Riding a Beam of Numbers

Selene 4

A flawless launch puts the unmanned VDL-Cargo into a 182x183km Earth orbit and translunar injection is completed just over an hour later. This time, the ECPS performs slightly better than expected, pushing the 34,027kg VDL-Cargo towards the Moon with 4.9t of propellant remaining at shutdown.

A course correction 24 hours out lowers the anticipated perilune and in doing so successfully tests the VDL's main engine. It proves to be sufficiently accurate that no further corrections are needed. Lunar orbit injection begins at T+87:38 under automatic control, lasting 7m 5s and resulting in a 41x243km lunar orbit, far lower than expected. A 3s burn an hour later raises perilune to a safer 66km.

Plans for further manoeuvers are put on hold while the error is analysed. It is clear from models of the orbit’s parameters that the injection burn was made at slightly the wrong angle (about a degree out). Over the next two orbits, controllers diagnose a misalignment of a gimbal offset when the system was last updated shortly before the LOI burn.
A new offset is uploaded to the VDL's computer, but it is thought safest to attempt a relative minor manoeuver to test the settings before proceeding further. At T+96:02 the orbit is changed to a near circular 95x100km.

With the ship now in a stable configuration, the Mission Controller delays the descent to give controllers time to rest and allow for further checks. Lessons have been learned from the early “Explorateur” flights, when controllers made quick (often too quick) adjustments and then continued with the mission as if nothing had happened. Modern flight plans allow time to solve some of these unexpected problems and flight rules now demand that controllers stop and diagnose faults that might threaten the mission, rather than relying on ad-hoc adjustments.

As part of these checks, engineers conduct a complete ground based computer simulation of the upcoming descent. The parameters of the ship's orbit, fuel loads, centre of gravity, inertia, control response times, engine performance and an exact copy of all the settings stored in the on-board computer’s memory are used to check how the VDL will behave during descent. The powerful ICL mainframes at Mission Control take the hundreds of numbers that define the properties of the VDL and use them to simulate every pitch, yaw, thruster firing, throttle response and dozens of other parameters of the ship’s behaviour as it travels down to the surface.

Trajectory designers have programmed the ship with an “ideal path” to follow; this is a smooth curve, gently bending down towards a vertical touchdown at the landing site. The path is carefully designed to allow the VDL to balance thrust, attitude and lunar gravity at all stages of flight, without the need for any quick changes.

Of course, this ideal solution will never occur in reality. The ship will always be a bit high, too slow, a different mass or not quite as responsive as the calculations predict. Consequently, the most important task of the guidance algorithm is to allow for these errors and steer the ship towards the ideal path, while also accepting input from pilots and updates from the landing radar.
It must also ensure that all manoeuvers happen quite slowly and gently; they cannot be allowed to call for say, a “snap turn” of 60 degrees. It takes the RCS thrusters time to torque the ship in any particular direction and to limit the buildup of any excessive pitch rates, the system is electronically restricted to a maximum rate of 5 degrees/second.
In addition to the ship’s position, velocity and acceleration, the computer has to consider two further parameters – “Jerk”, the rate-of-change of acceleration (essentially due to pitch rate) and “Snap”, the rate-of-change of rate-of-change of acceleration (dominated by the rate-of-change of pitch rate due to the action of the attitude control thrusters). Each of these parameters is a vector and is the differential of the previous one, and so it is possible for the computer to solve them numerically.

On Selene 4 the caution at Mission Control pays off. Controllers discover an erroneous zero setting of a target point in one of the guidance programs. If this zero had gone unnoticed, the effect would have been to cause the VDL to descend too quickly in the middle part of the landing. It would have crashed shortly after switching to the "Targeting phase”. A straightforward change of a number in one word of the computer's memory is all that is required to correct the problem.

The flight plan is resumed at T+104:12 and lunar descent orbit is entered at T+105:35, bringing the VDL to within 16.3km of the lunar surface when at perilune. After two orbits to refine the ground-based tracking solution, the computer is commanded to proceed with the landing.

At T+110:25:02, the "Pilotmode 5" guidance routine ignites the engine to start the 700km-long braking burn and descent towards the lunar surface.
For the first 20s, the engine fires at its minimum 25% throttle setting, before going to 100% for 10s, then back to 25% for a further 15s. Although not strictly necessary on an unmanned flight, these throttle changes serve to test the engine's performance early in the landing. If something went wrong at this stage, a crew could quickly and safely abort the descent and stay in lunar orbit.

The throttling and early phase of descent proceeds smoothly, albeit with the ship pitching under its control thrusters more than was expected. At 400s (6m 40s) into the descent, a manned flight would reach the Landing Decision Gate (LDG - the infamous "point of no return"). The VDL is performing well and if there had been a crew on board they would no doubt have been able to continue to attempt a landing.

90km out from the landing site, ground tracking suggests the ship will land short and the Targeting Pilot, Guy Larosse, is advised he will have to extend his glide slope (as it is still called, despite not being in any way a glide) in the final stages of the landing.
Twelve minutes 9 seconds into the descent, the ship reaches a point 10km from its programmed landing site and the on-board computer automatically switches to Pilotmode 4, the Targeting Phase. The VDL pitches down by about 40 degrees, bringing the landing site into view of the LPI. For these unmanned cargo flights a TV camera is mounted on this computer-controlled sight, which always points towards the current landing site and feeds images back to a controller on Earth.
This controller (who will always be a Selene astronaut) stands in a duplicate of a VDL cockpit and can instruct the VDL's computer to update its landing site based on the TV images being fed back to him from the Moon.
The fuzzy black-and-white image takes a moment to stabilise, but by 12m35s Larosse confirms he sees the surface. He recognises a small crater to the north of the landing site a few moments later. After a second or two he nudges his control stick eight times to re-designate the landing site about 800m downrange. Thinking he is still short of the site, he waits for nearly 15s to let the VDL properly stabilise onto its new trajectory, then enters 5 more clicks, 4 downrange and one to the south, before quickly clicking one back (to move uprange). Satisfied with the images he sees through the LPI, Larosse’s job is done. Although he continues to monitor the ship's progress down to the surface, ready to make further updates or even attempt manual control if the on-board systems fail, he enters no further updates and the VDL settles on its new course.
At 15m52s the computer switches to its final landing mode “Pilotmode 2” - to stop any residual horizontal motion and gently lower the VDL to the surface.

Contact probes and accelerometers indicate that the VDL touches down 16 minutes 11 seconds after Descent Engine Ignition, at a speed of just 1.2m/s. The engine shuts itself off 0.6s later and no further movement is detected after DPI+16:13.2.
At T+110:41:18, cheers and applause erupt around the control room at Biscarosse as the telemetry indicating touchdown is received. It quickly settles as mission engineers focus on the status of their new lander. Two minutes later, a mast carrying the panoramic camera is raised and starts to send higher quality images of the landing site back to Earth.

Earth based radio location and images from the camera soon confirm that the ship touched down a mere 70m from the planned landing site, which is about 90km southeast of the crater Copernicus. The performance of the systems and Larosse’s corrections during the descent were almost perfect. Calculations and telemetry agree that the VDL had 820-830kg of fuel remaining on board at landing, slightly higher than the expected margin. It could have flown for another 138s, sufficient to allow it to land (at most) 5km further downrange or 2km to either side. The final landed mass of 15,702kg is greater than all previous Selene, NASA and Soviet lunar landers put together.

The ship has successfully ridden its beam of numbers from 4,000mph down to zero, from ten miles up and 450 miles away to land within a few hundred feet of the pre-planned site.

Ten years after the Project was begun, the first lander large enough to carry a crew has reached the lunar surface.
 
Last edited:
there should be more space threads in this forum.

Truly excellent ! Hope the updates keep coming fast .

Well, we certainly also want the standards to remain high. It would be very easy to have bad space-wanks written by people who refuse to be realistic about what rockets and other related technologies can do in a given state of the art, fail to pay attention to economics, have unrealistic notions of how much resources are available for space programs, and so on. It also helps that most of the ongoing good space TLs have authors who either are pretty good storytellers or invite in partners to write stuff they are not so confident about.

In writing that, I've been thinking I might be guilty of every way to do it wrong in the book--I fancy I can be realistic about the limits of particular rocket types at least, but I often want things to go in directions that perhaps fly in the face what is possible, politically and perhaps technologically as well.

I see plenty of examples from off this site of people who use ATL space stories to ride political hobbyhorses too. I typically see them go a way I think is both wrong and repulsive, but perhaps my own version of the same sin would be just as bad.:eek:

A lot of our good space TL authors seem to be experienced engineers, if not in aerospace (and quite a lot of them are in that field professionally) than anyway some kind of engineering. How many more good engineers who are also good writers can the site keep attracting?

Well, apparently we do get new ones now and again, so I look forward o the next installation of this one!

Right now I'm very puzzled; it seems the landing of Selene 4's cargo lander went pretty well. So why were we told Selene's offices were very reticent and coy?

Waiting for the other shoe to drop here. Is anything wrong at all, or have Selene's managers been taking some edgy PR advice that tells them they need to string along the public audience?
 
...
Right now I'm very puzzled; it seems the landing of Selene 4's cargo lander went pretty well. So why were we told Selene's offices were very reticent and coy?

Waiting for the other shoe to drop here. Is anything wrong at all, or have Selene's managers been taking some edgy PR advice that tells them they need to string along the public audience?

The landing was almost perfect and the PR guys are complaining about the lack of information.

All will be revealed in the next installment...
 
Destination Moon

Selene Project press conferences are held on a regular basis and are frequently rather dull.
This one, however, was announced at the last minute, and by the Project’s Director, not by the usual PR staff. Every journalist, newscaster or writer who might be able to reach Paris in less than 24 hours has scrambled to do so.

At 1800 Paris time, the conference begins with a time-lapse replay of footage recorded from the Selene 4 LPI camera, from an altitude of about 2.5km and down to landing. The images show an “astronaut’s eye view” of what it would be like to land on the Moon. TV news organisations covering the conference are provided with a simultaneous feed for rebroadcast to Europe and North America. These are the first pictures of a lunar approach and soft landing ever taken (TV from US Ranger spacecraft in the 60s ended with the spacecraft crashing).

The projection screen goes blank and Project Director-General Jerome Aubinere, Britain's Minister for Aerospace Michael Heseltine and French Minister of Space Robert Galley are followed onto the conference stage by two Selene astronauts, James Waters and Alain Keifer.

The ripple of voices dies down to an expectant hush, and Aubinere starts the conference. Alternating between English and French, he begins with the dry statement “Ladies and Gentlemen, analysis of the flight of Selene 4 is now complete and we can announce that the mission can be characterised as being a success. The VDL is stable on the lunar surface and the images you are seeing were taken earlier today by the on board television camera” (the screen is now showing still images of the lunar surface).

“The systems of the VDL are functioning normally and the fuel and oxidiser on board are being kept cool and remain in a useable condition.”
< there the quiet murmur of chatter in the room >
“This success of this mission, in addition to the demonstrations conducted during the flight of Selene 2, have allowed us to bypass several stages of the test programme.
We have therefore decided to attempt a manned landing on the Selene 3 mission in eight weeks’ time. Plans for thi…."

Although Aubinere went on undeterred, the rest of his statement is inaudible under cheers and shouted questions.
Most of the rest of the news conference is taken up with questions to the astronauts and neither minister has the chance to say much beyond "This is a great day for our countries…"



“Light the Blue Touchpaper and Stand Clear” - The Legacy of Zond 11

In February 1973, shortly after it became clear that Zond 11 was going to orbit the Moon, Selene Project managers were asked in secret if it might be possible to attempt a lunar landing on Selene 3, assuming that the Selene 2 and 4 missions were completed successfully.

Their reply was a rather guarded "Maybe", as the Selene 3 mission plan would need to be revised and crew training would need to be accelerated. Part of the purpose of the Selene 3 flight was to act as a backup to cover any objectives that may be missed on Selene 2. However, they were able to advise that if all these objectives were met, some consideration was being given to an extended "mission of opportunity" for Selene 3.
A landing attempt would also rely on the Selene 4 VDL-Cargo mission to the lunar surface working perfectly. Due to vehicle construction schedules, the order of two of the test flights had been switched in 1972, meaning that the cargo flight of Selene 4 was already set to fly before the manned Selene 3.

A few weeks later, in a quiet corner after a Selene briefing, Director Aubinere was able to provide British and French ministers with more detail. In fact, studies had been underway for some time into whether the training, engineering and programme schedules could accommodate a landing attempt on Selene 3. He cautioned against any haste, but said it might be possible if the mission objectives of Selene 2 and 4 were met.

The faults seen during the launch of Selene 2 later that month seemed to rule out any advances in the schedule. Before the results of the failure investigation, it seemed more than possible that an additional test flight would be needed. If that were the case, even keeping the December date for Selene 5 could be tricky, never mind bringing it forward. However, nothing was ruled out.

The situation advanced and retreated over the next seven weeks. Aubinere’s statement that Selene will be “first to the Moon” attracted much private criticism; at the time there seemed little prospect of delivering on such a rash promise, while Ministers in Britain were presented with intelligence that the Soviets could be ready to launch in June and again in October, potentially beating even the most optimistic launch date for Selene 5 (early November).

A Selene briefing for ministers and their officials on the 28th May provided an excuse for all parties to meet. Once again, the situation had evolved.
The Project’s director advised that the next four Selene flights were now on schedule. The report into the failure of CLV-6 highlighted a simple quality control defect, indirectly caused by the failure of the previous flight. The problems with the Constellation launcher appeared to be fixed and the VDL/PROM spacecraft had been extensively tested over the past few years. The next flight, Selene 4, would be the last major test of the system; an automated landing by a VDL-Cargo on the lunar surface. This time, Project managers were quietly confident of success. Despite the recent difficulties and uncertainty surrounding the future of the Project, morale is high.

The real discussions started later that day; their purpose would be to resolve the question of whether Selene 3 should attempt a lunar landing. At this meeting, both sides were better briefed and despite their earlier caution, Selene mission planners had been hard at work looking into whether a landing might be possible. The flight of Selene 3 had been re-scheduled for early September, which would be just within the 60 day operational capability of the Selene 4 VDL-Cargo (due for launch in July). This spacecraft is to be configured as an "all up” test, meaning it will be equipped with all the necessary systems and propellant that could be used to refuel a PROM on the lunar surface.

Despite the sense of enthusiasm that had built since February, neither British nor French programme managers had entirely lost their sense of caution and there were those opposed to any changes in the schedule. At the meeting, it is pointed out that very few surface experiments will be ready in time for a September launch, while abandoning the existing lunar orbit mission would mean the loss of a great deal of the landing site photography that will be needed for future missions.
Programme managers’ views that "a single successful landing [by Selene 4] would not be proof that the system is reliable enough for a crew" annoys government officials on both sides, who see the record of a dozen successful Aurora and Selene test flights and consequently disagree. They are asked “Why not?” – surely if an unmanned lander can safely touch down under remote control, wouldn’t a piloted one have an even greater chance of success?

Engineering managers are more in favour of the attempt. They agree that the control and guidance systems could be ready for a landing attempt in September, and any minor pieces of equipment or tools that are not ready for the launch of Selene 4 could be carried in place of some of the surface science equipment on Selene 3.

At the time of the meeting in May, the Selene 3 mission plan was to fly to the Moon and practice the landing procedures, right up to the point at which the descent engine would be fired. Plans and training were therefore already in place to put the ship in a position from which it could attempt a landing – indeed, that was the primary objective of the flight. If a landing is to be made, an expanded flight plan would be needed from that point on, with only 7-8 weeks to finalise it (mission plans had to be frozen at least one month before a flight to allow time for final review, distribution and last-minute training). However, a draft plan for a Selene 3 landing mission already existed; it had been produced earlier in the year as part of a "training exercise for flight controllers". No doubt it would need some improvement, but details could probably be adapted from plans for later flights.

The crew of Selene 3 (James “Jock” Waters & Alain Keifer) are both highly experienced test pilots and VDL specialists. They are as well trained as anyone to fly the PROM and land the VDL. However, they have had relatively little practice when it comes to surface operations, including the crucial refuelling sequence. Selene managers are then asked as to whether the crew of Selene 5 (John Roberts & Xavier Tigges - who are in training for surface operations) could be substituted?

The astronauts themselves had been involved in the discussions at an early stage and responded with the sort of professional caution that might be expected of experienced test pilots. Commander Waters' opinion was that he would be prepared to attempt a landing, but that he and Keifer would need to quickly switch the focus of their training to the surface refuelling operations. John Roberts expressed concern at the possible advance of their entire schedule by three months and the consequent loss of time to practice the landing and surface sequences. Xavier Tigges would prove to be the most forthright about his concerns (or rather his distrust) of this sort of last-minute change, which in his view greatly increases the chance of failure.
Nevertheless, all the crews had confidence in the spacecraft and the engineers who built them. If asked to attempt a landing, all of them would be willing to try, and all of them believed that it could succeed.

After two days of wrangling with technical details and schedules, it was agreed to prepare complete plans for a landing mission on Selene 3. These plans could only be used if the Selene 4 VDL-Cargo performs as expected and if all went well with the flight of Selene 3 to lunar orbit. A very limited surface mission is all that can be incorporated into the flight plan at this late stage. The original Selene 3 lunar orbit mission would become the backup plan; one that can still be switched to at any point, right up to the decision to ignite the engine for landing.

All four crewmembers chose to remain with their existing missions. This is often seen as a controversial decision which later caused difficulties for them, however at the time it was regarded as the most practical option. The crew of Selene 3 were already trained for the flight to and from the Moon. They would therefore be able to focus on the landing and refuelling procedures in the few months before liftoff.
John Roberts and Xavier Tigges are often complimented on the calm they showed and the support they offered after the decision. In reality, it was by mutual agreement, and as Waters said at the time, "I'd still give Xavier and John 50:50 on being the first down. Landing's our extended mission, it’s their primary mission".

The comment reflected a point that is often lost. Irrespective of the outcome of the Selene 3 flight, lessons could be learned that would make Selene 5 a better mission. If anything, it made it more likely that Selene 5 would land and that Roberts and Tigges would be able to walk on the Moon.

With the need for plans to be changed and a wider range of personnel to be briefed, Selene staff were ordered not to discuss any changes to flight plans with anyone outside of the Project. There is no point in raising people’s hopes only to have them dashed by some technical problem. Both British and French governments have agreed that an announcement will be made later, preferably once the status of the Selene 4 lander is known.

Two months later, prompt analysis of the landing sequence and the post-landing status of the Selene 4 lander is conducted with unusual secrecy. No operational "red lines" are found to have been crossed and in fact the vehicle appears to be in better shape than expected. The VDL landed with a significant fuel reserve, which means it has a larger than expected reserve of power to cool its cargo of LO2 and Methane and maintain telemetry links with mission control. Unless there is a mechanical failure, predictions suggest it will be able to operate for 74 days, rather than the baseline requirement of 60. All it has to do now is keep its payload cold during the hot lunar day and survive two cold lunar nights.

-----

Following the sensational announcement in Paris, there is a blizzard of information coming out of the Selene Project. Months of intensive work has led to the development of a landing mission plan for Selene 3. Hundreds of changes to timelines and computer programs have been simulated and tested, however the underlying flexibility of the Selene systems and the experience of the control teams mean that very few "completely new" plans have been needed.

Up until the time of descent ignition, the old Selene 3 flight plan is unchanged. If the landing is successful, the crew will spend just 62 hours on the surface, a time calculated to be the minimum needed to safely refuel their ship and conduct a short science mission.
About an hour after landing, they will enter the VDL's surface hab to don their lunar surface suits, before beginning the first Moonwalk around 4 hours later.
The objective of this is to deploy and test their surface rover, then take samples from the area around their VDL. Once this is completed, they will drive over to the VDL-Cargo and attempt to offload one of four propellant tanks and bring it back to start refuelling their PROM Earth return ship. A "night" in the Hab will allow time for a rest and the diagnosis of any problems encountered with this first round of refuelling operations.
Day 2 will be spent completing the refuelling and taking several additional samples from around both landing sites.
Day 3 will be kept in reserve to allow for any overrun in refuelling operations. If all is well, the crew will make a short scientific traverse in their rover before shutting down the VDL and preparing to lift off in the PROM. An overnight stay in lunar orbit will allow for refinement of the tracking before the PROM boosts itself back towards Earth.
Procedures for the coast back to Earth and re-entry are almost identical to the old Selene 3 flight plan.

Mission constraints and orbital mechanics dictate that two launch opportunities are available, on the 3rd and 4th of September. Each opportunity lasts just under three hours, allowing some time for any minor problems with the spacecraft or launch vehicle to be resolved without the need to abandon that day's launch attempt.

If all goes to plan and the mission launches on the 3rd, mankind will reach the Moon at noon on Friday the 7th September.
 
why not convert selene into the european space agency :(

I do hope you continue a new timeline after you finish selene one anyway.

Excellent writing , keep the updates going .
 
why not convert selene into the european space agency :(

I do hope you continue a new timeline after you finish selene one anyway.

Excellent writing , keep the updates going .

ESRO still exists in the story (although for obvious reasons it isn't quite the same organisation - e.g. the UK isn't a member yet) They're talking about an "expanded ESRO" and France has mentioned a new pan-European agency, so there is certainly potential there.
 
The Summer of '73

Aug-73
Hermes-2-1
SSLV-19 launches an improved Hermes Mk.2 TV relay satellite for Britain’s GPO.
Five hours 58 minutes after liftoff, the Silver Star launcher deploys the satellite into a 35,802x35,610km orbit, just below geostationary altitude. These new versions of Hermes include improved transponders and a proper digital computer, replacing the rather limited programmer used on earlier spacecraft. This UK-specific version can provide direct relay of two TV stations, although other versions intended for Canada and Japan will also include radio relays. A lighter structure has allowed for a larger fuel capacity and greater redundancy of electronic components.
The satellite operates at full capacity until 8th February 1978, when a failure in the attitude reference system makes it impossible to continue public TV broadcasts. It is used for occasional international relay experiments until January 1979. Boosted to a disposal orbit and switched off 15 Feb 1979.

The Soviets announce that the flight of Soyuz 11 is underway. The announced purpose of this Earth orbit research flight is to test new systems which will be used on future space stations. In the West, there is widespread speculation this is a failed Soviet lunar mission. Wild reports that the crew were killed on takeoff or are unable to return to Earth are quickly shown to be nonsense, but rumours persist that the flight was originally intended to go to the Moon.
The crew land safely in southern Russia 13 days after liftoff.


The crew of Selene 3 enter a protective quarantine, four weeks before their flight. The stated objective of this is to minimise the risk of their contracting any infections before the flight. In practice, it is also a good excuse for them to stay away from press conferences and other public appearances and focus on an intensive period of training, simulations and briefings. It proves to be a timely decision. Media requests for interviews and access to the crew increase fivefold once it becomes clear the Soviet Soyuz 11 flight is not going to the Moon.

American and British Intelligence are aware of the background to the so-called "Soyuz 11" flight. Although full details are not available, the flight was clearly a failed lunar mission. In line with previous Soviet practice, a launch in mid-July had placed a booster stage into Earth orbit. The crewed ship (a.k.a. Soyuz 11) would then have docked with this booster and used it to reach the Moon. Analysts speculate that either the docking failed or the booster stage did not function, resulting in a backup Earth orbit mission being flown instead. It is known that the flight was to have been an attempt to put an unmanned "LK-M" lander on the lunar surface. It was never intended to be a manned landing. Public rumour and speculation surrounding the flight persisted until the fall of the Soviet Union, when the true facts emerged.


A worldwide data network test is conducted. Selene communications engineers test the processes that will be used to relay data, voice and TV images between the spacecraft and mission control in France. These tests have been made before each flight, however the importance of the upcoming mission and the fact that it will carry experiments from several other nations mean that a wide variety of other systems are involved. Three NASA ground stations, four NASA aircraft, a joint US-Australian station, two USN tracking ships and three Intelsat geostationary satellites are incorporated into the tests, in addition to the usual Anglo-French assets. All these units will play their part in maintaining near-continuous radio contact with Selene 3 throughout all stages of its flight.

After a two-week long night the sun rises on Copernicus Landing, the site of the Selene 4 VDL. The lander has continued to send back tiny amounts of telemetry during the lunar night, showing that its key systems have survived the cold. Unfortunately, the mast mounted camera is not among these, meaning that a plan to photograph the landing of Selene 3 from the surface is not possible. However, the vital cooling system used to prevent the liquid Oxygen and Methane cargo from boiling away during the hot lunar day is successfully restarted a few hours after sunrise. It is confirmed that the VDL still has enough fuel available to run the cooler for the entire lunar day. After that, it will no longer be needed; if all goes well, within a day of the next sunrise, the VDL-Cargo will be joined by a manned lander.

Integration of the CLV-8 launch vehicle and spacecraft is completed on Rainbow Beach Pad 8. A three week extended countdown will start on the 13th, allowing plenty of time for additional checks and maintenance if it is needed.

News organisations from around the world are briefed on what is likely to be available for print or broadcast during the flight of Selene 3.
British, French and Australian press all have free access, however other nations' media complain that they are being charged ground rent for access to mission briefings, facilities for remote vans and so on. The sums involved are comparatively small, certainly to the well-funded US news organisations, but it is the Americans who complain the loudest. They point out that there is significant US (NASA) involvement in the flight and that they should therefore be given equal access. This argument has no effect whatsoever on Selene publicity managers. British members of the group feel that it is fair to ask foreign media to make a "modest contribution" to cover the costs of accommodating them. The French attitude is much simpler: "If you don't wish to broadcast … others will". All the networks decide to live with it and eventually pay up.
In Britain, it has been decided that the BBC will be given first rights to the live TV and radio broadcasts as well as to all the key phases of the flight. This provokes a protest from ITV, however the BBC has been closely involved in Selene publicity for many years and is regarded as being the only broadcast organisation capable of delivering the quantity and depth of coverage that is needed.

The crew of Selene 3 depart for Australia. Their final two weeks before the flight will be spent in the relatively isolated environment of the Woomera testing range, which hosts part of the Lunar Surface Training Facility.

The Selene Film Unit's 90 minute documentary "Moonship" makes its debut in cinemas. Although unashamedly populist in its tone, the film seeks to explain all the phases of a Selene lunar mission. Real footage of launch, Earth orbit, translunar coast and lunar orbit is included. Library film and animation then show how the astronauts will land on the Moon near a VDL-Cargo ship and use their Lunar Rover to transport fuel across to the Earth-return ship, the PROM. Examples of the sort of tools and systems that are needed to explore the Moon are shown, including a compressed time-lapse of an astronaut putting on a spacesuit (despite the howls of protest from engineers at suit manufacturer Dunlop-Frankenstein, this slow, meticulously planned, hour-long process is reduced to 30 seconds and set to the tune of the Benny Hill show).
More animation and bits of real footage shows how the PROM will lift off from the lunar surface and boost itself back towards Earth. The mission ends with re-entry, where ionised gas almost as hot as the surface of the Sun will be kept away from the crew cabin by just 4" of plastic composite.

Selene’s presence in the popular media has grown considerably over the years, partly thanks to the work of the Selene Film Unit. Early publicity surrounding the Project was always rather dry and technical, usually presented in an academic style that failed to appeal to many members of the public. As time passed and it became clear that the Project was making real progress, more populist material came along, expanding rapidly once the Hermes TV satellites started to go into orbit in the late 60s. The Project made it into science-fiction shows and there was even an attempt to base a TV soap opera on the workers in a fictional spacecraft factory (called Spaceways, it was a miserable failure. The hi-tech setting didn’t mix well with the “ordinary” characters that were cast).
Despite the ups and downs of publicity, Project staff knew they were being successful when it became acceptable to laugh at Selene. Satire at the Project’s expense took off in the early 70s, perhaps most famously in Monty Pythons’ 1973 “Mouton Lunaire” sketch, featuring a cutaway drawing of an Anglo-French Astro-sheep, complete with steerable ears, deployable landing legs and rocket blast coming out of … well you know where it came from don’t you.

While on a visit to Britain, the Shah of Iran announces that he wishes to purchase a Hermes-class TV and telephone relay satellite for his country.

Italia-1
Surplus Blue Streak missile, used as the first stage of a new launch vehicle for the Italian Space Agency. The rocket is launched from Rainbow Beach and carries two solid fuelled upper stages topped with a dummy payload. A fault in the command sequencer means that the second stage does not separate or fire.


Jock Waters and Alain Keifer complete their hundredth simulated landing since starting training for the Selene 3 attempt. Seventy eight were in the simulators in France, while the most recent have been made using a lunar landing training vehicle based at Woomera. They have used this modified helicopter to practice using manual and semi-automatic control modes in the final stages of landing, starting from an altitude of about 1km.

A fire in the mission control facility at Biscarrose causes several buildings to be evacuated. Although quickly brought under control, it damages a building adjoining main control which includes the press briefing room and the Surface Science Team Control Room. Several members of staff later receive awards for refusing to leave the control building and computer block, instead standing by to defend these vital facilities in case the fire spread. Every bit of the Selene Project is being closely followed in the press, and the fire receives blanket coverage, a good deal of which suggests that this puts the success of the mission in question.
Fitters quickly rebuild the briefing room; that is a relatively simple decorating job.
The surface science room is another issue as it includes computer consoles and links directly from the main control room to allow lunar surface scientists to help co-ordinate the crew's deployment of instruments and the collection of samples. Plans for scientific exploration on Selene 3 are very limited and it is therefore decided to do without the SSCR. Instead, an additional astronaut and a geologist will be squeezed into Mission Control to provide advice where possible.

Flights to Australia are operating at record capacity. Pan Am, Quantas, BOAC and Air France have all laid on additional services to Brisbane. Hotel rooms are all booked and any local with a boat available anywhere on the East coast can make easy money selling trips to view the launch.

Selene Director-General Aubinere is obliged to make an announcement that the recent fire at Biscarosse will have no impact on the launch of Selene 3. The damage was limited to an auxiliary building which did not contain any mission critical facilities.


Sep-73
Waters and Keifer complete a simulated Moonwalk in full space suits at the Woomera lunar surface training facility, before flying to Rainbow Beach late in the afternoon.
Their final briefing on any last-minute changes to the flight plan will be on the morning of the 2nd, and the first time-lined event of their mission will be at 2100 GMT (0700 on the 3rd at Rainbow Beach), with 30 minutes allocated to breakfast.
The 162 minute launch window opens at 0528 (1528 local), with liftoff at T=0 planned for 0529.

The BBC announces its broadcast schedules for the flight of Selene 3.
For the first time since its inception in 1936, BBC Television will stay on the air 24 hours a day to cover key phases of the flight, specifically the countdown to liftoff and for the entire time the crew are in the vicinity of the Moon, either on the surface or in orbit. BBC 2 will be entirely devoted to coverage of the flight at these times. Major events will be simultaneously broadcast on BBC 1 to ensure that the public have uninterrupted coverage, even if there is a technical fault on one of the channels.
ITV has chosen to broadcast only the significant events of the flight - liftoffs, landings and Moonwalks - and will provide regular news bulletins at other times.
There has been a noticeable increase in the sales of the higher definition colour satellite-receiver TV sets since the announcement in July. Nevertheless, the opinion of a man interviewed on the street near Tower Bridge "Nah, not buying a colour telly, Moon's all grey anyway isn't it?" seems to reflect a good part of public opinion.
It is believed that 40% of TV sets in the country are still the "old style" 405 line black-and-white units.

Roads leading north from Brisbane and even faraway Sydney and Canberra are packed with traffic, with many Australians choosing to make it a long weekend away and go to watch the launch. Despite a rather grey start in the cool southern winter, ships from the size of cabin cruisers up to the P&O liner Canberra sail from Sydney on Saturday to arrive in a designated sea area near the launch site by Monday. Hundreds of smaller boats join them at Brisbane, making (as the Brisbane harbour pilot put it) "the most ragged convoy in history".

CLVpad.jpg

Overnight on the 2nd, Selene 3's launch vehicle is illuminated in the glare of arc lights while pad crews complete their final checks. The stocky, hammerhead design of the Constellation Launch Vehicle lacks the aesthetic appeal of the needle-like American Saturns. The three stainless-silver grey first stage cores are topped by a scaffolding-like interstage, on top of which is the white painted ECPS and payload fairing.
To some observers this makes the rocket look unfinished, but no-one ever said the world’s most powerful machine built had to be beautiful.

CLVpad.jpg
 
And to step out of the story for a moment, congratulations to the crew of TMA-19M and particularly to Tim Peake for showing us all how it should be done.
 
Countdown

3rd September 1973

Clouds of vapour surround the pad as loading of liquid Oxygen starts at T-7:30. The huge tanks take some time to cool down to -189C and in the meantime the venting of cold Oxygen gas causes condensation to drift around the rocket in the light morning breeze. Later on in the fuelling cycle, evaporating Methane will be pumped away into tanks or safely burned off well away from the pad.

At much the same time, James Waters and Alain Kiefer meet flight surgeons for their final pre-flight physical. After a somewhat uncomfortable hour of being poked and prodded by medics who need to measure key aspects of their physical health, they proceed to the robing room. It takes a couple of hours to put on their space suits and purge some of the Nitrogen from their bodies by breathing pure Oxygen. The Oxygen/Nitrogen mixture we all breathe on Earth is not duplicated on their spacecraft. When on board they will breathe a low pressure, Oxygen rich mix; 4psi Oxygen and 1.5 psi Nitrogen, reduced to just 4.5 psi of pure Oxygen while they are on the Moon and 3.5psi when outside in their spacesuits.

The countdown is paused at T-4:01:15 when an injection valve fails to open inside the payload fairing. These valves are designed to allow the fairing to be filled with Helium gas which, unlike air, will not condense once ultra-cold liquid Hydrogen is pumped into the VDL's fuel tanks. Launch vehicle controllers cycle the valve eight times and the issue does not reoccur. Countdown is resumed after six minutes and the lost time can easily be made up by shortening the next pre-planned hold, due to start at T-3:30

BBC television coverage of the launch starts at 2:30AM UK time, with the news that the countdown is on hold. Once it is restarted a few minutes later, those few viewers who have stayed up or wake early see Waters and Kiefer walking out to the transfer bus in their bulky space suits, surrounded by technicians carrying life support and communications kit. They depart for the launch pad at T-3:40.

At T-3:01:12, the first radio call of the mission is made by Commander Waters. "Hello Bisco, Selene 3, comm check". Over the next half-second, his words bounce around the world. First, they are radioed four miles from the spacecraft to a ground station north of the pad, then via cable to a dish at nearby RAAF Gympie, up to an Intelsat geostationary satellite over the Pacific, down to a ground station in California and back up to another satellite over the Atlantic before finally reaching mission control on the French Atlantic coast.

By T-2:40, the RM's hatch is closed and the PROM has switched over to its internal life support and power systems. Twenty minutes later, the pad crew confirm they are clear of the launch site. All that can be seen is a single trail of condensation drifting away from a vent on the launch tower. The earnest hustle of the pad crew and hiss of escaping gasses have now gone, and the quiet at the launch site is interrupted only by the steady rumble of six Gardner diesel engines which are supplying electrical and hydraulic power to the pad. In the control cabin of the PROM, Waters and Keifer can almost relax. All they can hear is the hum of their life support fans and the crackle of the radio to mission control, half a world away.

Now that everyone is clear and the crew are safely inside their ship, chill down of the tanks and loading of the liquid Hydrogen fuel into the ECPS and VDL begins. Problems with the injection valve are long past; Helium has been purged through the payload fairing and upper stage adaptor to ensure that air does not liquefy inside the machinery, and that any Hydrogen escaping from the thousands of joints and seals does not mix with air potentially causing a fire amid the miles of electrical wiring, pyrotechnics and heater units.

Both of the VDL’s generators are started at T-2:05 and all VDL and PROM power is being supplied internally by T-1:30. Over the next hour fuelling is completed, while other supply tanks are pressurised and hundreds of sensors and electronic systems are tested and re-tested.

At T-0:30, the first of several "GO/NO-GO" polls is conducted by the various launch vehicle and mission controllers. These will happen before all major mission events and serve to confirm to both the crew and controllers that they are able to safely proceed through a "decision gate" to the next phase of the flight plan. This first poll is "GO" and confirms that several electrical and gas supply umbilicals can be disconnected from the rocket. These cannot be reattached without sending a crew back to the pad, which at this stage would involve a "scrub" - a decision to abandon the launch attempt for today and unload the fuel from the rocket.

At T-0:03:00, the countdown reaches a moment of quiet and simultaneously, the point of maximum suspense for those watching. Between now and T-1 minute, the only action due is the final GO/NO-GO poll. If this "Commit Sequence" poll is GO, the Flight Controller will flip a switch and the computers take over for the final minute.
Up until T-40 seconds, the launch can still be placed on hold if the computer detects a fault; the countdown will pause and controllers can try to correct any problems, before recycling the count back to T-5 minutes and trying again. After T-40 seconds, the only options are to launch or scrub.

Around the world, the number of people viewing or listening reaches its peak. Crowds around the launch site start to quieten down as the sense of anticipation builds, even an American commentator is heard describing the flight as "what might be the most important voyage of discovery since Columbus".

In the control room at Biscarosse, the Commit Sequence poll begins.

"All stations, Flight Controller. Report GO/NO-GO for launch".
“…”
"Guidance - GO"
"Surgeon - GO"
"Teecom - GO" . . . [Telemetry and Communications Controller].
"Sipps - GO" . . . . .[SPS, Spacecraft Primary Systems Controller - monitoring electrical, life support and propulsion on the VDL/PROM].
"FDC - GO" . . . . . .[Flight Data Controller - dealing with the PROM's Spacecraft Control Computer and ECPS data unit].
"Booster - GO" . . . [Booster controller - monitoring the electrical and mechanical systems of the CLV and its engines].
“…”
"Network - GO" . . . [Network controller - monitoring the status of ground stations, ships, radio and satellite links around the world].

After a brief delay, the three controllers present at the launch site chime in.

"Pad - GO" . . . . . . [Pad Controller – In charge of the pad’s systems and ground-based monitoring of the rocket].
"Safety - GO" . . . . [Range Safety Officer – confirming that safety areas are clear and that the booster’s Escape and Flight Termination Systems are operable].
"Range - GO" . . . . .[Range Commander in overall charge of the launch complex – also confirming that the flightpath is clear and that the tracking systems are operational].

"…"
"CapCom - GO" . . . [Capsule Communicator, an idea copied from NASA. An experienced astronaut whose job is to relay information from ground controllers to the crew].
“…”
"Selene is GO" . . . . [Cdr. Waters on board the spacecraft].
“…”
"Flight is GO... All stations report GO for launch ... Mark will be tee minus sixty seconds and Commit Sequence..."
"…"
"Mark"

"Pad, ECPS LH2 at flight pressure … tank pressurisation shutoff, purge ended"
"Tee minus forty"
"Pad, BRATs retracting" . . [Booster Refuelling And Tiedown arms, used to fill the tanks and anchor the upper stage of the rocket to the launch tower].
"Tee minus thirty"
"Inertial" . . . . . . . . . . . . [The guidance platform is no longer locked relative to the Earth's surface]
"Engine valves unseat OK"
"Tee minus twenty"
"FTS arm" . . . . . . . . . . . [Flight Termination System - the "abort" systems].
"Ten"
"Nine"
"Eight"
"Ignition" . . . . . . . . . . . . [The trigger for a complex 3.3 second sequence that will start all 21 Orion engines]
"Six"
"Five"
"Four"
"Commit" . . . . . . . . . . . . [Launch Commit - six tie-down clamps are severed by explosives and retract. After this point, the rocket must leave the pad]
"Two"
"One"

"LIFTOFF…"
 
Lets us go forward a little bit closer to the stars.

The Anglo French
First to the oceans with the mariners from Brittany and the West Country
First to the skies with Ader and Blériot
First to the stars with Selene!
 
Lets us go forward a little bit closer to the stars.

The Anglo French
First to the oceans with the mariners from Brittany and the West Country
First to the skies with Ader and Blériot
First to the stars with Selene!

Well, that's technically wrong in every case; I believe the Portuguese or anyway some Basques can vie with British and French mariners, and in this TL it was the Yanks who got the first man airborne on powered wings as OTL, and again (here only) Yanks who put the first man in orbit. Russians and if I am not mistaken Americans have also circled the Moon here.

But yeah, assuming Waters and Kiefer do make it there and back again as I devoutly hope they do--Britain and France together will be the first ever to make landfall on another world. I really hope they pull it off, and have some confidence they probably will.

I might regret not suggesting something I did get adopted in Jonathan Edelstein's Malê Rising--the ship being named La Colombe. Which technically means "The Dove" in reference to this being a peaceful endeavor but has the punning allusion to Christopher Columbus as well--a bit more fitting here in that they plan to make landfall on a new world, whereas in MR the ship was "merely" the first to successfully put people--the crew in JE's "cup half-full" world (as I call it) included a woman--into Earth orbit.

But in the Malê'verse the ship was purely French Empire (though a German effort was neck and neck--tried earlier but launch was aborted) and launched from the American soil of French Guiana hence reinforcing the Columbian allusion, and the program was of purely civil design hence underscoring the "dove" claim--that and having a woman on board. Selene's military antecedents are too strong to contradict so boldly.

Still, they are going in peace for all humankind, in my take on it. That the Americans have been rather fatuous not to preempt them seems both a bit implausible and, well, Un-American, to me. But I am very happy to see the Duchy of East Fenwick take the laurel if we can't be arsed to.

Really not bitter at all!:D

Seriously I think a world where this outcome is possible might well be a better one than OTL.
--------
Regarding range safety--I wondered about that when a previous post mentioned the rag-tag armada of sight-seers in every sort of craft from luxury yacht and cruise ship down to fishing boats and possibly canoes all heaving to off Rainbow Beach to watch the launch. Is there a corridor kept clear by the Royal Australian Navy for the Constellation lower stages to splash into in case of abort? Or are some of the sightseers risking their lives in the downrange corridor, having been duly warned of their foolishness? If the launch goes nominally they'll be fine but I wondered if "Safety-GO" isn't a bit off.

I also bet that if the RAN has dared to chase off all Soviet flagged vessels (probably not; there's no war on, "freedom of the seas" and all that) in the ragtag fleet, then there surely are some Liberian or Panamanian registered tramp merchants currently chartered to allegedly west European firms whose representatives have rather Slavic accents, and which sport an amazing amount of antennae and telescopes considering they are humble private merchants--for the passengers, you know, in case they want to tune in to the new satellites or watch seagulls or whales at a range of 10 kilometers....:p

If anyone intrudes into the splash corridor it will be these fellows, and if no one is there, they'll be keeping station right on the edge and as close in (one of them anyway) as the RAN lets them.
---
Also noting how British and French fans of Selene have to be up in the wee hours of the morning to see the launch live; that's a consequence of day launches being preferable to night launches and then having your rocket base in the bleedin' Antipodes! Except for the last Apollo lunar mission American manned launches were all in broad daylight, Eastern time, so we didn't have that problem. (The only launch I might have personally witnessed was that last Apollo though; I lived far west on the Gulf coast halfway to Alabama's coast, but had the skies been clear and the launch occurred on schedule, I might have been able to see the flame rising even from Panama City, Florida. But the launch was delayed and there were clouds and I had to go to bed, being in second grade at the time).:(

I wonder if, if there is a much-hoped for next chapter in Euro-Space, whether this experience of being literally benighted during the launches helps tip the balance toward downgrading Australia as prime launch site and developing Kourou instead--that way, a mid-day launch there would be in evening TV prime time in Europe. Not to mention all the other assets Kourou represents--mainly in being a lot closer to construction and control sites in Europe, but also good climate for a tropical location and being a very tropical location, very close to the Equator.

Oh, and the crowd of spectator ships would be far more manageable there since the coastal population is so low--even if floods of tourists did come in there are only so many boats to charter.

But this launch is quite likely to represent the peak audience of spectators physically present in line of sight of the launch in world history; interest will inevitably wane once a successful Moon mission is accomplished, whereas if there is an unfortunate failure, of fatal variety or otherwise, watching a second attempt won't be as attractive.

Anyway I trust that latter thing won't happen, and those who flocked to watch will have no regrets, and be able to claim something no one else can ever claim again.
 
Originally Posted by Dunois
Lets us go forward a little bit closer to the stars.

The Anglo French
First to the oceans with the mariners from Brittany and the West Country
First to the skies with Ader and Blériot
First to the stars with Selene!

Well, that's technically wrong in every case; I believe the Portuguese or anyway some Basques can vie with British and French mariners, and in this TL it was the Yanks who got the first man airborne on powered wings as OTL, and again (here only) Yanks who put the first man in orbit. Russians and if I am not mistaken Americans have also circled the Moon here.
-It is rather. As I recall, the first Englishman to circle the globe was Francis Drake – he discovered lots of new lands, but he was about a hundred years after some Spaniard (or maybe Portuguese?) did it. I know Cabot et al. went across the Atlantic much earlier, but I thought even he was beaten to it by someone.
My medieval/renaissance history is not that good.
As the story starts in 1955, the Wrights still did their stuff in 1903, and Alan Shepard will certainly be doing well – here he was the first man in orbit, not just the first American on a sub-orbital hop.

But yeah, assuming Waters and Kiefer do make it there and back again as I devoutly hope they do--Britain and France together will be the first ever to make landfall on another world. I really hope they pull it off, and have some confidence they probably will.

I might regret not suggesting something I did get adopted in Jonathan Edelstein's Malê Rising--the ship being named La Colombe. Which technically means "The Dove" in reference to this being a peaceful endeavor but has the punning allusion to Christopher Columbus as well--a bit more fitting here in that they plan to make landfall on a new world, whereas in MR the ship was "merely" the first to successfully put people--the crew in JE's "cup half-full" world (as I call it) included a woman--into Earth orbit.

But in the Malê'verse the ship was purely French Empire (though a German effort was neck and neck--tried earlier but launch was aborted) and launched from the American soil of French Guiana hence reinforcing the Columbian allusion, and the program was of purely civil design hence underscoring the "dove" claim--that and having a woman on board. Selene's military antecedents are too strong to contradict so boldly.
All Selene ships bear names, I just haven’t introduced this one yet. That is a good suggestion.

Still, they are going in peace for all humankind, in my take on it. That the Americans have been rather fatuous not to preempt them seems both a bit implausible and, well, Un-American, to me. But I am very happy to see the Duchy of East Fenwick take the laurel if we can't be arsed to.

Really not bitter at all!
Seriously I think a world where this outcome is possible might well be a better one than OTL.
Console yourself with the thought that the US could easily have beaten everyone else to the Moon, even in this story. They just didn't want to spend the money that way. However, they have a lot of shiny new nuclear power plants instead, besides having flown a reusable spaceplane (the X-20) and now being on their fourth space station.

--------
Regarding range safety--I wondered about that when a previous post mentioned the rag-tag armada of sight-seers in every sort of craft from luxury yacht and cruise ship down to fishing boats and possibly canoes all heaving to off Rainbow Beach to watch the launch. Is there a corridor kept clear by the Royal Australian Navy for the Constellation lower stages to splash into in case of abort? Or are some of the sightseers risking their lives in the downrange corridor, having been duly warned of their foolishness? If the launch goes nominally they'll be fine but I wondered if "Safety-GO" isn't a bit off.

I also bet that if the RAN has dared to chase off all Soviet flagged vessels (probably not; there's no war on, "freedom of the seas" and all that) in the ragtag fleet, then there surely are some Liberian or Panamanian registered tramp merchants currently chartered to allegedly west European firms whose representatives have rather Slavic accents, and which sport an amazing amount of antennae and telescopes considering they are humble private merchants--for the passengers, you know, in case they want to tune in to the new satellites or watch seagulls or whales at a range of 10 kilometers....

If anyone intrudes into the splash corridor it will be these fellows, and if no one is there, they'll be keeping station right on the edge and as close in (one of them anyway) as the RAN lets them.
-Oh yes, a very wide area downrange and crossrange from the launch site, actively patrolled, particularly close inshore. Danger areas are defined and publicised well in advance of launches. It’s a problem the Cape has on a regular basis (the shipping lanes run right offshore). Exclusion zones are declared to cover the launch windows, but the USAF/Coast Guard regularly have to chase off idiots who ignore them. If it’s a little private boat and the launch is still some way off, they can be fairly polite. If it’s a freighter and it’s close to T=0, the politeness can get a bit strained…
Like any firing range, if it isn’t clear, they can’t fire.

Downrange there will be debris zones for the various stages and fairings, but they are huge areas far out at sea, usually far from shipping lanes, and are declared more “for information” than anything – the chance of actually being hit by anything is very small.
I’m sure Rainbow Beach has seen its fair share of friendly Bulgarian tramp steamers and Russian trawlers on their way to pay fraternal visits to the oppressed Australian proletariat, particularly during Blue Streak/Black Anvil tests. I’m equally sure the Aussies would tell them to bugger off in a friendly manner.
The Soviets would have no reason to interfere with a peaceful Moonshot. There were some concerns about it in the early days of Apollo, but long before they actually flew that became highly improbable. The Outer Space Treaty (which happened a few years later in the story) prohibits much of that sort of thing.

---
Also noting how British and French fans of Selene have to be up in the wee hours of the morning to see the launch live; that's a consequence of day launches being preferable to night launches and then having your rocket base in the bleedin' Antipodes! Except for the last Apollo lunar mission American manned launches were all in broad daylight, Eastern time, so we didn't have that problem. (The only launch I might have personally witnessed was that last Apollo though; I lived far west on the Gulf coast halfway to Alabama's coast, but had the skies been clear and the launch occurred on schedule, I might have been able to see the flame rising even from Panama City, Florida. But the launch was delayed and there were clouds and I had to go to bed, being in second grade at the time).
-The Australians can’t help living on the wrong side of the world :)
You would certainly have been able to see it from there, had it been clear enough.

I wonder if, if there is a much-hoped for next chapter in Euro-Space, whether this experience of being literally benighted during the launches helps tip the balance toward downgrading Australia as prime launch site and developing Kourou instead--that way, a mid-day launch there would be in evening TV prime time in Europe. Not to mention all the other assets Kourou represents--mainly in being a lot closer to construction and control sites in Europe, but also good climate for a tropical location and being a very tropical location, very close to the Equator.
Kourou is certainly a better option long term, for those reasons and the fact that the Aussies became less pro-British and more anti-nuclear as the 70s wore on. In reality, the logistics train out to Australia was one of the things that made ELDO-A/Europa so difficult. In the story they’re much better organised, but it’s still a long way.

Oh, and the crowd of spectator ships would be far more manageable there since the coastal population is so low--even if floods of tourists did come in there are only so many boats to charter.

But this launch is quite likely to represent the peak audience of spectators physically present in line of sight of the launch in world history; interest will inevitably wane once a successful Moon mission is accomplished, whereas if there is an unfortunate failure, of fatal variety or otherwise, watching a second attempt won't be as attractive.

Anyway I trust that latter thing won't happen, and those who flocked to watch will have no regrets, and be able to claim something no one else can ever claim again.
 
Top