The North Star is Red: a Wallace Presidency, KMT Victory, Alternate Cold War TL

I wonder if this will cause the USSR to consider a push to claim all of China. With so many allies in the Middle East and India I imagined the USSR feels emboldened.
Read allies as "people that like that you give them stuff" not "people that would actually help you in a gigantic war against the most populous country on the planet and it's ally India, the second most populous and also probably all western countries sending billions (it's too early to speak of trillions?) in aids of all type". Even if that shit goes well it could easy go to WWIII, China isn't Korea or Vietnam.
And any way making north China bigger would only make it more difficult to control.
 
Last edited:
Chapter 31 - The Cold War in Asia: Japan and the Philippines
The Cold War in Asia: Japan and the Philippines
President Russell's tenure in Asia was marked by two very different relationships: a fairly productive relationship with Filipino President Elpidio Quirino - and a rather acrimonious relationship with South Japanese Prime Minister Ichiro Hatoyama.

In Prime Minister Hatoyama, Russell saw a man who was working to re-construct the defeated Japanese Empire. A fierce advocate for military rearmament, Hatoyama faced protesters down as he stripped the pacifist provisions from the Japanese Constitution and in a late session, managed to force through provisions establishing mandatory universal conscription for young Japanese men, a proposal that endeared him forever to the Japanese far-right. Indeed, one of Hatoyama's fiercest supporters was Takushiro Hattori, the former Private Secretary to former Prime Minister Tojo Hideki.[1] The move outraged the Americans, who further viewed Hatoyama as a threat when he turned down a proposal by American diplomats to establish a bilateral defense treaty. Hatoyama was not anti-American, but he was actually a liberal internationalist who loathed the ideas of bilateral defense treaties, comparing such as a treaty to the earlier Anglo-Japanese Treaty. Hatoyama's entrance into the Busan Treaty was conditioned on it being more than a bilateral treaty, which is why ROC diplomats scrambled to include Sygnman Rhee's South Korea even though they thought Rhee was a little too erratic for their liking. To other politicians, Hatoyama openly disparaged Russell as a "white supremacist pulled from 1860" while Russell openly disparaged Hatoyama as "Tojo 2.0." Hatoyama had similarly unpleasant readings of Churchill and some, though not all French leaders, though he clearly had great affection for the West Germans. Russell even inquired as to whether Hatoyama could be removed, but the CIA vetoed this, finding that Hatoyama was actually much more popular among former military elements than he was among the general population - and the CIA viewed the former Imperial Army remnants as future allies against Communism. When the Japan Self-Defense Forces was founded, Hattori quickly became its first Chief.

Such a radical military policy was only popular because of the North Japanese threat and because Hatoyama had so skillfully placed himself in the center of Japanese economic policy. Against protests from conservative industrialists and bureaucrats, Hatoyama aligned his Liberal Party with the former members of the agrarian, centrist National Party and Cooperative Democratic Party by adopting their views on agricultural cooperative collectives, private trade unionism, and the "social market economy." Hatoyama, fluent in German, was an avid reader of post-Nazi political economics and philosophy in German, including the works of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi as well as economists of the Freiburg School in the journal ORDO.[2] Hatoyama was led to such a journal because after receiving a visit from West German diplomats, he endeavored to learn more about their ideology. Hatoyama also read German sources on the new Kibbutzes in Israel, which he was sympathetic towards. In many ways, he openly cribbed laws and regulations as passed in West Germany and Israel. Many more traditional members of his Liberal Party were outraged at his reforms and considered leaving, like his once-friend Yoshida Shigeru did, but Hatoyama declared that in wake of the threat from Northern Japan, a united front against Communism was required, including liberals, conservatives, former militarists, and yes, even "democratic socialists." Although several holdouts claimed the Liberal Party, Hatoyama took most of its members and merged with the National Cooperative Party into the Liberal National Party. Soon after, most of the members of the Democratic Party joined with Hatoyama, forming the Cooperative National Party. In the wake of worsening relations with the North, Hatoyama even managed to pull off the right-flank of the Japan Socialist Party as led by Tetsu Katayama into his new party coalition, forming the National Socialist Party of Japan, whose name was immediately vetoed and changed to the Social Nationalist Party by Hatoyama due to its unfortunate similarity to certain other historical political party that Hatoyama was familiar with due to his German fluency. With the right-wing Liberal Party and the far-left Japan Socialist Party (the Communists were banned), Hatoyama's Social Nationalist Party dominated the political spectrum.[3] As the Republic of China stabilized, trade soon skyrocketed and the Japanese economy immediately began to boom, being the primary supplier of skilled managers and technology to Chiang Kai-Shek's China.

In the Philippines, Russell saw a former American protectorate and World War II ally that was in need of aid. Although quite paternalistic in his belief that the natives still needed "white guidance", Quirino appreciated the aid even if the motivations were rather atavistic. In June 1950, the United States was set to approve a package of military aid to the Filipino government, but Vice President Russell convinced them to revise it into a full blown offer of sending American troops to train and support the Filipino Army. In addition, the United States would be providing fire support, including access to top-tier artillery, for any Filipino forces fighting the Huks. Wanting to take credit for inevitable Filipino victory, Quirino appointed himself Secretary of Defense and managed the movement himself. Although the Huks were destroyed by giant waves of iron and fire, gruesome collateral damage left a scar within many of the local populations, who wouldn't forget Quirino's management of the war. Quirino ran for re-election in 1953 with the glow of victory against the Huk movement, which helped weaken his unpopularity (as demonstrated by the Nationalist landslide in the 1951 elections).[4] Upon hearing that Quirino's opponent, Carlos P. Garcia of the Nationalist Party would disfavor foreign interests, American interests quickly went on a full-court press to support Quirino. Quirino would ultimately win 51.7%-48.3%, something many Filipinos began crediting to American intervention and some degree of pro-Quirino election fraud, much like the 1949 election. His popularity began to improve however as like Japan, the economy began to rise alongside the (all South) Chinese, Japanese, and Korean economies. As a result, the Philippines quickly grew to characterized by a popular, pro-US political establishment. Although corruption remained high, enough prosperity trickled down to normal people for the government to grow progressively more popular. However, the sheer degree of foreign investment, especially American, angered Filipino nationalists, who increasingly began to regard the Filipino government as a puppet regime that allowed almost the entire economy to be owned and controlled by Americans.
---
[1] This is almost OTL. OTL, Hattori was almost made commander of the Police Force by Charles Willoughby, MacArthur's Chief of Staff and was a supporter of Hatoyama.
[2] OTL Hatoyama actually translated Kalergi's books into Japanese. The ORDO thing is ITL.
[3] The differences with OTL is that in ITL, the dominant conservative party adds the right-wing socialists/private union movement, but doesn't add the most economically right-wing, pro-America elements of today's LDP.
[4] OTL, Quirino was a dead man (electorally) walking by 1953. Here's, he's a little better off.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this will cause the USSR to consider a push to claim all of China. With so many allies in the Middle East and India I imagined the USSR feels emboldened.

Read allies as "people that like that you give them stuff" not "people that would actually help you in a gigantic war against the most populous country on the planet and it's ally India, the second most populous and also probably all western countries sending billions (it's too early to speak of trillions?) in aids of all type". Even if that shit goes well it could easy go to WWIII, China isn't Korea or Vietnam.
And any way making north China bigger would only make it more difficult to control.

Yeah, strictly speaking, in terms of the countries that are aligned with the USSR, although there are numerically more countries than OTL, there are a lot fewer people/land in those countries than OTL.

Comparing ITL to OTL using very very broad definitions of "aligned in the Cold War", the Communist bloc circa 1954 has gained:
- Iran
- Pakistan
- Afghanistan
- an extra 20% of Korea
- 20% of Japan
- 50% of Burma
- 25% of Indonesia
- 50% of Saudi Arabia

and lost:

- 90% of China
- India
- Egypt
- Indochina

The advantage to ITL USSR is that their allies might be arguably a lot better geographically placed (as shown by the access to seas), more reliable (ie, ITL PRC as opposed to OTL PRC), or just all-around good allies (North Japan)?
 
Chapter 32 - The Cold War in Germany and France (1950-1954)
The Cold War in Germany and France (1950-1954)
The politics of Western Europe remained quite complicated in the early 1950's due to the controversy behind one issue: West German rearmament. Konrad Adenauer was a firm believer that the newly unified West Germany had to rearm as quickly as possible in order to join a Western alliance and counter the threat of East Germany. However, the nations of Western Europe that had fought two brutal wars against Germany in the 20th century were exceedingly skeptical of this. Winston Churchill was supportive of Adenauer's plan, but the rotating Prime Ministers of France were largely skeptical. A proposal to establish a "Federal Border Security Police" was vetoed by the French. Adenauer looked further west to America for support - but no such support was coming. President Russell valued close relations with France and he was somewhat skeptical of the West German position, though largely he didn't care much either way.

Similarly, the French would veto any attempt by West Germany to move towards rearmament. When General Eisenhower released a press release stating "the vast majority of the Wehrmacht" had "acted honorably" during World War II, the French Army sent out a contradicting press release.[1] Alarmed at the blowback, President Russell shuffled Eisenhower to another position (his actual cabinet), leaving policy in Germany to others. Public sentiment in West Germany was outraged when American troops oversaw the executions of hundreds of convicted war criminals at the Landsberg Prison, many of them leading industrialists of the 1940's.[2] Adenauer was able to mollify French anger by joining the European Coal and Steel Community, but this was very unpopular in Germany itself, as the ECSC was largely seen as a way for France to indirectly control the Rhineland. Public confidence in Adenauer dropped, as opposition leader Kurt Schumacher's attack on him as "Chancellor of the Allies" proved increasingly apt to many German voters. When Schumacher died of a stroke, supporters of the "Schumacher line" ended up winning the SDP leadership election, as SPD members voted in firebrand Herbert Wehner over the more-moderate Erich Ollenhauer, tainted by the Left for being "Britain's Man in Hanover" (Ollenhauer served as the Chancellor of Hanover-Westphalia under British occupation, 1945-1950). Wehner was infamous in West Germany for heckling CDU speeches and had received more censures in Parliament than any other politician in its history. Now, he was the leader of the SPD.

On March 1952, Stalin's offer to reunite Germany smacked into German politics.[3] The entire West German cabinet immediately refused the offer, seeing it as a bluff to stop European integration. However, this further proved unpopular with the general German population. Adenauer's party was losing support to several far-right defector parties (such as the unsavory German Reich Party). In contrast, Wehner figured he could win the next election by trying to corral the far-right without actually adopting any of their ideas. He promised that an SPD government would resist entrance into NATO and work to nationalize former Nazi-owned industries, especially in the Rhineland. Surprisingly, a significant share of the German far-right saw this as an implicit threat to French domination of the Rhineland, and the flocked to vote SPD. Wehner's strategy of simultaneously castigating his political opponents as Nazi sympathizers and anti-German nationalist Allied puppets seemed to pay off in 1952, as the SPD gained an absolute majority in the German Parliament, wiping out the CDU in the Rhineland and taking most of the former seats of the German Party (DP). The CDU did take most of the seats from the FDP (as worried party elites quickly jumped ship to join the CDU that had so-boxed them out), but it was not enough to stop the SPD surge in the Rhineland. Taking power in 1952, Chancellor Wehner immediately announced both of his plans - withdrawal from the European Coal and Steel Community and nationalization of industrial companies that had collaborated with the Nazis. As with most developments in the world, the Wehner Programme inspired anger in France and a government collapse, but it particularly discredited several advocates of European integration, such as Renes Pleven and Pierre Mendes Frances. In contrast, this had greatly strengthened the political appeal of Charles de Gaulle, who had always thrown shade at the integration of Europe. Soviet diplomats celebrated - the Stalin Note did everything it was planned to do. A shell-shocked Adenauer moved into opposition, his very role as leader of the CDU unclear.

The Americans were rather worried and responded by simply increasing supplies sent to American forces in Germany, who became an increasingly important outpost for the United States. With Franco-German relations so poor, West Germany was not going to rearm anytime soon, meaning that Allied forces would be required to remain in West Germany. At this point, the US's High Commissioner for Germany, John J. McCloy, saw the American mission as two-fold - to defend West Germany from the USSR - and to defend West Germany and France from each other. The relationship with French High Commissioner André François-Poncet became increasingly strained, with the British High Commissioner trying to act as an intermediary, but even that largely failed because the French still had frosty relations with Great Britain over their refusal to relinquish Fezzan to Libya (a refusal backed up by President Russell). All three occupation powers attempted to veto the Wehner Programme, but they spent so much sniping at how much of the program to veto (the French also fought within themselves, as some thought it would be shameful to stand up for "ex-Nazis") they were never able to issue a unified statement. The West German stance towards France softened after the brutal crushing of the 1953 East German uprising, but they would remain rather cold for a while.
---
[1] This is OTL, except France protests ITL.
[2] OTL, most of them were pardoned except for the "worst of the worst", to help soothe West German entrance into the Western alliance.
[3] OTL, the Stalin Note was probably (though we don't know for sure) meant to forestall German integration into Western European institutions. Here, Stalin pulls the same thing, but later (because integration is slower) and because he figures he can screw with the 1953 elections.
 
Last edited:
Chapter 33 - President Russell Pulls Back
I'm basically neglecting an entire part of the world, so let's not do that.

President Russell Pulls Back
...President Russell responded in fury when the CIA proposed overthrowing President Jacobo Arbenz. He correctly deduced that the result was lobbied for by the United Fruit Company. He noted quite dourly that the entire executive board of the UFC had supported his opponents, either Taft or Douglas, in the 1952 presidential elections. He noted quite angrily that was also true of the Arabian-American Oil Company (subsidiary of Chevron), who had also all supported his opponent. That betrayal seemed to smart the hardest, as Russell now considered the Qatifi Project to be an absolute disaster. He distinctly remembered that too was also advocated by the CIA. After a certain point, Russell simply stopped taking CIA briefings. He had better things to occupy his time in his own view. When CIA operatives pleaded with him to foil a possible Communist-leaning coup in Syria, he blew them off. This stance extended to those who hoped that he would join with the British in overthrowing Prime Minister Mossadegh in Iran. In fact, in order to further spite the corporate America that he so detested, he even welcomed President Arbenz with a state visit, hailing his agrarian reform as the "way forward" for Latin America, and indeed, his own nation. Latin American right-wingers were appalled. One of his leading critics in America, the increasingly erratic Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin renewed his attacks on Russell as being a "Ku Klux Communist." This grew to eventually haunt the Russell Administration, as the popular Arbenz continued to replace the judiciary with his own supporters and concentrate more and more power in the executive branch. Every attempt by Russell to work around Congress was quickly compared to the increasingly dictatorial (albeit popular) Arbenz. There also increasingly became a perception within the American CIA that their own President had become a problem. However, in the rest of America, with peace with the Soviet Union having been largely maintained since 1945, with the short exception of the Blockade of Vienna.

After what he saw as the early excesses of his first term, Russell grew to believe that a pullback was necessary. Even as the European empires screamed in flames, Russell was an adamant Eurocentrist who didn't really much about what was happening in their colonies, something he largely thought was their responsibility to clean out. Relations with the USSR were peaceful. Europe, for all of its problems between France and Germany, saw no more conflagrations or escalations after the American-backed Royalist victory in Greece. Latin America seemed largely peaceful and when things did escalate out of control, it seemed to only hurt his enemies in corporate America. No, what focused Russel's attention was nothing abroad, but a domestic situation that continued to spiral out of control, an unfolding crisis that saw his approval ratings plummet to the lowest recorded of any period since the nadirs of Herbert Hoover's presidency...
 
Last edited:
Chapter 34 - Brown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
President Russell's two choices to nominate to the Supreme Court, both came in 1949 and would prove pivotal to the decision in Brown v. Board, albeit in different ways. First was Pat McCarran, the anti-Communist Senator from Nevada and head of the Senate Judiciary Committee - his appointment was seen as a way to prove Russell's anti-Communist credentials. The second was James P. Coleman, the Dixiecrat from Mississippi. Adding a Northerner and a Southerner to the Supreme Court was seen as a way to unify the Democratic Party and keep the North-South peace. Indeed, Russell's involvement in this nomination strategy was seen by most establishment Democrats as proof that he sought to keep the peace within the party. However, by 1953, things had changed. President Russell had just won re-election in one of the most divisive presidential elections in recent history.

Chief Justice William Douglas was solidly against school desegregation and a solid believer in issuing a statement on how quickly school desegregation had to be done. He figured if he didn't issue that second opinion, the case would simply return to the Supreme Court. However, he was a prickly person and regularly refused to allow other the justices much input onto the decision. In this way, he alienated many of those justices. This was his decision and he wanted to go down in history as the author of the opinion. That proved to be a fateful mistake. The two Southerners, Coleman and Kennon were solid nos. Robert Jackson, Felix Frankfurter, and Pat McCarran were still undecided. Douglas only had the support of Hugo Black and Pat Burton. And indeed, those would be the only justices to sign onto the Douglas opinion.

The decision in Brown v. Board would perplex lawyers as much as it would perplex the rest of the country. The Douglas-Black opinion declared that segregation was inherently unequal and a violation of the Equal Protection Clauses and that the remedy was that states would have to immediately desegregate their schools.

The Kennon-Coleman opinion dissented, stating that the Topeka schools were constitutional in their entirety and thus did not address the remedy.

The Jackson-McCarran-Arnall opinion concurred in the decision with the Douglas opinion, but dissented otherwise, saying that the schools were unequal because of tangible inequality and that segregated schools had to "affirmatively prove" tangible equality between black and white schools, also tagging on a large essays about how the evils of racial inequality encourages the evils of Communism. The Jackson opinion did not address remedies.

On the question of unconstitutionality, the Frankfurter-Reed opinion failed to address the issue entirely, saying that the nature of the argument about the 14th Amendment was unnecessary and that the case should be returned to the lower courts for further factual arguments on whether segregation is "inherently" unequal due to the psychological effects. They only ruled that when pressed, the remedy was for most schools to "desegregate with deliberate speed" if ruled against.

Legal scholars doing the math, found that there was a very slim majority for a legal proposition. Namely, 5 justices concluded that at a minimum, segregated schools with tangible inequalities were unconstitutional judges and 5 justices concluded that if found unconstitutional, the solution would be at to a minimum be to desegregated with "all deliberate speed." However, this was a shaky conclusion as those were not the same 5 justices.

The political firestorm exploded when two of those judges, both Jackson and McCarran, died shortly after issuing their opinion. The math for desegregation immediately went to 3 against, 2 for, and 2 not commenting. President Russell denounced the decision as ludicrous, overly complicated, and with no meaning legal force. With the two court vacancies, he declared that he would with or without the Senate appoint judges that would overturn a decision he called the worst in history. The Republicans saw a chance to build party unity. In response, all 49 Republican Senators (a special election in Ohio meant Republicans took back the Senate) signed onto the "American Manifesto", which declared that they would not appoint any justice selected by President Russell picked for the sole purpose of overturning Brown v. Board. In response, all 26 Southern Democrats (from the 13 former Confederate States) signed onto the Southern Manifesto, which declared their opposition and total resistance to an illegitimate "Frankenstein" opinion. The last to sign was Senator Lyndon B. Johnson, who signed after a direct appeal from President Russell. The 21 Northern Democrats in the party sheepishly refused to comment.

Senate Majority Leader Richard Nixon made the fateful call to refuse to confirm or hear any nominee from President Russell, claiming that the "epochal question of racial equality" in America had to be settled by the 1954 midterms and that any nominee selected by Russell would be a closet segregationist at best. Northern Democrats rallied behind the party when Russell called the bluff, nominating Tom Clark, a liberal Texan known for his opposition to the KKK and segregation, as well as the Republican Earl Warren, from Richard Nixon's home state. Nixon refused to hear hearings for either, outraging Northern Democrats, who immediately argued that Nixon had no real interests in civil rights, but rather only an interest in battering the Democratic Party. Democrats abandoned the Senate, denying a quora for any other activity, as both parties abandoned DC in preparation for the nasty 1954 midterm elections, where many Congressional candidates called each other KKK members, Communist party members, crypto-Nazis, homosexuals, n*****-lovers, miscegenationists, hermaphrodites, mental invalids, possessors of abnormally shrunken organs, or any combination of the above.

However, just weeks before the end of the campaign, the death of Senator Robert Taft created a 48-48 Senate as the Democratic Governor of Ohio appointed a Democrat to replace him. This meant that the Vice-President could flip control of the chamber to the Democrats. Almost immediately, the Senate rammed through both of President Russell's Supreme Court picks, Sam Ervin, the famous and brilliant segregationist from North Carolina, as well as John Malcolm Patterson, the ferociously segregationist and KKK-endorsed Attorney General of Alabama, who was notoriously only 34. The Republicans cried foul, further poisoning the national atmosphere.
 
Last edited:
America tearing itself up while doing less harm with foreign interventions? Better than OTL. Pity about the solid grip of Hatoyama on South Japan. The fun North won't be able to unify the country. Is Yugoslavia going to stay the same as OTL?
 
America tearing itself up while doing less harm with foreign interventions? Better than OTL. Pity about the solid grip of Hatoyama on South Japan. The fun North won't be able to unify the country. Is Yugoslavia going to stay the same as OTL?

The next update will likely be Yugoslavia. It will likely be...the most "fun" update so far.
 
Chapter 35 - War Breaks out in Europe
War Breaks out in Europe
Under Soviet rule, tension had been building up the German Democratic Republic. The late 1952/1953 Bezirke reforms had proven relatively unpopular, as well as the intensified Stalinism of the Socialist Unity Party, acting under Joseph Stalin's orders in the aftermath of the SED's Second Party Congress. In a bid to accelerate the military buildup of the Warsaw Pact satellites, especially the nations of Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, taxes/prices were up and wages were lowered. In addition, party purges against "Titoism" had accelerated in the Czech Republic and East Germany, with most of the popular moderate socialists kicked out of the party, if not outright killed. As part of the Titoist purges, Stalin delayed the economic reforms another year, also reasoning that he should wait until after the West German elections in September.[1]

However, when the June reforms kicked in, a remarkable demonstration seized the streets of East Germany. Stalin was outraged and deeply ill at this point, blamed closet Titoists for formenting counter-revolution against him. However, Stalin calmed down and decided to simply authorize the Soviet and East German armies violently suppress the uprising, with live ammo being deployed against protesters, horrifying the Western world. However, what was to happen later horrified everyone.

Throughout his entire political career, Stalin prided himself on actually being a calm leader and trying to see the "story behind the story." For example, Stalin refused to flee Moscow during the German invasion of the Soviet Union because he truly believed that the German Army didn't have the capacity to take Moscow and that fleeing would be devastating for morale. On the other hand, this led Stalin to often fall into deeply conspiratorial thinking, such as with the Jews and Titoists. And this time, both were at fault. He pulled Laventry Beria out of retirement in order to send him to deal with the "Jewish problem" in a "permanent fashion."[2] That issue being taken care of, Stalin decided to finally establish Communist unity from the Mediterranean to Port Arthur.

Yugoslavia nearly avoided invasion by Stalin in 1950 after an unexpected Hungarian purge of “Titoist” generals.[3] Stalin was convinced that the Tito problem would have be dealt with, but that the Eastern bloc armies were not ready for this yet. After pondering the decision, he put off the 1950 invasion plan. He was also told the atomic bomb project had succeeded the year before, but that the USSR did not have a sufficient nuclear stockpile to dissuade American intervention. As a result, the plan was delayed. However, by 1953, it had ripened. The nuclear stockpile was large. The Warsaw Pact armies were large and ready. The 1953 German uprisings convinced Stalin that he could no longer put off the inevitable, especially with his health so fragile. Furthermore, President Russell’s tendency to avoid confrontation with the Soviet Union implied to Stalin that America was merely a “paper tiger” - one that would surely not interfere. Finally, the Yugoslavs gave him a tremendous opportunity.

The Tito-Stalin split saw a large amount of Yugoslavs side with Stalin - as a result, Tito launched massive purges on the Yugoslav Communist Party, alienating many. In 1952, the Soviets sought to deal with this problem by simply poisoning Tito with a biological agent known as "scavenger." Indeed, Tito was poisoned, but much to the surprise of everyone in Yugoslavia, he survived. Even more inflamed in his opposition to the Soviet Union, Tito greatly expanded the purges and suggestly realizing that most of these covert operations was from three intelligence posts in Bulgaria, the largest in Vidin, Yugoslav forces fired several mortar rounds at the intelligence posts as a show of force. Much to Yugoslav shock, the Soviets had a detailed invasion plan for Yugoslavia, which they then immediately put in place.

Under the Soviet plans, a combined Romanian-Hungarian force was intended to push from the Romanian Banat across the Iron Gates, with Romanian forces to occupy the Banat. The Hungarian Border Guards were to push across the Drava River and into Slovenia. Romanian and Bulgarian forces would push from Wallachia. The Albanians would move into Kosovo and the Bulgarians into Macedonia. Finally, when the initial infantry push over the various rivers were over, mechanized Soviet, Czechoslovak, and East German troops were to show up in the Great Plains and just totally overrun all Yugoslav positions (the German role was slightly lowered later due to concerns about future uprisings). Hopefully, by only using Warsaw Pact troops until the final push, the Soviet Union wouldn't appear involved in the invasion until it was too late for any foreign power to stop. In many ways, the routes taken by the Warsaw Pact Army would be almost identical to the routes taken by the Axis Powers when they invaded Yugoslavia in 1941. Like in 1941, Soviet commanders expected Yugoslav armies to melt away into rural partisans near the mountains, but with the Soviet Army entrenched in all the major rail hubs, Yugoslavia re-entry into the Eastern bloc would hopefully to them be international fait accompli.

With those plans, on a fateful August 15th, 1954, the morning of Assumption Day for Croats, a wave of Katyusha rockets from the Warsaw Pact armies showered Yugoslav Army (JNA) positions across the entire Eastern and Southern borders, and a joint invasion of Yugoslavia by Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Albania began.
---
[1] OTL, they were implemented in June, leading to a June uprising, which helped OTL Adeneur's win in 1953.
[2] This are the aforementioned deportations described in a previous chapter.
[3] Happened OTL. This alongsides with Korea made war much less likely.
~~~
well, lol, I forgot about the Informbiro crisis until someone told me. Should have probably happened in 1950, but whatever.
 
Last edited:
Anyone in Yugoslavia who is a closet Stalinist will be hurrying to cooperate with the invasion. Those who are open Stalinists, and still alive, are on a prison island called Goli Otok. Yugoslavian civilian population would have been confused by the invasion. They remembered times when Stalin's picture was next to Tito's*, and suddenly it all changes- and mentioning Stalin is a bad idea. And now Stalin is at war with their country. Croatian Communists actually might welcome the invasion, since their leader, Andrija Hebrang Sr., was offed in Tito's purges.

*there is even a folk song that in its initial Communist version, before the Tito-Stalin split, mentions Stalin in a stanza. After the split, that stanza vanished.
 
What's Colonel Sanders up to ITTL?

Like...the KFC guy? Presumably opening up KFC restaurants. American political life is weird, but I think life for most Americans is actually pretty similar. Although some people unfortunately disagree, politics is not everything. The average American goes to work, goes home, enjoys generic prosperity, blah blah.

Anyone in Yugoslavia who is a closet Stalinist will be hurrying to cooperate with the invasion. Those who are open Stalinists, and still alive, are on a prison island called Goli Otok. Yugoslavian civilian population would have been confused by the invasion. They remembered times when Stalin's picture was next to Tito's*, and suddenly it all changes- and mentioning Stalin is a bad idea. And now Stalin is at war with their country. Croatian Communists actually might welcome the invasion, since their leader, Andrija Hebrang Sr., was offed in Tito's purges.

*there is even a folk song that in its initial Communist version, before the Tito-Stalin split, mentions Stalin in a stanza. After the split, that stanza vanished.

Yes, thank you for the information! Very interesting things! I think it absolutely crushes popular support for Communism in Yugoslavia for that reason (while trashing its reputation among Western intellectuals). If I forget to mention something you think I should have mentioned, I'm probably just ignorant and appreciate the information!
 
Like...the KFC guy? Presumably opening up KFC restaurants. American political life is weird, but I think life for most Americans is actually pretty similar. Although some people unfortunately disagree, politics is not everything. The average American goes to work, goes home, enjoys generic prosperity, blah blah.



Yes, thank you for the information! Very interesting things! I think it absolutely crushes popular support for Communism in Yugoslavia for that reason (while trashing its reputation among Western intellectuals). If I forget to mention something you think I should have mentioned, I'm probably just ignorant and appreciate the information!
If Yugoslavia is crushed, and 5-6 obedient puppets created, Croatian opposition to Communism might reduce, as the formation of a separate Croatian state placates moderate nationalists. Yes, as a state, Soviet Croatia would be less liberal than Yugoslavia was, but a longer continuity of independence might help avoid the 90-s wars.
 
Top