So, I was looking through maps to make updates to additional WWII era maps. There's a few observations and questions...
First of all, SnivyLink's update to the Caribbean islands looks like it needs to be applied to, at the very least, all the WWII era maps, and possibly a lot of others too.
Second, some questions in regards to coloring.
First, China. If you compare the
1932 map to
1939 and after, there's different color conventions for China and the warlord states. The 1932 color convention is newer. Should we just switch all the following ones over to that convention?
(also, I noticed that 1932 has some errors in regards to Tannu Tuva not being shown as claimed by China, Soviet Central Asia is wrong-Khiva and Bukhara no longer existed at that time, and... just learned that Arunachal Pradesh was only controlled by British India after 1944, I originally thought that was an error when looking at it, but looked it up and apparently it is legit, huh)
Also, in regards to US coloring, I'm wondering exactly how regular US color vs darker for territories is supposed to go. Is it just that anything that isn't a state should be the darker territory color? Some of the maps show Alaska on the left side the darker color but have the obvious error of the Alaskan islands on the left side close to Russia being the lighter normal color, but some maps have them both darker along with Hawaii, but don't have DC or Puerto Rico or some of the other minor island possessions of the US which aren't states colored in as the regular color. So... should DC, Puerto Rico, and the rest also be colored in as territories? How exactly should we do that?
Also, Egypt technically got independence in 1922 on paper, though it was still a puppet of Britain. Should it be changed after 1922 from the darker British colony color, perhaps to the lighter protectorate one or instead done with the Egypt outline and solid British fill-in? Also, if we change it, then Anglo Egyptian Sudan also needs to be changed back to the older way of being striped
I can't really contribute much to the late 1800s/early 1900s stuff but I can do a lot of these things with the WWI/interwar/WWII stuff myself, just wondering about some of these coloring conventions
Anyways, here's a 1932 map, with fixes to Tannu Tuva, Soviet Central Asia, a coloring fix to some pixels on the Italian claim line in Ethiopia which was partially miscolored, the Caribbean islands updated, Hong Kong, Macau, and the French city in southern China now shown, Hatay province shown as French (it was only given to Turkey after 1939), the Golan Heights shown as French-Syrian (the border only changed with the 1967 war), Thailand shown as free from the spheres of influence of France/UK after 1931, Dodecanese shown as Italian, and all US territories that aren't states shown with the darker color (though maybe some areas like DC shouldn't be shown like that? Idk, I can change it if that would be good). I could further update it to show Egypt and Anglo-Egyptian Sudan if that would be good and there's a certain way I should do it
View attachment 473875
On a different note, I'm not entirely sure how it is decided which islands get colored in, but I'm wondering if the US virgin islands should get a colored dot. They are close to Puerto Rico and could sort of be assumed to be American on that basis as they are uncolored, but were actually Danish before 1917 when the US bought them, and especially at that point, it wouldn't be clear that they are Danish if they aren't colored