I get that but it doesn't make it accurate.I think OP uses them because they are the most famous divisions of the country.
I get that but it doesn't make it accurate.I think OP uses them because they are the most famous divisions of the country.
@erictom333 Libya doesn't use those as internals any more, and haven't for over half a century.
Per @Uebeltank. Plus, they coincide with modern subdivision borders.I think OP uses them because they are the most famous divisions of the country.
- you outlined crimea wrong, that's not how the outlines work
- i learned the hard way that eyeballing old worldas for borders is a bad idea, so we need to remake the subdivisions from the ground up (or base them off of borders from new worldas)
- if you're gonna update colors, at least show us what all their shades look like
- herzeg bosnia is not its own subdivision
- the hala'ib triangle is controlled by egypt, and we normally show disputed territories as part of who controls it
we should finish this maptook the time to fix @tungsterismapping's colours.View attachment 518796
I added some factions for countries with civil wars.A few minor edits.
View attachment 585605
- Added Baja California do Sur
- SnivyLink's Antarctica
- DC uses the territory color
Also, why is south Korea green? I prefer the blue version but hey if that's what the colour scheme is then sure.
i think he might be using the wrong color scheme anyway as shown by his earlier patches to the mapArgentina should also be sky-blue, like in the Antarctic claims.
i think he might be using the wrong color scheme anyway as shown by his earlier patches to the map
I fixed some stuff on the borders, change the colour to Korea and Argentina and added the Liybian civil war.
I added some factions for countries with civil wars
I added some factions for countries with civil wars.
Just for reference, these maps should show the situation as of 1 January, 2020.I fixed some stuff on the borders, change the colour to Korea and Argentina and added the Liybian civil war.
Also, why is south Korea green? I prefer the blue version but hey if that's what the colour scheme is then sure.
Argentina should also be sky-blue, like in the Antarctic claims.
Yeah, I use DCS primarily.i think he might be using the wrong color scheme anyway as shown by his earlier patches to the map
oh that explains it, these maps are supposed to be using NCS. i made that mistake too when i started making maps, because i thought it was using TACOSYeah, I use DCS primarily.
The red rebellion was CHAZ. I don't know why I added it but I assume they were some sort of commune.I feel like the red "rebellion" bit in Seattle is probably inconsistent, otherwise territories like the EZLN in Chiapas (far more legitimate as an existing para-state/political entity) should be represented.
CHAZ existed for less than a month and controlled a handful of city blocks. It wasn’t very organized or militaristic, and didn‘t have any concrete plans or ability to become self-sustaining. It really isn’t worth the two pixels.The red rebellion was CHAZ. I don't know why I added it but I assume they were some sort of commune.
I mainly added it as a joke for me. I was originally gonna erase it but I forget to until you brought it up. I will delete it in my next update.CHAZ existed for less than a month and controlled a handful of city blocks. It wasn’t very organized or militaristic, and didn‘t have any concrete plans or ability to become self-sustaining. It really isn’t worth the two pixels.
I'd ask if it counts as a rebellion, but there would be not enough room to stripCHAZ existed for less than a month and controlled a handful of city blocks. It wasn’t very organized or militaristic, and didn‘t have any concrete plans or ability to become self-sustaining. It really isn’t worth the two pixels.
I'd ask if it counts as a rebellion, but there would be not enough room to strip