The Ninth Crusade (my first TL)

Based on the the 'three wars' theory the author has described, it sounds like Franco remains neutral with the Vichy and the Nazis.

One thing is the Spanish (Francoist) interpretation of the Second World War, and it is another thing very different as Germany (Hitler) acts about that interpretation if it leads to Spain to declare war on an important ally of Germany as is the Japanese Empire.

Remember that Hitler ordered the invasion of Yugoslavia because the day before was there a coup that overthrew pro-German government, although the new government expressed its commitment to cooperate in the upcoming invasions of Greece and the Soviet Union. If Hitler did that when he was cornered, imagine if he would pass when it starts to be cornered.
 
Last edited:

Goldstein

Banned
One thing is the Spanish (Francoist) interpretation of the Second World War, and it is another thing very different as Germany (Hitler) acts about that interpretation if it leads to Spain to declare war on an important ally of Germany as is the Japanese Empire.

Remember that Hitler ordered the invasion of Yugoslavia because the day before was there a coup that overthrew pro-German government, although the new government expressed its commitment to cooperate in the upcoming invasions of Greece and the Soviet Union. If Hitler did that when he was cornered, imagine if he would pass when it starts to be cornered.

Well, I'm already pushing the story in one direction, and the WWII changes are meant to prepare a series of actions that will be centered in the Cold War (see how I have dealt with WWII in a single update), so for the sake of continuity let's just say that Hitler doesn't overreact ITTL, though maybe that could have been a serious possibility that was averted. Anyway, constructive criticism is always welcome.
 
Well, I'm already pushing the story in one direction, and the WWII changes are meant to prepare a series of actions that will be centered in the Cold War (see how I have dealt with WWII in a single update), so for the sake of continuity let's just say that Hitler doesn't overreact ITTL, though maybe that could have been a serious possibility that was averted. Anyway, constructive criticism is always welcome.

A good way to do it is guaranteeing that no allied troops would be in Spain, it would be enough for the Germans ( because if they invade Spain they cannot conquer all of it before the Brits and Americans start sending troops in mass ... )
 
One issue that may arise regarding this uchronia is that Franco's Spain would have a more active intervention in Latin America and certain differences in the Spanish-U.S. Alliance (eg Spanish support to Juan Domingo Peron in Argentina and other South American countries where their presidents are military rule under a nationalist policy with subtle influences fascist, as happens with Carlos Ibáñez del Campo in Chile, Marcos Pérez Jiménez in Venezuela, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo in Dominican Republic, Getulio Vargas in Brazil, Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua, Alfredo Stroessner in Paraguay, etcetera), it may give the impression to the U.S. that Franco's Spain aims to create a fascist Axis in Latin America (an idea that would promote its own paranoia in the Cold War).
 
Last edited:

Goldstein

Banned
One issue that may arise regarding this uchronia is that Franco's Spain would have a more active intervention in Latin America and certain differences in the Spanish-U.S. Alliance (eg Spanish support to Juan Domingo Peron in Argentina and other South American countries where their presidents are military rule under a nationalist policy with subtle influences fascist, as happens with Carlos Ibáñez del Campo in Chile, Marcos Pérez Jiménez in Venezuela, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo in Dominican Republic, Getulio Vargas in Brazil, Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua, Alfredo Stroessner in Paraguay, etcetera), it may give the impression to the U.S. that Franco's Spain aims to create a fascist Axis in Latin America (an idea that would promote its own paranoia in the Cold War).

Good, you have spotted something I've been planning to play with... later, when I decide how to shape the tiny details and the full implications.

BTW, this is not dead, I just had too much RL issues, mostly concerning studies and hard partying. I'm planning an update for the coming week.
 
A good way to do it is guaranteeing that no allied troops would be in Spain, it would be enough for the Germans ( because if they invade Spain they cannot conquer all of it before the Brits and Americans start sending troops in mass ... )

That's the only way I see this working at all. Franco does not want to be at war with Germany, whereas the Allies will be very frustrated with him not offering a second land front against Hitler.

Or third, considering that by this time the Allies have landed in Italy and Italy (those parts of it not under Nazi control anyway) has turned against Mussolini. But the Italian front, while it did to some extent drain the Third Reich and was a valuable training ground for the American forces, was a slow and costly line of advance for the Allies, leading to the natural fortifications of the Alps--clearly a "real" second front was needed.

But if they were to start a buildup of Allied forces in Spain intended to attack Vichy France, Hitler would have little choice but to try and preempt it; the war would move into Spain itself. This would probably be OK with the Americans and British but not a wonderful outcome from their point of view, having to fight their way to the Pyrenees before being able to sweep down from them into France.

Given that the Invasion of Normandy was not possible until a really massive buildup of mostly American forces could accumulate in Britain, Franco entering wholeheartedly into the UN would give the Western Allies a battleground against Hitler where relatively small Anglo-American forces (at this stage more British than American) could start engaging with Germans and gradually build into overwhelming force, assuming they could hold on to strongholds in Spain. But it isn't clear they'd be any farther ahead in the advance to Germany itself come December '44, and it is clear Spain would probably get badly chewed up in the process.

Franco therefore has good reasons, aside from his ideological commitments, to avoid opening the door of Spain to an Allied buildup there. But the question is, how do both Hitler and the Allies react to his offer of limited help against Japan alone?

Hitler at this point is deeply committed on the Eastern Front and Italy, and has to maintain serious forces ready to defend against Allied invasions, not only on the French Atlantic coast but on its Mediterranean shores too and in Scandinavia--Hitler always believed the Allies would in the end attack by invading Norway and he kept forces ready to stop that to the bitter end, long after D-Day mooted that. Can he afford a preemptive attack on Franco on a whim and a suspicion? One thing I have little idea of is just how good intelligence he could rely on regarding what was actually happening in Spain. I'd think that the long association of the Fascists with the Reich would mean the channels of information were relatively good--this means the Allies would be very ill advised to try and sneak in enough force to seriously contend with a large German invasion, let alone strike first at France. And even at this diverging point in the timeline, Franco himself has no hostile intentions toward the Germans and this would probably be true of most Phalangists. Assuming Hitler can reliably verify that in fact there is no buildup of Allied forces happening in Spain, it's in his interest to keep that front neutral, which means his own buildup on the border would also be inhibited to avoid provoking the Allies, aside from his logistical issues. So on the Nazi side I can see this odd "three wars" configuration of Franco's being accepted by them. It's not the like Nazis actually cared what happened to Japan!

However, just how vexed will the Allies be? From their point of view, Spain has stayed neutral thus far because Spain is pretty abjectly dependent on the West--on trade first of all, and second is vulnerable to a determined Allied invasion if they are given cause. One way of looking at Franco's declaration of war on Japan is, it's a free gift of extra forces to be used against Japan and that's well and good enough. But I think they'd constantly be trying to leverage his opening to the West in this one matter to giving them that valuable early land front against Hitler, never mind it would devastate Spain and never mind it might not get them onto German soil any sooner than Overlord would. They don't know that. The Western allies might even take the position that the logistical costs involved in transporting and supporting the Blue Legion to the South Pacific outweigh the value they'd offer as fighting forces once there.

It's evident from the timeline that these naysaying and backbiting grumbles have been overruled, and the Legion is there in the Philippines. Presumably there are enough Nazi spies in Spain still to assure Hitler Spain is not being prepared as an invasion front. The "third war," Spain with the Axis against the USSR, might even be still technically on--I gather Franco did withdraw the Blue Legion from the Eastern Front? He'd better have, or the pressure on him in Allied councils will be that much higher. But on paper I suppose Madrid still hates Moscow and they don't actually get invited to the big summits, not the ones with Soviets present anyway--and Stalin will be that much more suspicious of meetings that don't include his representatives, if Spanish ones show up to them.

I suppose then Franco is on the whole kept at arm's length, agreements between him and the other Allies arrived at via back channels. Even if he were to abjure the war of the Axis on Russia, his neutrality regarding Hitler would be reason enough to keep him sidelined like that anyway, so he might as well stick to his anti-Communist guns--though no one can be sure at this point, of course that would stand him and Spain in good stead half a decade hence and after!

So yes, I suppose the situation Goldstein is (hopefully still?) outlining is plausible enough--a balance of terror keeps Spain neutral in Europe but with this bizarre option of attacking an Axis member on the other side of the world.

I have to say it's a configuration I never imagined possible and therefore worth reading about!
 
Haha :) just found this one and cracked up, it really promises. I hope you get some time to work on it... because i foresee one of the possible derivations of this:

The A-Team is a Spanish tv show! :eek:
(Sancho Gracia would play lead, instead of ever playing Curro Jiménez XD)

Well, I'm already pushing the story in one direction, and the WWII changes are meant to prepare a series of actions that will be centered in the Cold War (see how I have dealt with WWII in a single update), so for the sake of continuity let's just say that Hitler doesn't overreact ITTL, though maybe that could have been a serious possibility that was averted. Anyway, constructive criticism is always welcome.
Also, i'd say that at that point of the WWII, Hitler could do little else than giving Spain stern looks from the other side of the Pyrinees, he was busy enough with the USSR.
 
Last edited:
I hope you can update very soon your promising alternate history. It would be very interesting to see the development geopolitical of Francoist Spain immediately after the end of WW2, especially Spanish diplomatic relations with European countries (UK, France, Italy, Germany, Portugal)
 

Goldstein

Banned
I hope you can update very soon your promising alternate history. It would be very interesting to see the development geopolitical of Francoist Spain immediately after the end of WW2, especially Spanish diplomatic relations with European countries (UK, France, Italy, Germany, Portugal)

I haven't totally forgotten about this, and I would like to raise it from the dead one day or another. Real life has exploded in my face in the last months and I would like to acquire the proper level of research, especially regarding military aspects of the TL and Francoist and Cold War politics. So, please, be patient.
 
I haven't totally forgotten about this, and I would like to raise it from the dead one day or another. Real life has exploded in my face in the last months and I would like to acquire the proper level of research, especially regarding military aspects of the TL and Francoist and Cold War politics. So, please, be patient.

If you do decide to take up this AH, I found a news story that you could serve for it:

In 1956, Franco -by the request of many exiled Hungarians in Spain- studied assemble and move several thousand exiled Hungarians to Hungary to support the Hungarian government that sought to restore multiparty democracy against Soviet tanks, but eventually the US vetoed any possibility of transfer for it, not wanting to start a war against the communist bloc by Hungary, while it was still going on the Suez Crisis.

After that, Franco sought to capitalize on its new international status and initiated a bid to qualify for one of the rotating seats on the UN Security Council in 1956, winning the immediate support of Latin American and Arab countries (on the first ballot, Francoist Spain won 32 votes of 78), but the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France joined forces to promote Sweden to occupy that position. Finally, Franco ordered to withdraw the nomination after strong pressure from the USA.

http://www.libertaddigital.com/cult...n-anticomunista-de-franco-para-hungria-80367/ (It's a news written in Spanish language about it, because it's the 60th anniversary of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956).
 
Last edited:
Top