The Prodigal Sons Return: The Progressives of Wisconsin and the Republican Party

Introduction:

This timeline really comes out of the year and a half of research I did for my thesis about the collapse of the Progressive Party in Wisconsin, and those Progressives who carved out a place for themselves amongst the Republican Party, and those who migrated into the Democratic party.

In 1946, the Progressive Party of Wisconsin disbanded. Unlike the Farm-Labor Party of Minnesota, which merged with the Democratic Party to for the DFL, or the Nonpartisan League of North Dakota which retained its own organization before merging with the Democrats, the Progressives utterly disbanded, and those Progressives who remained in the government moved into the Republican Party individually. The result was a catastrophic defeat that year when Bob LaFollette Jr., was defeated by Joseph McCarthy in the Republican Party, and many Progressives went down to defeat with him (some were able to hold on, normally in the state's North and Western areas which had long been strong holds for the Progressives)

This timeline seeks to look at what might have happened in 1946 had not been such a disaster. In short, LaFollette returns to the state, campaigns harder, and is able to beat McCarthy and drag more Progressives in on his coat-tails. The result is that many of those who would emerge as Democratic leaders in OTL, begin their political life as Republicans in the ATL.

There are some difficulties with writing this timeline. Namely, that its focus on state politics cuts down dramatically on those readers who have a working knoweldge, or even interest, in the topic. As a result, despite the fact that I want to maintain the focus on the state, rather than the national, level, I promise that the butterflies of the POD will be effecting national developments soon enough! To the readers of AH.com, please bear with me!

Since many of the figures this timeline focuses on will be unknown to many (I doubt many here know who Clifford "Tiny" Krueger is, nor about the Kannenberg family), I will do my best to explain who everyone is, and give enough background that everything makes sense.

So, if you are reading this, I invite you to sit back, and enjoy a drive through a little known facet of American history. If you stick with it, I think you will find much of interest. And, if not, well, I'll consider it a kindness in any case; I've been neck deep in this subject for quite some time, and it would be nice to think that I'm not crazy in finding it fascinating!
 
Robert-LaFollette---resized.jpg

The responsibilities of office always weighed heavily on Senator Robert M. LaFollette Jr.

Part 1:
August 13, 1946
Madison, WI

Bob LaFollette Jr., took a deep breath to steady his nerves as he listened intently to the election results coming from the family radio. He cast a glance around the living room at his family, friends and close advisors who crowded around, giving them a wane smile. His stomach was killing him, and he imagined he could feel a fever coming on. For year he had always seemed to fall ill during periods of great stress, as if his own body was seeking to betray him when it counted the most.

“And, with the results from Milwaukee county coming in,” the radio began. LaFollette barely heard them as he squeezed his wife Rachael’s hand. She placed hers on top of his tenderly, and smiled at him.

“We are calling the election for LaFollette. Robert M. LaFollette Jr., has defeated Joseph R. McCarthy for the Republican nomination for United States Senator.”

Bob’s shoulders fell as if all of the tension he had been carrying around for the past several months evaporated all at once. He looked over and hugged his wife and his ten year old son Bronson. “My God,” he said, “I thought I was really going to lose this one. I really thought I was going to lose.”

Rachael looked at her husband, and suddenly a wave of fear crossed over her. For years, Bob had talked about how much of a burden public life had been, and how much he had wanted to escape it and live a quiet life. But as she looked at him now, she saw just how much he needed it. For better or worse, public life was the only life Bob had ever known, and if he were to leave it, it would have to be on his own terms. She shuddered to think what might have happened if he had lost; turned away by the people who he had given his entire adult life to, and much of his childhood as well.

Bob stood up and, suddenly, the tension broke. He smiled shyly, “Thanks, everyone for coming. I know Rachael and I really appreciate your support over the past few months. It was a tough one, the roughest in a while, but we won. It may be hard in November, but now I’m sure that we’ll carry the state.”

A ripple of applause was carried through the room, and then everyone came and gave their congratulations. And deep inside, Bob LaFollette sighed in relief. The Progressives weren’t a spent force after all. Although there would be rough years ahead for them as they reintegrated with the Republican Party, he was sure they would find their old home comfortable once again. Only he knew how close it had truly been, how close he had come to destroying everything his family had worked to build. But that was in the past, the hurdle had been crossed, and the future looked bright indeed.

From Turmoil to Strength: Wisconsin Progressivism from 1946-1972
Robert Nesbit
[Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982]

The Progressive Party of Wisconsin was officially declared dead at the party’s final state convention, in the city of Portage, in March of 1946. The announcement had been years in the making and simply confirmed what many had suspected for a long time. Two years prior, Charles Madsen, then a state senator representing Wisconsin’s 29th district in the northwest, had written to George Hampel Jr., a Progressive organizer in Milwaukee, declaring that “The Progressive Party is dead … whether we like it or not.” Weeks after the Hampel letter, Madsen had written to Bob LaFollette Jr., describing the sorry state of affairs; speaking of the organization in his own county, he stated “in Polk county which has always been carried by the Progressives in the past we ran a poor third with only 1300 votes.”

This feeling was shared by many of Madsen’s contemporaries. Following the defeat of the party in 1936, which saw Governor Phil LaFollette denied a historic fourth term and the decimation of the party’s holdings in the state’s assembly and senate, victories had been few and far between for the Progressives. It was not until 1942 that another Progressive, Orland Loomis, was able to win the governorship. However, even this victory was tainted, as Loomis’ popularity did little to reinvigorate the party itself; no other Progressives won state-wide office in that year, and the state government remained dominated by Republicans. Loomis’ death of a heart attack, mere months after his victory, and weeks before he would be sworn in as Governor, would prove to be the final straw for the dwindling party.

By 1946, then, the main task confronting Progressives was to chart out the future of their organization. Three options lay before them; to remain independent, to move into the Democratic Party, or to return to the Republican Party which they had left over a decade ago.

Of these three, the first was the least feasible, despite the support of some hardliners, such of Walter Graunke of Wausau. The second, moving into the Democratic Party, as the Farm-Laborites of Minnesota had recently done, seemed more plausible. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin, long a conservative organization which was often at odds with the national party, had recently come under the control of Daniel Hoan, the former Socialist mayor of Milwaukee, and a cadre of younger leaders who had begun to move the party to the left. These Democrats had openly courted the Progressives in general, and Bob LaFollette, Jr., in particular. The third option, returning to the Republican Party, left many with mixed emotions; before forming their own party, most Progressives had been members of the Republicans, and there was the added draw that the Republicans so dominated the state that gaining the party’s nomination for an office almost guaranteed victory in the general election. Although the Republican party of the state had grown more conservative over the past decade, there were still many moderate and semi-progressives within the organization, and many Progressives felt that, given time, they might be able to retake the party machinery as they once had in the past.

Bob LaFollette, Jr., belonged to the later group. A romantic at heart, he had never fully given up on the party which has elected his father, his brother and himself. Furthermore, he deeply distrusted the state’s Democratic Party, which he denounced as an urban machine driven organization, more interested in patronage than in representing the voters of Wisconsin. LaFollette also saw storm clouds on the national scene, fretting that the Truman administration was drifting too far to the right over domestic issues.

In retrospect, the Progressives’ return to the Republican Party seems preordained. It was not only where the loyalty of a majority of Progressive voter’s loyalty, it made good political sense. The Republicans were the dominant party in the state, and although the Democrats were growing in strength, they had not reached a level where they could openly challenge their opponents for control of the state.

The road back to the Republican Party was not without travails, however. The Conservative Republicans were not willing to give up control of their party so easy. Tom Coleman, an influential Republican businessman and party leader, had feared such a move for some time, and convinced the Republicans in the state legislature to pass the “Fence-Me-In” Bill, which would have restricted anyone running for office to switch from one political party to another less than two years prior to an election. This bill, in a moderate form, would eventually be vetoed by Governor Walt Goodland.



Bob LaFollette Jr.,’s first instinct was to take a largely hands off approach to the coming campaign. He was entering into the race as the hands-on favorite over the relatively unknown McCarthy. Furthermore, for years LaFollette had had an ambivalent relationship towards his political career; although a popular and effective Senator, he had always felt that the position had been forced upon him, and that it was not one of his own choosing. He had come to see himself as a statesman, not a politician, and did not have the love for tough campaigning which his father and brother had possessed. Finally, at the time of the election, LaFollette was working to gain support for the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, an act which would produce the most sweeping reform of the legislative process in the nation’s history, which he saw as being the capstone of his career.

Despite his concerns that the passing of the bill would consume most of his time during the primary season, LaFollette soon became aware that the bill was in much less danger than he initially feared; in fact it would eventually pass both houses of Congress with ease. This freed up more time for the campaign, and allowed LaFollette to return to Wisconsin to truly gage the situation. [FN1]

Upon returning, the Senator seemed to grasp the danger that the Progressives were truly in. Writing to his sister Mary upon returning to the state, he stated his thoughts plainly; “If we lose in 1946, then everything which our Father worked for will be ruined, and it will be my fault.” Rather than giving in to feelings of hopelessness, LaFollette decided to fight.

His first order of business was to form an alliance with Governor Walter S. Goodland. Goodland had become acting governor in 1942 after the death of governor-elect Orland Loomis. By 1946, Goodland was 83 years old, and the oldest sitting governor in the history of the United States. He was also an avidly popular figure in the state; in 1944 he had dispelled fears about his age by describing himself as a “tough old codger,” and his opposition to the more conservative elements of his own party had won him the loyalty of many within the state. This same opposition had soured the party leadership to the idea of a third-term for the Governor.

WalterSGoodland.jpg

The "Tough Old Codger" himself, Governor Walter S. Goodland

In addition to the opposition of the conservative party leaders, ‘Walt’ Goodland had another problem, by the name of Major General Ralf Immell. Immell was a longtime friend and ally of the LaFollette family, and had been gearing himself up for a run for the governor’s mansion. This difficulty was of Goodland’s own making; he had previously written to Immell and suggested the general run for Governor, prior to deciding that he wanted to stand for reelection. [FN2]

Goodland and LaFollette were natural allies. Goodland, throughout his long career as a newspaper editor and politician, had built up a reputation as a reformer, and a moderate. Due to the opposition of the party leadership, he had naturally begun to rely upon the support of progressives, both in his party and outside of it, and had come to be seen as one of the natural leaders of the movement. If LaFollette wished to win reelection, he was going to need the governor’s support; support which had, more or less, been openly offered from the beginning.

As a result, LaFollette met with Ralf Immell to attempt to dissuade the later from trying to unseat the popular governor, and to make a run for the position of Lt. Governor instead. At first Immell was reluctant; he had invested energy into making the run, felt personally betrayed by Goodland, and was stubborn in his resolve. However, LaFollette pushed on, convincing Immell that Goodland was too old to run for a fourth term and that serving as Lt. Governor would strengthen his chances in 1948. Eventually, Immell relented.

Immell_Ralph_Maxwell.jpg

Major General Ralf Immell, war hero, and Progressive candidate for Lt. Governor of Wisconsin


Having secured an alliance with Goodland, LaFollette began to move against McCarthy. The Senator was largely taken back by the strength of the McCarthy campaign and, as a result, failed to counter some of his opponents attacks. For his part, McCarthy seemed undeterred that he was the under-dog in the campaign, and attacked LaFollette from many angles; McCarthy charged that the Senator had failed to fight in the war, despite the fact that LaFollette was too old to serve at the outbreak of hostilities, that he was a war-profiteer.

It was the later charge which drew LaFollette’s attention. More than a political attack, it was an attack upon his own character. The Senator counter-attacked by pointing out that McCarthy had invested in the stock market prior to the war, and had made as much profit as LaFollette himself. The Senator then charged that McCarthy was accepting the help of Communists during the campaign, in an effort to defeat LaFollette, who was building a reputation as a staunch foe of Communism. These two attacks were deeply damaging to the McCarthy campaign, as they painted the candidate as being disingenuous and overly ambitious. [FN3]




When the votes had been tallied on election day, the Progressive camp was reason to celebrate. Walt Goodland had been overwhelmingly re-nominated, handedly defeating his more conservative opponent, Delbert J. Kenney, and it was expected that he would just as easily defeat his Democratic opponent in November. Ralf Immell had defeated Oscar Rennebohm, the incumbant Lt. Governor, strengthening his chances of attaining the nomination for governor in two years. Robert M. LaFollette Jr., had also been chosen by the Republicans to be their candidate for the Senate. In the end, the election had been closer than expected, with the final vote tally being roughly 209,000 for LaFollette to 200,000 for McCarthy. McCarthy, himself, had much to cheer; being the campaign as a near unknown, he had nearly defeated the incumbent Senator, and had proven that he could draw voters to the ballot box.

Finally, and most importantly, the victory of Goodland and LaFollette had coat-tails. Throughout the state, many former Progressives had been able to successfully make the vote into the Republican Party. Furthermore, the election had marked the appearance of many younger political leaders who would form the core of the Progressive faction of the Republican Party in years to come; men such as Gaylord Nelson, Lester Johnson, Clifford “Tiny” Krueger and Charles Madsen.


[FN1] This is the actual POD of the timeline. In OTL, LaFollette obsessed about the Legislative Reorganization Act, and did not return to the state until August, leaving little time for campaigning. In the ATL he becomes convinced of the bill’s passing earlier, and is able to return to the state to get a feeling for the situation, and dedicate himself to the campaign.

[FN2] In OTL, Ralf Immell attempted to unseat the popular Goodland, with the tactic support of LaFollette. He ended up losing badly, and the campaign killed any chance of a Goodland-LaFollette alliance. Much of the fault for this rests on the shoulders of LaFollette; endorsing Immell near the end of the campaign, although laudable for the loyalty he showed to a friend, was politically foolish. Also, Immell never really recovered from his loss to Goodland; although he would run again in 1948, he never was able to gather as much support as he had had earlier. By running for Lt. Governor in the ATL, Immell will have a victory under his belt and will not have damaged himself as he did in OTL.

[FN3] In OTL, LaFollette bitterly complained after his defeat, that McCarthy had won with the help of Communists, especially those in the CIO. LaFollette had previously made a speech attacking Communist infiltration, and believed that the Communists wanted him defeated in order to remove an enemy. In fact, the Democratic candidate for the Senate, McMurray, openly attacked LaFollette during the Republican primary, believing that McCarthy would be an easier opponent to defeat. The Democrats at this time were largely restricted to Milwaukee, and the industrial counties in the Michigan shore, and were heavily dependent on the Unions for support, the AFL as well as the CIO.

Robert-LaFollette---resized.jpg
 
I'm not familiar with Wisconcin politics, but you have my attention. No McCarthy means no House Un-American Activities Committee, right?
 
HUAC will still be around, just not as prominent.
One wonders how this will affect Wallace's Progressives in 1948...

Well, at least in Wisconsin, the People's Progressive Party had only negligable impact. Of the slate of candidates it fielded, to my knoweldge, the only one of them who ever attained office was Ben Reihle, who was able to win a seat in the Assembly after three attempts, and only then after becoming a Democrat.
I suspect that the victory of "Young Bob" and the other Progressives might actually cut into the PPP to an even greater extent, as those who might have been disguntled over the collapse of the Progressive Party have a new home. On the national level, Bob Jr., certainly is not going to be a Wallace supporter, although he might well sympathize with him to an extent. If any LaFollette would jump on the Wallace bandwagon, it would have been Bob's brother Phil, and Phil was busy in 1948 trying to organize the Douglas MacArthur campaign.
 
I'm not familiar with Wisconcin politics, but you have my attention. No McCarthy means no House Un-American Activities Committee, right?

As others have said, HUAC is still going to be around and kicking. I suspect that the Hollywood investigations still go on. But the loss of McCarthy will have an effect on the Red Scare of the era. Of course, as I've hinted, McCarthy may be down, but he's not out. He did surprisingly well against a candidate who, many thought, would wipe the floor with him. There may be a certain wing of the state Republican Party which comes to see him as their standard bearer yet.
 
Very interesting. I know relatively little about this period in US politics and even less at a state level, but good AH opens you up to new areas and this has caught my interest. I'll be following, keep it up.
 
Very interesting. I know relatively little about this period in US politics and even less at a state level, but good AH opens you up to new areas and this has caught my interest. I'll be following, keep it up.

Thanks man, I appreciate it. I figure that most people are in your boat, and so I want to make this as accesible as possible. My next post will deal with the general election, and will also outline some of the figures who will play an important part in upcoming chapters. There were some real characters during this period, and its a shame that many of them aren't better known.
 
Well, at least in Wisconsin, the People's Progressive Party had only negligable impact. Of the slate of candidates it fielded, to my knoweldge, the only one of them who ever attained office was Ben Reihle, who was able to win a seat in the Assembly after three attempts, and only then after becoming a Democrat.
I suspect that the victory of "Young Bob" and the other Progressives might actually cut into the PPP to an even greater extent, as those who might have been disguntled over the collapse of the Progressive Party have a new home. On the national level, Bob Jr., certainly is not going to be a Wallace supporter, although he might well sympathize with him to an extent. If any LaFollette would jump on the Wallace bandwagon, it would have been Bob's brother Phil, and Phil was busy in 1948 trying to organize the Douglas MacArthur campaign.
OTOH, if La Follette moves the Republicans leftwards, Wallace may rejoin them later. After all, his dad was Secretary of agriculture under Harding and Coolidge. While he would still be bitter against Hoover, he might decide to forget the party of Hoover and fight the party of Truman.
 
OTOH, if La Follette moves the Republicans leftwards, Wallace may rejoin them later. After all, his dad was Secretary of agriculture under Harding and Coolidge. While he would still be bitter against Hoover, he might decide to forget the party of Hoover and fight the party of Truman.

From my reading, Wallace did, eventually, return to the Republican Party; he supported Nichard Nixon against Kennedy in 1960. This came after the release of his book where he denounced Stalin and the Soviet Union following the Korean War.
Although the return of LaFollette to the Republican Party does speak of a, possible, drift of that party to the Left, i doubt its enough to cancel Wallace's People's Progressive Party campaign in 1948. Now, if Dewey wins in 1948, i could see Wallace officially returning to the Republican Party; but how willing that party would be to embrace him is another matter (the Taft faction of the party was very strong during this era, and its unlikely they would welcome Wallace back with open arms).
 
Part 2: “But the Roots Remain”
Madison, WI
November 12th, 1946

Tom Coleman was a deeply unhappy man; much more unhappy than he had every right to be. The Republican party had swept the Democrats in the midterm elections; not just in the state, but nation-wide. For the first time since in recent memory the Republicans controlled the state’s entire Congressional Delegation. They dominated the state government in a way that they hadn’t since, at the latest, 1930. But none of that seemed to matter, because a certain poison had found its way back into the veins of his beloved party, and it sickened him.

A successful industrialist, Coleman had become active in the Republican Party in the 1920’s and had helped engineer the defeat of Phil LaFollette in 1932, the defeat which had finally driven the Progressives from the party, his party, and left it firmly in the hands of the stalwarts. Since then, he and his allies, had funded Republican candidates and, using their influence, had turned the party back into what it once had been; not the party of Hoover, although he had been a decent man, but the party of Schofield, of McKinley, of Lincoln. His enemies called him a “Boss”, an attack his Coleman found hilarious; the LaFollettes were the true bosses, and always had been. They attacked bossism, and then had created a machine that put the old party bosses to shame. That had always been the hypocrisy of the Progressives; they slandered their enemies, tarred and feathered them, and then adopted even worse practices.

“And now, they’re back”, he muttered to himself ruefully.

Coleman couldn’t help but partially blame himself for the disaster. Hadn’t it been he who had trusted that old bastard Walter Goodland, when the Governor claimed he would sign the “Fence-Me-In” Bill which would have disallowed LaFollette and his ilk from running as Republicans in the election?

And then Goodland had turned around and vetoed it anyway, hoping to add the Progressives to his already ample base of support. Coleman tried to get the best of him again, and denied him the party’s endorsement at the Republican convention a few months later. But it had done no good; Goodland had been swept back into the nomination, and then office, after beating Delbert Kenney, the party’s own nominee. [FN1]

And LaFollette was back. The only good thing to be said about that debacle is that “Young Bob” had a lot less ambition than either his brother had, or that of his damnable father. The newly returned Senator would be less likely to meddle in the affairs of the state, and would likely just keep his head stuck in the affairs of Washington.

Coleman couldn’t say the same thing about the new breed that his election had drug into the state legislature. Take Krueger for instance; that kid had run as a Progressive back in 1942, been beat, and had come back four years later. He beat his opponent in the primary and then, when the Republicans had convinced the vanquished Senator to run as an independent candidate in the general election, Krueger had beat him again. Good god, they had elected a damned Circus Fat Man to office! Not for the first time, Coleman decided that he just couldn’t understand the voters of Wisconsin.

But, maybe it wasn’t an entire loss. After all, the Faithful Republicans, he refused to use that hated term “stalwart” which the progressives had so longer slandered the conservatives with, still held a majority, and he suspected they could rely on the moderates to keep the Progressives in line. And McCarthy, the Irishman, had done much better than suspect; Coleman had a feeling that that boy might still have a bright future ahead of him.

Sighing, he took a sip of fine Scotch from his glass. He had a horrid feeling, it was going to be a bumpy few years.

From Turmoil to Strength: Wisconsin Progressivism from 1946-1972
Robert Nesbit
[Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982]

After the drama of the primary election, the general election of 1946 turned out to be anti-climatic. Across the board, the Republicans won seat after seat, driving the Democrats out of the state’s Congressional delegation, and winning every state wide election. Although the Democrats put up a strong fight, they found their total voting percentage down from two years previously. Part of this was not their own fault; 1946 was nationally a Republican year, as voters turned against the highly unpopular President Truman. However, in Wisconsin, this was not entirely the case; with the successful move of a core group of Progressives into the Republican party, the Democrats found a number of their growing voters coalition fleeing to the Republican Party. Many progressive voters were particularly offended by the strong Democratic attacks against Senator LaFollette during the Republican Primary, and blamed the Senators close election to those “dirty tricks.” When it was over, Walter Goodland won nearly 60 percent of the votes, and LaFollette nearly matched these results, with 59 percent of the votes cast. [FN2]

A Progressive core had returned to the Republican Party. It was small, and needed nurturing; the collapse of the Progressive Party had badly wounded the once vaunted organization of the faction, and Bob Jr., did not have the skills nor the temperament to rebuild it. The success or failure of the progressives would rest squarely on the shoulders of the elderly Governor Goodland, the vigorous lt. Governor Immell, and those young Progressives who had recently been elected to state office.

January 13, 1947
Madison, WI
Senate Floor

Clifford “Tiny” Krueger

Clifford “Tiny” Krueger looked around the chambers of the Wisconsin Senate and tried to suppress his nerves. There was a part of him that had always known that he would be walking through the halls of the state capitol. He still remembered the crushing feeling of loss when he had lost his first election to the Senate four years previously. And here he was, four years later, at the age of 28, an elected state senator from Wisconsin.

He looked for his desk and found it easily; it stood out. Just a few months earlier, following the November results, he had been sent an article by supporters, clipped from the New York Times. The article’s headline had read: “Circus Fat Man Elected to Wisconsin Senate: Special Chair Ordered”. [FN3]

A mixed expression crossed his face as he thought of the article. It was true, of course, Clifford, or Tiny to his friends, hadn’t won his nickname by being a small man. At his current age, he weighed nearly 450 pounds and stood well over six feet tall. And it was true that he had been in the Circus; both professionally, and back in High School when he and his friends would put on a circus to raise funds for local Progressive candidates. Tiny loved the circus, and would his entire life. And yet … and yet, he was serious to be here. He saw himself as a follower of the Progressive traditions of the state, and was bound and determined to fight for them. Anyone who took him lightly was going to be in for quite a surprise; Tiny might be jovial, but he had no problem in playing rough if need be. No trouble at all. He could compromise if need be, but he refused to sacrifice his ideals to the Communist-infested Democrats, or the reactionary Stalwarts.

Finding his seat, he spied another younger man smiling, positively beaming, as he made the rounds, and recognized him as Gaylord Nelson. He stood up to meet his fellow Freshman Senator.

Gaylord “Happy” Nelson

Gaylord Nelson smiled as he greeted the other Senators in the chamber; not yet 29 years old, Nelson felt privileged just to be present in what he still considered to be hallowed chambers. He had vowed on the campaign trail to fight alongside the Progressives of old, and wasn’t going to step down now. But, despite that, he was never one to forget the fact that his opponents, be they Democrats of Stalwarts, were human beings as well. If he hadn’t lost that fact while fighting in the Pacific during the war, he certainly wasn’t going to forget it now.

Nelson had been born in the town of Clear Lake in 1916, a small rural town in Wisconsin’s Mississippi Valley. His father had been the town doctor; a position which had brought the family a great deal of prestige, if not financial security. A man who valued community and morality above all else, the elder Nelson often refused to accept payment from his poorer patients, or accepted barter, such as eggs or farm goods, over cash.

One of Nelson’s earliest political memories was seeing Bob LaFollette Jr., come through town campaigning. He had been smitten with the thought of serving his state in government, but also despaired to his Father, that with men such as the LaFollettes, there would be no more battles to fight by the time he grew up.

And yet, here he was, and such righteous battles seemed to evident now. First, there was the environment. Nelson, even at 29, was an ardent conservationist, and determined to preserve as much of nature as he could. Even more than that, however, he wanted to preserve Clear Lake and the communities like it. He was a small town boy at heart, and nothing was ever going to change that fact. Finally, he understood that he would have to work with other Progressives to rebuild themselves within the Republican Party. Other liberals had moved into the Democratic Party and were busy trying to reform that destitute organization, and Nelson held nothing against them, but he was a Republican, just as every good Progressive in the state was, and he was going to do his best to make the Republicans the party of Progress, just as they once had been.

“Forward,” he muttered to himself, his state’s motto, and then smiled again. Life felt good.

Charles Madsen

Charles Madsen shook his head is bemusement as he stared at the younger Progressives in the chambers. Madsen had served two prior terms as a Progressive, representing Polk County in Northwestern Wisconsin, and had moved back into the Republican Party only with great reservations. Although the Republicans were largely in the hands of Conservatives, he was an opponent of the Democrats for historical as well as philosophical reasons. The Dems, in addition to being controlled by labor, having recently outed the reactionaries, had little organization to count on. He fully understood the battle that was before him and the other in his party, or rather, bloc. The Conservatives of the party had suffered a defeat, but it hadn’t been a grievous one. If the Progressives of Wisconsin were going to find a true home within the Republican Party, then they were going to have to fight and fight hard.

He looked around to find any old friends in the chamber, and smiled as he spied Fred RIsser of Madison, and a few other old hands. He silently marveled that there seemed more new faces than old, and wondered about the passing his generation, although he certainly wasn’t that old. But he did see potential in a lot of the new comers; maybe they were up for the fight after all. Even more so, however, he actively wondered if Goodland and Ralf Immell would be able to fashion their voting bloc into an organization on par with the old LaFollette one.

He knew Goodland after all, and had voted with the Governor on occasion; although he professed to be a moderate, the Governor was sympathetic to the goals of the Progressives and could be counted on to support them, within reason. Immell was slightly unknown; a general in the war, he had served largely in administrating in occupied areas. Madsen hoped that his organizational skills in the army would translate to the political sphere as well.
In any case, a new chapter had been written, and he felt blessed to have seen it. What ever happened now, things would certainly be interesting.

“GOVERNOR WALTER S. GOODLAND DEAD AT THE AGE OF 84: LT. GOVERNOR IMMELL SWORN INTO OFFICE: “Tough Old Codger” suffers heart attack while preparing message to State Legislature” – Wisconsin State Journal, March 19, 1947 [FN4]



[FN1] Coleman, despite his great organizational skill, had a tendency of backing losing candidates. In 1942 he had attempted to deny the party nomination to Governor Julius Heil, who he regarded as a buffoon. Although he was unsuccessful, the voters of Wisconsin seemed to agree with him; they voted Heil out in favor of Orland Loomis. It was only Loomis’ death a few months later which prevent a Progressive governor from returning to office.

[FN2] These results were a bit difficult to come by. In OTL McCarthy crushed McMurray in the general election. Despite the Democrats’ hopes that progressives would flock to their side in the general election, they actually did substantially worse than two years previously. Part of this has been blamed on a backlash, on the part of Progressives, for the Democrats part in the defeat of Bob LaFollette Jr.

In the ATL, LaFollette wins. However, I suspect that most of the Progressives who voted for McCarthy, of all people, would be unlikely to turn to McMurray in the case of a LaFollette victory. I decided to have him run slightly behind the governor, simply because LaFollette was not as accomplished of an campaigner, and the animosity that labor still felt against him for moving into the Republican Party.

[FN3] The wording is somewhat different, but this isn’t two different from the byline that ran in OTL.

[FN4] Goodland died right around the same time in OTL; I decided to shift the day a bit to show this is an ATL.
 
i wanted to take this post to introduce a few of the characters who will be featured in this TL. My next post will focus on the post-election career of Bob LaFollette Jr., which should be rather interesting.

I did want to include some pictures of the people involved in this this, especially Coleman and Krueger, but all of the approriate pics i could find were housed in the Wisconsin Historical Society, and I didn't want to pay to use them!

in any case, you should certainly google these guys; there were interesting folk!
 
I'll be updating this in the next day or two. My next post will follow the post-victory careet of Senator Bob LaFollette jr., and then I'll turn to state politics to show the effects of Governor Immel.
I promise to address the affects this has on national politics very soon :)
 
Chapter 3: Everything that Dies, Someday Comes Back

“I had to fight like hell to get in the Republican Party. My attitude towards Tom Coleman and the rest of the leadership was “Kiss my ass!”
- Former United States Senator Clifford “Tiny” Krueger.

From Turmoil to Strength: Wisconsin Progressivism from 1946-1972
Robert Nesbit
[Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982]

The news of Governor Goodland’s death of a heart attack hit Madison like a bombshell. Words of condolences soon began to flood into the state capitol from elected figures from across the nation. Bob LaFollette Jr., whose support for Goodland had been sincere if tepid, made a personal phone call to the governor’s widow, Madge, where he expressed his sympathy, and told her of the sorrow he had felt upon the death of his father, years before. The governor’s body lay in state in the capitol rotunda for several days, and was viewed my thousands of mourners before being given a private funeral days laters.

Tom Coleman, never a supporter of Goodland, was also struck by the death of the governor. “The Old Codger is dead,” he is reported to have said, “and now we’ve got that damned general in the governor’s mansion!”

Coleman and his supporters had much to fear. A retired Major General, Ralf Immell had served in the North African campaign, winning the esteem of the Sultan of Morocco who had commended the general for fostering goodwill between his people and the United States Army. After the United States had swept the Germans out of North Africa, Immell had found himself transferred to Europe where he served as Deputy Commanding General of the Continental Advance Section. A longtime friend of the LaFollette family, Immell was widely viewed, and had campaigned as a staunch Progressive.

However, certain difficulties presented themselves for Immell as he was sworn in as Wisconsin’s 32nd Governor. Despite the overwhelming majorities which the Republicans held in the state legislature, holding 88 seats in the state assembly and 30 in the senate, the new Governor was not able to count on the support of any but a small core of legislatures in either house. John Wygaard, one of the premier journalists within the state, summed up the Governor’s position best when he explained, “much like Governor Goodland before him, the newly-minted Governor Immell will have to work hard to build coalitions with key legislators in order to govern the state effectively.”

The new Governor himself put it much more colorfully, stating, “I have a feeling that fighting Germans will be a piece of cake, compared to fighting Coleman and his Stalwarts.”

In attempting to fashion a governing coalition, Immell and his progressive Republicans, would fashion a strategy aimed at gaining the support of independent Republican voters and legislators who were not actively associated with Coleman. In order to do so, the progressives attempted to turn Tom Coleman into their unwitting ally, savaging the industrialist and state Republican chairman as “Boss Coleman,” and liking his influence in the party to those party bosses which the progressives had vanquished decades earlier.

Immell also made moves to form an alliance with the Milwaukee chapters of the Republican Party, which had long found themselves in opposition to Coleman and the state party. Throughout the 1930s and 1940s, the Milwaukee organization had often bucked those candidates who had won the backing of Coleman and other party leaders. Although ideologically more conservative than Immell and the progressives, the governor made moves to give Milwaukee greater influence within the party at large.

Milwaukee would prove an important battle ground for the progressives in their struggles to gain control of the state and the Republican Party. Although Milwaukee County, with its strong Socialist tradition, leaned heavily towards the rebuilding Democratic Party, Immell felt that that the city might provide important votes to the progressives under the correct conditions. To support this assertion, he pointed to the importance that Milwaukee voters showed in the election of Bob LaFollette Jr., in both 1938 and 1946. As a result, beginning in 1948, he and his successors would throw their influence behind liberal Republican candidates, hoping for cross-over votes from the Democrats, and eventually undermining the strength of the stalwarts in the county party.

Finally, while recognizing the importance of the progressive victories in 1946, he also understood the weakness of his faction within the Republican Party. Although many of the progressive candidates elected were young men, nearly all were under the age of 40, who showed great promise in becoming party leaders in the future, they were still outnumbered. Furthermore their organization, largely inherited from the wreckage of the Progressive Party, was in shambles.

As a General, Immell had possessed a strong skill in organization, and he turned that towards building an organization to rival Coleman’s Independent Republican Voters. This plan involved resurrecting the local Progressive Clubs which had acted as the progressive’s local units throughout the first three decades of the 20th century. Immell also championed the creation of a separate Progressive meeting which would occur prior to the Republican convention to choose delegates to send to the party’s convention.

Although tensions existed between the Governor and the Republican leadership throughout the remainder of his first term, the years from 1946 through 1948 remained relatively calm in the legislature. Many of the bills passed during this period were general legislation which could count on broad based support from across the political spectrum.

This calm was to be shattered at the Republican state convention of 1948 in Green Bay. For the past decade the convention had fought bitter partisan battles over whether or not to endorse candidates before the primary election. Tom Coleman was a strong supporter of such a measure, claiming that an endorsement from the party would help separate serious candidates from those who had no chance of victory. Governor Immell opposed such a measure, fearing that it would be used by the party establishment to hamper progressive candidates in the primary election. He also questioned the success of endorsement, pointing to the fact that the convention in 1946 had failed to endorse either Goodland or LaFollette, and yet both claimed victory. In the end, the party convention agreed with the Governor and, in what was widely seen as a noticeable loss for Coleman, voted against endorsement by a margin of 2-1 [FN1]

Immell used the momentum from this victory to win the passing of a strong plank in the party’s platform calling for redistricting of the state’s legislative districts. The state constitution called for such redistricting every ten years, based on the most recent census, but that state government had passed on the task, citing more pressing matters during the Second World War. [FN2]

The convention was not a total victory for the Governor, nor his progressive allies. Immell was unable to prevent the election of Harvey V. Higley, a conservative businessman and staunch Coleman ally, as state party chairman.

Despite this later setback, Immell and the progressives had much to look forward to. Immell had proven to be a popular governor in the state, and his victory in the endorsement battle meant that the stalwarts would have to fight harder to defeat progressive candidates in the next election.

By the end of the convention, the Republican primary already promised to be a vigorous competition between conservative stalwarts, moderates and progressives. However, in the coming months, the entire political landscape of the state would be thrown in chaos following events in the national party. …



[FN1] This vote is almost identical to what occurred in OTL; the main difference is that in the ATL it interpreted as a major victory for Governor Immell.

[FN2] In OTL the Republican Party dutifully included a plank in their platform calling for redistricting, but the legislature continued to not act on it. Part of this stemmed from a disagreement between the governments of cities, such as Madison and Milwaukee, who had the most to gain from redistricting, and the state legislature. According to Wisconsin law, the city governments would need to be reorganized, so each ward would match a legislative district, and many were unwilling to go through the hassle. However, much of it was also practical; Milwaukee had become a Democratic stronghold throughout the 1940s, and the party was making gains in Madison as well. Any redistricting was liable to reward the Democrats and cut into the Republicans strength by limiting representation from rural areas.

However, in the ATL, Immell is a staunch supporter of redistribution and plans on fighting for it in the next legislative session, should he win election for a full term as governor. Part of this is that he believes in following the state constitution, but he also sees a political opportunity to increase his support. By throwing more power to Milwaukee, he hopes to strengthen his alliance with the county party. He also feels that, by favoring the city and campaigning for progressive candidates there, he might cut into Democratic support there.
 
Chapter 4: Better Dead than Red

“The acid test is foreign policy. The determining factor is placement of loyalty. Is it with America and democracy, or with the Soviet Union and totalitarianism? Does it follow the flip-flops of Soviet doctrine?” – Senator Robert M. LaFollette Jr.

*My thanks to David Tenner who posted a similar “LaFollette Defeats McCarthy” scenario back in 2001 on S.H.WI, and from which I drew much of my inspiration*

The Reluctant Statesman: the Life and Times of Robert M. LaFollette Jr.
By Timothy Kohler
[Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993]



LaFollette’s near loss to McCarthy in 1946 had badly shaken the Senator. For years he had served as Senator from Wisconsin, a position which he often felt had been forced upon him, and had given almost the entirety of his adult life to representing the people of the state in Washington. Throughout his career he had been a staunch supporter of labor and its right to organize, sacrificing much personal happiness in the pursuit of Labor’s causes. Reflecting on the primary battle, he understood that the attacks against him, by the Democrats and their allies in the CIO, had undermined his support with many of the rank and file members of the labor movement in Milwaukee. To LaFollette, and many of those in his circle, this smacked of betrayal, and personally hurt the Senator. As early as February of 1947, he was explaining to friends that this would be his last term in the Senate, and that he was looking forward to retirement in 1952.

The near loss had also reaffirmed something which LaFollette had come to believe in recent years; that Communists had infiltrated the American labor movement and were attempting to steer the United States into a policy favorable to the Soviet Union. In the months leading up to the primary election of 1946, he had spoken out about these concerns, and it was his bravery in tackling this issue, he felt, which had pushed the CIO organization against him. Despite this, the eventual Second LaFollette Special Commission, was not the Senator’s brainchild, but that of Ohio Senator Robert A. Taft.

Taft, and many in the Republican Party, had already become convinced that Communism had infiltrated the American labor movement, and he also felt that the House Un-American Committee was ill-equipped to deal with the threat; under the colorful, yet bombastic leadership of Edward Hart, the Committee was largely taken seriously only by those on the far right. Furthermore it has been an earlier LaFollette commission which had exposed violence against labor in the 1930s.

In early 1947 Taft approached his old friend LaFollette and asked him head the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation (PSI) to investigate Communist infiltration in the United States. Initially Senator LaFollette was skeptical of the idea, pointing to the resources needed for such a sweeping investigation, and also worried about the affects it would have upon his standing with the labor unions, which he understood had been weakened. Taft countered that his difficulty in getting re-election proved that Communists continued to be a threat, and that he would be doing his nation a great service. After asking for a week to think the matter over, he telephone Taft and agreed to accept the appointment, “Should the Senate think it wise to do so.” [FN1]

LaFollette’s chairmanship of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation would prove to be an exercise in moderation. Focusing his attention mainly upon congressional and department staff within the United States government, as wells as the state leadership of many Unions, LaFollette set to work. A staunch believer in civil liberties, as well as in facts over hyperbole, he refused to slander innocent victims, or even to release the names of suspected Communists in most cases. The hearings of the committee were held in secret, and those present were sworn to secrecy. In most cases, the Senator preferred silent dismissals over public displays, and only resorted to public statements in the most flagrant cases.

LaFollette also went out of his way to express his support for Labor, and, when his investigation focused on Unions specifically, he strove to frame his inquiries as a boon to Labor leaders struggling to clean their organization of corruption. He pointed out his deep commitment to Labor throughout his career, and went even further, staunchly attacking the proposed Taft-Hartley Act, and siding with Labor throughout the 80th Congress.


Although it lacked much of the spectacle of HUAC, the PSI’s investigation would prove highly popular with the American public. By 1947, a LaFollette for President boom was beginning to develop in certain circles, although the Senator denied any desire to run for that office, confiding with one friend, “I do not want, and never have wanted, to be President. That was always Phil’s thing.”
Speaking to his brother Phil, who was organizing a drive to get the Republican nomination for General Douglas MacArthur, and was understandably worried about his brother running against the General, he was even more blunt, “I can’t imagine why anyone would want that job.” [FN2]

LaFollette’s disinterest in the Presidency did not stop the buzz going into the Republican Primary season of 1948. President Harry S. Truman had been growing more and more unpopular over the past two years, and it was felt that whichever candidate won the Republican nomination would have an easy path to the White House. Of the serious contenders going into the Republican Convention, the strongest were Harold Stassen, the former -governor of Minnesota, General Douglas MacArthur, Senator Robert Taft and Governor Thomas Dewey, the governor of New York and the Republican nominee for President in 1944.

Dewey had noticed LaFollette’s growing popularity but, even more important to the former Special Prosecutor and District Attorney, he had noticed the Senator’s skills as an investigator. He had also noticed, with genuine gratitude, LaFollette’s lauding of Dewey’s response to Harold Stassen early in the campaign when asked about outlawing the Communist Party, “You can’t shoot an idea.”

By the time that Dewey had wrapped up the nomination, he had a short list of three names for possible Vice-Presidential candidates’ Stassen, who Dewey personally disliked, Earl Warren, and LaFollette. Of these, he had grown more in favor of Senator LaFollette; no one could accuse him of being soft on Communism, he was an avowed liberal Republican, and his nomination might garner some support from Robert Taft as a result of LaFollette’s moderate isolationism.

The night of his nomination, the newly minted Republican candidate called the Senator and offered him the second position on the ticket. LaFollette was taken aback and asked for time to consider it. Dewey stressed that time was of the essence, and asked LaFollette to respond in two hours. An hour later, Dewey’s phone rang; LaFollette had discussed it with his wife and agreed.

The Republicans had a ticket that they felt could win in 1948; Dewey/LaFollette.


[FN1] Bob LaFollette Jr., and Robert Taft hit up an unlikely friendship during their time together in the Senate. Despite their very different political views, both had come to the Senate in the shadows of their influential fathers. In 1946, Taft horrified many in Wisconsin’s Republican leadership by personally asking them to help LaFollette win reelection (Coleman and many other leaders were avowed Taft supporters)

[FN2] Philip Fox LaFollette was an interesting figure in his own right. A three term governor during the Great Depression, Phil had been instrumental in forming Wisconsin’s Progressive Party, over the opposition of his brother Bob (who went along with the plan only grudgingly). In 1938, Phil’s political career had crumbled when he sought, and failed to win, an unprecedented fourth term, and attempted to launch a national Progressive Party.

Phil had then become a founding member of America First, although after Pearl Harbor, he had joined the army and served on the staff of General MacArthur. After returning from the war, he became an avowed MacArthur supporter saying that the General had “B-r-a-i-n-s.” In doing so he alienated many of his supporters who believed he had become a conservative (which wasn’t the case. Phil seemed to support MacArthur out of personal loyalty rather than ideological agreement).
 
There I promised an update or two a few days ago and have delivered! The next post will look at the general election of 1948 and the impact it has on national and state politics. I hope everyone has been enjoying the ride so far.
 
Top