-Slavic Hungarian language. It is much, much easier for a Slav to spend just a few months to master some other (Visegradian) Slavic language.
Some Visegradian Slavic peoples may dislike some other Visegradian Slavic peoples; but it cannot take away the fact of life - if the official language is some Slavic, you don't even have to learn it to understand the essence of the text. But if a Slav is reading the official text in Hungarian, s/he won't understand a single word in it (those are mutually unintelligible linguistic groups).
But my point about taking a job in the Central government/army stands though.Visegrad holds a so what liberal view on languages - the majority of all important documents and official texts are translated into all three languages (it would only make sense, of course), while the work in each of the nations' autonomous convention is done in their native language.
Silesia belongs to Bohemia and has been so since the 14th century.
I already stated the most likely guesses on Visegrad's population earlier in the thread, and I imagine Bohemia would have somewhere around 12 million.