There's Samori's kingdom, Mossi, Wadai, Adamawa, Futa Jallon (I think). There's Yeke in Zambia.
The NextGen OTL Worlda Series
- Thread starter hadaril
- Start date
check this out
Gustone's Paleoworldas
There can be artifact islands and lakes. Imgur album, cuz i cant attach more than 10 imgur.com/a/80Gk1u3 Now i also made the same 14 paleoequalaas. imgur.com/a/2KgZ5CF
www.alternatehistory.com
I have a few suggestion for the current year map:
2020: the year that changed everything OR
2020: The year when the World stood still OR
2020: the Great Reset
2020: the year that changed everything OR
2020: The year when the World stood still OR
2020: the Great Reset
looks a bit different than the source map whose date label is the closest to 1600, are you using other sources in conjunction?
No, but I could blend it with what was already there before the patch.
Just turned in my last final for the fall semester. I'm free once more!
As for the 2020 subdivision maps - They look great so far. I'm holding off on adding a link to the map in the main post until this version is complete. To repeat what I've said before, there'll be two 2020 maps: one with the normal rules for subdivisions, and this one with the maximum number of subdivisions. Personally I prefer the former, but I understand that the latter could be a potentially useful resource for some projects, and it's a worthwhile endeavor.
I always welcome community improvements to the maps, and I definitely understand where @SnivyLink is coming from. Sinvy is right in that we'd have to go back and update all the rest of the maps with the fixed borders. Seeing as @Admiral A. Kolchak is far more familiar with Chinese history than I (and I'm so thankful he is), if he wants to go back and update the patches, I'd love to incorporate them.
Looks good. I'll go back and double check to see if the borders changed at all throughout its history. I'll add it to the relevant maps.
Good start so far! Only one suggestion - the 2020 US census data will be (presumably) be coming out soon, which might change the ethnic map for the USA. Other than that, best of luck with the project.
As for the 2020 subdivision maps - They look great so far. I'm holding off on adding a link to the map in the main post until this version is complete. To repeat what I've said before, there'll be two 2020 maps: one with the normal rules for subdivisions, and this one with the maximum number of subdivisions. Personally I prefer the former, but I understand that the latter could be a potentially useful resource for some projects, and it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Currently doing that from 1400 and beyond but I'm putting it on hold until a new patch for the Qing Mongolian banners can be made.
not sure if it's me but the kurdish region seems to reach too far west (in hatay)
Yeah, from eye I feel like there's a lot of minority bias.
Where are you getting your data from, and by what criteria do you judge what an ethnicity is and which people are members thereof? The depiction of the United States is especially confusing to me, because it looks similar to a map I've seen which shows the largest (as in, a plurality, not necessarily a majority) reported ancestry by US county, and what you've got here looks vaguely similar but also egregiously skewed and wildly inaccurate: Finnish Americans, the instance that caught my eye (being partially of Finnish American descent myself), don't constitute a majority of the population in any city or town anywhere in the US. Furthermore, I'm skeptical of African Americans being assigned colors on this map that are associated with countries in Africa, because per my understanding African American is an ethnicity in and of itself; furthermore, I'm fairly certain that portraying African Americans in North Carolina and Virginia as distinct enough from those in the rest of the South to warrant a different color has no basis in actual data.
In any case, I'm not sure a map of ethnicities is as useful as a map of languages in any case, and so I feel like that's the direction you should be going in instead.
i think it's based on one of the older worlda language maps from the wiki
Language and ethnicity don't necessarily overlap, though.
I have the map I think you're talking about, and I've recognized various elements of it there, but Unkown00 obviously isn't trying to simply adapt that map to use NCS conventions; if they were, there wouldn't be any distinction between, say, Irish Americans and Anglo-Americans, because they both speak English.